Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,305

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. hntnhole
    So, it seems it's the boy-wonder's turn in the crucible of fire-breathing magoid miscreants. He says he's trying to avoid a Govt shut-down in the coming days, communicating with Schumer, all of that - but the nut cases are insisting on their way or the fiscal highway re: a CR. We're watching, closet-boy ..... so is Kevin ...
  2. hntnhole
    According to State Law in Florida, sex between relatives is a third-degree felony, regardless of the age of participants. Merely the fact that they're biologically related is enough to prosecute. Some States have de-criminalized sex between adults of some degree of common descendants, but not here. Now. I think that argument is weak as water (when both are well past the age of majority), and resides mostly in a religious/culturally repressive milieu. That said, I think the scene you described is hotttt !!!
  3. hntnhole
    "Should incest be normalized?" This ^ is the original post, As is often the case, the thread has developed into a deeper issue: namely, serious child abuse. I have nothing against the "development" of a thread, and enjoy reading the responses. It was not specified if the prospective participants were boy/girl, boy/boy, girl/girl. To the original issue, once the prospective participants have reached the age of majority (as I included earlier), it's not the business of anyone to judge. There are many interesting viewpoints expressed, and one truly tragic experience. Doing so would only open the door even wider to judgements from disassociated "arbiters" of normalcy, which we - as gay men of a particularly delicious-yet-deeply-frowned-upon persuasion - should not enable. Since we've migrated to include those not of majority, I completely agree, whether biologically related or not, that it should never be tolerated. Those misguided souls who willfully wreak havoc on the emotional lives of minors should be punished to the greatest extent of the law. That kind of behavior is a moral outrage, akin to emotional murder.
  4. hntnhole
    Kudos, bottomdad123. Where would those guys be without your Hole? Where would the rest of us be without guys like you? We'd be one crabby lot, that's where.
  5. hntnhole
    ugh .... it's almost dinnertime, and I don't dare ... the description is simply perfectly vomatious .... and now I'm just not hungry anymore .... but at least I'm laughing !!
  6. hntnhole
    I don't mean to offend any religious guys, but - - - the sillier some of the propaganda is, the easier it is to reject, and hear the siren call of wanton raw sex. The notion of gold dishes buried somewhere in the mountains out East (I think?), or the holes sewn in the undies of the husbands - supposedly to make access to the balls easier for the "spirit-babies" constantly circling the earth, waiting for a pair of cojones to sneak into (and thus increase the population) is just begging to be laughed out of court.
  7. hntnhole
    I would avoid it, since it could lead to all kinds of accusations (regardless of what actually might happen) in the future. If a younger relative came to me asking for advice, how to navigate Aunt Bitch's reactions, Uncle Asshole, etc etc, I'd gladly offer what advice I could - from the chair on the other side of the room. In the case of brothers, however, I suppose it's only natural that sex is discussed between them as they grow up. If both turn out to be gay (I mean on their own, no coercion), then they're already close, so it might be unnatural to argue against it, once each reaches the age of majority.
  8. hntnhole
    Just had the opportunity to get back to this .... If ever there were a crystalline example of just how far down the garden path the "evangelicals" have been led by that hellish cretin, this mish-mash of garbage points the way.
  9. hntnhole
    I'm going to get the fire extinguisher ready before I click "play" .....
  10. hntnhole
    Oh wow - Thanks so much, viking8x6 !!!!!!! Computers can do so much, but only if you know how to tell them what to do !! I'm going to save your instructions - write them down in cursive if I have to .... Many thanks !!!
  11. hntnhole
    You're a prescient one, NWUSHorny. Nope - never experienced the "fag hag" syndrome. I remember a few trying, years ago - mostly in undergrad. I put up with one for a few months though - her grandfather had given her his old 1962, Series 62 Coupe-de-Ville with a 390 in it ... which I got to drive when we (f.h. and I) went someplace. That made it somewhat tolerable, for a while .... and she wasn't all that pushy - more a mouse f.h. than one of those noisy ones.
