hntnhole
-
Posts
6,145 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by hntnhole
-
"I can leave the hurt where it belongs." That's the goal, of course, and I hope with all my heart that it happens for you. Be prepared, however, for an occasional, sudden re-emergence of grief. It's not a "one-n-done" thing. It hides, lingers in the hidden recesses of the mind, and sometimes it'll jump out and kick you in the balls. The passage of decades can diminish it's power, but I don't believe anyone with a modicum of humanity can completely dismiss grief. It's sort of like an old chair that we can't bring ourselves to toss out; it's uncomfortable, it's ugly, worn, even threadbare, and we cover it up with a nice "throw" or something, but there is it, just waiting for us to weaken and plop down in it. The positive thing though, is that we can learn to control how often we sit there, and make those visits fewer over the years. I hope you can eventually ditch your old chair - toss it out for good. I haven't, but at least it's in a disused room now, and covered with other old stuff that only weighs me down now. One of these years .....
-
From your - well, fingertips - to Whatever's Ears. If there's anything left to rebuild on 2 years hence will be at least something; The hatemonger-in-chief does have quite a large plate of Hatemonger's Stew in front of him.
-
I haven't investigated this issue, but it occurs that any marriage that was "legal" at the time it occurred, could only be specifically addressed at the SCOTUS-level in the courts. The current resident of the White House cannot simply alter standing law on a whim. Of course, that's not to say the SCOTUS wouldn't grab their ankles instantly and take it right up their withered, flabby Holes, but that process would have to take place first (shudder). I don't think he can simply annul standing, legal anything, merely by allowing that particular turd to drop from his lips (or sharpie). Of course, he can (and will) try, but Obergefell is and remains the law of the land.
-
Isn't the variety in our little corner of the world just delicious?
-
You're entirely correct, as I see the issue. We - gay folks in general, and practitioners of raw sex in particular - are an easy target for those who believe they can somehow exert control over everyone else. It's not merely this website that would excite hatred in the pinheads, it's the fact that we share the planet with them, breath the same air, walk the same streets, shop at the same stores - in other words, simply exist. Most of them realize that they can't simply murder every gay guy or girl, that would be far too enormous a task. And what would they wind up with? Nothing more than millions of bodies, with new GLBT+-to-be babies being born every single day. The real issue at hand isn't this facet of freedom or that facet; It's freedom itself. This is what seeking to control everyone else is about; freedom for some, and worse for everyone else unlike them. Coexistence is the only way there will be room for everyone to share the planet. The hatreds used to be more limited; to religions other than one's own, for instance. However, the more millions of us there are to share diminishing resources, the more the hatreds gnaw at the minds of the selfish. The issue of who's fucking who is only the mask; the real problem is people's propensity to hate each other.
-
Agreed. Join your local chapter of the LGBTQ+ Democratic Organization, and take part. RESIST.
-
For question #1, I chose the second supplied answer, since it came closest to offering a "non-reproductive" urge to fuck other men. The way I see is, we already have a name for guys that like to fuck guys, and still reproduce. which moniker is "bi-sexual". For question #2, I chose the first supplied answer, since there is no suggestion of reproduction. Had I been wired to do that, I would have done that. I am not, and thus never have done that. For question #3, I chose the 2nd supplied answer again. That choice offers an implication of Lust, but doesn't mention that lovely, compelling, universal urge. Commentary: If I had wanted to sire offspring (i.e. been born het), then that's what I would have done. That's not at all what I wanted, and from a young age. I never found girls attractive (in any way), and always liked other boys. Physical attention, from my youth, was always aimed at other boys, but thanks to O.R., didn't allow to take place until I got away from the city I grew up in and went away to school. I don't quite understand the reference to this site in the questionnaire, unless it refers to two guys that share sex, both members of BZ, taking part in the poll. The preponderance of guys here have never met, never will, and "know" each other only by what other guys write.
-
Most folks have a laptop, for which they also subscribe to one of the 'security' companies that offer protection from viruses, hackers, etc. Most also offer a VPN service. I can't imagine anyone (other than a computer-geek) not subscribing to one of these services, and given the potential threats, also a VPN. The one I use offers the ability to change where you "live" from - oh - say Fort Lauderdale, to any other major city in the world ... for instance, Copenhagen (where I currently "am" at this very moment). It can still take several attempts to arrive at BZ, but finally it works. Once the current administration messes up some of the larger targets they're aiming at, they'll get around to us, presumably. So, I'll enjoy BZ - as I have for the past number of years - and hope the dullards get dumped in 4 years. If that doesn't pan out, then I've enjoyed what we all shared here, and be grateful for what was.
-
Minimum number of people to make it an orgy?
hntnhole replied to cintarius's topic in General Discussion
THAT'S for damn sure !!! -
Thanks for that from The Guardian. It appears to be a generalized statement that the current President without much detail. Maybe more a "de-rigueur" scrap of red meat tossed to his jockstraps ... er ... I mean supporters. I suppose that crowd will get around to us at some point though, after trying to further disgrace themselves with the "immigrant" bullshit.
