hntnhole

Ukraine, obviously. If Pukin takes that, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Moldova would be in the most immediate danger. Clearly, the Russian armed forces couldn't swallow all of them at once, and most (if not all) are members of NATO. The weasel in that woodwork though, is if his corpulence manages to get reelected, NATO itself would be on tenterhooks. With the recent right-wing victory in France, it could easily wind up as WW2 redux .... this time with nukes.

Frankly, I have nothing against the Secret Service or some other US Government Agency picking up a number of Soviet spies, and holding them indefinitely until our people are released. I know there must be double-agents whereby the US feeds phony intel to the Russians, so they could be exempted, but tit-for-tat worked in years past, and might again. Ukraine may very well have already been part of NATO, if it weren't for the first (and only) TinHat Trump administration. In that case. little baldie wouldn't have invaded in the first place. The only reason he did is, the Magaroid-in-Chief gave him permission. Fuck (not actually ... shudder) Orange Jesus and little baldie.

Is Telegram an app?

In the places I go to fuck, sometimes I do see a wedding ring on a guy. Not that I'm looking for one - I'm not - and I don't really care if they're married or not. Besides - in those places it's far more likely that they're pigs - married to another pig. Once, I really wanted to fuck this guy - the Hole was perfect, and right there in plain sight - perfect for eating. The only problem was his Daddy (!) was standing nearby, and wanted to fuck whoever was fucking his boy. And, the Daddy had a gigantic Cock, which I couldn't have ever ever ever have managed, even if I were inclined to pay that price. That was their call though - not for me to object. So, I only got to eat that boy's sweet, delicious furry Hole, dammittall. 😠

Done. Will hit the P.O. this afternoon.

I just too pissed off to comment with anything even close to decency ... maybe tomorrow ....

My other half and I used to go to a gym over on Lincoln Ave, and we both got marginally better physiques out of it. Shortly after joining, that gym moved to Steamworks though, and we continued to go, but for some reason the physiques didn't continue to improve. 😂

Are there different - well - "areas" of the BZ chat-function? A few years ago I tried the chat-function for a while, but it didn't seem worth the bother.

I see you're a new member, noyes019, so welcome to BZ. From the quote ^ I reckon you definitely belong here in the pigpen with the rest of us !!

We won't be expecting to hear from you for a few days - since you'll obviously have better things to do. Just try to remember them all ..... take some sweet little secretaryboy with you to take all the notes 😅

To the OP though, one of the brightest signs of a real, genuine, down-n-dirty pig is guys putting their mouths on a well-bred Hole, tonguing out the loads/hole sweat, and sharing it with other pigs. What could possibly be more endorsing to our sexual lives than sharing the fruits of our labors with our brothers?

I couldn't find a "salute" icon, so ..... here's a text-version: SALUTING a First Class Pig !!!

The other night I was over to Ramrod for a beer ... saw a guy with a black t-shirt emblazoned with huge bright red letters across the front: RAW. As I passed by the guy, I said "You mean there's some other way to fuck?" He laughed so loudly other guys looked around to see what was going on.

I think Biden could justifiably order not merely the detainment, but the "hurry-up" of expulsion of a couple of those haughty clowns - maybe both (with their magaroid wives) could get in that huge Winnebago and sail that tub through the roads of somewhere else ....

I haven't taken part in this voting exercise yet, since try as I might, I'm not able to come up with a viable definition of what gay "culture" actually is. Wikipedia offers a wordy, bland, vague definition of "gay culture", rather amorphous and unsatisfying, and glosses over the practice of prostitution within "gay" life. Even the Oxford definition - "a person, in particular a woman, who engages in sexual activity for payment." is clearly (at least to my eyes) somewhat exclusive (and therefore a suggestion of denigration) of this activity. We all know what "prostitution" entails, but what do we mean by "gay culture"? Relatively few gay men or gay women engage in the business of prostitution, and when they do it is usually associated with pecuniary needs that cannot be met in any other (as perceived by that individual) way. I don't see how we can offer perceptions of that particular business endeavor without knowing more about the reasons the individual engages in it. That would apply to both genders, and equally. While prostitution has existed for millennia, and in virtually every "culture" that has or continues to exist, I don't see any particular characteristic that separates us (gay men) from every other "culture" regarding the OP.

From your fingers to Whatever's ears. I don't see that kind of "house-cleaning" happening in November either. That said, I'll be thrilled when the WOMEN (and their male friends) generate a blue tsunami that flushes these magaroid nutjobs down the john. I'll put a penny under my pillow on Election Eve anyway .....

I agree. The President is more concerned with the continuance of the Republic than his own career. I'd trust Kamela with the job over almost anyone, and certainly over some magaroid idiot. Which, in an ancillary way, brings to mind the question of which craven magaroid sycophant the walking, constantly talking disgustment will choose for his running mate. Maybe Stormy ??? Karen ??? Some other tart? Nah - they've already got their careers well in hand. After all - look how much they've earned already from the Pervert-In-Chief when he was in office.

There are advantages to being on the thick side in a certain department 😉

Thanks, PozBearWI. That's understandable (the either/or choice), and I agree. Better to massage the existing a bit than to try all over again from nothing.

Well said. Some types of specula can be downright dangerous if used without the particular care you invest. Thanks for the comment.

