Jump to content

Ieatcumholes

Senior Members
  • Posts

    309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ieatcumholes

  1. A cockroach crawling on my leg would make me scream the same way! Mother Nature's creatures need to stay out of my space and DEFINITELY off my person! Now, I would MOST definitely fuck him though!
  2. @DarkroomTaker Don't know if that's you or just some pic you found, but OH MY F-ing G! He looks like he is hairy ALL over AND is in dire need of a whole-body tongue bath! πŸ‘…πŸ‘…πŸ‘…I don't care how long it takes to complete! I'm up for the task! From this top's perspective, I tell all my bottoms, no deodorant. (And definitely no cologne! I want to smell you!) Other than kissing while fucking, my next favorite thing to do while fucking is lick out a nice, odiferous armpit! (Freshly washed is fine. Odiferous is better!) And most definitely, the hairier the better! Most positions don't easily allow for that without one or both parties being contortionists, but I definitely take advantage of the positions that do allow for that! Again, from my perspective, definitely irrigate! But neither soap nor water needs to touch the rest of your body as far as I'm concerned! As I like to say, sex is dirty (and sticky and smelly and sweaty) only if it's done right!
  3. πŸ˜†πŸ˜‚πŸ€£ If I did them on the DL, I wouldn't need a cinematographer! πŸ˜‰πŸ€ͺ😘 But good looking out for me! πŸ₯°πŸ₯°πŸ₯°
  4. I'm a team player, and will take one (er, eight) for the team. What can I say? 😁πŸ€ͺ And just between me and my BZ peeps, I actually do find some of them sexually attractive. 🀯 If they just weren't such a-holes, I'd do them on the DL and no one would ever know. But when people who should do the right thing don't do the right thing, I'm happy to help guide them towards the right thing to do. And if I get to breed some hole while I'm at it, even better! πŸ‘Ό
  5. I want to fuck (and film for blackmail) Ron De Santis (without the mouse ears, although he can wear them if he wants) Jim Jordan Ron Johnson Marco Rubio Tom Cotton Rand Paul Josh Hawley Ted Cruz Hmmm.... I notice a theme there. I'm not trying to take it to that particular topic though. πŸ€ͺ (And, sorry, I really did TRY to keep it down to five, but that just wasn't possible.)
  6. When I was "versatile," it was mostly because I hadn't realized yet that I am multi-orgasmic. As a top, I cum pretty quickly the first time so thought I was a premature ejaculator. So instead of putting a bottom through that, I would claim to be versatile and top first and cum so that I could then bottom. (Unlike many guys, I can still bottom after I cum.) Once I discovered in my mid-30s that I'm multi-orgasmic, I gravitated more and more towards topping until that's pretty much all I do. (As I have said in another thread, there are precise circumstances under which I will bottom now that I consider myself top-only.) For me, prepping for bottoming is a two-day process. I firmly believe that the session should last at least as long as the round trip travel to have the session. (And I do my best to ensure that for the bottoms I hook up with!) Preparation for the session should be included in that! And since most tops that I've experienced don't last long enough to justify the amount of prep it takes, a two-day prep process isn't worth it for me. (Now, of course, that was back before multiple tops in a day/night was on my radar.) Yes, as a top-only, there is a limit to how many times I can cum (3, max) in a session, while there isn't necessarily a limit to how many times I could get fucked as a bottom if I were versatile. But I'm OK with that.
  7. I rarely do totally anonymous hookups - the bottom has seen my profile on some site or other, and I clearly state that I'm poz. Now if they state they are neg and only want neg but still hit me up, I will remind them that I'm not negative. If they still want to hookup, it's on and popping! As I just posted in another thread though, if the bottom is in an anonymous situation offering their hole up to anyone who wants to fuck it, they relinquish the right to control whether or not they are fucked with/without a condom. Anonymous situations and control of what happens/how it happens are diametrically opposed (unless there is a "gatekeeper" involved).
