hntnhole

I don't think there are any rules specifically for darkrooms. Just the common courtesies we'd extend to anyone, anywhere. When someone gropes you, but you're aiming at someone else, a gentle hand on his is enough. The whole point of a darkroom is to remove all the stimuli that are usually present. It's definitely not kosher for one bottom on a fuckbench, waiting for a Cock, to reach over to the guy getting fucked next to him and try to yank the Cock out of the neighbor and guide it to his own Hole - and that's actually happened to me. It's definitely not kosher to fail in one's <polite cough> "preparations. A Hole full of shit can clear the whole darkroom out in one damn hurry, and it's a thoughtless, selfish thing to do. Just the common manners apply, in the darkrooms as everywhere else. Generally there's not much talking, but I don't think there's anything wrong with talking Breedshit quietly to a Hole you're fucking, or the guy who's fucking a Hole right next to you. My first experience was at the recently passed Mans Country in Chicago. Off the snackbar there was a long, narrow corridor called Pig Alley, which wasn't totally dark. You could see other guys via ambient light at each end, and more clearly the nearer either end you happened to be. This was well before hiv came along, and guys would do anything to each other they felt like doing. Wanda Lust's* room off the stage in the music hall occasionally served as a darkroom, but at her invitation only. There was also a darkroom at the first incarnation of Steamworks, over on Broadway in boystown. The name escapes me - it was bought out fairly early on and changed to Steamworks, but while it was under the first owners there was a very dark darkroom, which was always popular. While (being slim) I liked the steam room best, I hit that darkroom for a while every time I went there. Lots of sucking/fucking, groping, etc etc. In FL, some of the bars/tubs have excellent darkrooms, and depending on the hour, can be full of men rutting in each other's Holes. There are a few guest houses that still have them too. But the best one, as far as I'm concerned, is Slammer. That darkroom is quite small now, but totally dark. One navigates via braille, since there can be a guy rutting in a Hole inches from you, and you can't see anything. The moans and groans (occasionally much louder) do help indicate where the action is, but usually it's so full of guys that one has to be very careful not to trip over some guy. Hands can reach out and feel you up, and you can't even tell which guy it is. Mouths can start to suck your Cock, and you can only feel the head - can't even see it. You feel up the asses, finger-probe the Holes, and slowly slide your feet up to the Hole, so as not to kick/step on some other guy. For guys that love this kind of sex, it's 1000000000 % fan-fukkin-tastic !!! I think one of the reasons I like darkrooms so much, is they reduce all the variables to the lowest common denominator. No one knows how good-looking (or not) the other guys are, so no one cares. No one knows much of anything, other than there are men busy doing what they're driven to do. Rutting/Mating/Breeding with joyful abandon. What more can any guy ask for ..... It's all about Cock/Hole/Sperm *Wanda Lust was a famous Chicago drag queen, whose trademark was a brilliantly red wig. Stephen was one of those gentle souls who developed a superbly viperous tongue in reaction to the criticisms most D.Q.'s get accustomed to. He died in Kansas City - of all places - when he and a trick went to see a movie, someone seated behind them started in on him, Wanda turned around and verbally flamed the guy, at which point he knifed her to death. RIP, sweet boy. On a lighter note, once some guy with a really big hard Cock was lying in the middle of the empty dance floor in midday, on his back, when Wanda came out of her room by the stage. She was all dolled up, but walked over to this guy - rock-hard Cock pointing to the sky - lifted her dress and sat down in one fell swoop on this guy's Cock. That's when I learned about the "peter principal" - "take it when it's there for the taking".

Apology hardly needed at all. The above example is well constructed, sound thought-leading, and perfectly spelled. So are all your other interesting submissions/responses.

I had no idea that's why so many guys appear to have never attended grammar school. It's the drugs they're using !!! Here I had been blaming the sagging state of public education for the atrocious spelling, sentence construction, flow-of-reasoning, etc. My apologies to grammar school teachers everywhere !!!

I'm assuming that this gear is worn only when you're at a fuckjoint, private fuckparty, etc. So. This cage you wear is intended to warn others that your Cock is "hands-off", correct? Wouldn't a mere "no thanks", when some guy grabs your Cock, be enough? I get that it's fun to wear gear - particularly impressive items. It's your experience that even while wearing some clearly visible "hands-off" device, you still get guys grabbing at your Cock? My answer to the question was related to the limits the bottom has visibly stated, by wearing the chastity gear in the first place. I understand that some guys simply don't understand that a bottom isn't there to be handled any way a Top pleases. That's disrespectful at the very least, and deserves to be called out. In the context of a "scene", any guy touching something he shouldn't would definitely get called out by the man conducting the scene - maybe even kicked out.

I can cum again, after the first time, but there's not as much "evidence" the second time. After two though, I'm ready to do something else for a while.

You're not the only one .....

One bottom. Not that watching one T get in a number of Holes wouldn't be fun, but - given that choice - one bottom servicing many Cocks.

Yes, there's an enormous base of locals. This entire sprawl of urban/suburban/exurban population has an appreciably larger percentage of gay men, gay households, gay property/business/owners that most other areas in the country. Only the largest gay "mecca's" would enjoy more than the greater Ft. Lauderdale area. Sure, we locals fuck each other, hook-ups or in the fuckjoints, but there are always travelers here for sex too. That's a salivatingly hot pose you've assumed in your photo - maybe you should cum for a visit !!! Around here .......... It's all about Cock/Hole/Sperm

I guess I'd put them in reverse order to that listed above. Favorite would be "emergency fuck", since it implies a lot of what I like and do anyway. Second-favorite would be "urgent fuck", since the mating ritual can be completed, but perhaps not savored in any lengthy way. Third-favorite would be the "bed-fuck", but it does have attractive qualities too - luxuriating in the Lust, Breeding repeatedly, wallowing in the pigpen as long as both guys want to. A perfect way to spend a rainy day.

