hntnhole

First, thanks for the information, guys. I can't say I understand it yet, but a challenge is always worthy of the mental exercise. While I've never even seen a "language?) like that, it's always good to learn new things. I'll try .... Assuming that the partner does not know: cheating: (I'll have to mess around with the computer looking for those symbols) implies fun, but there may be costs. cheating implies not ethical: that is the implication, without further definition of terms. not cheating implies no fun: intrinsically correct, but a bit vague for a definitive answer. You already know what the parameters I would endorse. For clarity: when I was in high school, algebra was a required subject for the higher-ed "track-system" (remember that?) As it happens, the librarian of the high school was also my mother, and she and the algebra teacher, an old, single woman nearing retirement, were coffee-break-buddies. Thus, the algebra teacher felt comfortable asking if I were doing the homework, knowing my mom would answer truthfully. As it also happens, I spent a lot of time each night trying to understand algebra. Of course, my mom reported that yes, I was spending hours at it. At exam time, I flunked algebra completely, but - thanks to the friendship - the algebra teacher passed me with a D, since she knew I'd been seriously trying. She also told my mother - which was shared with me by mom - that the teacher had said to my mom that "very occasionally I run across a student whose mind simply doesn't comprehend algebra, and I'll pass your son with a D, since I know he's got other talents, and I don't want to keep him out of the college-bound track". Thus, while Everest looms before me, and my name isn't Edmund - yet, I'll try. Since I telling tales out of school, one more quickie: I wanted to try out for the football team, and stubbornly insisted. My mother also knew the football coach (natch), and marched into his office and for-fucking-bade him to let me on the team. She was only trying to prevent her skinny kid from being broken into pieces of course, but I did resent being offered golf, tennis, and finally accepted the track and swim teams.

Both ErosWired and backdoorjimmy raise a valid point, and thanks for raising the issue. It seems we need to define the word predator with some specifics. For clarity, here's one from MW: "an animal that lives by killing and eating other animals : an animal that preys on other animals predators like bears and wolves and another, compliments of BBC: "A predator is an animal that hunts, kills and eats other animals for food. Prey is a term used to describe organisms that predators kill for food. Predator/prey relationships can be illustrated in a diagram called a food chain or food web" Now, We are not reflective of either of those definitions. While there may be some validity in some guys calling themselves "predators, or predatory" within the context of men having sex, the real definition of that word is being stretched to the limit. We don't fuck, then kill each other. Some of us do go "hunting" in the fuckjoints, and maybe some of us misuse the word. I'll accept the blame, since I may very well have used the word in an inappropriate manner somewhere along the line. If that's the case, it most definitely wasn't in a bloodthirsty context. That in no way conflates with the actual definition though; we're "hunting" for willing partners to fuck. They wouldn't be there, ass up, if they weren't "on the hunt" for Cocks to Breed them. That said, there is never, ever, ever any excuse for deliberately harming another human being (unless society determines that shall happen according to the law). Thus, perhaps we could describe predatory acts as aggressive, destructive, threatening, disruptive, offensive, disturbing, to name a few. While these are not complimentary at all, at least they don't imply killing each other. We're all about exchanging pleasure, each guy has what the other guy needs.

I couldn't agree more !!! Dull guys are good for some things, but intelligence, honesty, integrity, is really sexy ......

But. There is an even more powerful act which could accomplish that and so much more. It's called VOTING. Crucial at the local level, critical at the State level, and of utmost importance at the Federal level.

There is an easy way around this. Any business of decent size retains a professional CPA service, which assigns numerical codes to all areas of expense that particular company incures. Thus, whether electronic or actual checks written to pay various invoices, the specific accounting code is also entered, which information is for the CPA firm only. When desired, these codes can be "double-protected", in that the initial numerical code leads only to another one. The point is to make it as difficult as possible for any outside agency to unearth the actual purpose of the payable. Plus, there are other ways to compensate the CPA firm, particularly when it's a gay-owned/operated company, and I don't mean fucking them. As it happens, my partner and I had a weekend place, and twice a year we invited the accountant and his other half to spend some time there. Purely as friends, of course.

