Ieatcumholes

Like @YourNoLimitsBottom, I'm always in the mood for sex. (And I'm assuming this thread is about sex with another person and not masturbation.) And I'm definitely not going to cry if I don't get it! And I live in a big city. If I could've modified the answers, I would've selected, "I'm always horny and amenable to sex." I have a number of hobbies that require my full focus. And when I'm involved with any of those hobbies (which could be days or weeks at a time), I'm not actively looking for sex. But if someone hit me up and said, "Let's fuck!" I more than likely wouldn't turn him down! Even when I setup a sex session and the bottom flakes for whatever reason, I don't usually get upset. Cause I can turn my attention back to whichever one of my hobbies I'm currently involved with. And at the end of the day, I jerk off most nights before going to sleep if I haven't had sex with some guy during the day. So I still get that release. And without what can sometimes seem like an effort....

Hmmm.... Didn't think I had a negative outlook. My various conditions are well-controlled through medication and/or lifestyle changes, so I don't regularly even think about them. Yes, my conditions and I co-exist - they don't control me. But the thread asked about poz being exciting. For me, it's neither exciting nor boring. It just is. I wouldn't be surprised though if others fell definitively on one side or the other though.

While I agree that becoming poz was liberating (and have discussed that in other threads), being poz is as exciting as having diabetes, high cholesterol or high blood pressure - it's something I live with.

I've seen this same phenomenon with many different studios. Part of me wants to indulge the fantasy and think about how eating so much cum out of a bottom would be pure heaven! And part of me is pissed the F off that studios think I'm that stupid! I know that some men can cum like that, especially if they haven't cum in a number of days. But it's pretty unlikely that EVERY top in a porn movie is going to cum that much! And it doesn't help that we can all buy lube that looks like "fake cum" from many different vendors.... The "money shot" where the top pulls out to show he's coming is no longer necessary in the "fake cum" world. It doesn't matter if the top cums or not cause fake cum will be used to simulate the top's load. 😖😬🤬

Yes, he was facing me while riding me. There's another guy I have fucked in many different positions (on his stomach, riding me but facing away and with him on his side and he has come without touching himself in all three cases. But that could be as much from excitement as from me hitting his pleasure spots. Aww, thanks!

I fucked this guy (sadly only one session cause he's been out of town for a long time) and while he was riding my cock, the upward curve hit something inside of him and he came not once, but twice, without touching himself. That was the first and second time that had ever happened to him and he's a mature man like I am. I've fucked other bottoms who haven't cum hands free but have exclaimed that I was working spots no one else had ever worked. I attribute it to the curve of my dick working an area that a straighter dick never could touch. As a top, I pay attention to the bottom's reactions. If he reacts positively to something I do, I continue to do it. And if he reacts negatively, I don't do it again. In my mind at least, it's about mutual pleasure and not my pleasure at the bottom's expense.

Inane dialog including fake moans (so I have the sound down low) Fucking bareback (the only porn I watch) and then pulling out and cumming anywhere other than the hole (I would prefer an internal cumshot and the bottom push it out, but barring that shooting on the hole and then pushing the cum in with the dick will suffice) I don't mind the camera men except when one camera man is in the view of the other camera man (If the camera man is part of the action, that's fine) Intermingling scenes such that scene 2 starts before scene 1 ends and then moving back and forth between the scenes that way Obvious looping of action (replaying the same x seconds over and over again) to extend the length of the scene Hearing the director give directions Guys who obviously have no chemistry so the scene should've been left on the cutting room floor Scenes that are more than half oral (unless it's a blowjob vid and I don't watch those)

Yeah, I just got 4 more "You were added to a message" messages at 8:06 and 8:07AM.

Thanks @gingerdaddyG! it's always helpful to know "it's not just me"!

Although I was sexual as a pre-teen, penetration didn't happen until my teens. My memory is that I bottomed the first time. Don't remember when (or who) I topped for the first time though. In my 20s, I was officially versatile but tended more towards the bottom cause I thought I was a bad top who came too quickly. It wasn't until my mid-20s that I came to realize I'm multiorgasmic, so that first quick orgasm isn't the only orgasm. From that point on I starting topping more and more to the point where I pretty much only top these days. I'm not adverse to bottoming, but I wouldn't bottom for just anybody. Barring ED issues, I don't see myself ever going back to being a full-time bottom.

