Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,302

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. hntnhole
    As do I, assuming a meaning of Israel's right to exist, as well as other countries in the Middle East. No WWII-era nation went after the other Semitic populations. Only one, with breathtakingly hellish results. However, that was 80-some years ago, and that particularly hellish era is well over now. Those days are a crystalline example of how a population of a nation, once the very font of the arts, culture, accomplishment, can return from the depths, becoming a valued nation again within the community of nations. I can understand (if not endorse) the hatreds the Islamic nations hold for the Israeli's. That land (Israel) was traditionally Arab for centuries, and after the holocaust, the leaders of the world decided to take a sliver of the British Empire, and create the State of Israel, in a gesture of recompense for the horror recently experienced in Europe. I would be surprised to learn that none of those WWII-era leaders considered the repercussions that would result, but it may well be the case. After enduring a holocaust, of course some measure of compensation should be offered, even if not much thought was devoted to later developments. Thus, the world has implacable enemies living within a stone's throw of each other - literally, How this finally gets resolved is beyond me (but it surely wouldn't be creating the biggest sea-side "resort" on the face of the earth either).
  2. hntnhole
    Once we give in, jettisoning our cultural/religious taboos, and actually do what we know we must, the fears, phony disinclinations tend to dissipate like a bad smell. We're still the same men, with the same desires, the same family, all of the same baggage - except that we've experienced the actual thrill of whatever our particular sexual bent happens to be. Fortunately for me, I jumped into the fantastic life we lead before hiv came along, when everyone fucked everyone else, and condoms were nothing more than a fetish a handful of guys observed. When hiv did come along, my other half and I turned Victorian, and only shared sex with each other. Finally - it seemed like forever - there were measures to take and we returned to our thrilling, fulfilling, exciting previous ways. When we decided it was probably going to be relatively safe, we both started achieving the thrill of wanton sex again, and I felt whole - unavoidably, insistently horny, as did my other half. What we felt was denied before became even more pressing, more dominant, more insistent. What had been something of a siren's call became a full sforzando of pounding, Wagnerian symphonic thunder. I can't say I dwell on what was back then, but I haven't forgotten either. This is Thursday - and tomorrow night I'll be back at my favorite fuckjoint, repeating that same sweet reply to the beautiful, insistent, recurring call again and again. Life is fan-fukkin-tastic, when we allow ourselves to be the men we were born to become.
  3. hntnhole
    He's built a career in exploiting the (assumed) "weak spots" of other nation's leaders. But, as the old saying goes, flattery will get some folks everywhere. Of course, that's only if the flatter-ee is susceptible to being flattered in the first place. In the US, that susceptibility is world-renown by now. What I wonder is, how deeply the EU leaders stooped to it.
  4. hntnhole
    Well said. Isn't it odd how human beings prefer to cling to their own outmoded belief-systems, which demand strict obedience to those systems, to the exclusion of every one else's differing belief systems? How more inflated could a nationality of people be? "Our way is the Only Way" is self-limiting for any group, whether political, religious, nationalistic, whatever. We're all residents of a planet that has developed quite a number of belief-systems, and if we demand that everyone else honor our own particular system, while we denigrate everyone else's, we're only limiting the progress of everyone. That's a recipe for disaster for all of humanity, if we can't overcome these self-limiting contrivances.
  5. hntnhole
    Someone should tell him that there's a small garment which exists to prevent Prideful Moments like this .... it's called a jock strap 😄
  6. hntnhole
    Perfectly said. The thing about using electronic contrivances is, we sit around typing or texting or whatever, and don't go out and fuck. Yes, phones, computers have their place, but nothing takes the place of getting out there and giving/taking loads. Interacting with our peers. Fantasies are for beginners - acting on those fantasies is the only thing that actually counts.
  7. hntnhole
    My supplier advises PReP every day (one pill), and Pep for only 3 days, one per day (after exposure). So far, so good ... it's working for me. I am also - at this very moment - knocking on wood. No, not my head - actual wood.
  8. hntnhole
    It is, to my mind anyway, inconceivable that these nations could be anywhere near to "friends" - that is simply asking too much. What is not asking too much however, is that the hatreds carefully built up over the centuries be turned into at least some measure of co-existence, if not anything close to friendship. It occurs to me that there are too many similarities between belief-systems - each with their own concrete belief that they - and only they - are beloved by some Deity. It's well past time to consciously set these false divisions aside, and focus on what unites us, rather than that which divides us.
  9. hntnhole
    If you mean the latest iteration of the time-worn troubles in the Levant, I agree. I don't particularly like the fact that there are so many US soldiers on the ground (in various encampments in the larger area), since they're exposed to increased risk these days. Let's hope many have been/are being brought home. That said, this is probably the most perfect example extant of why so many citizens of the World eschew the religious bullshit fomented by temporal leaders, particularly in that region. Using this Deity or that to excuse inhuman behavior never, ever works. It seems the PM of Israel has been stirring this pot since he was in diapers. The current President of the US probably is in them at present. I too find it unconscionable that the US has given so much rope to this particular PM of Israel. I'll trust you to finish that mental picture. The US had reached an "accord" in the area regarding nuclear weaponry, including offensive nuclear weapons some years ago. but a Certain Someone yanked the US out of that agreement during his first term. So, the trail of cookie-crumbs leads directly back to His Corpulence. DIRECTLY. Netanyahu has only taken advantage of that seriously stupid error, but reliable information regarding what the citizenry of Israel feels is not heavily covered; we don't know what Joe average citizen in Israel actually thinks. In the event (just short of the usual "2 weeks") the US does indeed use this so-called "bunker buster" bomb, our hands - by extension - will be covered yet again with Levantine blood. Is this what we want our collective legacy to be? I rather think not. When rabble-rousers (emphasis on "rabble") beat the war-drums, instead of sincerely working to find a solution wherein each party to the dispute gets something, gives up something, a peaceful solution might be found, instead of more oceans of blood soaking the sands of the Middle East.