It was quite chilly again yesterday, and Chris came over last night as well - and brought a little present with him. I think I may have fucked the "present" before, and fortunately I had the playsheet under the sheets. We had a pervectly filthy time of it for the second night in a row. The present was a hot-holed Hispanic guy, with a great hairy Hole - one of my very favorites. Chris and I both rutted in him, ate his Hole together, fucked him some more and then shared each other's Sperm up that sweet hairy Hole. It's only a queen-sized bed, and the three of us actually slept together off and on, but the sensation of a mouth on my Cock did wake me up a couple of times. Of course, I was guilty of the same ... Now where did I put that bottle of cum-stain-remover .... the washing machine is calling those sheets ... loudly 😒 It's all about Cock/Hole/Sperm

Yikes .... math was never my strong suit; I'd never seen that symbol before. Is there such a thing as a dictionary (cross-referenced) for these symbols? I'd buy one in an eyeblink. After reading fskn's contributions, I thought that's what he must have meant, but I wanted to ask you math-whizzes to be sure. And yes, I'm sure he is ......

I think that in all relationships there is some sort of "power dynamics" involved. The question is, are they acted upon. Usually, one guy is at least somewhat dominant, which attracts somewhat subs, and vice versa. That inborn bent, however, doesn't need to be the foundational aspect of the relationship; merely loving, caring for each other is an even more powerful dynamic. Often an innately D can/will restrain his natural dominance somewhat, in favor of demonstrating his love for the partner. After all, he can exercise his dominance in the backrooms/fuckjoints, with tricks (agreed upon within the relationship), fuckbuds, whatever. Love is worth every ounce of effort to protect, nurture and grow with. A loving relationship is as much a partnership too, with Love being the Dom, and everything else always serves the Principal Cock ... right ??? 😁 Thanks for the clarification re: symbols.

Last night / this morning. Here in SoFl, we're going through a substantial cold-wave, and my fb Chris doesn't have a furnace at his place - only space heaters. He asked if he could come over and spend the night, to which I replied "of course". I like him, we have similar tastes is sexual depravity, occasionally we go to Slammer together, but usually I go to his place or he comes here. Often he has some hot-holed bottom over there, and calls me. So, we had some fun last night Breeding each other, eating each other's Hole, and sucked each other off this morning. And, when I took the dog out this morning, I left the computer on, and he was sniffing around BZ. Maybe he'll join up !!

Actually, I think it's the pattern of behavior that's addictive. Sperm, in an of itself, isn't addictive - only the lust that drives the behavior which is rewarded by Cocks pumping loads into your mouth or Hole is the "addictive" component.

You flatter that circus-barker, and I dare not go into it further lest I get thrown off this site .....

First, fskn, thanks for moving the thread. Secondly, thanks for the very well informed post. Clearly you know more than most about these problems. To the listed items: 1) lost insurance 2) decreased risk 3&4) precarious housing and employment: 1. These are social depravities, with strong, debilitating affects on the underserved in the US. Unless one happens to be a full-blooded Indigenous Native American (which group has suffered mightily at the hands of the Government), you are either an immigrant or the descendant of one, and almost certainly not Caucasian. While in some areas of the country it is not accepted, the fact is that non-Caucasians have been treated with little compassion by the Government for 400 years. This generational inequity has soaked into the very dirt beneath our feet. Obviously Government-sponsored health-insurance should follow the individual, not their employer or any other second-party. The social contract should be between the individual and his/her Government, via the agencies set up to accomplish that important task. It is a "given" that people favored by the institutions of Government are well-served, or at least better served. The relationship between the individual and the insurance provider need not depend on extraneous service providers - they are there to provide health care, not be a part of managing who gets insurance and who doesn't. The problem is surely not with the individual who has lost their insurance, often through no fault of their own. 2. The issue of risk awareness (i.e. consequences of serious illness vs individual impressions, misinformation) is something the Government can impact via public service announcements (I mean more like commercials for every little tiny worthless thing on tv), professionally written and produced, and run serially on every platform. HHS would do well to invest (that's exactly what it would be) in such a program, since it would not only present useful, true information, but would also soak into the community-at-large that risk awareness is something that everyone should be cognizant of. Remember when Elizabeth Birch ran the HRC? She initiated the "come out, come out wherever you are" campaign, which went a long way towards normalizing gay people. And when we did come out, family members, neighbors, employers, co-workers realized that we're not the demons as previously thought. Now, on almost every Netflix series, there are gay characters, and no one gives a hoot. The same thing can happen with our tax dough, to take the stigma of the unknown "gay" illness down a few pegs. As we know, misinformation seems to be the order of the day, politically speaking. The Government can easily fight this battle too. But, without a very large (i.e. Governmental) information campaign, far too many will rely on hearsay (for instance, some of the garbage on <polite cough> certain websites). I think that once people are armed with reliable information, they will recognize what they need to do. Most people buy X brand of soap flakes because they ae inundated by ads from the soapflakes company. Why not turn the internet to some useful instrument of disbursing real information? With everyone's nose buried in their phones these days, it can't help but get reliable messages out. Without any widely accepted source of reliable, non-judgemental information, the folks who need the information the most won't be able to access it. When that ignorance is allowed to fester, folks may well thing something like "I've been doing this for a long time - no reason to alter my behavior", or along those lines. In the absence of such an information source, folks wind up thinking whatever they happened to hear over the backyard fence. Or a trick. Or any other "special" place. Ideally, the Government could mesh both a comprehensive media campaign with a health-care campaign; reportedly, they can walk and chew shit at the same time. 3. This is the most egregious of all. Some of you won't like this, and may want to skip it. If there are precarious housing problems for certain segments of our citizenry, then why the fuck is that? Why is it that some folks have a tough time which mansion they're going to live in that month, and which the next? Why are the underpasses full of homeless folks? Some are worthy and some are not? Hardly. It's because our Government is dominated by one certain subset of persons, who have traditionally controlled Government for centuries, and overlooked the humanity of others for even longer. In case anyone missed it, I mean Caucasians. Currently, we see these "Entitled" Powermongers actually changing voting laws in certain States, merely to preserve their own privilege and power. Their depravity is mind-bending. What harm does it do the nation to insure that everyone gets decent housing? A handful of senators* unable to pocket millions for a year or two? Forced to live in only 2 mansions for a years or two? Forced to abstain from the Maserati or Ferrari and put up with a Cadillac or Lincoln for a year or two? Would it be so terrible to share enough of the wealth so that everyone could have decent housing? The child-tax credit has just expired, and almost certainly will not be renewed until after the primaries, and most likely not at all until after the 2024 election. I see the listed issues in this post as worthy Government pursuits. The problems are so large, so diverse, I think only Government can fix them. Foundations, Human Rights organizations can help, offer expertise, but only the Government can make such a massive undertaking come to pass. I use a different place for political commentary, and it can get far more blunt than the above, If it sounds like I am angry about these un-addressed issues, I'm not. What I am, is enraged. Worse, I have managed to devolve into the political arena, where this may not belong. My apologies. *small case intentional

