fskn

The lengths to which some people will go to repress their desires are really surprising! Your former friend is likely to die having only received blowjobs on his birthday, from reticent and unenthusiastic women.

Indeed. Empirical evidence!

Daddy always knows best.

I guess they fear that homosexuality is contagious and can be transmitted by kissing. 😂 In all seriousness, it would be interesting to find out whether these men also dislike non-sexual intimate contact (kissing, hugging, cuddling) with their wives, or whether they specifically avoid it with other men. I would love to get a psychologist's take on this. Is it that some straight men have repressed homosexual desires and really do want to see big penises; that they are merely curious and want to see how they measure up; that when they see women being fucked by big penises, they imagine that they themselves are similarly endowed, and fantasize that they are sex gods; or something else?

Folsom Gulch, the renowned adult video arcade, is not far. It's on Folsom between 5th and 6th Streets. (Beware, San Francisco has duplicate sets of numbered roads. The ones at the far western edge of the City are the Avenues, whereas the ones South of Market are streets.) An arcade a little farther from downtown is Secrets on Bay at Mason. (Note that multiple arcades named "Secrets" exist.) It's a brisk 30-minute walk from the foot of Market Street, or you can take the historic F-line streetcar toward Fisherman's Wharf, get off at Bay and walk east, or get off at Powell & Jefferson and walk north. Secrets will be quiet other than at lunch and right after work. Historically, the Gulch has traffic whenever it is open, but this may have changed due to the pandemic. Enjoy your visit! 😈

Isn't that what the grease pencil by the side of the bed is for? (Or the Sharpie marker, for a multi-day event?)😈😏 In all seriousness, the Health app in Apple iOS has a Sexual Activity metric that you could use. Tap the Browse icon at the lower right (four blue squares, looks like a window), then start typing "sex" in the Search bar at the top. It's only suitable for counting, and for examining the date and time distribution. You can say whether "protection" was used. (It's surprising that folks in Cupertino, California would be so naïve, considering that non-barrier birth control methods, PrEP, and TasP are also highly effective at preventing pregnancy or HIV infection, as the case may be.) No notes or other details can be tracked. For a quick way to record a new load, you could use the Shortcuts app and put a one-tap widget on your iPhone's home screen.

Thank you for this perfect description. This is my absolute favorite position. I prefer some bottoms with their legs tightly closed and others with their legs slightly apart, as you suggest. Each one seems to have a sweet spot as far as leg positioning goes. Bottoms default to spreading their legs when they assume this position, so I usually do have to force their legs back together — a good way to assert control from the start. This position is ideal if the bottom struggles. With my whole weight on him he can't get away until I am done and my cum is leaking out of his hole. This position does not work well for making a bottom cum from direct stimulation of his penis. Some bottoms like to jerk off or to be jerked off while I fuck them (or for me to suck them while I fuck them missionary-style). That said, I have fucked a few guys who creamed the sheets, either from friction/frottage or from the very limited hand movements that are possible in this position. It's a huge turn-on to notice, when the bottom gets up, that the sheets aren't just soaked in sweat, but also in his cum. (Note about pronouns: Trans bottoms are welcome in my bed, too! I tried writing this neutrally, with they pronouns, but feared it would be hard to read without specific context.)

Thanks for sharing this story. It's a good reminder that these companies behave arbitrarily, and that the consequences to us can range from frustrating (no more porn posts) to serious (bank details stored permanently; having to use prepaid cards). Pre-Brexit you in the UK had strong rights to review your data, to have companies delete data no longer needed for processing, etc. Even so, many companies based outside Europe ignored the GDPR.

I'm just reporting the material. You'll have to take it up with the evolutionary biologist Robyn Baker, who wrote Sperm Wars — and check the research referenced in the book. The author also maintains an online addendum. One thing to consider is that sexual skill is multidimensional. If reproduction were simply a matter of inserting the penis into a random vagina and ejaculating, we'd have a much larger population. Baker is no doubt referring to confidence, ability to interact before and during sex, stamina, and so on. Apparently, the Boy Scouts do (did?) prepare young men, on multiple levels! 😉

Very well said. It's a lesson that bottoms learn, sooner or later. I wonder whether they know it instinctively, from the start, and go through a process of (self-)acceptance rather than learning.

Basically, that young men will already have honed their sexual skill by the time the opportunity to fuck women arises. For sexual prowess and peak fertility to coincide would certainly increase the chances of procreation. 🙂

This is true too (the evolutionary biologist Robyn Baker argues, in Sperm Wars, that having more descendants, not necessarily immediately, but over multiple generations = success), so it might justify the gay sexual fetish "pecking order" that @BlackDude posits. Baker adds that homosexual sex also serves evolutionary-biological ends, in that it provides hetero- and bisexual males convenient opportunities for sexual experimentation and practice with other males, years before sex with females would be readily available and/or socially acceptable. Last but not least, Baker argues that homosexuals may help successive generations by taking on nurturing roles.

