hntnhole

This response assumes a "hook-up", not a free-for-all at the fuckjoints. All I expect is honesty. If the bottom has certain pleasures, certain things to avoid, whatever, I want to know about them in advance, so I can reinforce his pleasure, and avoid his displeasures, or just pass if it seems unworkable. It needs to be a good as it can, and both guys have equal input. Tops can guess at what will please the bottom, and maybe receive a a good fuck. Or, he can ask the bottom pointed questions to receive the answer. Once the scene commences, it's then that the power-structure begins. Prior, it's merely two horny men that need good sex. In the fuckjoints, none of the above is really necessary. Both men can assume the other is a sexual pig, and revel in their lusts. If/when one guy displays displeasure at whatever, it's easy to say "thanks, have a great night", and go on to the next one.

Almost 3 months later .... So the princeling in House invited the PM of Israel to address Congress some months ago, and Netan-yahoo decided to accept. While a number of major events has taken place since penning the above, the event did happen, and apparently many Dems seemed to have a problem clearing their calendars to listen to that personage spew his bullshit. Oddly, no reports on the R's attendance as of yet - at least that I've heard. This is what's called a Congressional "kick in the balls". Of course, the President referred to pushing as hard as ever for peace to break out in the Middle East in his brief speech this evening, describing the reasons he's stepping down. Our President has done more trying to bring peace to the area than the PM of Israel, particularly now with Nettie's increasing military activity in the Northern areas lately. More Palestinian dead, natch. More destroyed infrastructure. The commitment to decency, observing basic human rights on the part of Biden, and continuing the wholesale murders of Palestinians in the Northern parts of the area, merely so Nettie can cling to power (and keep his position), demonstrates the problem the US faces. That said, if anyone can alleviate the situation, it's Joe Biden. Netan-yahoo only cares about himself. Sound familiar? I wonder if he stopped by MagaBlargo, to kiss the congealed, fat-encrusted ass of the former Liar-in-Chief.

You mean you weren't impressed when she climbed up on the roof of her house and claimed she saw Russia ???? 😄 Neither was the rest of the Whole Wide World !!!

It's interesting she has not mentioned any religious affiliation, beliefs, etc, (that I know of, anyway) nor should she. Religious beliefs are a private thing, and should only be evident via that person's behavior, if evident at all. No one automatically has "quality", "value" via mere religious beliefs (or lack of them). What counts is what they do. Harris has a long history of bringing the unjust to justice, activity in progressive causes, and if that's a result of some religious beliefs, fine. She doesn't need to broadcast her religious beliefs (if any); it's what she's already done and can therefore be expected to do in the future that counts. To my mind, Kamela Harris exponentially outclasses the other side (which, admittedly, is not a tough task).

By all means though, make the decision regarding hiv exposure. PreP will greatly diminish the chances of hiv, and I hope you will consider getting that protection. It's also a good idea to get tested for the lesser std's every 3 months, so they can be treated and cured. Recognizing what you need, what you want out of life is a great achievement. There are plenty of guys that never get that far, but you did. Welcome to Freedom.

Well said. Isn't it delicious how the Magaroids were hammering constantly about Biden's age, when their own candidate was only 3 years less-old, grotesquely out of shape, and mumbles nonsensical nothing-isms constantly? The R's have to completely reinvent their election efforts now, and that choice of Veep isn't going to help them one little bit.

Well said. Sometimes a business-owner has to do a bit of legwork to find the "right" person for whatever position he's offering, but if it comes down to two "finalists", two people that can reasonably be expected to perform well, the job should go to an underrepresented/underprivileged person. That was my practice for many years, and I never had so much as one reason to regret it. Talk is cheap; it's what we do that counts. The "problem" employees were always the ones that felt they were "entitled" to more than their work-product allowed.

