Do you still cum in a bottom who asks you to pull out?

[Ffistboi21]

19 hours ago, LittleCumSewer said:

lol I have never asked a guy in my life to pull out. I always beg them to blow their loads in me then thank them after they do it.

Same here. I beg them to cum in me. And say thank you once they do. I love being a receptacle for tops to unload in when they need it. 

[smallcocksissyboi]

As a closeted faggot bottom not on prep, I often cum I prematurely during a fuck and then get anxious and change my mind as the top gets close to cumming in me. Sometimes I’ll whimper for him to pull out but really can I expect him to when I consented him to cunning in me when we started? It’s my fault for ejaculating prematurely so I’m not surprised to hear most tops will cum in me regardless

[BlackDude]

Is this still a thing?

[BootmanLA]

1 hour ago, BlackDude said:

Is this still a thing?

It is because apparently large numbers of people on here failed Reading Comprehension 101.

The question did not ask "Do you like tops to cum in you?" The question did not ask "Do you like condoms?" The question posed was a simple one: If a bottom has requested, before sex, that the top pull out before orgasm, do you cum in him nonetheless?" You could rephrase the question "Are you a selfish fucking piece of shit asshole who doesn't think other people's opinions matter?" and all the people who answered the first question with "yes" should check "yes" to the second question.

All these inane and pointless side tangents from bottoms talking about how they are there for the top's pleasure and all that associated bullshit are completely non-responsive to the question asked - which is clearly directed at tops. It's reasonable for a bottom to comment on a top's answer, but there's simply no way for the allegedly subservient take-any-load-never-say-no bottoms to even legitimately answer the question because to correctly answer it, you should be a top (or at least, top on occasion).

It's also why I don't answer any of those fucking questions addressed to "Faggots" or "Useless Cumdumps" - I'm a bottom, but I am not a faggot. (Call me one once and you'll get corrected. Keep it up and you lose teeth.)

[BootmanLA]

22 hours ago, Cockdumb&Cute said:

I don't agree....no....i will be bred at the whim of whoever is inside me, period....what the hell are u talking about a bottom "thinking"-or-"deciding"-or-"demanding"-or-"making choices"???? i don't understand this thread at all!!! #confused&scared #leavingthis thread

😭😭☹☹🥺🥺

If you're confused it's because you didn't understand the question that was asked originally.

It was addressed to tops, asking them about THEIR behavior. The fact that you're trying to answer with a non-sequitur answer suggests you need to re-read the question, realize it doesn't pertain to you, and move along. 

[NWUSHorny]

I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but I have never cum in anyone the 1st time without confirming immediately before I shoot.  The only times I don't ask are repeat hookups and guys who are begging for the load.  

[verslut]

I had a fuckbuddy who wanted me to pull out and I obliged. He started doing porn and made me use a condom. I did that once but stopped hitting him up after that. We met up a few months later. He said he was way pigger than before. He let me go in raw and breed him the night before he was scheduled for a porn shoot. I started fucking him again on the reg and he never asked for a condom or for me to pull out ever again.

[Cumfilledbottomboi]

On 4/1/2021 at 11:13 AM, BreedingTop71 said:

I see so many bottoms responding to this thread and it is clear there’s a difference between the subs and the regular bottoms. 
 

I don’t hook up with gay bottoms. They always instructing the or tops on how they want to get fucked and have their little “rules” and such. I have no patience for any of that. 
 

men I hook up with are submissive bottoms. They know their place. They know they exist to give me lemasure and take my loads. “No” is not something I want to hear. 
 

Everyone else has a right to do what they want. I do too and it is all agreed to beforehand. I for one would never ever pull out. My swimmers need to be deposited inside the sub. 

I am a faggot, a male with useless cock. I am always focused on alphas and real men like, you. You can use me as you wish. But that load should go inside the boipussy.

Edited April 23, 2021 by Cumfilledbottomboi

[DarkroomTaker]

18 hours ago, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

I am a faggot, a male with useless cock. I am always focused on alphas and real men like, you. You can use me as you wish. But that load should go inside the boipussy.

Each to their own. I am a bottom full stop. A man who loves sex with Men.

This post above is a killer for me, just takes away the masculinity of Men, it is in MY opinion so off putting.

Feminizing the bottom role of men and bottoms does not do it for me.

[blondy]

As a top, I won’t meet a bottom if there’s a suggestion that my load is going to end up anywhere other than deep inside his ass. If there’s a sniff of the pull-out-before-you-cum discussion, then I’ll just tell the bottom that I’m not interested.

It is also one of the reasons that I don’t meet versatile guys anymore … I had a few experiences where they wanted me to pull out, so the chemistry there doesn’t work for me.

One its one of the primary reasons I strongly prefer strict bottoms … they are always focused on getting the load inside their ass.  Total bottoms are my absolute favourite to fuck!

[Cumfilledbottomboi]

5 hours ago, DarkroomTaker said:

Each to their own. I am a bottom full stop. A man who loves sex with Men.

This post above is a killer for me, just takes away the masculinity of Men, it is in MY opinion so off putting.

Feminizing the bottom role of men and bottoms does not do it for me.

I’m not feminine at all though. I just am what I am. I’m a man who “exists” (in the bedroom) to be used by top men / alpha men. Hell, most people outside of the bedroom don’t know I’m even gay. 
 

my whole point was I was there in the bedroom to be used as the top wishes.

[Whiteboy4bbc]

I love to take raw loads, I have taken a lot oF

cum at the bookstore from Mostly black older men who love to cum dump in a young white slut. It’s not to feel them slide a rubber off and put it in raw and slam it hard and rough and feel his nuts contract back and forth as he’s loading his seed in me

[alwaysready]

well, i begin to cum b4 i have an orgasm, so after some convo, while my seed is leaking into him, i pull out and j/o on his ass

[DarkroomTaker]

9 hours ago, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

I’m not feminine at all though. I just am what I am. I’m a man who “exists” (in the bedroom) to be used by top men / alpha men. Hell, most people outside of the bedroom don’t know I’m even gay. 
 

my whole point was I was there in the bedroom to be used as the top wishes.

Ok

[BootmanLA]

11 hours ago, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

I’m not feminine at all though. I just am what I am. I’m a man who “exists” (in the bedroom) to be used by top men / alpha men. Hell, most people outside of the bedroom don’t know I’m even gay. 
 

my whole point was I was there in the bedroom to be used as the top wishes.

When you call it a "boipussy"  you are doubly feminizing yourself.

"Boi" originated as a term used for a submissive lesbian who wasn't femme; "Dom" was usable for both men and women, but "boy" didn't work as a term for a woman, hence the creative spelling evolved.

Many years - MANY years later - puritanical online services like AOL banned the use of the word "boy" in any context that implied sex, and as gay people are wont to do, instead of leading a respectful charge to allow the term in context (ie Dom/boy or Dad/boy) when used for actual adults, chose to just misspell the word in an attempt to get around the automated censoring the services used. (I see lots of people on here trying the same shit - if a word is banned because of certain associations, it's just as banned when you hide certain letters or misspell it deliberately to evade the censors, and you're proving yourself to not actually care about following the spirit of the rules.)

"Pussy" is a long-standing term used for vaginas. While there are trans men who have vaginas, "boipussy" is almost always referring not to a trans man's vagina, but to a gay submissive's ass.

So "boipussy" is doubly feminizing, just as calling one's pectoral muscles "boobs" is feminizing as well. You can claim to be "not feminine at all" but that's a peculiar way to demonstrate it.

If (and I have no reason to doubt you) you are a man who exists in the bedroom to be used by top men, then I'm not sure why you wouldn't use the terms that apply.