Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,502

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. hntnhole
    I think this ^ statement gets to the crux of the issue. To less secure-minded folks, the world seems to be careening out of control: Russia on the march, financial instabilities, commodity scarceness, unreliable trade agreements, governments struggling to stem the tide, often seemingly unable to deal with important issues, on and on. This has been increasingly clear for several years now, and only becoming more obvious. More emotionally secure folks are concerned, but not losing their ability to keep the unsettled in it's proper perspective. There is hope that people of good will can right the ship in more self-confident men and women. When an era of disruption of what's been the norm seems imminent, insecure folks tend to lash out at anything around them, without considering the negative value of their actions. Without a firm belief-system (I mean, personal - not institutional) of hope, enlightenment to hang on to, some folks simply succumb to a sense of ennui - which is when the real despots can take advantage and create genuine havoc. But there's always hope too.
  2. hntnhole
    Of course this is true. What is also true, is that we vary widely in the manner we enjoy sex. Some men love X, some men love Y, and some men love the entire alphabet. Yes, we have much in common, and we have a wide pool of ways to express out sexuality too. There are men who are deeply in love with another man, and have mind-blowing sex with their loved one. There are men who love their One and Only, and never find outside sex appealing. There are men who find polyamory thrilling, and men that don't. There are men that find that "connection" with only one, and men that find it in a pile of rutting men. Who's to say one is better (or less confused?) than the other? Certainly not me. There's room for everyone, and men that see things differently deserve just as much value, to have their lives upheld, and enjoy acceptance from all of us. While it may be true that some guys write "can you top this" stuff on this site and there's room for that here on BZ. The point is, do what makes you happiest, and share that with everyone else. If some guy reads something he doesn't care for - well, no one is forcing him to read it in the first place. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
  3. hntnhole
    Welllllll ..... there is, of course, the question of skill involved in this question. It did serve to recall a semi-regular years ago who, somehow - was able to relax his throat to the point that there was no muscular resistance, only the flesh, which gave way fairly easily. That was fun. Then, there's the issue of the teeth. If the bottom has a particularly wide "bite", it might be ok. If not, as the old saying goes - sticks and stones may break my bones, but teeth will definitely break my enthusiasm ...... or something like that.
  4. hntnhole
    Your point is well taken. As to the others (Protestant - i.e. Luther derived), the method of teaching racism was less overt, and thus more insidious. "They" (meaning P.O.C.) simply weren't mentioned. The R.C's were heavily denigrated in the most overt fashion (after all - they worship statues - which I was quite literally taught as a little kid in Sunday School), they don't have to be sorry for their sins, because they only have to pay money and count beads, and then they can go do whatever it was all over again. This, when we were taught that every single little thing we ever, ever did wrong was written down in some impossibly enormous book in the sky, and we would have to answer for every single entry under our individual name. I clearly remember someone asking something in Sunday School - can't recall just what - about the people on the other side of the river dividing the city I grew up in - and the answer came that "they stay over there, we stay over here on our side". This shit was literally taught to little kids. So, generations upon generations of mostly Northern-European-derived Americans were inculcated with the notion that "the other" simply was not relevant to "our" lives. We wind up therefore, with Caucasians today who can actually say shit like "I didn't own any slaves - it's not my fault". And this was in the second-largest metro area outside of Chicago. With this kind of nurturing of kids, it's hardly a wonder that we find ourselves where we are these days.
  5. hntnhole
    There are some verrrry tasty Holes around BZ ..... so when's the BZ Convention scheduled for ???
  6. hntnhole
    As you are so very well aware, we are of one mind about this. It's one thing to go hit the backrooms/fuckjoints, and occasionally share something akin to The Connection you describe so beautifully. It's a whole 'nother kettle of fish to be fortunate enough to live it on a daily basis. It's apples vs oranges - tartare vs canned tuna - mating vs fucking. I'd gladly give every damn thing I own to see that mischievious little smile one more time ....
  7. hntnhole
    LOL ..... Well said !!!
  8. hntnhole
    I would suggest that what is obvious is not the comprehensiveness of my reading, but rather your lack of it.
