Phallarchist

Yes. The anus did not evolve for penetration. You are putting it to unnatural use and suffering the natural consequences thereby. Use lots of lubricant, follow medical advice to reduce the incidence, and learn to accept the injury as the price you pay for having men inside you.

I agree. Good pornography is a boiling brew of male dominance, degradation, and violent penetration. Heterosexuality plays better on screen, mostly because it is better. The necessary inequality is built in to male and female bodies. Payment removes the problem of consent and allows the male star and the director to maximize the exploitation and use of force. And vaginas are perfect, of course, even when they're mainly used as a source of lubricant for anal sex. Fag porn is way too concerned with maintaining the male status of both performers. The power imbalances need to go way up and attention to the fag-female orgasm has to disappear completely. I greatly prefer the man to be much larger, older, and masculine than his fag-victim. Unfortunately, males are much more likely to be similar to each other in stature, so natural physical domination often cannot be achieved. Only degradation and violence can really satisfy. Rough rectal intercourse is painful, so it's harder to get the victim-actors to agree to the necessary abuse. But I think the complete abrogation of maleness required might be a bigger problem for the audience of confused homosexuals who like to think of themselves as men.

Yes, it matters, because male power matters, and a huge erection is the inescapable epitome of maleness. It will always be thus. However, other secondary sex characteristics can also be deployed to achieve successful penetration: 1. Height 2. Musculature 3. Dominance The last is most important. A short guy with 5" and an attitude of penetrative entitlement has the potential to own me. His success as a male will largely depend on his ability and willingness to use physical force against me while verbally demanding my compliance. But the fact is that his maleness has to be proven, while guys with 8" have abundant male power by default, whether they want it or not.

Your self-sacrifice to his magnificent phallus was beautiful and virtuous. You understood correctly that your place was to suffer and endure in exchange for the privilege of being conquered and bred by him. Your torn cunt was a badge of honour. I salute your service to his brutal male instinct.

Gatorade is full of sugar. Piss is probably much healthier!

But your account name contains "Alpha", which directly refers to an apex male who dominates everyone else. How could you not see him as a bitch?

Yes, not feminine, you are female. It's your sexual function with respect to your breeders, not your appearance or self-presentation.

Would experiencing Schadenfreude encompass situations in which I have inflicted the damage? I thought it had to be a matter of happenstance. In principle, I see little difference from paddling a boy's behind until he can't sit down or slapping a bitch while you're fucking him/her. There's no direct justification for the pain and violence, but I enjoy it (and the victim might also). I think this response is partly conditioned. When I was younger, I encountered a string of boys who begged me to fuck them hard, then screamed bloody murder at the first twinge of pain. As a convinced non-rapist, I withdrew immediately at their insistence. I was not being rough at that point. Perhaps my penis has a naturally cruel geometry, but I rather think these boys just failed to understand the inherent difficulties of rectal intercourse. For most receivers, it is usually going to hurt a bit for some time. It's just a built-in fact of the misused anatomy involved. I knew it to be the case because I had given my cunt to a number of superior men and understood that the pain of entry was the price I paid for the privilege of serving them, having them bodily inside me, and basking in the glory of their animal breeding power. These recalcitrant boys weren't deliberate cockteases, but as a worshipper of men myself, I found their devotion to male dominance and pleasure lacking. Their self-regard offended my instinctive sense of the penis as the axis of the universe. They had carelessly disregarded the natural law that I embodied. They did not apologize and were not repentant. I could not forgive them and yet I could also not punish them or push them onto the path of righteousness. These frustrations injected a bitter note into my sexual mindset. Anger became part of my male arousal patterns, and I began to be attracted to phallic rage in other men as well. I came to understand violence as a central component of maleness. It powers the hardest erections, drives the most vigorous thrusting, and propels infinitely pleasurable releases of seed that are miraculous to experience and awesome to behold. Penetration is the largest natural component of a meaningful life for a man, and it is inescapably violent. I agree with the radical feminists who say that a penis is a weapon. Only, I'm glad of the fact, while their enthusiasm for male hegemony is somewhat less in evidence. A better man would have carefully set these thoughts aside, but as a habitual follower of my nose (and other protuberances), I began to seek out boys who claimed to be more reverent. I.e., they would shut up and take it. Mostly this quest failed, as I resembled them too much physically, whatever the dark corners of my soul. They wanted men who looked as rough as they fucked. I couldn't compete well in that arena. Nevertheless, I did encounter a few who genuinely wanted to be taken hard. They openly encouraged my sexual hostility and one even asked to be immobilized so that he could not escape. That one bled profusely. It was both unbelievably exciting and frightening. AIDS was killing fags around me every day. The tyranny of the condom was firmly in place, so I was nominally protected, but it was still a shock to see my cock covered in his gore. I realize now that he was using my dick as a tool for his self-destruction, but the deed was done and bloodlust was instantly added to the many layers of my unreconstructed perversion. Other willing victims bled much less or not visibly, typically a pretty drop or two in the toilet, floating in the lubricant. Those injuries were consistent with my own experience as cunt: rectal fucking occasionally leads to obvious rectal bleeding, and there's generally no problem as long as it's a small quantity, stops within a day or two, and no other symptoms arise. It's as healthy as anyone can reasonably expect an egregious assault on the colon to be. If you can't accept the terms of this compromise, then you shouldn't be offering men your digestive tract as a substitute for a vagina. I don't think I generally fuck differently from other men. I'm just more likely to appreciate the beauty of those difficult moments when the boy's body tenses and he throws back his head in shock at his predicament. I will stop thrusting at that point to let his cunt adjust to me (unless he has explicitly invited me to sadism). But I will not pull out of him of my own accord. I believe that he has a moral obligation to satisfy me and I will not deny him the opportunity to fulfill the duty that he has willingly undertaken. He should think of coitus interruptus as the last resort. My fuck should be a sacred rite to him and interfering with my pleasure should be a sacrilege. Or he's the wrong boy.