Ah yes, the joys of content delivery networks! To protect Web sites from rogue traffic, CDNs maintain automatically-managed lists of trusted and untrusted IP address ranges. Unfortunately, IP address ranges controlled by legitimate Internet service providers sometimes end up on the lists, which is frustrating. The pleasure is all mine! It's nice to meet another friendly and constructive person here. Not to mention that you are sexy and are in Germany! Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Tag. 🙂 If you find a work-around for BZ chat, please post so that others can try it, too.

Hello, @BBTV6! It sounds as if you have tried many alternatives to get the chat feature working. Have you tried a different path to the Internet (for example, public WiFi at a café, or cellular data on your phone, with WiFi disabled temporarily)? Depending what the JavaScript code for the chat feature actually does, there is a chance that some kind of port blocking, DNS interception, DNS-based censorship, or packet filtering at the level of your regular router or your regular ISP is breaking something. It's a remote possibility. I wish I had specific advice to offer, but I have never tried BZ's chat feature. Can someone else help? Thank you for posting the exact error message and what you tried. Very often, people just say that something "didn't work", which makes it hard to understand what happened and to offer useful help. Good luck!

Very interested to hear about PrEP access options and concerns in the UK...

Earlier this month, the FDA expanded the approval of Cabenuva, cabotegravir and rilpivirine injections for HIV treatment, to allow injections every 2 months rather than every 1 month, for virally-suppressed patients without resistance concerns and without past treatment failure. I just got off a public health call in San Francisco, where this novel treatment has been in use for months, in a fairly large group of patients. One patient told us that it had improved his health and changed his life, and another, whose doctor relayed his experience, was happy that he could schedule a trip to his home country between injections without risking scrutiny of his HIV pills at the border. Insurance coverage has not been a problem, nor has drug stock, but both are expected to be concerns in other states. Doctors expected that their patients, who are accustomed to coming in every 3 or 6 months, would not be interested in coming in every month for an injection, but instead, the response has been enthusiastic. The particular medical facility has not switched anyone to a 2-month schedule yet. Oral bridge — taking cabotegravir and rilpivirine pills if someone misses an injection — is possible but was flagged by one doctor as impractical. (One concern is that the pills have to be taken with a meal.) Instead, this facility recommends that patients keep a 1-month supply of whatever HIV pill(s) they previously used. @120DaysofSodom and others, if you are comfortable sharing, did you start the injectable, and what has it been like for you so far? (In a separate thread, I mentioned the recent approval of Apretude, the cabotegravir injection for PrEP. Apretude is fundamentally a 2-month injection.)

@negboyslut, if he takes HIV medications reliably, is in the care of a doctor, and consistently has such a low viral load (he should be testing periodically), then the research indicates no chance of HIV transmission. The PARTNER study, done in two phases in the 2010s, established no risk of transmission within opposite-status heterosexual and homosexual couples who don't use condoms for vaginal or anal sex, when the HIV-positive partner has an undetectable viral load. At that time, the threshold for undetectable was even higher than what BootmanLA mentioned: it was 200 copies per mL of blood. If you are still worried, you could add further protection by starting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for yourself. It's very likely that there are PrEP clinics in D.F. You would have the option, subject to practices in Mexico, of intermittent dosing (taking 2 Truvada pills 24 to 2 hours before sex, then 1 pill every 24 hours for 48 hours after the sex sexual encounter) or daily dosing (7 day lead-in recommended to achieve maximum concentration in blood and in rectal tissue, but no data on penile tissue concentration, for tops). If you are curious about PrEP, you may find the US Centers for Disease Control PrEP Guidelines, 2021 updated edition, informative. The US CDC guidelines are long and technical at first glance, but they are organized in such a way that you can find answers about specific aspects of PrEP care. They reference, and are based on, the best available research. [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2021.pdf You could then compare equivalent information resources from Mexican health authorities. One suggestion: Please don't hesitate to open a new thread with a question like yours. The present thread is so old that the information has changed significantly. When this thread was active, the PARTNER 2 study for gay men had not yet been completed. Even now, there are new developments in HIV prevention and treatment every day. If you choose to start a new thread about a topic that was discussed years ago, you can insert a link to the old thread in your first post in the new thread. You can also add a post to the old thread with a link to the new, as a cross-reference. Last but not least, your regular medical professional, or a medical professional at a gay-friendly health clinic, is a good resource for medical questions. Online forums are not a substitute for professional medical advice. Happy fucking! 😈