No wonder I had no idea what "boolean" means; it has to do with algebra !!! The only way I passed high school algebra is, my mother (Librarian) was friends with my algebra teacher. Miss Penstone (how's that for a Dickensian name?), a single, never married old woman, would ask my mother if I were studying (homework) at all - and I was - which my mother reported, Literally hours virtually every school night. It was a total nightmare for me. Even my dad would sit with me trying to help.😬 Geometry wasn't all that bad, but algebra was simply a bridge too far. We had a "track" system in high school, meaning one would be "put into" one of several "tracks" for career purposes. I was put in a Humanities track, thus college-bound. Skinny old Penstone* knew that, and told my mom that occasionally she'd run across students with minds that simply could not comprehend, make sense of algebra. So, she passed me with a D, and I got to go to undergrad. Not once have I ever regretted not knowing shit about algebra. I can pay the bills, balance the checkbook, and I don't give a rats ass about the rest of it. *skinny barely describes it; she could easily walk through a harp ...

from your .... well, fingertips .... to Whatever's Ear !!!!

1. After the misery of the post-debate carrying on last night, I had a hunch, so I waited to watch the rally in Carolina to see if I was right or wrong. The President's speech just wrapped up moments ago, and , while it's only my own analysis of the debacle of last night, there's one interesting detail I'd like to point out: One of the rules agreed upon by both parties to the debate last night was that no prepared written notes would be allowed. Each candidate was provided several sheets of paper and a pen, so notes during the debate could be made, by either the President or the other guy. I've noticed during speeches that the President relies, perhaps a bit too heavily, on the teleprompters. During speeches, he clearly looks at the teleprompters constantly. It's only during applause, chants from the crowd, that he looks away and makes the requisite 'eye-contact' with the crowd. Thus, I surmise that without the teleprompters, and in combination with the flood of lies, merde from the King of Bullshitters, our President lost his way. He was deprived of his 'support system', the teleprompters. I'm not suggesting that the other guy prevented the use of notes/teleprompters - he's far too dull to figure that out, but one of his acolytes may have. Now. I suppose one could argue that a President should be able to speak confidently without any visual, pre-recorded prompts like a prepared speech. That fact is, he's old, set in his habits when publicly speaking, and should have either insisted (successfully) on including the teleprompters at the debate, or declined the invitation. He's in his 80's now, and some synapses just don't work as well as they did 40 years ago. That possibility however, in no way indicates impairment of his mental acuity. It merely makes obvious a bad habit, likely developed over many years, of depending on a certain technology - a support system during public appearances. I can and have forgiven him of that, since all of us have developed the same bad habit of depending on technological advances more, perhaps, than we ideally should. That issue, however is hardly enough to disqualify him from the Presidency. 2. Let's imagine the US Government as a gigantic corporation. The President is the CEO, with a huge office (for this purpose, we'll call it the White House), staffed by many employees that have various duties. Let's imagine that this Corporation produces some product, which has come into use world wide. Using that analogy, the CEO of some large, multi-national corporation has, of course, many managers of various divisions within said Corporation - from procurement of materials, to labor relations, to Sales of said item, to Shipping, to servicing of the product to customer relations, on and on and on. Each of these 'divisions' has it's own large staff of employees that actually do the work. The US Government is similarly structured, with "divisions" for every kind of activity any Government anywhere engages in. The CEO relies on the information his employees bring him, to inform his "macro" decisions, and that corporate structure generally works fairly well. However, when one Manager fails to foresee, or investigate some potential problem with an upcoming meeting/conference, the entire operation may become threatened. In this specific case, someone failed to realize how crucial some particular component was to the success of the Company, with a terrible result. That may be a cumbersome analogy, and thanks to those who bothered to read it. After hearing the President's speech this afternoon in Carolina, watching it carefully, I am hopeful that this mistake - omitting the "crucial component" mentioned in the previous paragraph - led to a disastrous result. One can pick at nits - maybe the President shouldn't have become so reliant on teleprompters in the first place, maybe this, maybe that, ad infinitum, but this is a rather reasonable explanation for last night's horror. The inescapable fact however, is with teleprompters, Joe Biden is his very able, very confident, very clearly in-command self. Without them, he's crippled. That fact has not one whit to do with the goals he sets out for his "employees" (in the Corporation example) to follow through on, and for which the Nation has benefitted enormously since his Presidency began.

This doesn't require any responses, since it'll all be over in a few hours: I am so tired of all the carrying-on in the media about tonight's debate. It's like nothing else is happening in the world. We all know it's important, we all know the implications, and if anyone didn't before today, they surely do now. And I'm a bit weary of the Woman in Black explaining things this way, rehashing it that way, ad infinitum. At least CNN has an International version of their broadcasts. Enough already.

I think that every guy should get to unload in whatever way he feels is best for him. If a bottom feels that he shouldn't cum until the last Top does, great. If he feels he should wait until he gets home, fine. If he wants to postpone his climax until after taking as many loads as possible, great. If he wants to cum while getting fucked, all he should need to do it mention that to his Top once, and let the Top make it happen. If the bottom doesn't want to cum (at that moment), he should mention that to the Top, and have his desires respected. If the bottom has some kind of "suffering"* complex, and doesn't even want to share that information, that's ok too. Sex is always best when both guys get what they need. *I mean that in the context of 1) a Bd Sm context, or 2) an emotional need to submit so entirely to his Top(s) that his own release becomes irrelevant, to be dealt with some other time/place.