  8. While I generally agree with the sentiment that something was forced on you that you didn't want, I have to express what may be an unpopular opinion. Anonymous sex, whether in a dark room, back room, woods, ass down/face up, blindfolded, etc., kinda by definition lacks accountability. In those situations, the top can do whatever they want to a bottom, regardless of the bottom's wishes, whether or not what is done is morally right considering the bottom's wishes. If I come across a guy in an anonymous situation and in a position that screams, "FUCK ME!", as the top >> I << get to choose how to fuck that guy. If I, as the top, choose to wear a condom (probably to protect myself more than it is to protect someone I don't know, don't care about and likely has some STI cause he obviously lets anybody fuck him, regardless of what I might say), oh well! And the same is true in the opposite situation where the bottom wants condoms used, is in an anonymous situation and is bred by a top. (>> I << would never willingly use a condom to fuck! I'm playing Devil's Advocate here! πŸ€ͺ) Whether a bottom only wants to get fucked raw or only with a condom, then that entails a conversation, agreement beforehand and not an anonymous scene.... So, while I agree something was forced upon you that you didn't want, I have Judge Judy (American TV Court show judge) in my ear talking about "proximate cause" - if you hadn't put yourself in a position to be taken advantage of, you wouldn't have been taken advantage of and had an experience you didn't want.... Case dismissed! And I would give the same reply to a top who blindfolded himself, laid on his back with a condom-covered erection and multiple bottoms came through and rode his cock for the same amount of time each until the top came. If one of those bottoms sabotaged the condom so that he was effectively fucking raw, oh well! He relinquished the control to make sure the sex happened how he wanted it to happen. So he can't then complain after the fact. Now, if the top and bottom had discussed condom use beforehand, then the top came over and forced himself onto and into the bottom raw and bred him, THAT would be rape.
  9. IRL, I'm a man of few words and I make the words I use count. If a bottom's profile says they want a verbal top, I'm generally not the guy for them. πŸ˜„ I've had to do the same thing as a top! I keep repeating to myself, "Great sex does NOT equal love!" FTR, I wouldn't be turned off as I understand that anything said in the heat of passion shouldn't be taken seriously. 😘
  10. Whether the bottom's dick is caged or swinging free, it's his ass I'm interested in. I see the caged cock as a banner that says, I don't want my dick played with. End of story, and no further conversation needed on that topic.
  11. As a 50+ top, I prefer a 50+ bottom (in shape or not) to a twink, a 20-something and probably even a 30-something. My experience has been that older men (tops and bottoms both) know what they like and know how to use what they have to bring the most pleasure to both parties involved. Of course, that's a generalization and there are exceptions to that, even for me. (Like this late-30's bottom who has this "magic ass" that always makes me cum sooner than I want!) I think what you may be bumping against is a twofold issue: 1) the shortage of tops vis-à-vis the number of bottoms and 2) the culture of youth that seems to permeate the US. You need to not only play to your strengths, but play to the audience who wants what you're offering. (If we were in the same town, I'd be inside of you regularly. Just saying.... 😍) Give me an older bottom who knows how to take dick and can hang for a 3-hour session over a twink who's ready to tap out after 20-30 minutes EVERY day of the week!
  12. Porn moaning? No. A truly-elicited reaction to something I'm doing? Most definitely!
  13. Smallest was about the size of a Vienna Sausage. The guy was 6'2"+, size 12 shoe and huge hands. 🀯 I can only guess that the growth hormone hit every part of his body but his dick.... Back when I was mostly a bottom, I had two guys in the 10 inch range (what I call, "Double Digit Dick"). And I know cause my "good spot" is about 9.5-10" deep and it turns me into a gibbering idiot whenever it's touched. It's a pleasure/pain spot where if you touch it again, I'm going to hurt you. And if you don't touch it again, I'm going to hurt you.
  14. I voted this morning but didn't have time to reply. I'm probably closer to @viking8x6, but that wasn't an option so I chose loose. I prefer a hole that is loose enough that I can get in using spit for lube OR that is loose cause it's already been fucked and hopefully preloaded. In either case, if the bottom still has enough muscle control to milk my dick while I'm fucking him, extra added bonus! I don't want a bottom who's so loose that I could fist him up to my elbow in one stroke. (I don't fist, but that was to make a point.) Now if he's really loose cause I'm the umpteenth guy of the night and his hole is full of cum, all that cum has weight and substance and will fill in the space in the hole, giving my dick something nice and squishy and tight enough to fuck.