  12. hntnhole
    Agreed. Sounds good, but seldom works. As best I can see, hopefully the more official programs like this the fewer kids of Inherited Power will continue that atrocity. While some claim that the US is a "Christian" nation, talk is cheap, it's the actions that count, and the US is no more "Christian" (in the sense of following the Original Message, as opposed to what passes for it these past numbers of centuries) than the man in the moon. It's a step in the moral direction, but far from achieving the claimed goals. My own view is DEI programs work mostly on those who attempt to honor that message anyway, and are least likely to violate the message. How long it lasts though, is a different question. Still, it's better then openly advancing hatred, which is no doubt why TX is banning these programs in the first place.
  13. hntnhole
    Wellllllllll .......... thanks for the reply, but I'm afraid I don't know how to do that either. I always had secretaries to figure out how to make the damn computers work ... No apologies needed - the discourse is what I come to BZ for !!! I'll go back through some of the "likely" posts and see what I can find. It won't be today or tomorrow, but - I'll look for some. Again, thanks for your kind words.
  14. hntnhole
    For what it's worth, I never cared for girls much - from grade school days on. It's not that I had any notion of what "sex" was, I didn't. I just didn't like how girls behaved, being silly, all the damn giggling, little girls trying to bat their eyes at little boys, the whole panoply of childish behavior. I always gravitated to other boys. To be clear, I hadn't so much as experienced a sexual thought at that time. I just didn't like girls, which blessing has remained to this day.
  15. hntnhole
    That's an interesting proposition. Are you equally active with both women and men now?
  16. hntnhole
    Agreed - with the obligation to what? I would posit that would be our ancient enemy, Organized Religion. In the effort to cover the world with certain religious beliefs, and thus accruing corporal/emotional power to themselves, some religious institutions forbade any form of birth-control. For instance, it wasn't until 1968 that the Pope allowed women to take advantage of "the pill". I would further hazard a guess that one of the reasons so many of our neighbors in the Southern Hemisphere are trying so desperately to get to America, is the overpopulating taught them by the original invaders of that continent - Catholic Spain. The more adherents fearful of hell, the more dough flowing back to Rome. This while the clergy were busy lifting their long fancy dresses and fucking each other, teaching choirboys that sucking Cock is a holy activity, on and on. The post-Reformation lturgical institutions may be ever-so-slightly less culpable, but I wouldn't bother trying to fit a piece of paper between the two.
  17. hntnhole
    Quite a number of worthwhile advice above. Here's one more possibility: Get a friend/buddy to go with you. Some guy who you already trust, knows your issue, and is willing to help you release your inhibitions or fears. These are the things that can interfere with one's Lusts, and need to be expunged from your mind. Basically, the fuckjoints are about only one thing: Guys who need sex meet up to either fuck or get fucked. Sure, there can be small groups of guys who know each other, sit around and trade gossip more than anything else, and that's ok too. NO guy has a fantastic time every time he goes to a fuckjoint/baths. Allow yourself to be bolder - if one guy doesn't work out, find another, and then another. Don't allow your inhibitions to rule your sex life, listen to your Lust instead. If you can manage that once, the second time will be easier, and the third will be even easier, and the hundred-and-third will be a piece of cake. Know that exercising your sexual needs is an important part of your wholeness, your human-ness. Good luck !!
  18. hntnhole
    Agreed. There are almost always other cultural issues afoot when one race or ethnicity is avoided, but another sought. Nevertheless, we can work on solving the issue, bit by bit, bigger bit by bigger bit, and improve not only ourselves, but including others in that process too.
  19. hntnhole
    It does seem, NWUSHorny, that you need to get outta Dodge as soon as you can. A well-rounded, talented man, erudite, versatile, loving both T and b, is too precious to waste on an unappreciative population.
  20. hntnhole
    Apparently I was unclear: it's the owner of the bar that fills the envelope, out of the cash register to which you "make your contribution" when you buy drinks. The bar owner needs the cops to know who the dough is coming from ....
