viking8x6

Snakes are very popular tattoo subjects (as are most venomous creatures) way beyond our little sub-subculture here, and have been for centuries. Snakes in general are a very old symbol with quite a few powerful meanings, and so the symbology of the tattoos can cover quite a lot of different topics. [think before following links] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpent_(symbolism)

The CDC has a tool that will help you get an estimate of risk based on your sex choices and risk reduction practices: [think before following links] https://hivrisk.cdc.gov/risk-estimator-tool/#-sb Bottom line is that based on what you stated above, your risk is pretty low and the chances that you are currently HIV+ are slim to none (way less than 1 in 1000). That's assuming your BF is negative, of course. But it's extremely easy to find out: Just get tested already! If you decide that your risk is low enough that you choose not to use PrEP, I'd strongly recommend getting regular screening for HIV and other STIs, especially if you play outside the relationship. Because (1) the others are much easier to catch than HIV, (2) they increase your odds of contracting HIV if you are exposed and most importantly (3) if you do pick up something, you'll be passing it on (whatever it is) until you get it treated.

Excellently written - delightfully hot!!

Awesome! Intense! Kudos!

Bummer! I missed you by a day. HMU on your way back if you're interested.

This site actually has excellent moderators and a seriously responsible webmaster/site owner. You might like to read the actual rules of the forum before dishing out criticism: [think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/12285-read-this-before-you-post/ [think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/64867-read-this-significant-change-in-rules-effective-31/ Also, if no one reports a post that is against these rules, they have to read all of the posted content in order to catch it. They have lives outside the site, so that's an unreasonable demand on them (though they do read an amazing amount of it!).

Very hot!

Very hot!

Very hot!

Another delightful episode. This is so hot - love the writing and the wonderful variety between the different parts of the story. One of two fiction topics I actually have in my follows. Kudos!

Sure thing... though my explanation (mostly) won't be about measured data (I wasn't able to find any), only about the theory and predictions I can make from it. There are three factors that I expect to make differences: evaporation, stability, and affinity for water. Evaporation - within a series of similar substances, the lighter the molecules, the more easily it evaporates. Faster evaporation will mean you'll get a bigger dose from a hit, and you'll go through a bottle faster. Lighter molecules are those with fewer heavy (non-hydrogen) atoms, so isopropyl > isobutyl > isopentyl / cyclopentyl > cyclohexyl. Stability - the bond between the nitrite and the carbon atom where it attaches is rather weak. When it breaks, the molecule breaks down, and this is also how it releases the nitric oxide (NO) molecule that causes the effect of the poppers. So, a weaker bond will mean they have a somewhat faster effect in the body (probably doesn't matter much, as it's very fast anyway) and also that they go bad faster (which can be slowed by keeping them in the freezer). The property that matters here is how many other carbons are attached to the one with the nitrite, and in this group we have molecules with one or two. Those with two have the weaker bond, so the order here (less stable to more) is isopropyl / cyclopentyl / cyclohexyl (all 2) > isobutyl / isopentyl (each 1). Affinity for water - the greater the affinity for water, the greater the tendency of the liquid to absorb moisture, which then reacts with the poppers to degrade them. The carbon part of the molecule tends to have a low affinity for water (think oil and water), so the smaller molecules (which have more nitrogen/oxygen part per carbon) have the greater water affinity. So the order here winds up being the same as for evaporation, isopropyl > isobutyl > isopentyl / cyclopentyl > cyclohexyl. Of course, some of these are banned in various jurisdictions, so what you can get may vary by location as well. Happy snorting! 🐷

IF the biktarvy kept him undetectable, then the three meds in it were effective (ie any resistance was not enough to keep it from working). The descovy gives you two of those three (yes, that's correct; let me know if you want details). I think it's very likely that simply by staying on the regular dose, you'd be completely protected. On the other hand, IF the biktarvy DID NOT keep him undetectable, that would be evidence that his virus may have some resistance to one or more of the three meds in it, in which case you might want to think twice about taking his load.