-
"I wondered if this was cheating" Wellllllllll ...... not if the recipient(s) are aware of what they're reading*. In the event they're not, maybe they won't notice any difference - maybe there isn't any - when "real" Philip appears, in-the-flesh. As PozBearWI points out above, what's important is that every participant (2, 10, whatever) gets the genuine guy**. As long as that happens, real, fantastic "connection" is available to any/every guy in the writhing clot of bodies. *AI is a fascinating - well, "thing" - and it can improve all kinds of interactions immensely. But it's inanimate, and people aren't. It may seem/appear to be "animate", particularly when the actual people haven't met (in-the-flesh) yet. I very much hope you give us a description of how the day unfolded - not necessarily the sex part - but more if/how the actual, in-the-flesh meeting was, your impressions of any match/mismatch of the AI persona with reality. **What I'm unclear about is, how much (in the recipient's mind) is AI and how much is the actual person. I realize that AI can help us understand ourselves, improve ourselves, all of that, but it that result permanent? Do we revert to what we were before we used AI, if we stopped using it? Or can the subtle alterations become permanent in our minds? Or even should they ....
-
Minimum number of people to make it an orgy?
hntnhole replied to cintarius's topic in General Discussion
Well, if only one guy is bottoming and the other 4 are Topping, I guess it could be called a gangbang. Ideally though, we'd need 10, 15 guys to call it a proper orgy - which is why most orgies take place at hotels, tubs, fuckjoints, etc. Whatever we decide to call it, call me too .... 😁 -
Thanks for that exceptional explanation. It's not easy to understand unless one experiences it personally, and when that happens, words often pale into insignificance - and that was spot-on.
-
" I want to carry that forward, to teach others with the same care and curiosity he showed us." I would say that you're already on that path, whether you know it or not. By sharing some of the facets of your life, you're inviting others to consider those issues you've discussed (or invited discussion, which is aka 'teaching') and make relevant in their own lives. One + one = two: that's "teaching". Describing some situation in your own life, how you resolved it or how you're wrestling with that issue, is inviting others to consider the same issues in their own lives, and in the same way. It's like some required "nuts-n-bolts" coursework versus coursework that challenges not only the facts, but why they're facts, and more cerebral subjects you're already good at. Maybe you're not a degreed "teacher" yet, but you're already well on your way to being a wise man capable of gently offering others a different way of thinking.
-
Hopefully, your concerns will prevail. It seems that a lot of BZ'ers either are too young, or simply don't remember the repressions some of the more 'experienced' guys remember too well. In any case (on behalf of us all), thanks for this splendid and most useful site. It's a real treasure.
-
Welcome, new guys. We hope to hear a lot more from each of you. Cheers !!
-
The tiktok rumor-mill is not of much direct importance to me. I think the widespread dependence on these apps is obviously detrimental,; no person should live in a bubble. We need each other more than we think we do, and attempting to substitute virtual interaction for actual human interaction will be a dangerous and fruitless endeavor. I don't need some algorithm to tell me what I think, and neither do any of us. It's a dangerous behavior to get too comfortable with that practice.
-
I'm no mathematician, and I don't have an abacus big enough handy, but our buddy over in T.B. (sorry about last Sunday's game) seems to have his math fairly well covered. Faced with the obvious (according to ellentonboy's figures), I have been either very naughty, or very well-behaved.
-
Actually, I hadn't realized it until I read this ^, but I too fuck for a while first. The Hole needs to be pre-opened one way or another so as to obviate any damage when the fisting begins, and a Cock will do it just as well as anything else. My goal isn't always to fist - I do it rather seldom - when I'm asked. But when it's part of a "scene", I always rut first.
-
Actually, I have used real butter a number of times. As far as I'm concerned, butter is the perfect food - I've loved it since my earliest days. However. When butter is over-churned (i.e. used for lube and literally churned inside the Hole), the result can be disappointing, no matter how good it tastes. It can get - oh - what's the word - maybe "lumpy" - with too much churning. I'll stick with loads (either fresh or pre-frozen) and saliva.
-
Minimum number of people to make it an orgy?
hntnhole replied to cintarius's topic in General Discussion
I don't think there is a certain number to qualify as an "orgy". Obviously, an orgy would be comprised of a number of guys, but what makes the event an "orgy" is the uninhibited serial sucking/rutting/breeding that takes place. The only "measure" that creates an orgy out of a roomful of gay guys, is the degree of love for wanton raw sex the participants share. It could be 5, it could be 10, it could be 20, it could be 50. It's determined only by the willingness of the guys attending to push their boundaries. -
It's a fascinating - well, "thing"? .... Obviously I haven't tried it, don't know the first thing about it, but that doesn't mean I'm uninterested in how it works. Pleased you gave that dish to a real friend ....
-
I've heard it called a number of things, but 'tiger' is a new one for me 😄. I rather like it ....
-
Hooking Up With Poz Guys
hntnhole replied to twink-hearts-loads's topic in HIV/AIDS & Sexual Health Issues
Well said. Actually, I do have those as well, they just started coming along with the PrEP. Thanks for pointing that out.
