hntnhole

1. After the misery of the post-debate carrying on last night, I had a hunch, so I waited to watch the rally in Carolina to see if I was right or wrong. The President's speech just wrapped up moments ago, and , while it's only my own analysis of the debacle of last night, there's one interesting detail I'd like to point out: One of the rules agreed upon by both parties to the debate last night was that no prepared written notes would be allowed. Each candidate was provided several sheets of paper and a pen, so notes during the debate could be made, by either the President or the other guy. I've noticed during speeches that the President relies, perhaps a bit too heavily, on the teleprompters. During speeches, he clearly looks at the teleprompters constantly. It's only during applause, chants from the crowd, that he looks away and makes the requisite 'eye-contact' with the crowd. Thus, I surmise that without the teleprompters, and in combination with the flood of lies, merde from the King of Bullshitters, our President lost his way. He was deprived of his 'support system', the teleprompters. I'm not suggesting that the other guy prevented the use of notes/teleprompters - he's far too dull to figure that out, but one of his acolytes may have. Now. I suppose one could argue that a President should be able to speak confidently without any visual, pre-recorded prompts like a prepared speech. That fact is, he's old, set in his habits when publicly speaking, and should have either insisted (successfully) on including the teleprompters at the debate, or declined the invitation. He's in his 80's now, and some synapses just don't work as well as they did 40 years ago. That possibility however, in no way indicates impairment of his mental acuity. It merely makes obvious a bad habit, likely developed over many years, of depending on a certain technology - a support system during public appearances. I can and have forgiven him of that, since all of us have developed the same bad habit of depending on technological advances more, perhaps, than we ideally should. That issue, however is hardly enough to disqualify him from the Presidency. 2. Let's imagine the US Government as a gigantic corporation. The President is the CEO, with a huge office (for this purpose, we'll call it the White House), staffed by many employees that have various duties. Let's imagine that this Corporation produces some product, which has come into use world wide. Using that analogy, the CEO of some large, multi-national corporation has, of course, many managers of various divisions within said Corporation - from procurement of materials, to labor relations, to Sales of said item, to Shipping, to servicing of the product to customer relations, on and on and on. Each of these 'divisions' has it's own large staff of employees that actually do the work. The US Government is similarly structured, with "divisions" for every kind of activity any Government anywhere engages in. The CEO relies on the information his employees bring him, to inform his "macro" decisions, and that corporate structure generally works fairly well. However, when one Manager fails to foresee, or investigate some potential problem with an upcoming meeting/conference, the entire operation may become threatened. In this specific case, someone failed to realize how crucial some particular component was to the success of the Company, with a terrible result. That may be a cumbersome analogy, and thanks to those who bothered to read it. After hearing the President's speech this afternoon in Carolina, watching it carefully, I am hopeful that this mistake - omitting the "crucial component" mentioned in the previous paragraph - led to a disastrous result. One can pick at nits - maybe the President shouldn't have become so reliant on teleprompters in the first place, maybe this, maybe that, ad infinitum, but this is a rather reasonable explanation for last night's horror. The inescapable fact however, is with teleprompters, Joe Biden is his very able, very confident, very clearly in-command self. Without them, he's crippled. That fact has not one whit to do with the goals he sets out for his "employees" (in the Corporation example) to follow through on, and for which the Nation has benefitted enormously since his Presidency began.

This doesn't require any responses, since it'll all be over in a few hours: I am so tired of all the carrying-on in the media about tonight's debate. It's like nothing else is happening in the world. We all know it's important, we all know the implications, and if anyone didn't before today, they surely do now. And I'm a bit weary of the Woman in Black explaining things this way, rehashing it that way, ad infinitum. At least CNN has an International version of their broadcasts. Enough already.

I think that every guy should get to unload in whatever way he feels is best for him. If a bottom feels that he shouldn't cum until the last Top does, great. If he feels he should wait until he gets home, fine. If he wants to postpone his climax until after taking as many loads as possible, great. If he wants to cum while getting fucked, all he should need to do it mention that to his Top once, and let the Top make it happen. If the bottom doesn't want to cum (at that moment), he should mention that to the Top, and have his desires respected. If the bottom has some kind of "suffering"* complex, and doesn't even want to share that information, that's ok too. Sex is always best when both guys get what they need. *I mean that in the context of 1) a Bd Sm context, or 2) an emotional need to submit so entirely to his Top(s) that his own release becomes irrelevant, to be dealt with some other time/place.

The 'Old World' has everything to offer, and in a magnificently judgement-free atmosphere. I wish that every sexual pig in the world could get to Berlin at least a handful of times during his life. A'dam & Britain too. It's nothing less than mind-boggling, it's mentally healthy, emotionally healthy, it lifts one's spirits to previously not experienced heights. In short .......... FAN-FUKKIN-TASTIC !!!

I couldn't agree more. And they start learning it early - when they're just little girls. Thank Almighty Whatever for boys that grow up to love dick up their ass!

Shucks .... there's more I haven't experienced than things I have.🙂 I think that's one of my favorite facets of BZ. I learn a lot about issues I either didn't know existed, or never paid much attention to !!!

Note the self-quote above, KindaBasic. Generally, when guys meet in some fuckjoint, it's without any immediately-previous connection (like an app, for instance). If the initial connection is made via the apps, it's surely easy enough to politely cull out guys that have a different agenda than ours. That would include, obviously, any particular requirement of either guy,, including using a condom. I see no contradiction between your viewpoint and mine at all. Knowing what one wants/needs, and being clear about that detail is the important thing. That said, in my experience, guys that hit the fuckjoints are there for raw sex, and I can't say I've ever encountered a guy who wanted a condom in the fuckjoints. Maybe things are different where you live, but somehow I doubt it. NYC has always been a fantastic place for anything, I see that as those two sentences as sides of the same coin. Thanks for your input.

