hntnhole

You're hanging with the right crowd, ellentonboy. They're right. A strict definition of "whore" implies an exchange of money, but that definition has become a bit usurped, in favor of describing a wanton, load-hungry guy. A guy that simply cannot get enough hard raw cock pumping loads into his body. "Whore" and "cumdump" are, practically two definitions of the same type of guy. and both are at the apex of the ladder of gay sexual life.

Within the past hour, there was a presser with Netanyahoo & (what passes for) the US President. Mr. T wasted almost half an hour praising himself, reporting countless insincerities he's (apparently) received from other world leaders for "solving" the Israeli/Palestinian issue. We all remember when President Biden's illness was made clear during that debate. Today's event was at least as unfortunate, not because Mr. Trump "froze", but for the opposite reason. It was nothing short of an embarrassment. Wandering from thoughtless observations on his own questionable "accomplishments" to predicting a Nobel prize for himself. After he finally finished praising himself, in every conceivable way, the other guy finally got a chance to speak. I hope with all my heart that something will come of it, other than more oceans of blood.

Balls-deep inside .... always.

Apology hardly necessary; you're simply living your Truth. You're not hopeless, you're a complete man. No one needs to apologize for that, unless causing serious harm to others is in the mix.

Not at all verse. The only exception was during covid, and that guy wasn't particularly well-hung ..... at all. But, fair was fair, and we managed to get through those days together. Later, I did have to get some dental work done, thanks to all the gritting of my teeth 😄

and now you know why I bought a house in this neighborhood. Sadly though, the action in the bar has really been impacted by the Eagle over in W.M's. Not much going on over there anymore - at all.

Does he say why? Does he know there are medications that can prevent (or greatly lower) the chances of catching something undesirable? There are guys that haven't worn a condom since hiv surfaced - and I'm one of them - and I've only come down with one of the lesser bugs occasionally. There are also medications available that (when taken for 3 days after raw sex) prevent the common bugs that have been around forever. That said, maybe he's just halsstarrig .....

Well, sometimes we can try, and they just won't. However, keep on trying ... Maybe if you arrange a little group-action, and he's the only one who won't fuck raw, he'll watch ..... and watch ...... and finally figure out that it's simply the hottest way to fuck there is. If you do, be sure to clue the other guys in, making sure they mention how fantastic the raw hole feels, how hot it is to fuck in other cocks loads, all of that. But be sure to clue the other guys in on the goal, so they can help - telling the bottoms how hotttt their raw holes feel, all of that. One of these days, he'll want in on the action, and you'll get a verrrrrrrry nice surprise when he comes over 😁

Hi back, Ben1970, and welcome !! There are many different subjects being discussed, (as you probably already know), and we look forward to hearing more from you.

Agreed 100%.

Wellllllll ......... it's not a deal-breaker (some guy has to be the first to load the hole), but I much prefer a well-bred hole. There's simply no better way to be sure the bottom is a thoroughly committed, in love with hard raw cock up his hole, pig.

There are all kinds of permutations of relationships, and particularly in our corner of the gay world. The mores, habits, arrangements, lusts all have to be put in their proper order, according to each guy's honestly-felt needs. The only way to achieve this - and thus a loving, satisfying relationship is to honestly talk with each other (meaning sex, or any other facet of life) - and build the relationship on that "rock" of trust. Cheating is a fickle flower - it's fun for a while, and while the bloom fades, there needs to be something concrete to offer a firm footing to the relationship, and it just ain't sex. I think each guy in an "open" relationship gets a lot from the relationship, when it's founded upon the rock of honesty. More, while relationships mature, they also often bend to accommodate new inclusions in that relationship. Sometimes, one of the partners can't handle some new arrangement, and that's a real shame, but in order for the relationship to progress, both men need to be flexible, not frozen in what was good years prior. That applies to a lot of things: mortgages, locations of where to live, and more thrilling sexual agreements. So what's the common denominator? Caring about the other guy enough to keep him apprised of what's happening in one's life - regardless of what that "thing" happens to be. Love is as precious a gift we can enjoy and celebrate in our lives, as I saw/see it, and working to achieve it doesn't mean it becomes cast-in-concrete. Lust is a wonderful human capacity, trumped (and do excuse the usage) only by real love. Point: Just be honest with people you truly care about and love. Fuck all the others (literally).

Other than one's long-term "lover" or "partner" (which it would be expected), I vote a solid yes ...

It seems there's a gremlin switching portions of text on the sly 😄 Never the less, thanks to both of you guys for such an interesting discussion. So I picked up two of Harris' book. One of my buddies is having to undergo a series of eye surgeries, and he can't read for a while. So, when I brought his copy over to his house, I read the first chapter aloud for him (he and I have been going to all the protests together - it's been fun). I'll be going over there to do a chapter a day (when he's ready, of course), until he can either read again, or we finish the book. To the interview on Maddow's show the other night, her intelligence was yet again demonstrated clearly, and I don't think she's going to run. I hope I'm wrong - she's got high-carbon steel in her backbone - but it sounds like she's got other things planned. Then again, it's really early to talk much about who might, who might not, all of that.