I think for a good percentage of men, the gender of the person they're fucking is unimportant. What matters is getting off. These would be the "any port in a storm" types where the storm is their need to cum by means other than their own hand. For them, "straight" is about who they would be in a romantic/sexual relationship with and/or who they are physically/romantically attracted to. When the little head is in control, that's lust, pure and simple - there is no physical or romantic attraction to the object of the lust, be it male or female. Just like such a man would fuck a woman if one were around, available and interested (and he didn't have to jump through too many hoops), he would fuck a man (or get blown by one).

I have a number of ongoing messages with another member. Over the last 3 days I have gotten 20 email notifications titled "You were added to a message" with the message being one of the ongoing message threads between us. But there is no new content from the other member. I'm able to add content to one of the existing messages and send it. When I tried to send a new message to that person yesterday, I got an error message that the person couldn't receive messages. Unfortunately, I didn't capture the exact text of the error. When I just tried again so I could capture the text, the message appears to have gone through. I also get daily site notifications that the member is now following me even though that person has been following me for awhile now. My confusion is around whether the issue is with my account or that person's account. Not sure if I should mention the other member's handle or not, so if additional info is needed, I'm happy to provide it.

Cigarette smoking is a dealbreaker for me. Pot smoking isn't really a dealbreaker. Even if a cigarette smoker doesn't smoke while we're together, the aura of cigarette smoke is present. Not my thing, but to each his own. Both of my parents smoked cigarettes. Thanks to my mother telling me at 15 or so, "You can smoke if you want to. But you better not touch my cigarettes. You better go buy your own," smoking wasn't something [banned word] that I had to sneak and I never thought it was cool. So I never picked up the habit. I used to say I'd take a hit of pot once every 2-3 years, but it's probably been 6+ years since I last took a toke on a joint. I'm not overly fond of the smell of pot, but I actively dislike the smell of tobacco.

Hairy! All day every day! And there is no such thing as too hairy either. Eating a smooth hole just isn't as satisfying for me as eating a hairy one. Naturally smooth is fine too - I wouldn't turn down a naturally smooth ass that I otherwise found edible and/or fuckable.

I've had men who are thousands of miles away hit me up. Some of them just want to give a compliment. I'll take it. Some of them are even coming to my state on vacation. But they're going to the Southern part and I live in the Northern part and that's still a few hundred miles away. My view on it is that if the universe intends for us to hookup, it will happen regardless of where we might be at the time of initial contact. And if we don't hookup, there's no harm and no foul in exchanging a few pleasantries. As others have said, the world needs more of that these days....

My bedroom today. Three loads to the same guy. I usually have to pee between orgasms or I can't come again even if I can fuck. On rare occasions I can stay hard after the first orgasm and continue to fuck. I dubbed this guy a unicorn cause not only did I stay hard and continue to fuck, but I came a second time! Then I dubbed him the King of the Unicorns when I came a third time without peeing between orgasms. That has NEVER happened before!

This! Most definitely! Hairy? Yes. Naturally Smooth? Yes. Manscaped? 😭 I prefer hairy. Naturally smooth is fine though. No need to reject a guy just because genetics didn't provide him with something that makes me 😍😍😍! YAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!! My tongue and cock both love a hairy ass and/or hole! Body hair traps odors. And that's why I love it! More to taste and experience! 👅👅👅 I really DO try to live and let live and accept people where they're at. But if I ruled the world, manscaping would be illegal. All that wonderful body hair being trimmed or cut away.... 😭😭😭 Would I have sex with a guy who manscapes? If I found something else about him attractive, sure.

Hundreds of VHS all went in the dumpster 11(?) years ago. I don't remember knowing of transfer services at the time. (Or if I did, I deemed them impractical/too expensive.) I kept the magazines (both softcore and hardcore) and some "novels" though. I have 5 Bankers boxes of softcore mags (stored on their sides like files instead of laid flat) that I plan on digitizing in my copious free spare time (of which I have none). The hardcore mags occupy a 4 shelf Ikea bookcase. I keep a random 5 in the nightstand for when I need to take matters in hand. Back to the original subject though, I would turn into a bottom again to be gang-banged by Leidermeister, Bruno and Chad Douglas. I know Chad has left us, but I'm not sure about the other two.