Thanks for catching that! In fact I misspoke (must have killed one too many brain cells). The ingredient I have seen is cyclopentyl nitrite, not cyclopropyl. I do remember being surprised that it would be used rather than cyclohexyl. And actually I am a chemist, though it's no longer my day job.

I am pretty sure I have also seen cyclopropyl nitrite poppers at some point, but I don't recall what brand they were.

Well done! Looking forward to the continuation.

I would definitely get a new doctor. As others have said, you don't need a reason. But in fact, you have several good ones. To be blunt, she is (apparently deliberately) making it difficult for you to get and adhere to the healthcare you need (and which is currently recommended by the medical community as the standard of practice). Regardless of why she is doing that or whether it's intentional, it is unacceptable and there's no reason you should put up with it.

I believe that @rawTOP has plans, as the improved site takes shape, to make the "topics" (various ick-factor fetishes and gay, straight and bi categories as well as drug and chasing topics) tag-driven rather than subforum-driven (correct me if I'm mistaken). Once that transition is implemented, it will become much simpler both to search by specific topic and to filter what you see by topic (in either a positive or negative sense). While it would be possible to set up an entire parallel tree of fetish subforums within the Backroom, I expect if the tag implementation is coming any time remotely soon, it would not be worth the effort. It would also have the disadvantage that it would make it considerably harder to find content if it were scattered among a collection of subforums. All that said, if authors would start practicing tagging their content going forward, it would improve @BootmanLA's experience (because he can see the tags at the top of the piece and skip reading it) and make the moderators' jobs a lot easier when the eventual transition happens (and everything will have to be tagged to get it to show up in the right feeds).

That is a beautiful hairy ass!

HIV probably not all that high at that frequency (though if you go to a bath house or other group scene they increase a lot). Of course, you can bring HIV to nearly zero by taking PrEP, and I recommend that if it's available to you. Other STIs, fairly significant in my opinion (and my experience) at the every few months frequency. And they can be hard to spot, especially syphilis. Generally treatable (as long as you are vigilant and don't let them fester). In your shoes, I'd be up-front with the wife that it's a risk, and adjust venues and testing to keep it at a comfortable level. Just my opinion, there.

In the interest of not accelerating the flame war, I am not addressing this to any specific person. The Covid-19 vaccines are designed to stimulate immunity to the virus. The immune system is not an all-or-nothing deal - it has many different components and of course every person's is slightly different. One of the things it can do (and usually does, that being its proper function) is to reduce viral load (a subject familiar to most members of this site) and thereby the chance of transmission. Therefore, the Covid-19 vaccines (more than one, remember) are expected to reduce the overall rate of transmission. There is evidence that suggests that in fact they do. [think before following links] https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/08/study-ties-covid-vaccines-lower-transmission-rates That said, the management of Crew Club has the right to make whatever decision they see fit regarding the requirement for proof of vaccine, or mask use, or any other damn thing. I strongly suspect that their motivation is to stay open (having just spent over a year with no revenue!), and those of us who enjoy having a sex club to go to in DC would be well advised to support them in that goal, don't you think?

We can call them whatever we want to call them between ourselves - labels are obviously irrelevant, not to mention inadequate to describe the complexity of human sexual response. It's only polite to call them what they want to be called when in their company. If they like to be called "straight", I'm happy to call them that. Even if I have my dick balls deep in them.

Unapologetic tramp who has found love on more than one occasion - sometimes it goes awry and sometimes life choices can get in the way. Currently about 10 years in to a relationship with a very sweet man, a wannabe pig whose fantasies greatly exceed his experience so far. And getting plenty on the side, which seems to work for both of us. In my view of the world, love is about the heart, not about the body - it can happen without sex at all, with a monogamous relationship, with a polyamorous relationship, or with an open relationship. There are billions of men on the planet and every one of them is different in how they behave and think about sex and love, so trying to put them in boxes will only make you crazy.