All Activity

Just as the guy is about to to cum down my throat, as he tightens up and his cock swells up and he holds your head and shoots that first bead of cum to the back of your throat I just love that feeling. Chat anyone?

I only watch condom porn if I know the rubber is coming off and followed by bb, especially when breeding happens! Otherwise NO FRIGGING WAY!

Please please please tell me that Dan decides he is lonely in his bed and curls into Rick in bed…. Or maybe Rick commands his pussy boi Dan to sleep with him. I am guessing it might be a somewhat sleepless night either way 😈😈 excellent writing once again @mancoco!

And to this point I referenced the U FL article which deflates the implication. You used Musk as an example on page 2 on this thread, first entry, and I tried to use that as demonstration. By this quote from there: "One of the reasons i am in favor of campaign finance reform is i think the current system breeds and sustains corruption with both parties. If i give $50 to a democrat or republican's campaign, i'll get a form thank you letter. Most of US voters are not "$170 billion richer since endorsing trump...." i don't think that coincidental. It makes perfect sense to me that anyone who contributes to a government representative, does so to get something in return. It seems evident to me that the higher the... 'contribution' the higher the return. Musk, as just one example, does not strike me as altruistic." I don't really know what your point is.

@tallslenderguy I feel like you keep moving the goalposts. Can you be clearer on these points you make: On page two of this thread you typed this: "" i should have qualified my question: "as regards campaigns and campaign financing." So then, how would your apply science and rationalism to campaigns and campaign financing? "" with a BZ site time of Sun 2:09am (I don't know how to quote from a different page). Campaign and campaign financing are literally for elections. There is no campaign without an election. So what does the quote above mean? In response to what you quoted from me: "You're focus is on the election. I've tried to express the limitations of the "selection set," if you will." Selection set = what you're talking about which, by your quote was "" i should have qualified my question: "as regards campaigns and campaign financing." So then, how would your apply science and rationalism to campaigns and campaign financing? "" so I reasonably assumed it was about campaigns and campaign financing. What do you mean if not that? By "selection set" you took this is a negative way, it seems. I don't know how you got there, exactly. It's just what you are considering by this quote again: "" i should have qualified my question: "as regards campaigns and campaign financing.""

I want to be sissy mercy school training program that saves white boys are fully funded transformation to female wearing dress hormone replacement therapy fake tits Botox injections training dildo, breeding partner I choose from jail glory hole he is Ur nigga U both are given cock ring sissy visit Daily session I screaming in pain Congo republic nigga have thickness sissy mercy Ur hips break

Exactly how I would need to be handled. Very hot story.

I’ve taken 38 loads in my hole, swallowed 5, all from 39 different guys in 2026 so far.

No, not really. There are men of all racial backgrounds in Berlin, giving/taking loads. Berliners have known for ages that stuff like skin-tone doesn't matter a hill of beans when it comes to breeding each other. There may be visitors from elsewhere that carry a regrettable "color-issue" with them, I suppose, but not enough to have much of an impact.

Well, Trashyfagboi92, it sounds like you're really down in the dumps, and that's something that needs to be worked on first. I'm no therapist, but I can recognize a guy that's grasping at straws, and I really hope you're able to get some help with the other issues you're dealing with, and get around to the sexual issues when the crucial ones - like living your life - when the really crucial one is salved. My best wishes to you.

That's pretty common. On the flip side, there are a lot of guys that don't seem to understand why they are being rejected by guys like me who are primarily looking to fuck or get fucked, just because they don't fuck or get fucked. I'm sure I've heard about thousands of ways to have the "best sex ever" without having to put a dick in a hole or in a lot of cases even touch each other's "icky dick," at PNW bathhouses, theaters, ABS, and other cruising spots.

I'd vote for "open" .... my other half and I were "open" from the day we first met. Often, one of us would have to go to the downtown office, and it was fully expected that the guy that had to go (sort out some issue, generally a bit of a pain in the ass), would either .... 1. stop off at some bar on the way home and pick up something to bring home and share, or ... 2. stop off at some fuckjoint, fuck/get fucked, and then bring the trick home to share "seconds" with. When everything is out in the open, expected and shared, it's far more fun than cheating - at least for us it was. We went out to the fuckjoints together at least a couple of times a week - sometimes more 😇

Maybe a dozen. I always seem to forget about counting while in the moment.

I really like the way our protagonist is being converted. Not only the pozzing, but also the development of his kinks. I used to sub for a Dom who introduced me to pain in sex. Deliberate pain, not the inadvertant pain that comes with getting a cock rammed up my butt. I found it liberating to discover that I could take it and not break down. At least not right away. He would increase the pain slowly, pushing me to take more, until my fight-or-flight instinct seized me and I'd try to get away. Once he had me losing control like that he knew he was in total control and he'd proceed to fuck and seed me. I'm not a pain pig, but I'll go pretty far in accepting pain to please a Dom.

I don’t like condom porn. It’s weird that I’m missing at least an entire decade of porn with some amazingly hot guys—but condoms immediately me off

lol... you are conversing with a guy who is certified in preventing and reversing disease process through diet, so i cannot put "PepsiCo" and "health" on the same planet, they are at opposite ends of the universe.

According to a doctor friend, despite some fantasies on here, it’s very difficult, if not impossible, to have more than one strain of HIV at a time. Once a virus takes hold, it does something to the cell to prevent other versions of that same virus from entering. that’s why you don’t get two colds or two flus at the same time.

No. This is a vast topic. i really do not know what you are thinking when you infer, then imply, my "selection set?" Whether intended or not, to assert what my "focus is" can give the impression that's all i'm aware of and that i'm in need of counsel lol. That happened earlier in the discussion when you asserted that i think/contend that "small dollar donations are better." Rather that asserting what i think or say (e.g., what my "focus is,"), maybe quote specifically what leads you to that impression of me and state it as your read of me vs telling me and others what my position is. That way i can more exactly say "yes, you read me correctly" or "no, that is not what i think or am trying to convey" and then i can further try to explain or clarify. i do not presume to have this in "focus." I think the focal point is too vast for focus, so naturally, It is easy to identify and express limitations when the focus is narrowed on a broad topic, eh? It seems to me that "express[ing] the limitations" is often "your focus." And i think that's fine, and part of the larger discussion, but only part. While i am biting off pieces for sake of discussion, i think it's obvious that there is other stuff on the plate. i do think there is merit to chipping away at this, i.e., that we can approach attempting to 'fix' this in steps. Given the divergent view points, i'd question the chances of any attempt at holistic approach towards consensus. i reiterate that i believe "campaign financing" is not only about how contributed money affects the ultimate list ("selection set?" ) of those who get to ultimately run for office, but also how that money affects the elected's decisions and representation after the campaign and election process. But clearly, there's "other stuff on the plate." The study i cited above (tis a ponderous tome) goes into other factors about that influences the resultant "selection set:" "...this paper also provides further evidence on the impact of demographic factors, such as candidate’s age, gender, party membership, and incumbency status, on electoral outcomes." Agreed. What do you propose as realistic, alternative?