I'm trying so hard to conclude that gay men's fetishizing straight men isn't a big deal, but you are right. Your observation about the fetish pecking order made me laugh. Here are words I remember, verbatim, from a gay erotic story that I read either in a print magazine (which dates it to 25+ years ago) or online in the Nifty archive (which means it might be a few years more recent): "... but this cock was the real thing. It had made babies. ..." To add to my amusement, the one student in my graduate program who was married and had a child bragged about the same thing, in a non-sexual context. "I've proved my masculinity. I've made a baby." No one could tell him that we saw how tired and unhappy he was from being married and having a new baby, when the other graduate students were fucking and having fun. I couldn't tell him that I'd read his line previously, in a gay porn story.

This brings up another point of caution. There are many wonderful people and beautiful places in Texas, but from a legal perspective, it's a risky place for a GLBT person to choose to move to. Wherever you move, be sure to check for local or preferably state-level anti-discrimination laws covering employment and housing, if not also services that businesses offer to the public. Texas has no state-level protections for GLBT people, and has sought to override local protections. I don't remember the outcome of that effort, but it is a template that bigoted lawmakers have used successfully in several states. You don't want the risk that your landlord could evict you because they, a neighbor, or a security camera spots you bringing guys home, or because you ask to add a future boyfriend, partner or husband to your lease. On the employment front, you don't want any employer — even a remote one — to be able to terminate you for being gay. (Most employment in the US is at-will, so most workers can be terminated without cause, but anti-discrimination protections stop employers from terminating you just because they find out that you are gay.) If you end up living in Texas and your company has an office in Texas, it will be easy for them to apply the state's lax employment laws. Even if your company has no nexus with Texas, someone bent on discrimination might argue that the employment laws of the state where you are doing the work, and not the laws of the state where your company is headquartered, apply. The combination of remote work on a large scale and discriminatory state politics is new, untested, and unpredictable. Income tax laws of the state where you do the work definitely do apply (for example).

@hntnhole, never feel intimidated by the technology! Alway try a different browser, or switch between cell phone and computer, if something doesn't work as expected. As a software professional (I haven't focused on the Web for 20 years, but it is always a part of the environment in the companies I work for), I find it frustrating that even when a company makes the investment to take browser quirks into account (perhaps by relying on manual testing on disparate systems, or by using the kind of cross-reference I mentioned), code workarounds meant to fix an issue in one browser may cause problems in another. Alas, no interactive Web site, however thoughtfully programmed, will work perfectly in all browsers, and no browser will work perfectly for all Web sites. On a related note, will your service dispatch a handsome and ideally fuckable computer support technician if you call? 😈 In a favorite movie of mine from the 1970s, the wife in a swinging couple deliberately breaks the phone so that a technician will come. She is rewarded with a phone connection that works better than ever before, plus a five-way involving her husband, the young, bi-curious married couple they've been trying to seduce, and the phone repair technician, with souvenir stills captured on a Polaroid camera!

This is true for most people, and if you've experienced it, I am sorry you had to go through it. But it's not true for all of us. I get turned on when someone I'm with is cheating. I cheated (only physically, never emotionally) on my husband for years, when he stopped putting out. He ended up cheating emotionally with a guy he met online. In spite of the emotional impact of the imminent end of our 9-year marriage, I was extremely turned on each time I overheard him jerking off on cam with his online lover. It was not just my surprise at my husband's rapid sexual reawakening (he'd fallen in love with the online guy after only two weeks), but also the thought that this guy was soon going to be fucking my husband regularly and enjoying his ass just as I (and some threesome buddies) had done years before. My body's response — arousal — seems paradoxical, but it's not. In Sperm Wars, evolutionary biologist Robyn Baker points out that (hetero) men who have been away for a few days (as they would have been when hunting) and who suspect their (female) partners of cheating have a strong desire to fuck upon returning. Physically, the ridge around the head of the penis serves to pump out the interloper's semen, and the man's ejaculate will contain more, and more vigorous, sperm than in the case of a routine fuck. For me, cheating is hot, whether I'm doing it or it's being done to me. (That said, I reject cheating as a concept because I don't believe any partner has the right to regulate another partner's sexual behavior. I am in an open relationship today and will never enter into another monogamous/traditional relationship.)

Even if he's conflicted, I bet he appreciates being able to slide in with no lube and no need to start off gentle. 😈 Do you think about the last guy while your husband is fucking you?