I don't understand the connection between the thread title and your question. No, not everyone is passionate, or even capable of passion. For some tops it's all about the proper amount of friction for the proper amount of time until they unload. For some bottoms it's all about getting the top's load inside them. For both of those groups, passion isn't necessarily part of the experience. Some people (tops and bottoms) see passion as a form of weakness and therefore refuse to allow themselves to show it. >> I << am totally the opposite. I'm going to bring some passion to the experience even if I know before I get my dick in the bottom that there won't be a repeat engagement for whatever reason. If my passion is rejected, there definitely won't be a second time even though I will still fuck and breed the bottom. If it's accepted but not really reciprocated, depending on how the overall sexual experience goes, there may or may not be a second encounter. If my passion is reciprocated though, we are definitely going to keep getting together until one of us tires of the other.... I try to accept people as and where they are. Somehow I find that easier to do when clothes are on.... (shrug) As I have gotten older, I have come to understand many of the different facets of the phrase, "the folly of youth".... I have disabused myself of many of the things I thought in my youth, like if a guy has sex with me, he's in love with me/wants to be in a relationship with me. 🤣 Even if my current self could time travel back and pimp slap some sense into my younger self, I wouldn't do it. My younger self had to go through those experiences and learn those lessons in order for me to be the person that I am today. (And my younger self was hardheaded and had to learn lessons the hard way anyhow, so wouldn't have paid attention to my current self anyway. And probably would've done the opposite of everything my current self said to do just out of spite.) So, what does passion have to do with eating ass? Although I must say that I do eat ass passionately.

YAY!!!!! Self-lubricating bottoms aren't unicorns!!!!!

Personally, I have never liked poppers - the headache they give me way overshadows any benefit they might bring. I don't mind if the guy I'm playing with uses them though. (Poppers in the general vicinity don't bother me, but inhaling them does.) And having had other spill poppers, they leave one helluva stain to get out (or at least they did the last time that happened)!

Like I said, I only had a taste. So it wasn't like I was down there long enough to realize he was wetter than he should be based on how much I'd eaten him. Every hole smells and tastes different, but I don't remember anything unusual about the smell or taste of his hole. Since it's been almost 20 years since the last guy I encountered like that, my mind would've went to he has loads up there already before it went to self-lubricating. (But he came over from work, so loads wouldn't have made sense.)

That's about the ONLY church I'll be attending! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I guess there could be such a thing as too loose. But too sloppy? NOPE! That's what my tongue is for!

I'm a top who doesn't need my ego stroked in that way. My dick is as big as it is. For some bottoms it's large and for others it's average or even small. Regarding the thread title, for me what you've described in your opening post is a well-used or well-broken in cunt. For me sloppy is all about how much cum is inside of and/or leaking out of a cunt. (Well-used and sloppy don't necessarily have to go hand in hand either.)

In the last 20 years, I've had the pleasure of fucking two guys whose holes self-lubricate - no lube, spit, pre-cum or cum was needed to be able to get inside of them. The first guy was almost 20 years ago. We met through a friend and had some really good sex for awhile and naturally just drifted apart. The second guy was last year, and we met through BBRT. He didn't mention anywhere in his profile that he self-lubricates. We hadn't had the lube or spit conversation before meeting up though. So we're naked making out on the bed with me on top of him. I had eaten him out a little (I'd gotten a taste, not enjoyed a meal), but not enough yet to even try to enter him. His legs went up in the air, he reached around and grabbed my dick, lined it up and pushed back against me. I slid halfway in without even trying! I was quite pleasantly surprised! During a break in the action when I asked him why he didn't mention that in his profile, he said that a lot of tops don't like that. I was 🤯! I let him know that I most definitely liked it! And I told him he was only the second guy I'd had sex with who self-lubricates. I'm wondering how prevalent self-lubricating bottoms are? I've had sex with lots of guys - compared to some people I'm a slut, and compared to others I've barely dipped my big toe into the sex pond.😉 So I don't know if self-lubricating male bottoms are all over the place and I've just not met many of them for whatever reason? Or if I've been super lucky to have found 2 of them! (In which case, I guess I should stop playing the lottery.) For the tops, how do you feel about a bottom who self-lubricates? Is that a positive, a negative or are you indifferent as long as you cum inside of that hole? The tight or loose thread made me remember that I wanted to post this thread. In the Goldilocks and the Three Bears world, his hole wasn't too loose or too tight. It was damned near perfect. I shot two loads into him and for the first (and second) times in his life, he came without either of us touching his dick. The only reason I haven't fucked him again is scheduling. But we both want to hook up again as soon as possible! It was long enough ago that I don't remember if this applies to the first guy, but the second one appears to have a condition(?) where his body overproduces some kind of liquid? Cause he also sweats a lot. I firmly believe that sex is dirty (and sticky and smelly and sweaty) only when it's done right, so no problem for me there. I look forward to hearing others thoughts and experiences.