It wasn't large, but the man was tall, slim, muscular, and hairy. Most importantly, he demanded service because he knew he had a right to use my mouth. He never warned me that he was about to come. He just held my head tightly and forced his load down my throat. I was so grateful to him and would have gladly spent the rest of my life on my knees, swallowing his seed, but he got bored and moved on to something better: pussy. I love bisexual men.

I dislike cockrings, just as I seem to dislike many things that are wildly popular with other fags. Most sexual accoutrements are silly, but cockrings distort what should be the natural perfection of the male organ. If an erect penis isn't inherently beautiful, then no amount of strangulation is going to improve it. I briefly wore a rubber one in my youth to try to emphasize my bulge. It's not an enhancement that turned out to be necessary or useful. (I still believe in genital advertisement via appropriate clothing, e.g. sweatpants or dress pants with no underwear, tight-crotched jeans, and of course erections in public whenever feasible.) I understand that many use cockrings to compensate for erectile dysfunction. I have some sympathy for this condition, but the failure to become hard enough to penetrate is a sign of the collapse of maleness itself. The afflicted need to fix the underlying causes (diet, exercise, psychology, etc.), or accept their fate and withdraw from the penetrative arena. Though I can somewhat accept pharmaceutical interventions, because I don't have to look at them or feel them.

No, but one of my cell cultures was abnormal once. It's scary. There have been disturbing rises in oral, anal, and penile cancer due to HPV. I put them in what I think is the order of severity, though all are horrible. Most fags don't strictly need their penises. Anal cancer is no doubt painful, but your elimination can be re-routed if necessary. Oral cancer is in your head, in organs you use constantly every day. And it could easily affect your face.

Rape/torture/murder. Serial-killer stuff. Specify that the victims are children and you have the ultimate horror. (Unless they're really annoying children.) I'm aroused by some rape scenarios and might be tempted to argue that it's justifiable in some limited circumstance. The rest holds no interest even as fantasy.

