hntnhole
-
Posts
7,099 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
.thumb.jpg.5226ec95ef476fb7bed17d3a949e9f65.jpg)
Recent Profile Visitors
16,221 profile views
hntnhole's Achievements
-
So, Str8convert .... it's about a couple of months now, since your "awakening". It seems that whatever particular sexual depravity we find most exciting, most fulfilling, once we actually do it, we're "hooked". So my question is, have you bent over for a hard, raw, precum-drooling cock again? Or should that question be: how many have you bent over for? There's nothing wrong, and everything right, about being the man you need to be.
-
Shae Reynolds watching his hole getting bred.png
hntnhole commented on ff69's gallery image in User Galleries
I think he's checking that cock fucking his breedhole yet again - as though he can't believe he can actually take a cock like that ..... -
... which is most appreciated - but it isn't "fair" to bottoms. I know it's just a part of needing sexual license in your life, and we Tops applaud you for all the effort you (and every other bottom) put in, just to get a load up your gut. Every once-in-a-while, some bottom has an "accident" in the darkroom over at my favorite fuckjoint, and it clears the darkroom out in mere moments. We Tops definitely do appreciate the lengths bottoms go to. It's not "fair" that bottoms need to do all that prep-work, and Tops just show up and reap the benefits. So, thanks for your courtesy towards men that sometimes take too much for granted.
-
As a Top, I wonder about thoroughness of the cleansing. That's an issue for most Tops anyway, and an ineffective douching will clear out a fuckroom in verrrrrrry short order. That said, occasionally a bottom simply can't get 100%, and that's understandable. Which leads to the next question; if the bottom doesn't prep his hole, what's to prevent last night's dinner from sneaking out past the contrivance, and .... well .... For those Tops among us that are particularly "blessed", will the doo-dad interfere with the pleasure in some way? Can it - for lack of a better word - come "loose"? I think it's an interesting idea, as long as there are plenty of tests and trials before the "marketing machine" gets cranked up. Thanks for an interesting addition to the posts.
-
First, Thanks to NJRawDaddy for coming up with an entertaining thread. There are more entertaining facets to this question than I would have believed. My thoughts; 1. "taking a load" means sperm being transferred from one man to another (at least here on BZ), generally from one guy's cock/balls to another guy's breedhole. No intermediary needed, simply cock to hole, no "vessel" of any kind needed for the transfer. Otherwise, it's merely a contrivance, as opposed to a raw fuck. There's zero chance of "connection", it's simply a substance (however delightful and needed) being transferred from one man to another. 2. About as exciting as staying home on Saturday night to watch reruns of Lawrence Welk.
-
I know many of us are ambi-sexual (if that's even a word?), but our bits and pieces are simply "men only". If a guy wants to fuck a vagina, let him go do it, but keep his terminology in our lane.
-
Greenland turned out to be yet another flop for His Corpulence, but one thing does stick, however ... and that's whatever the PM of Israel whispers in his ..... er...... her (as above) ear. Maybe Bottle Blondie & Krispy Blow'em are on the way out, maybe not. In any case, there are plenty of ass kissers left. For that matter, " Ikea has better cabinets " *truth in advertising counts: that's from one of the placards/signs at No Kings.
- 1 reply
-
- 3
-
-
Healthy coping with risky-sex thoughts
hntnhole replied to WhatWeThink's topic in HIV Risk & Risk Reduction
Of course. Thanks for pointing that out, PozBearWI (and former neighbor) 😉 -
LOL ... Even I've never actually heard that disgustment voiced, and I've been in more than my share of pigpens !!!
-
Healthy coping with risky-sex thoughts
hntnhole replied to WhatWeThink's topic in HIV Risk & Risk Reduction
Congrats; you hit the nail on the head as far as I can discern. In other words, there are no 'one-decision-fits-all' answers. As (virtually all) of us know, the 'call of the wild" is very difficult to resist, once we hear that siren's sweet song, and answer it. For many of us, PrEP / Pep is the easiest answer, since all we do is pop a couple of pills after lunch or supper, and presto - we're well-protected against disease. Thus, the answer to your question is, you can't. None of us are completely, 100% guaranteed we won't catch something. But the odds of catching something we've decided (for whatever reasons) we don't want are greatly reduced, and we make a bargain with Mr. Odds-Maker that maybe we won't hit the pigpens every night - maybe just on weekends - or somesuch. I know pervectly well that I'm gonna at some point, no matter what I tell myself, and since there are preventatives out there that are highly effective, why not stay as healthy as I can? I get enough pigsex to keep me sane, and, with the PrEP/Pep, enough of the odds in my favor that I may avoid something I'd rather not contract, it's a win/win. I used to contract one of the lesser bugs every once in a while, but since P/P, I haven't even contracted one of those, and I've been exercising my lusts a couple of times a week. And that's enough. Your phrase above encapsulates the thought-process of tons of rawmen: I know I'm gonna keep doing it, but maybe I'll stay healthier longer with these pills, so why not? -
Questions that don't deserve their own thread
hntnhole replied to yoursinmine's topic in General Discussion
There's got to be a way to overcome this problem - it's really nothing more that an "engineering" issue 😄 -
16 seems right to me ... if a kid is responsible enough to drive a car, then he's responsible enough to give/take loads too.
-
Tops becoming always more agressive and rough
hntnhole replied to IntoBBvisitor's topic in General Discussion
I completely agree, but - it seems to apply universally; what was, fades away - and whatever is new takes hold. That outcome is lessened perhaps, for more generalized organizations, but for the more "specialized" clubs, it's been a like a scythe cutting down the more traditional organizations. I supposed this has been happening to humans since we crawled out of the caves, but that doesn't make it any easier to accept. -
Questions that don't deserve their own thread
hntnhole replied to yoursinmine's topic in General Discussion
I don't see any "reaction" doo-dad for "blush", so - - - here it is: Thanks for the kind words. -
Tops becoming always more agressive and rough
hntnhole replied to IntoBBvisitor's topic in General Discussion
To my mind, it's the fading of these specialized organizations into our history. There are rather few "act-specific" * clubs around anymore. It seemed to happen somewhat obliquely connected to the advent of online cruising, the fuckapps, all of that, with the accompanying "de-personalization" of cruising, That's merely my own observation however. *meaning, B/d clubs, S/m clubs, Leathersex clubs, etc, around anymore. The venues still are, obviously, but the personal membership, interaction with, being with, other men with like interests, is mostly gone.