  21. hntnhole
    I can't explain that either, but then I haven't noticed that situation in the fuckjoints I go to. At Slammer, there are simply far too many guys to mentally keep track of, even if I were inclined to do that. I wouldn't know if I'd been there at the same time they were from one week to the next (excluding some hot bottoms, of course). I suppose it's possible that emotionally, some guys want to be seen to be pigs, as a part the raw community, and show up at the fuckjoints but fail to have any sex. To me at least, that would be a lot of bother for precious little reward. Frankly, it's what a man does that matters - not what he might appear to be doing. There are plenty of places where gay men go to socialize, some of the bars over in Wilton Manors are jammed all night long with guys not having sex. Even some of the bars where guys do fuck have areas where that happens, and not in the main bar area. Ramrod is like a weekend meeting place for gay friends of long standing too. Sometimes it's almost funny; a group of buddies can be blabbing away, right next to a group of guys fucking each other. To the OP though, I'm hoping some other guys can offer differing viewpoints on why those findings may/may not be valid. I'm not doubting the researcher's intent, nor their product, but there's got to be more they didn't factor into their conclusions.
  22. hntnhole
    I didn't mean to imply that I ever "bought into" that philosophy - but I knew guys that did. It doesn't make sense to me that one guy should play "deity", and the other guy should play "lump of clay" needing to be remade. That may be fine for some guys, and I have no judgement to offer regarding what other's do; I only hope informed decisions are made by both guys during the negotiation. I much prefer the "work with what is, and see if you can make it even better" approach. You're entirely correct that this type of interaction definitely implies a long-term, committed relationship, which should be explicitly a part of the foundation the two build their lives upon. One guy gets the fulfillment of caring for his "property"*, the other gets the fulfillment of knowing he's secure and treasured. *obviously, nothing more than language used within the Bd/Sm community. A "collared" boy is off-limits unless and until his Dad decides to share the boy, and then only after a serious chat with the prospective Top.
  23. hntnhole
    First, to the OP: It changes every time you do a scene with a new guy - during the negotiation. One of the points of a negotiation is for the bottom to allow a safeword to come into his own mind, all by himself. Thus, he's more likely to remember it if he feels he needs it during the scene. You can write it down on a sticky note, in case you might need it - preferably out of the bottom's sight. Yes, it does, and I'm glad nothing serious happened to you. Placing yourself at risk of hospitalization (or worse) seems a bit too heavy a risk to achieve "an ultimate high". It can happen for you over and over again, when delivered by a man who knows his craft, and can be enjoyed over and over again. On the other hand, the "one and done(for)" seems to be risking too much. Good luck.
  24. hntnhole
    Interesting article; thanks for posting it, NWUSHorny. (from the article) "But if the errors aren’t random — if, for example, somewhat same-sex oriented people are more likely to misidentify themselves as heterosexual" I don't see much material about this cultural issue in the article. What appears to be not in the consideration of the scientists, is that fact that thanks to cultural/religious repressions, it's entirely likely that a number of respondents would keep their sexual behavior to themselves. They'd have centuries-worth of repression and worse behind their decision. To another point the researchers raised, is something I've occasionally noticed: the gay or straight gene seems to run in extended families, meaning that in any generation, one (extended) family may have more gay men or women in their wider biological family, and the opposite true of families with no known gay members. To the point that bi/gay men appear to father more children, could that be since they are simply craving that which we all crave: sex. If they can't have it the way they want, they'll get it from their second-choice partner - their de rigueur wives - and finding it less fulfilling than their same-sex partners, want all the more sex, hoping to find that which is denied them for cultural/religious reasons. "why there seem to be so many gay men who are mostly or completely averse to sexual activities" My own personal reasoning points to an effective repression of any sexual activities that won't potentially produce offspring. Cultural, and more importantly religious beliefs can really stunt a gay man or woman's emotional health, and the only way I know of to overcome it is to simply shuck it off as irrelevant to that person's life, and move on. Thanks for sharing the article !!
  25. hntnhole
    Depending on what you mean by a "clean" Hole, there are definitely gradations to that particular aspect, at least for me. To me, "clean" means no bits of last night's supper. "Pre-lubed" means that hot-assed boy has taken loads before I got to his Hole. If the bottom's Hole doesn't measure up (or down, for some guys) to that requirement, there are plenty of other guys that do, and I'll just excuse myself and go find some. Yes, I know that "accidents" can and do happen, and all measures taken by the bottom to prevent accidents are not only much appreciated, but - using my definition of 'clean' - a requirement. It's happened a number of times, and all I say is something vague-yet-unmistakable like 'maybe there's something you need to attend to ... see you a little later'.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.