I think your questions and consternation are sincere, so I'll attempt to respond, probably with no great success. Fundamentally, I think I just enjoy a bit of sexual sadism when i can arrange it, while you don't at all. There will probably be no meeting of minds. Nevertheless, 1. I do not brutalize every boy indiscriminately. The faggot must accept his fate and agree to the necessity of the ordeal that I will inflict on him. This level of submission in a boy is rare and beautiful. 2. There is no such thing as a generically submissive boy. Each man has his own requirements for total erotic fulfillment and each boy must be put to particular use/abuse to meet those requirements. Some men are easy to please. I admit to being cruel and difficult at first, but a boy who suffers for me endears himself to me. His self-sacrifice at the altar of my manhood could well inspire love. And as I indicated, this blood rite would generally just be a one-time demonstration of my phallic power. I would reserve the right to hurt him occasionally in the future to satisfy my perversity and renew our bond as man and bitch, but I would have no further need to break his cunt. Though, in truth, he will bleed whenever I fuck him, just not always visibly. The rectal cunt always bleeds because it is not meant to be used by men. Anal penetration is thus always inherently abusive. I just want to make the abuse explicit and purposeful in a ritual of initiation that fills me with a sense of absolute power. 3. What I perpetrate is no worse than any rough fuck. It's certainly less risky than fisting, which is shockingly common. I would indeed and be aiming for the sigmoid junction (it feels great), but the locus of the injury depends on the size of the boy and the anatomy of his cunt. 4. I radically disagree with the notion that I have no right to hurt anybody. Sadists and masochists have been hurting and getting hurt since time immemorial. Consent has no meaning if you can't agree to take pain and risk damage. 5. There's always the possibility of a more serious injury. That potential is always there, because a rectum has no substantial natural defenses against the depredations of penile invasion. I could tear him from his first hole to his second hole in the course of normal breeding. Or he could move the wrong way and fracture my penis. Or we could transmit HPV to each other and eventually contract anal and penile cancer. Every sexual act has known risks. It is possible that I could cause the boy great pain. He has to decide for himself whether or not it's worth the risk to accommodate my plainly twisted desires. 6. It's absolutely my intent to prevent the boy from receiving other men. I fucked him to own him, nothing less. I would give him about a week to heal completely before initiating regular breeding. In the meantime, his throat will serve me well. 7. The short answer (sorry to leave it for last) is that hurting a (consenting) bitch with my dick gives me the sort of thrill that I associate with brutal rape. I am not actually a rapist. I'm probably actually too considerate for my own good in most situations. But I believe that men should give expression to the primordial impulses for conquest and violent penetration that lurk in our genes whenever possible. Fags love a beast fuck. So do many women for that matter. We should pay this much tribute to the ancestors who raped their way into genetic immortality. Their example can inspire us even as we confine ourselves to the limits imposed by modern civilization. I love the power in my dick without reservation. 8. Finally, pricking the boy and enjoying his suffering strongly recalls the classic ruination of the virgin. In many cases، and especially on the wedding night، consummation would have consisted of heedless forcible penetration, leading to unlimited pleasure for him and pain and bleeding for her. You're a good person, so you no doubt abhor the thought. I, on the other hand, love the practices of patriarchy implicitly and regard traumatic penetration as one way to establish and enforce the correct, male-dominated, penis-centred marital and social order. I hope I've clarified my intent somewhat. No doubt I remain a monster, but I am ill-disposed to prevaricate in this regard. Though I probably should have used my time to seek out and defile an innocent instead.

I want to hurt the boy deeply our first time. I drive hard inward to stretch his guts around my full length. A few sharp thrusts from there will reliably draw blood. I withdraw my weapon to wipe the boy's cunt gore on his agonized face and make him taste his defeat. When he accepts my power over him and my right to abuse him for my satisfaction, I can proceed with normal breeding. I might never need to hurt his cunt again, but it's essential that he be forced to yield to my will and learn the price of disobedience.

Bitch, then fag. Slave and object are automatically included in either of those.

Yes, you gave him the right to take you by force when you entered his door. Withdrawing consent before he's done is despicable behavior for a faggot. Any man so betrayed should discard the useless bitch.

You could take the initiative and move to suck the man clean. Pause to give him the opportunity to refuse you the honor. He might need a few seconds to comprehend the depths of your depravity and balance his natural disgust against the satisfaction of completing the cycle of dominance.

"Cocksucker" is an identity as well as a gratifyingly demeaning insult used by normal men. However, "dick" is the word more associated with anger and active abuse. "Being a dick". "Dicking me over". Somehow "suck my dick, bitch" sounds more aggressive than "suck my cock, bitch", so I prefer it. Although if the man is using his strength to forcefuck a throat, he can call his sex-weapon a "johnson" or a "pecker" for all I care. Male sexual aggression is invaluable, whether it's silently contemptuous or accompanied by constant, hateful verbal degradation. The bitch is there to worship, choke, and swallow, not to have vocabulary preferences.

Fuck me while I'm asleep (probably drugged). Fortunately, it still counts as rape even if I want you to do it and ask you to take pictures while you're doing it. In terms of an unplanned assault, it's more of a date-rape scenario where I tell him to stop because it hurts and he holds me down and forces it in me until he's finished. It's illegal, but also his natural right. It's immoral for a fag to interfere with a man's pleasure.

I like this standard. Fair game if he's still breathing.

If the faggot bitch is going to reliably swallow every drop, then it should kneel next to the toilet. Otherwise (e.g. full-face urination), it should kneel in the bathtub just as a practical matter.

He had a huge mouth and it felt like he had detached his jaw, snake-like, to swallow the whole thing. There was no scraping or struggle, just immediate deep entry to the tight wet cunt of his throat. It's a rare experience.

I much prefer that the man reach down to grip my throat of his own accord. With one hand on the back of my head to force me down and the other wrapped tightly around my throat, he shows me his strength and his capacity for violence. I surrender to the threat and power of his male instincts as he forces his seed into me.

Roughly forced rectum bleeds pretty reliably. I hope you'll share the pictures of your haemorraging cunt next to the man's blood-soaked weapon.

I agree that it's scarce, but haven't found it to be better elsewhere. BlowBuddies does have a monthly event for it and their specialized piss area is generally open every Saturday.