I'm finding it interesting ... thanks for the post !!

That sounds like the very definition of "open minded" to me ...... just sayin ......

When considering the effectiveness of PReP, take into consideration the danger of a crash while driving, walking across the street and getting run down, slipping and cracking your head open in the shower, all kinds of stuff. Then, balance those risks against the above-mentioned reductions in risk of hiv, and you'll wind up with a fairly impressive appreciation of how PReP can protect you from hiv. Nothing is fool-proof, we're all going to ditch at some point from something, and the way I see it, taking easily-accomplished steps with impressive track records of protection so I can live my life on my terms is - well - a no-brainer. Sure, you'll pick up some treatable bugs once in a while. Get regular testing, get rid of the bugs, and keep fucking. The way I see it, a small price to pay for living the life I need to live.

Welcome, BigBearSean Thanks for your insightful commentary. Most appreciated and well thought out. As to the "fuck that asshole" comment, that's waaaay too generous of you .....

Actually, if I were the cinematographer, EVERYONE ON EARTH would know !!! Obviously, I'd put a "squiggle" (or whatever it's called) on your face so you wouldn't pay the price, but they definitely would. I wound have to admit - if I saw a couple of them at the tubs taking loads, I'd probably add mine. ... 5 or 7, maaaaaybe ... expecially if you'd already been "visiting" with them ....

Please do !!! The first three are definitely rarified and refined !!!

Thanks .... I knew the wrap-up would be well worth the wait !!! That elusive "connection" doesn't happen all that often, which makes it all the more precious when it does.

#'s 2 and 4 will be eeeeasy pickins: the wrestler wrecker and "our dancing daughter" are already well-established (if closeted) gays. #1 is all yours: Not me, not for anything. #3 doesn't deserve a second glance, let alone your magnificent obsessions. #5, welllllll ... maaaybe I'd second the motion, provided a large gag was handy. #6, I'd rather take that curling iron off his head and shove it where you intend to leave your calling card, so check to see if I beat you to it before you ... well ... #7, Not in my nightest-of-mares. #8, I'd rather never Breed a Hole again, than get within 30 yards of that total p.o.s. I WILL, however, be your cinematographer ......

Beautifully said, PhoenixGeoff. Thanks.

I think that we have "inborn" aims/goals/alignments that only surface when we become sexually aware. That can happen at any age, of course, but at some point relatively early in our lives we begin to sense that we're more interested in one (T or b) than the other. There are many equally interested in both, and more power to them. Maybe I'm wrong, but the instinct to fuck other men - or get fucked by men - is something that's waiting for the right time to surface in our consciousness. At some point, maybe in (grade school?) little girls stop hating boys, and boys begin to notice girls. It just happens to straight kids, so why not the same for us? We begin to notice other boys, maybe not even sure why, and that "notice" eventually awakens our sexual Lust. It's said that the gene that controls sexuality is passed from the mother, which would imply that it's something that's there from birth. Just as our Cocks begin to sprout, get hard, pubes start to grow, and sexual maturity begins, the object of our sexual needs also becomes apparent. Once clarity dawns, it's off to a wonderful life of sating those Lusts, and it's really nothing more than becoming the men we were born to become. Or is that too simplistic?

It's the guy, his personality, his commitment to a life of honesty, recognizing and reveling in personhood, needing and having raw sex with many men that counts most; not whether or not he's poz. That's an ancillary issue.

LOL ..... Seeya in a couple of months then !!! Conversely, if that was a typo, enjoy the whole damn double-chocolate cake !!!

We'll be waiting patiently !!! (hmmmm .... no pun intended)

Well, I must say - that was as professional, clear, and incisive an explanation I've read here. Kudos, and thanks so much for that very comprehensive, intelligent reply. If I wore a hat, it would be off to you right now.

By which statement, he invited a State - any State - to bring the challenge to other privacy rights to the SCOTUS for reconsideration. Mr. Thomas has made clear what his pre-determined judgement will be, and is hardly open minded on the issue of Constitutional rights hinged on privacy rights as set forth in the Constitution. Of course, he seems to have forgotten that certain right to privacy dealing with interracial marriage, since it would deprive him of "his best friend". All the others though, are on his chopping block - he has said so, and in explicit terms.

I try not to use the 'dislike' response much at all. There are occasions within a thread however, when some guy proves intractable in his discourse - almost like throwing word-hand-grenades at others with whom he disagrees. If that happens, I just skip reading those submissions, and read/respond to other, less antagonizing guys thoughts. I've only used the block-function once; and I haven't seen any of his mess since. Unfortunately, there are some folks that simply insist on uncouth behavior, but fortunately there are only a handful of them, and easily denied attention. All of that said, I think the "thumbs down" is useful, when used sparingly, and I hope it remains, since I don't think some little doo-dad possesses the power to "stifle" the exchange of ideas, perceptions, or thoughts. We use the "thumbs up" doo-dad far more often than the thumbs down anyway, which I find most appropriate. Thanks for your thoughts.