Wouldn't that have been a "power-play" on his part? Trying to keep you tied only to himself? Enjoying your sexual prowess, while denying it to others? The real killer would be denying his own body to your sexual requirements. I wouldn't put up with that for anything. Since you two apparently had "the conversation" about "outside" sex, and he didn't respond appropriately, I would have done the same thing - with one possible exception: I would have told him that I was going to fuck whoever I want, whenever I want, and however I want. Bluntly, and to his face. It's our nature to use our Cocks on countless Holes, and against our nature to restrict our inborn lusts just because someone else wants our Cock all to themselves. and then restrict access. And then he falls in love over the ether? All I can say is, thank "Whoever" you did what you needed to do. Many, many men received what they needed, and you enjoyed what they offered in return. 100% Spot on. Accepting who and what we are is healthy. Trying to deny it is unhealthy, particularly if we love them. Does this symbol ⇏ mean an equal sign crossed out? Sounds like we're two peas in the proverbial pod, huh?

Posted August 18, 2021 On 8/13/2021 at 8:50 AM, GarrettParker said: A sidepiece/cheating is definitely hot! So is sharing a 3rd or more!!! Does your bf know that you want more? Maybe he does, too... He's vetoed opening things up. I read this reply a bit differently than some of the early replies. One guy asks if the poster of this thread "Does your bf know that you want more?" The response from the poster follows. "The bf has vetoed opening things up". Now. We don't know anything at all about these guys, other than one is financially dependent on the other, that one wants outside action, and (presumably) the other doesn't. Thus, we're being asked a question without much to go on to offer a response. Maybe: a) the bf is afraid of losing his financial support, and thus vetoed extra fucking. b) is the clingy type, and doesn't want to share. c) has not yet matured enough to trust in his bf's (the author of this thread) fidelity, if extra Cock/Hole becomes ok. d) maybe the bf is a prude. e) maybe the bf is already cheating, and is performing a power-struggle to keep his (the author) bf under his domination. Maybe a whole lot of things. Now. Most of us aren't built to attempt getting the approval of the gay "Ozzie & Harriet" crowd. Most of us love sex, identify with being sexual beings too much to honestly maintain a closed relationship. I happened to absolutely love watching my life-partner suck off other Cocks, take loads off other Cocks. We were both Pigs, and reveled in each other's porcine tastes. I knew exactly when he went out for sex, and he knew exactly when I did, and often we went out together. And yes, it's hottttt. I know that kind of relationship isn't for every guy, but the flood of "do it do it do it" isn't warranted either. Cheating is dishonest, and leads to the shrinking of emotional well-being. In my opinion, the one should tell the other the truth, since this couple will probably split up once the facts surface (as they inevitably will). One of the magical things about living our lives through the prism of knowing we're sexual beings, accepting who we are, loving who we are, and acting upon our carnal needs as often as we must, is the act of fucking men we've never met, doing it simply for the pleasure. Spreading our Seed to as many men as possible is - for want of a better term - "wired" into our brains. We are also (at least, "conditioned") to want a love-relationship, and these two are often opposing pressures. How to satisfy both? Honesty within the relationship. Each guy wins, and neither guy loses.