Well, I did ... he had plenty of money, didn't need any of mine. He just wanted to be a cumdump, and that was a-ok with me. Thanks.

There's a more extensive reply somewhere in the previous pages, but ... I fucked a guy in a junkyard out East (Ohio, maybe?) on top of a '49 Buick fastback ... I don't quite have a "straight-8" under my hood, and engines need even numbers for fire properly, but that old Buick didn't seem to care - and the guy loved the fresh "fluid" in his oil-pan.

I'm really glad to know drugs aren't the issue in your case. Could be he's just a honest guy that needs to live somewhere, keep food in his belly, and loves hard raw cock up his gut. I've got my fingers crossed that it'll work out for you 😉

Be really careful. At one time, I "kept" a cumdump for a few years. The 'cumdump" part was glorious - but he had a little secret (drugs) that he managed to keep from me for quite a while. While it's not my business who takes what, it does become my business when they live in my house. Things went missing when I wasn't around (apparently tricks with sticky fingers), and the drug addiction made him more and more unreliable. A ton of fun while it lasted, it didn't end badly - but it did end. Just be sure you know who the guy really is.

Thanks for your erudite and detailed commentary. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree re: the racism situation; I don't believe that completely dealt with, as it should be by now. I didn't compare Obama to Harris intellectually, since there's no comparison to be made. The way I see it, The choice McCain made for Veep was a ridiculous choice, considering some of Palin's public utterances. Obama is/was far more intellectually adept, and won the election based on his estimable abilities. To your point about national origin, unless one happens to be of Native American descent, we're all either immigrants, or descendants of immigrants. Some "emigration" was by choice, of course, but for far too many it was anything but. As to the "gay" quotient in public service, as the public education system continues to churn out poorly-prepared graduates, the brightest potential leaders that happen to be gay are more and more acceptable (so long as they're "regular" persons, and not "flaming" gays. That might be attributable to less discriminating public policy advocated by Liberals, as opposed to those who espouse racialized ideals re: who is most able among us. I don't see the point: for too many Americans, she's black: for too many Caucasian Americans, that's all it took/takes. Folks who make judgements about others based on racialized preconceptions and nothing else don't need any other qualifier. Actively being publicly "racist" has diminished in the US, thankfully, but that doesn't mean that underachieving Americans have stopped carrying that depravity within themselves. The "ICE" raids on Home Depot's and the like across the country have proven that Caucasians are far more likely to be ignored, while Americans with a certain degree of melanin-content in their skin make the racism current, obvious, and deplorable. We - as a polyglot of immigrants - have still not completely irradicated that curse. Agreed, and it appears the situation was worse than we thought ... until that most regrettable debate. I don't know anything more than anyone else about medically-caused deterioration, but whatever it is, all of us saw it clearly, bluntly, and obviously. The person Biden was debating had/has nothing whatsoever to do with that. I have come to believe that everyone in the Biden Administration was anguished by his abrupt decline, and did their best to "cover" for him. The fact that he insisted on running again only brought the medical issues to the fore. And, in a lighter vein: Yeah, but one is clearly a Top and the other isn't. Apparently, Studebaker-ville produces more Tops than Conway, SC. Thanks for your most interesting and cogent thoughts. It's the exchange of ideas, perceptions, beliefs like this that I most enjoy here on BZ.

Really !!! I thought he was a committed Christian ..... apparently not!

Of perhaps ancillary interest, Harris will be on MSNBC this coming Monday evening (Rachel Maddow's guest) at 9;00 pm, Eastern US time. Maddow is known for asking "no bullshit" questions, and putting up with none in answers. If Harris has any answers to give, Maddow will pry them out of her. ________________________________________________________ To the "why she lost" question: Much of her campaign was a bit prosaic. Then, there's the fact that she's a woman (with a beautiful smile), and and of African American descent to boot. And, while her choice of VP is a good and decent man, he didn't generate much in the way of coattails, which is the primary duty of any VP candidate. There was precious little of a potential for hard-nosed negotiations with other world leaders, and that lovely smile just isn't enough when one runs for President. There are plenty of misogynist's in the electorate, for whom that would be enough to vote for someone else. Then, there's the racism problem. There are far too many Americans still infused with racism, and that hill would be a tough climb. While Biden's physical decline was obvious, she apparently felt that stepping into her VP role a bit too forcefully might turn some voters off even more, that die has already been cast. I still think that Jill Biden is mostly to blame for pushing Joe too far, which also means she pushed to keep Harris out of doing more. Put the two together (racism and misogyny) and Harris has two mountains to climb, as well as putting forth viable proposals for the American people. I'm no Maddow fan, but I'll be watching on Monday night.