  9. hntnhole
    If I may offer a suggestion? It may prove more productive to simply mention that your sweet, brown, foreskinned dick belongs to someone else, who enjoys your sweeter-still beautiful ass being rawfucked and pumped full of Sperm. It may not be totally true, but it may very well get you more BreedCock up what is surely a most-deserving and delicious Hole.
  10. hntnhole
    Ok. That clears that up. I'm guessing that it's some sort of "fashion" statement in your neck of the woods. by bottoms that are unsure of how to "present". In my experience, gear like chastity devices are mostly used to focus the bottom's attention - for instance, away from one thing in favor of another, and principally within the context of a Bd/Sm scene - which would never take place in a bath house or fuckjoint. The purposes of each are diametrically opposed. So, to answer the original question, no. I would maybe give the guy wearing a chastity device a sidelong glance as I passed by, and that's about it. I would consider it a statement of (perhaps unwittingly) confusion by the bottom and steer clear. Thanks for the explanation.
  11. hntnhole
    I've read a number of his books/letters, and he's magnificent. Also, Bonhoeffer's writings, in the same vein. If we don't learn from those who faced similar (for those to, far worse) challenges, how can we avoid making the same mistakes?
  12. hntnhole
    I'm unclear about the question: Chastity device placed on the bottom's Cock? Or a belt w/dildo, thus blocking access to his Hole ........ I've seen (even used occasionally) both - but only in "scenes" at home. I can't think of ever seeing something like this in the fuckjoints ..... If a Dad places some "instrument of focus" on his boy, and then whores him out, great - but that would hardly imply chasteness - it would demand the opposite.
  13. hntnhole
    You're 100% correct. There is. There are certain "faith-traditions" in the US that not only excuse, but actually support White Privilege, which is at the root of the national debacle taking place. These are not the "mainline" denominations, such as Lutheran, Presbyterian, Episcopalian, etc. These are smallish, loosely confederated denominations, and mostly in the South. These cultural organizations-cum-churches have tacitly as well as actively supported institutionalized racism since before there even was a USA. Thus, the roots of racism are deeply imbedded in the stolen land of this country, and I wonder if they will ever die. Racism has been so carefully tended, taught overtly and covertly in this country, I doubt it will ever die. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't try as hard as we can. As you might imagine, I reserve my deepest disdain for Romanism, but the others are hardly blameless. You're also correct in blaming the cultural divisions on various sources of information. I think it's human nature to seek out others of our own mindset, and the online sewers of disinformation have only exacerbated the problem. I too am guilty, in that I never watch the Fox channel (unless there's a good game being broadcast). I have never used any of the so-called services like facebook, tweaker, instagram, all the rest. Frankly, I just don't have time to waste on it, and I saw it for what it was years ago. These "social media" sites are nothing more than funnels, aiming people into their own little corrals of shallow sloganeering, in my humble opinion. Rather, I subscribe to publications (print or electronic) that I know have no political axe to grind, and present issues in a balanced way. Thanks for your interesting responses.
  14. hntnhole
    The fact that these pinch-faced creatures on the SCOTUS had to reach that far back into history to find hateful enough legislative hooks to hang their white sheets and hoods on is the result of this Nation failing to address the hellish issue of enslaving an entire race of human beings, fighting a terrible civil war over that depravity, and then failing to put in place institutions to ameliorate that grave error. The chickens are finally - after over 400 years - coming home to roost, and the price of supporting the filth of White Privilege will be very steep indeed. Perhaps too steep to be paid-in-full .... and we're the ones who must choose decency over depravity now.
  15. hntnhole
    Of course it should. In any civilized society that should always be the case. Unfortunately, there are a substantial number of citizens in the US that have never been taught to think for themselves: they've been taught to fall in line behind someone who declares them self to be The Leader. It is the complete surrender of their humanity, their intelligence, their self-worth, and their value to society. When a group of people jettison their humanity, in favor of being in some cult, well .... the result was clearly demonstrated a bit to your East 100 years ago. You're 100% correct: it should. But when good-faith negotiation evaporates, so do the institutions that bind the people together into one nation.