Ahhhhhh .... red !!! Colorful, eye-catching underwear only leads the eye to appreciating the curve of the ass, the angle where the cheeks meet the legs, the natural things Tops notice. But you can't go outside in just those ... I'll just assume whatever pants you're forced to wear (by an unjust law, of course) follow the same cut. Pissing up a hot Hole can be great - the jets of piss can really be shot out hard by the Top, and felt/enjoyed by the bottom. Plus, guys who drink a lot of hot black coffee don't get denied because of the bitter taste. Naaaahhhh ... you're not the only one. But, the fabric of the pants has to be really thin for the edges of the briefs to be clearly visible. I find that one signal I very much appreciate is when a hotassed guy hikes the pants up his back, thereby almost shouting at us to inspect his cheeks/hole as closely as possible. Of course, if he's going commando - wellllll .... we KNOW what he really needs. So lets go get him .......

Well, it's always a good day when we learn something new. Thanks, blackrobe, for the clear explanation. I honestly had no idea. Fortunately, I seldom use contractions, but I will absolutely never use that one again.

Completely agree ... a First Class Ass deserves to be shown off to everyone. Not necessarily in a vulgar way (but, better if it is ...), just clear definition. I particularly love tight shorts/jeans that ride low on the ass, showing off a hairy ass .... grrrrrrrrrrrrrr !!! I'm betting you'd be a LOT of fun to tag Holes with .....

I see this thread started a couple of years ago - I did read back somewhat - but I don't see any allusion to rape at all. That inhuman act is a very clearly defined and abhorred one .... maybe this thread "drifted off-topic", as they sometimes do (and which drift I admit I have contributed to occasionally). Rape, by the universal definition, is never ok. That's why men that visit that outrage upon others wind up in the clink, and deservedly so.

What color are those enticing briefs? (I really don't see colors all that well ...)

I am still not clear about the contraction - what it means and what it doesn't - if there are racial connotations, I wouldn't use it on a bet, and generally avoid contractions in the first place. I'm pretty much "color-blind", both literally and figuratively. Anyone inclined to clear this question up for me?

Nope. But, that needs to be established before the fuck takes place, and if a guy won't take the load, I'll find a guy that needs it. In other words, if a bottoms says he wants my raw Cock, but doesn't want my Seed, the I just move on, since there are more than enough guys that do need it. If a guy says "yeah, I want your load pumped up my Hole", and then - at the last minute - says shit like pull out, I don't want it, chances are poor I will. Obviously, in the fuckjoints no discussion is needed ... every guy there needs what every other guy there has.

As the old song asks: What is this thing called Love? What are the qualities that a "love-experienced" person possesses? As another (yet to be written, perhaps) old song asks: "What is this thing called Whoring", Sharing sex with thousands of others like ourselves? I would submit that there can be no line between the two at all. "Love" is transcendent, encompasses all things, forgives all things, celebrates all things. Whoring - sharing sex with thousands of others like ourselves is also transcendent - perhaps not every single time (there are disappointments occasionally), but on the whole, Whoring is quite similar to Love in it's particular qualities. We don't sit down one day and decide to 'fall in love'. It just happens, if we're fortunate enough to recognize and allow it. Whoring, on the other hand, can become part of ourselves slowly - as in an evolution - or it can suddenly seize us by the balls and almost force us into Whoring. We become our best selves if both occur, and better selves even if only one occurs. Either way, I see Love and Whoring as two sides of the same coin. Each is about sharing - giving - receiving - celebrating. If we cut off one half from the other, both sides of the coin tarnishes from disuse - and that's a sadness indeed.

Neither do I .... but, there's room for everyone, right? Now THAT part I do understand.

Well, it's always refreshing to hear about stuff I don't know anything about. Frankly, I've never tried any of this, but I know a lot of guys enjoy it. Seems sort of like a "time-sponge" to me.

So do I .... love eating wet Holes ... and I remember one of the 10 Commandments is Thou Shalt Not Covet ..... but with THAT tongue, in your case, I shall and do covet !!!😁