1. Magaroid enters a bar, plops down on a barstool and orders "a beer" - 2. Bartender asks what kind - 3. Magaroid gets pissed off because the bartender can't remember the M's favorite brand - 4. Magaroid hollers back something like "I left you a quarter for a tip two months ago, and you can't remember that?" - 5. Bartender replies 'yeah, I remember the tip, and I remember you too'. Turns on his heel and walks away. 🤣

This will garner a lot of downvotes, but .... A less-quick history check will demonstrate that the Spanish invasion of South America, bringing with them their R.C. bent, forcing the conquered people to convert at gunpoint, (along with the strict prohibition against any form of contraception, enshrined in official RC Policy in 1930), has led to the overpopulation of the South American continent. Yet, Spain only sucked the riches out of the continent, and did rather little to invest in the inhabitants and their well-being. There were other European nations that did the same, of course, but Spain sowed the seeds (pardon the pun) for todays masses of desperate people trying to eke out some measure of quality in their lives. Desperate people tend to do desperate things to avoid starvation and stay alive. For instance, leave their miseries behind, and try to escape to that (you all simply must forgive this one) Shining City upon a Hill.* *first and last (I promise) RR quote my fingers will ever type.

I'll bet they're planning 8 years in advance. Kamela's not quite 60 - in her prime for two successive administrations.

I don't quite understand the connection of who gave Thurmon's eulogy and the current election cycle. Would you please explain? Thanks. The fact that the President (while he was a Senator, of course) made friends (or at least worked with in good faith) with everyone in Congress he possibly could, for the benefit of "working across the aisle" to advance the causes important to him, has nothing to do with fulfilling a promise to give a eulogy, Would you please explain that in greater detail? Thanks.

where is that little button ..... I know it's here somewhere ....

Of course you "can" .... you just don't want to, and there's no reason at all that you should. I've long thought that it's the excitement, the thrill of "living the raw life" to the fullest extent possible that is the "addicting" pattern of behavior. It's the mark of a guy who's figured out who and what he is - his "place" in the world. Why would you want to curtail (or worse, stop) a behavior that makes you feel so fulfilled, so "whole"? Yes, there are multitudes of us who experience the same thrilling life, whether T or b. Some of us are able to put raw sex on the top of the "do list", some of us would rather exercise some measure of control of our behavior; there's a wide range of choices we have in fulfilling our wholeness. You do have to eat, you need a place to live, all of that, and if you can get those necessary things in place, and devote the rest of your life to offering your raw Hole up to other men's raw Cocks, who's to judge your behavior? The answer is no one. It's your life - you get to decide how you want to live it.

I was with you until the above. I'll agree that it was the last thing he wanted to do, given his life of service to the Nation. Everyone has some measure of "ego" in their makeup, and given that the accomplishments through the years are many, that doesn't make "hubris" a valid accusation. More to the point, he subsumed whatever measure of those two characteristics in favor of the good of the Nation. That's an honorable accomplishment in and of itself. There's no similar act on the other side (the former President's administration) that is within the same universe; only acts of the opposite nature.

A man who has served his Country in public service for decades. A man who can accept that his physically his body is failing him, and puts the welfare of the Nation before his own pressing urge to continue his service to the United States. Joe Biden, our President, the consummate Humanist, deserves to be honored, respected, celebrated and held in the highest esteem both now, as he steps down from his office, and by future generations. He has advanced the citizenry of the United States with tremendous accomplishments by service first to his State, then as Vice President, and finally President, and unfailingly working to advance the rights of the downtrodden, the underprivileged, those who society has ignored since the founding of this Nation. His gifts to the Nation have been nearly uncountable through the decades, and now his final gift to the country he loves has now been given, and we all know how difficult that decision has been for him. Whatever one's personal political beliefs are, lets not let petty notions allow us to denigrate this truly good and decent man. May he find peace as we, the citizens, move on.

Agreed. If there are any "conditions" involved, they should be mentioned before the fuck, not during or after.

Not during, but sometimes just after. That's only an occasional event though, not common.