Never heard that one before, but it exemplifies what I happen to believe in too. Thanks for sharing that, blackrobe.

Easier to ask it the other way around: Who wouldn't ??? That flic was as "classic" as it gets 😁

That's pretty much how I see the issue as well. Lots of bottoms (frankly, my favorite) like to take a number of loads before they themselves pump one out. I've made it no secret that I love cumdumps, and I understand why they wouldn't want to shoot their loads after just one fuck. I don't conduct "interviews" in the fuckjoints - as far as I'm concerned, the bottoms should let go whenever they feel like it - whether they've got 1 load or 20 up their gut.

1. I've never heard the term before; thanks to EuRawBull for the definition. 2. I doubt that very many gay guys would put up with it for more than a few minutes. 3. The only thing that really separates us from the hets is, we fuck each other, and not them. Meaning, we're as susceptible to all the vagaries of human existence just like every other group/sub-group. 4. Inventing new nicknames for various idiosyncrasies in human behavior is ok, I suppose, but it occurs that the time would be better spent figuring out how to readjust.

Nope. There's everything right about it 🐷

It's like how a magnet draws iron-filings .... A well-fucked & bred bottom exudes that special magnetism that no commercial scent possibly could, and do it fully clothed. Remember that old phrase "cum-drunk" ??? Poppers can't do that ....

Well said, and thanks, BootmanLA. Occasionally, a reason to be guiltlessly selfish arises: Hollowing out Obergefell would be thiiiiiis close to actually reversing it if the R's retain their majority in the House, and gain seats in the Senate. More, given O.J.'s latest verbiage about 'States Rights" - i.e. allowing the individual States to decide what should be (and, in the case of Roe, were) citizen's rights, that approach would seem to be the more obvious choice for the Magaroids. How the pseudo "Christians" decided that the freedom of (or from) Organized Religion should also be brought to heel is beyond me. That's yet one more on the Court's chopping block. They claim that the US is a "Christian" nation, on an utterly false basis, and if these people aren't tossed out on their greasy asses in November, the US, as we know it, could be finished. I can only imagine what would happen when these misguided folks start in on us.

I can't remember being actually solicited up front. There have been a few times after the fuck that a guy has asked if I could "lend" him a few bucks though. Obviously the operative verb was tongue-in-cheek, but sometimes I'd fork over a few bucks, particularly if it looked like he really needed it. Or, offer to buy him something to eat at one of the all-night beaneries around here. Being down on their luck isn't a crime, it's just sad, and easy to be kind about.

I'm sure there were undercover cops in the snitzier areas of the northern burbs (Evanston, for instance), around N'Western U) Wilmette, Winnetka, but I can't remember hearing about undercover cops in the city. The cops who did grab guys off the streets/parks were in full uniforms, in regulation police cars with the blue lights on the roof blazing. It wasn't all that tough to evade them, particularly in Lincoln Park (along the lakefront. Most guys cruised on their bikes - at least at that time.

Thanks for that most interesting post, BootmanLA, All I can say is, there are more and more reasons (almost daily) to vote "straight-ticket" Dem, particularly local/State-wide/Federal offices. I did have more to say, but considered against it.

Very well said. Too many Tops don't realize that fisting is a whole-nother kettle of fish from Cock-fucking. It's takes not merely skill, it takes an aware mind, a watchful concentration on the fistee, but it's a craft well-worth learning for Tops.

Geez .... I never even noticed the lack of the refection ... come to think of it, there would need to be a reflection of whoever took the photo too. I feel really dumb, but at least no one has ever accused me of being an art critic. I'll get better at it ..... I think? ... 🙄 Thanks for pointing all of that out !!!

Then I'll cross my fingers, toes, balls and anything else I can think of that you have a pervectly filthy time of it. in PS !!! Guys like you shouldn't have to put up with a dearth of opportunities !!!

So the fuck do I .... it's just not sex until one guy pumps his load up another guy's gut or down his throat. I simply won't participate in the cuddle-buddy stuff. Perennial Foreplay is fine if that's what some guys want - but it's nothing compared to a good fuck in my book. To the OP though, I've tried Viagra before, and didn't experience what some of the guys above did. I didn't get a headache or some other bothersome result. Usually when I head out, I take half a pill in my pocket, more as a "just in case" thing. Years ago someone gave me a Cialis pill, which did absolutely nothing ....

The CumUnion events I remember were full-on, total mass orgies .... every guy fucking every other guy .... That was a few years ago, before I moved - but what's happened to CumUnion ?

I don't know anything at all about AI - but I could tell that some of the first images in this thread weren't "real"; they looked more like talented some talented artist's sketches. Some of the later ones though (other than the impossibly gigantic Cock, like the one of the john-attendant above), everything else fooled me. In that "photo", the stuff on the counter, the reflections in the mirror, the grout-lines in the tile floor, everything about the guy (except that impossibly huge Cock) fooled me completely. How do you guys tell the difference, when there's not some outlandishly oversized thing in the fake photo ??? I don't get it ...........

Wellllllll .... I reckon that's one way to tell us you need to exercise that tongue (which I covet with all my Lusts ...) 😁

Really .... for chrissake ..... is that the best you've got ???