  10. hntnhole
    Given the circumstances, what more can a guy ask for?
  11. hntnhole
    Who-wants-a-seat-with-some-fur (1).jpg
    ..... and I'll lay you 10 to 1 that his Hole is just as furry !!! Yummmmmm
  12. hntnhole
    I remain unimpressed with the President's response to Netanyahu's aggression. It's been too quiet over there for too long, and I've been wondering when the next blow-up would take place. The President is putty in Netanyahu's hands, and the PM of Israel has been self-serving for years. While T's latest response is his usual "I'll figure it out in a couple of weeks" reply to the major media's questions, the PM has been stirring this pot for years. He's used the "Iran issue" since he first was elected, and perhaps with good reason. Fanning the flames of religious differences is his calling card. This is a good example of why I turned my back on O.R. years ago; both sides claim to serve the One and Only Deity, and neither serves anyone but their own ambitions. The US has something around 40K soldiers in the general area, which T may use as an excuse to bomb Netanyahu's enemies to bits. But he can't do it without bombs from the US, and Trump is like putty in his well-experienced hands. All we can hope for, is "advisors" in our Government can dissuade Putty-brain from supporting this misadventure on the part of others. The straights of Hormuz could easily be closed if the US enters this mess, and that would cost the rest of the world dearly. The only "real" solution I see, are new elections in Israel. Until then, it's time to buckle the seat belts. We can't displace the ridiculous one for a few more years (but, we can take back Congress in a few months),
  13. hntnhole
    Ahhhh .... That depends on how 'in-your-face" you want to be. I think that whatever a straight couple could do to show affection for each other would apply across-the-board to gay couples. What you "ought" to do is, do what you feel comfortable doing, within the parameters of socially-accepted behavior. If you and I were in some store, deciding on whether or not to buy this or that, came to an agreement, a hug, a quick peck on the cheek, would be no problem, as I see it. We probably shouldn't fuck in the aisle, but then if we have bail money in our pockets, so what? You should do what you believe to be the right thing for you. Outside of starting a physical fight, no one should have an issue with some measure of PDA. If someone doesn't like it, then turn their face the other way. We won't advance our cause by being ashamed to openly love our partner.
  14. hntnhole
    Thanks for that intelligent post. Now. WHERE DID YOU GET THAT SHIRT ????
  15. hntnhole
    That could well be, but there's a far more enticing way to demonstrate a mouth-full of cum: simply kiss it to some other guy.
  16. hntnhole
    To the OP though, a lot of the answer depends on the location. The responses would be different from different parts of the country. Some parts of the country wouldn't blink twice at PDA in public spaces - other places, not so much. In major metro areas, public displays of affection (depending on how "graphic" they are, obviously) would barely be noticed. In others, the most innocuous, limited expressions would be demeaned. I think each guy has to sniff this one out for himself; there isn't any cut-and-dried answer.
  17. hntnhole
    No surprise to me - a close relative lives just up the road from J.H., I've visited, and I wouldn't live there for love nor money. One morning I woke up to find a gigantic* moose staring in the window at me. Oh - and there's a grand total of 6 weeks of summer. *I mean, as big as a medium-sized, 6-passenger car
  18. hntnhole
    One of the things I learned was, we're a group of men with widely-varying interests. Not every guy is a total bottom, not every guy is a total Top, there's a wide array of inclinations available to us, and assumptions are simply inappropriate. Thus, my reliance on a "negotiation", however brief, to make sure each guy gets everything he wants and nothing he doesn't. Every guy usually enjoys at least one of the "basics" - fucking or sucking - and a brief "I like X, but I love Y" exchange can always make sex hot, as well as avoid regrettable mistakes. Or, just start in with one act, and if he responds well, keep at it. At the tubs, there are always plenty of other guys if one turns out to be not quite what you're there for.
  19. hntnhole
    "What's Guaranteed To Make You Cum?" It's not "guaranteed", but damn close; A well-bred cumdump with a truly filthy mouth, begging any/all passersby for more hard raw cock (geezer or not).
  20. hntnhole
    Thanks for sharing that excellent resource. I hadn't known of it.
  21. hntnhole
    I can't recall even once being asked for drugs - in the fuckjoints, at the tubs, never. I suppose it's possible years ago, and I just don't recall it. I don't think I look weird - cuckoo - crazy .... but, maybe I do 🤪
  22. hntnhole
    That's closer to alliteration .... but, what's in a word anyway? As long as the deed gets done (and so is that).
  23. hntnhole
    Welcome, new guys ... We look forward to hearing more from each of you !!
  24. hntnhole
    Nope - you pretty much nailed it. I'd forgotten about the active/passive references - haven't heard that in years now. But, language is a fluid thing, constantly changing, little by little. Per the ass-eating, there were some that did it, but not until bottoms routinely <polite cough> made sure their Holes actually were edible. Accidents can and do happen, of course, but the cleanliness routine wasn't as obligatory back then. I don't think most of us were as comfortable with ourselves back then. We were still concerned about being "outed" all of that. M2M sex wasn't as celebrated, it was more in the shadows. These days, being an "out" gay man is no big deal; back then it was a substantial and bold choice to make. Thanks for offering that commentary.
  25. hntnhole
    Do you actually mean some guys only want to get high, and will fuck in order to get the drugs? That's beyond pitiful.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.