Congratulations on your new, remote job, @Breedingandseeding, and on being deliberate about living in a place where you can do something you love: fucking! I'm going to make a contrarian suggestion. Take a gay-friendly metropolitan region like the San Francisco Bay Area, find cities within the region that have effective rent control, and then find a simple but adequate rent controlled apartment. The starting rent may seem high relative to your salary today, but if you choose a place you like and you attend to the legal details over the course of a long tenancy, your rent will rise more slowly than your income. Most jurisdictions with local or state rent control exempt units built after a certain date, so as not to discourage new apartment construction. This means searching for older housing stock. Also, rent control laws usually do not apply to single-family dwellings such as houses and condominium units, or properties with a small number of units, such as a large house that has been divided into 2 or 3 flats or a house with a granny flat (an "accessory dwelling unit") in the back yard. The theory is that tenants have closer relationships with individual landlords, and can negotiate. Though flats and ADUs may be cheap initially, and though you might form a great relationship with the current owner, there's no guarantee that rent increases will be affordable — especially if ownership changes someday. If rent control becomes a component of your financial security and of your happiness (in that it affords you a chance to live where you want to live), it's crucial to stay informed. Jurisdictions with rent control may offer workshops, and they can definitely field questions about the status of specific rental buildings and units, and about no-cause eviction protections and caps on rent increases (you need both to have any possibility of being secure). A tenants' organization may also have information. Keep every document associated with your tenancy, including proof of every rent payment. I don't recommend straying far from gay-friendly metropolitan areas. There are hidden costs to living far away from gay life. Not having a place to rest, freshen up, or take a shower while you're in town, and then getting home late at night, is inconvenient and tiring. Traveling to meet people or attend events is expensive. Ultimately, the need to travel reduces social opportunities. Loneliness and isolation (if they occur, as a result of living far away from kinds of people you like to spend time with) can harm your health, even reducing your performance at work, and thus, your income growth. I focus on the cumulative impact of reduced access to health care, and of lower-quality care. Gay men who fuck a lot have better health outcomes if they see medical providers who have experience serving lots of GLBT patients. Knowing that you, and the hot young guy you fucked a week ago, can walk in to San Francisco City Clinic for no- or low-cost, shame-free STI testing and treatment, same-day PrEP initiation, PEP in case of a fundamentally risky exposure, and same-day ART if you are newly Poz, is worth a lot. (There are similar public or non-profit clinics in DC, Los Angeles, New York, Boston, Atlanta, and a few other big US cities, although San Francisco's stands out for providing the most up-to-date medical care. You want a jurisdiction that spends money on public health, and a clinic whose staff also do research work.) Access to sexual health care aside, consider carefully what the health insurance landscape looks like in the state you'll be moving to. What will a decent Affordable Care Act plan cost you, after subsidies? Has the state expanded Medicaid, providing a safety net in case your income ever drops? Will you have to travel for general medical care? All of these factors can affect your cost. A suburban, rural, or small-city environment with low rents might not turn out to be a cheaper place to live.

For people who use Safari, especially in iOS but also in MacOS, you will have to go to Website Settings and then turn Use Content Blockers off to successfully use some features of Breeding Zone. In iOS, start by tapping the AA icon on the left side of the address bar. Note that Apple, Mozilla (which provides the Firefox Web browser) and Google (which provides Chrome) have all introduced tracking protection options that can interfere with dynamic content such as menus. The approaches differ, the level of strictness differs, and the default scope differs, but your browser's (site-specific and overall) anti-tracking protections are the first thing to check. Someone assumed earlier that Apple's Safari browser must be exhibiting a non-standard and incorrect behavior. The notion that one browser is correct and another, wrong doesn't make much sense anymore. There are few cases where one can point to a specific violation of a W3C standard -- and doing so requires research and extensive testing. More often than not, differences in browser behavior revolve around ambiguities in W3C standards, different interpretations of the same standard, or implementation details (behaviors that a standard deliberately doesn't specify). Once again, we have a normative versus descriptive issue. Those of us who work in software know that there are numerous projects and tools whose purpose is to describe and track differences in browser behavior. Every browser has quirks. The notion of a canonical Web browser died several decades ago, when Netscape introduced Navigator, to compete with the NCSA's Mosaic browser. There was no JavaScript back then, no CSS, no dynamic HTML, no DOM, etc., HTML itself consisted of a short, clear specification, and yet the first two browsers already exhibited some different behaviors. Thankfully, users have a choice of many platforms, browsers, and even browser versions. If a particular site doesn't work well in Safari, try Firefox, Chrome, or even Edge. Check whether you're running the latest version. Sometimes no browser running on iOS, Anroid, ChromeOS or another mobile platform will work, and it's necessary to use a personal computer-based version...of the same browser! I hope that this provides some insight.