  16. hntnhole
    Well, Biden will be even older when he's sworn in to a second term (if he runs). So, for a thought-exercise: Assuming Biden doesn't run, that would put Kamela Harris as the front-runner for the Democratic nominee. I've noticed that since she became Veep, she has substantially muted her comments, but I well remember that she's got a heavy-duty tongue, and not afraid to unleash it. Remember: The presidential primaries last time around were not kind to President Biden. It was Jim Clybourne of SC who single-handedly gave the nomination to Biden because of his stature within the Southern States. Those of us who supported the current Sec'y of Transportation knew - within a minute - that Biden would get the nomination, once Clybourne started to speak that night. So, if there's to be a fight in the next cycle, and I reckon there will be, if Kamela goes to bat against Cheeto-Head (may heaven forbid, since hopefully he'll be in the clink for good) or Death-Santis, or any of the other hatemongers, I wouldn't bet against her. That lady has bigger balls than almost every one of us.
  17. hntnhole
    Well done !!! And please don't forget to report it's inaugural use !!! 😈
  18. hntnhole
    AND which second part has been so heavily altered through the centuries by human constructs of repression - such as the R.C. Church - and subsequent to Luther, splintered into dozens of even more fractious belief-systems, of which only the barest handful currently reflect the original Message. There are actually smallish congregations (particularly in the South) that actually believe that the one they claim to follow was - - - wait for it - - - Caucasian !!! White as a sheet of paper !!! This, in an attempt to defend their perverse belief in the depravity of "White Privilege".
  19. hntnhole
    I just noticed this question. It's because each Federal judge that's nominated to the SCOTUS must appear before the US Senate for confirmation (to the high court), which is preceded by individual meetings with Senators. Mr. Thomas, during that process, was asked many questions by most Senators in these private meetings whether he concurred that R.v.W. was "Correctly Decided, Standing Law". The asshole lied to each Senator, saying he agreed that it was, just so he could be confirmed to the High Court. So, he knew perfectly well that if he told the truth, he wouldn't be elevated - so he simply lied. Over the years, the tradition of Senate confirmation has become somewhat of a smiling, nodding, not-worth-much type of action. Yes, some Senators took it seriously, grilled the nominee(s) extensively, and voted against confirmation, and those Senators are to be thanked for taking this as seriously as they did. Some others, however - for instance, Susan Collins (R, Maine, since 1997), treated the confirmation process more like having milk & cookies with the nominees. Now, with the Senate so closely divided, and with that old relic of the "Jim Crow" years - the contrivance of the "filibuster" still standing - the minority can prevent the majority from passing any kind of legislation at all. Worse, to overcome a filibuster, 2/3 of the Senate must concur to override a filibuster. That kind of unity simply doesn't exist in the Senate these days. It's become a cesspool of infighting, preserving their fund-raising abilities, and center stage for the battles to come. Hope this helps answer such an excellent question.
  20. hntnhole
    While he was still alive, if he started to jerk his Cock I jumped his bones then and there (at home). When he noticed my Cock getting hard in my pants, he hit his knees in an eyeblink. I don't think either of us ever jacked off privately .... often, even while in the office, that mischievous little smile would surface, and that was all it took.
  21. hntnhole
    Ditto. 100%. I much prefer an experienced bottom that has learned his craft to some pretty young thing with his head up his ass. This is particularly off-putting, as I see it. There is little respect for what I call Learned-Life-Lessons" that accrue to men (and, sometimes the other gender) that have learned from living their lives. In this country, we seem to almost worship youthfulness, in all it's ignorance. The places I hunt for Hole seldom have many twinks clotting up the works. I don't happen to pine away for the days when I was young - I'm fairly comfortable with having been through all that, learned a lot about living life, and I like men that have made similar accomplishments. I don't respect the assumptions that young men make relative to older men, but I definitely do respect older men that have learned it's all about sharing - not just taking.
  22. hntnhole
    Could someone take away that photo of Mr and Mrs Thomas, just after he received the Official Hatemonger's Award? It's burned my eyes several time while scrolling, reading these excellent responses .....
  23. hntnhole
    Certainly true. Your guess didn't occur to me (fucker was my guess), which I thought a bit generous, given that I'm one. If your guess is the correct one, and it may well be, it's definitely regrettable.
  24. hntnhole
    I think that should apply across the board. I haven't seriously considered it previously, but ......
  25. hntnhole
    Well, it's Saturday night - all you guys have a pervectly filthy night of it !!! I'll do my best too !!!

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.