hntnhole
-
Posts
6,668 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
.thumb.jpg.5226ec95ef476fb7bed17d3a949e9f65.jpg)
Recent Profile Visitors
15,260 profile views
hntnhole's Achievements
-
Well, on the other hand, maybe don't ..... Those NY's resolutions always seem to last an hour or so, and then forgotten. At least mine often get forgotten sooner than later 😉
-
So we're going hungry with just that appetizer to tide us over ??? <<<filthiest of grins >>>
-
For those affected by the high prices (due to the tariffs, among other issues), the current situation is very "real". Going hungry is "real". Losing one's home is "real", and there's only one place where the blame resides. Closing of rural hospitals, due to government actions is "real". Children who have zero say in how the government's inaction creates unnecessary, serious hardship is "real". I could go on, but you get the idea.
-
first-time My Genesis, The Brotherhood
hntnhole replied to verbalBTTM's topic in General Bareback Sex Stories
What a fantastic representation of The Life. You have real talent - have you been published yet? -
Being a Liberal myself, I was of course gratified by the across-the-board ascension to elected office by the Dems/Liberals. As I see it, this portends the beginning of a potential belittlement of the current Administration, and all it entails. From the East coast to the West coast, citizens have roundly rejected the current administration's policies. Perhaps the fever is broken, and healing can finally begin? Too soon to tell yet, but hope is afoot in the land, and that's a good sign.
-
Raw Vikings - Barebackers From The Nordic Countries
hntnhole replied to KnkyWnky's topic in Scandinavia
You make a good point: Maybe there's something in the water there ... 😇 -
Welcome new members ! We're glad you're here, and look forward to hearing more from each of you !
-
Despite having paid into the Social Security Administration their entire working lives (via required withholding from their paychecks), some retirees are, and some aren't. For those that aren't receiving their earned SS benefits, that's robbing them of their duly-earned benefits, not some governmental give-away. If we can give away 40 B to a South American country, then we should damn-well give SS recipients what they've earned as well. SS is the very last thing from largess, it's the government keeping it's end of the bargain. Ripping off Granny & Grampa of what they earned, or promised enhanced purchasing power such as food stamps is beyond bullshit.
-
Correction, if I may ..... EVERYONE would love your blond fuzzy rear !!! -
I disagree. The manner in which she would have been expected to assume the office of the presidency is explicitly enshrined in the Constitution - the highest authority in our government. The issue of should President Biden have stood down earlier, is an interesting one, however it's also tangential to this issue. The entire purpose of having a Vice President is that there is a duly elected official waiting in the wings, just in case the President is unable - for whatever reason - to fulfill those duties. She was duly elected to the position, with every voter recognizing that in the event a President is disabled in some way, the Vice President becomes President. This arrangement is clearly written into the Constitution, which is the highest authority in the US. For a historical example: President Lincoln was shot, and Andrew Johnson was sworn in as President less than 24 hours later (Lincoln didn't die immediately, as we all know). Had Harris said anything other than she would fulfill her Constitutional duty to her best ability, that would have been something to criticize. The circumstances of her ascent to the Presidency were a potential occurrence that every duly elected Vice President accepts. The fact that she ran a truncated race to become elected to the Presidency on her own is tangential to the issue at hand.
-
I'm certainly not against a more equitable (population-wise) distribution of health care opportunities. When a state-sponsored health care program is controlled for a balance of cost-to-benefits ratio, every participating citizen knows well in advance what their own situation happens to be, and could become. That said, when a state-sponsored health care program, with citizens suddenly denied their earned, expected care, is simply taken away, that is indefensible. Food stamps, for example, is something the less fortunate have depended on for years. Regardless of whether one believes it is a faulty program or a good one, the fact remains that citizens have become accustomed to that program to help the less fortunate keep food on the table. Yanking that out of the clear blue sky is nothing less than cruel and indefensible. Regarding medical care, when decades of promised health care assistance is yanked, that leaves the ill, the elderly in an undeserved situation. I'm assuming the system in South Korea would fit the above parameters, and the onus of maintaining that system falls upon the current government's shoulders. An established governmental assistance program of any type cannot simply be halted, simply because the government decides to spend money on something else. That's nothing short of an abomination.
-
Maybe his a/c broke down ???? 😄 -
Hardly, but if you'd like another suggestion, how about two-faced (as though one isn't enough !) I wouldn't trust her farther than the tips of that bottle-blonde hair. That's true, but I doubt it was of her own making. Virtually all political campaigns begin to prepare, settle on an agenda, gather support, all of that many months before the campaign gets into full swing. She had a fraction of that amount of time. Frankly, I wouldn't have blamed her at all for refusing, but she was a sitting V.P., and she had no choice in the matter. The utter chaos that resulted is demonstrated daily, but it's not her fault. Harris wouldn't have considered tariffs for an instant. She wouldn't be cutting off food stamps for the needy. She wouldn't be tearing down the East Wing to build a Lord-alone-how-expensive ballroom . She wouldn't have sent paramilitary soldiers into cities across the country, to arrest and deport whoever they could. She possesses more intelligence than twenty trumps.
-
I did, and read it shortly thereafter. I voted for her, and proudly so. That lady is more than capable of being President, and if the "loving shepherds" of a thoroughly decent, but fading man hadn't been so pushy in trying to maintain his Presidency, we wouldn't be in the mess we're currently in. But, it's election day in many parts of the country, so by tonight we should have a better situation. The "government" can't afford to keep food on the table for the poor, disabled, but that "government" can afford to send paramilitary troops into our cities, arresting/jailing/deporting as many non-Caucasians as they can manage to grab off the streets. Occasionally, a "thumbs down" is actually taken as a compliment.
-
What about the elderly, the indigent, those with health problems, and the plethora of other issues old folks are afflicted with? How are those issues addressed by the government? I can understand how those who can work, but choose not to could be not included, but are the retired seniors, after a lifetime of contributing, they're cut off as well?