Which is the only way he can stay out of the clink for the rest of his misguided life ....

and then you proceed to list a number of the more egregious qualities about the former President, any one of which is a disqualifier for most folks. 1. I've heard many comments comparing him to Hitler, but none that actually believe he's Hitler returned from the bunker where he shot himself. He's literally similar, obviously, but he's certainly not Hitler redux. 2, Everyone has concerns about who would exercise undue influence over him. He has demonstrated the shallowness of his character for decades, and any conman (or woman) could manipulate him easily. All that's required is flattery. 3. "Hoping" that he's learned something from his Presidency implies that he might have learned something useful. He has not. What he did learn, is that the adoration of millions of citizens he's fooled, manipulated, taken advantage of, feeds his own insecurities. He's like a little boy who is juuuuust clever enough to steal cookies from the jar, without the intelligence to replace the stolen cookies with something else underneath the cookies, so mommy won't figure it out. 4. You also express (well-founded) concerns about his choice for Veep. So does every non-maga person on the face of the globe. He's been against/for so many dramatically opposing viewpoints, and in the short space of a couple of years, no one can believe anything that comes out of his mouth. If there's a replica of Shitler lurking about, it's Vance; exponentially more clever than the wanna-be returnee. 5. I tend to agree with you re: the ancient texts. They are used now only partially, to prop up anti-human viewpoints. 6. To your second paragraph, I think most of us have the same experiences; I know I do. What is the point you're trying to make? Given that the former President cares little about anyone or anything more than feeding his own ego, surely you realize that the correlation between his inflated self-image is far, far more important to him than caring about anything else, including gay folks. If elected, he would gladly order every single one of us either deported (as part of the mass deportations he goes on about), if not rounding us up to be shot. If "killing all the queers" would garner him praise from his supporters, he wouldn't (attempt) to think about it for one second. It would please all the misguided "christians", and it wouldn't bother him one iota. In the event that you "don't think Trump presents any threat to me", and everyone else with the same goals, wake up. He would cheerfully, gladly, and happily commit genocide (against us and any/every other group the magaroids aim at), if it allowed him to squat on top of the nation for one more day. If you could explain your reasoning, it would be helpful. Thanks.

As you surely know, "racism" is not something folks put on or take off like a shirt or cap. Once introduced, it's something that grows in a fevered mind - fertilizing resentments, false equivalency, anti-human behavior. It's a learned depravity, but it's possible to unlearn racism, given the realization in the racist's mind that it's unhealthy in every way. The "antidote" to racism also is a learned behavior, given the individual's determination to flush it down the mental john. All it takes is to recognize in ones self the mental/emotional wart, and keep applying the antidote until if finally fades away. It may be hard work, and take no small amount of time, but it's a happy, productive journey as well, and can be applied to any particular aspect of our mindset that we realize is counterproductive.

Well, I don't use any of the so-called "social media" websites, which may also say a little bit about me 😉

While I have nothing but admiration for the President, I'm a realist - you're almost certainly right. That eventuality would be ideal, if he doesn't decide to step down. Plus, if the trumpet. dares to debate Harris, I'll buy tickets to that take-down. She'll mop the floor with him - and the same with the "bearded wunderkind".

I had to ask the Googler who Fuentes is ... and I predict that in a few years, so will everyone else.

Interestingly, it does now. That lovely lady that married Vance would be one example. She of amazing accomplishments, not a native citizen, noticeably darker in complexion to those of Northern European heritage, should give the ranting crowd of hate-mongers a pause or three in their sweeping judgements against those with more melanin in their skin than those of Caucasian descent. It might be fun to hear how the racists deal with this. Is that a rug being lifted up and a broom I hear?

Given that we already have a duly elected Veep, there would be no vacuum at all. She'd have to find her own Veep quickly, of course, but that wouldn't be the biggest problem she'd face. If the President does leave office, all his committed delegates (and the campaign dough) would go to her (assuming she'd want to run for President). I do think, however, this issue must be settled before mid-August, and well before if at all possible. An open convention is hardly a palatable event.