  15. And everything above is why I am envious of you! 😍 I don't want anyone living with me, (at all, but) especially not if they're a regular drug user! I'm less pressed if a hookup does drugs though. EXCEPT for the time when the guy got so high getting ready that a) he lost track of time and b) was too high to get in a rideshare.... 🀬 I'm not really one for performing in public, even in a dark back room. Wish I could be more like you in that regard! My ideal relationship would be with someone who has his own place. There could be the occasional overnight stay, but that's about it. And I've finally come to accept that I'm not really relationship material. And I'm OK with that. On the subject of being too exclusive, about the only exclusion I have is that I'm not all that into chubs (but chubby is fine). And I'm even exploring that option, as of late lots of self-described chubs have hit me up. Didn't enjoy one, was quite pleasantly surprised by another and at least on paper the one I hook up with next week when he's in town should be lots of fun. The two major reasons I might not hook up with a bottom who hits me up are 1) it's late and I get up at zero: dark thirty and 2) they want me to travel to San Francisco, which I just have an aversion to doing! (I'll drive twice as far away as SF before I would drive to SF. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ) OK, I have a second exclusion - I'm not into a lot of kink (I call it "the alphabet"). If that's your thing, you do you! But I won't be doing you. And my top dance card still isn't full. Like I've already said, I have other things I can do, so I don't trip.
  16. I am 58 this year. In my mid-30's I discovered that I'm multiorgasmic. Before that I thought I was a bad top who prematurely ejaculated, so I was much more of a bottom than I was a top. (For those of a certain age in the US, this revision of the Tootsie Pop commercial perfectly sums up my top experiences before that - "How many fucks until you reach the center of a Tootsie Pop? One. Two. Three. Cum!) Once I discovered I was multiorgasmic, I likened my orgasms to going out to dinner. The first one is like the Appetizer, which arrives quickly. The second is like the Main Course in that it takes longer to arrive and is hopefully worth the wait. The third is like Dessert - sometimes you get it, sometimes you don't. (Dessert has required a 3+ hour session since my mid-30s.) So, in the last decade, my sexual position hasn't really changed. I much prefer to top than to bottom. YES, there is a limit to how many times I can top where there isn't a limit to how many times I can bottom. But there is WAY more prep involved in bottoming than there is in topping! (And let me shout out all those bottoms who are diligent about their prep!) So, under precise circumstances, I would consider bottoming. Otherwise, I'm quite content to top!
  17. As a top, I'm not really into the anonymous hookup scene - the connection is just about as important to me as the fucking. So, while I think a pump and dump is hot, it's not really my thing. (But getting with the bottom from a pump and dump when he's done with that is definitely my thing!) And even though I seem to be a rarity (a top), bottoms flake on me regularly as if tops are a dime a dozen. And I'm in a major metropolitan area. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ When that happens, I take a glass half-full approach and just assume that the universe wants me to do something else cause I have LOTS of other things to do besides have sex! Even bottoms who profess to have had a great time seem to drop off the face of the earth when it comes to hooking up a second time....
  18. I can quite easily envision you riding me, bending down to kiss me and that hair covering my face like a canopy.... 😍😍😍😍😍 (Is there an erection emoji on this site?)
  19. I agree with 1-3 in that order. I prefer 5 over 4 though despite the cost because the TASTE of silicone lube isn't as repulsive as the taste of water-based lubes! Don't get me wrong. I put Vaseline on my lips every night before going to bed to keep my lips kissing soft! But I love to felch a hole after breeding it. And the thought of licking Vaseline in that instance just doesn't do it for me. It might be fine. But it might be gross!
  20. Most nights before going to sleep unless I've fucked someone that day or I just don't have time cause I already don't get enough sleep and every minute matters.
  21. Po-tay-to/Po-tah-to, but I would say that I'm more in touch with my inner 🐷, than I would say that I've become sluttier. 😜
  22. @pervinmt not that it matters, but I 😍😍😍 that look on you!
  23. Just to clarify, I will have sex with someone who is more than 20-ish years younger than I am. They just have to hit me up first. (And then not flake. But that's a discussion for another thread.)
  24. Oops! That should've said, "I WILL NOT under any circumstances hit up a guy who is MORE than 20-ish years younger than me." 😊
  25. My "viable" age range has always been +/- 20 years. So, in my 20's, I would've gone down to 18 and up to 40's. Anyone older than that I would've called "Henery." (Look it up if you're not familiar with American cartoons from a certain period....) As I'm approaching 60 (🀯 How did THAT happen?), my lower range is 40's and there is no upper range. If a guy who is almost 80 wants me to fuck him, I probably WILL!!!!! I WILL NOT under any circumstances hit up a guy who is less than 20-ish years younger than me. But if he hits me up (and he's not looking for a Sugar Daddy), it's on and popping!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.