hntnhole

Since you're on PrEP, (and likely Pep), likely tested regularly, you've taken all the available steps to avoid those issues. The issue you're facing is one of Trust. Are you able to trust your friends, family, whoever? Is the ability to "trust" the issue? The use of restraints is something that needs to be "negotiated" in advance of the scene, and if you don't trust the guy when you're having a discussion in some non-sexual place (like a lunch-spot, sitting on a park bench, whatever), chances are poor you'll suddenly find that ability when both your cocks are hard. The point is to establish some level of trust as you spend a bit of time with him, before the hookup. If that seems unlikely, I'd suggest you demur with the best excuse you can come up with. Wait until you're ready to jump in with both feet.

I don't think that's unwarranted at all. Lots of guys have experienced some kind of negative event when they're in a fuckjoint taking loads. Frankly, it's guys like me that hold all the cards, which also implies a certain level of responsibility one brings to the fuckjoint. There are certain responsibilities Tops have that bottoms don't. Tops need to behave responsibly - eat their Hole, fuck them beautifully, and find something supportive to say (if any words are exchanged). There are a lot of Tops who think with their cocks, and we all know that hard cocks have no sense in the first place.

Interestingly, the PM of Israel has just visited the White House, and not a whisper in the major media about what transpired. I know Hamas is / was demanding their usual, and Netanyahu was still stirring that pot, but oddly, nothing is being reported. Was it a wasted opportunity? Or are there some nasty surprises up someone's sleeve(s) .....

I know this kind of mating ritual isn't available everywhere, but that doesn't mean guys can't aspire to deepening their sexual acts to match their lusts. Reading these responses only makes a guy all the hornier to get out there and jump into the pool of writhing, breeding men. To those who live in more restrictive areas, it might be up to you to advance the possibilities for other, more repressed rawmen. If you can possibly manage it, why not start a group of men dedicated to pigsex in your area? Start small - maybe a handful of guys - word will spread, and more will turn up. Tell the attendee's to tell other guys they know. Once we taste the sweetness of sating our lusts (however temporarily), the impetus is already there. For men like us, there's hardly a bigger thrill than sharing ourselves with those just like us. Nothing comes of nothing, right? Why not try it?

^, which allowed you to fantasize the entire event in your mind. When a bottom simply adores hard, raw Cocks pumping Sperm in his holes, the mind automatically fills in all the details. There's no real "need" to even see who they are - since the actual, physical, emotional need is being thoroughly satisfied, sight-unseen.

Congratulations, Watch-me-share-me. I'd say you're among the most fortunate of cumdumps, in that you found (or were found) by a man that sensed your craving, realized who and what you really are, and simply made it possible for you to become that man. Many have to work much harder to figure out how to make their dreams come true. I would add that the implied connection to a religious belief-system is common for many men, but when push comes to shove, the opaqueness of those strictures becomes apparent easily, once we apply our serious thought to the issue. I hope you've thanked that Man who freed you from your inhibitions many times, both verbally and in more thrilling ways as well.

3 or 9 .....

As was I. I have come to believe that Jill (and other family members, perhaps) was most responsible for pushing her husband to run for a second term. More, I think it was out of her love for him, that she couldn't accept what was so clear to others. But, it happened, that page has been turned now, and I don't disparage what she did out of love for her husband. Sadly, I'm no stranger to enduring the intellectual / physical decline of a loved one from that hellish malady; it's the worst nightmare possible. I don't have enemies, but if I did, I would never wish that tragedy on anyone, for any reason.

An interesting hypothesis, and it hadn't occurred to me. Other than his uncountable wealth, we really don't know that much about him. I am still thanking friends in WI for handing him that solid defeat, but I don't really know that much about him either. I am, however, looking forward to his attempt to start a replacement political party for the R's, now that they're steeping in total, abject shame. All that's happened so far is the announcement of forming a new political party, and if money can do that, he'll get his new political party. Interestingly, he seems to sense that the Congressional R's have shamed themselves so clearly, so deeply, almost the entirety of the R's in the Senate, that they seem merely opaque shadows of human beings, politically-speaking.

We part ways on that particular issue. Nations - even great ones - fade when a sizable portion of citizens of a Republic turn away from paying attention to the things that matter, either by sheer laziness in civic duty, or malign intentions. I can't imagine a way to "force" citizens of any nation to pay attention, care, when a majority of those citizens have lost interest in working towards that "More Perfect Union". It seems that everyone that doesn't quite fit the "ideal" is being denigrated, from those imported centuries ago as "property" to refugees from extreme poverty or denigration elsewhere in the world, on and on. Worse, when those citizens no longer care who sits in the White House, pandering to their fears and insecurities. I suppose the most appropriate phrase would be We're at a Crossroads. And, that outcome can only be decided by the citizens, (discounting an actual coup). Cleverly, the Administration has covered the worst of their tracks by commencing the most egregious repressions until after the midterms, thus appearing (to those not paying attention) that nothing all that disgusting is scheduled to take place until it's themselves that feel the boot of repression crushing their balls. (one last thing: I would have been stunned had you done otherwise)

If I could still blush, I would ..... but it's been decades since I could manage one 😇

Well, some of us did. She possess impeccable credentials, experience, intelligence, particularly compared to what she was running against. If her only "negative" possession was being a woman of color, and thus denied votes, then our country is in deeper trouble then we think. Her opponent possessed none of these attributes, "claiming" (read: lying about) all kinds of pseudo-impressive accomplishments, none of which has proven true. Insolvency, failure at numerous businesses, an obnoxious temperament, pandering to the populations unworthy fears instead of offering sound proposals beneficial to all citizens. Remarkably, many didn't even "bother" to vote at all. And, you're correct: any successful candidate for President must include the needs of all citizens, not merely of their own political party. How could we? The great percentage of that unholy mess of a bill wasn't even read by most of our Representatives/Congressperson. And that is the fault of the media. Ever slow-to-learn, most Americans are too busy with their day-to-day responsibilities to study proposed bills in Congress. I would guess that there are enough Congresspersons who didn't read the entire bill (which is their damn job) to sink a ship. Plus, most Americans expect that their Congresspersons will actually do their jobs - before it it too late. That's been the expectation for 249 years, and has served us well. But this is a different day now. Giving the insanely-wealthy such inordinate monetary rewards is nothing short of an arrestable offence. I agree. It used to be a valid assumption that we could trust those who we elect to Congress. Clearly, one of the parties has clearly been fucked into abject compliance with the Hater in Chief, to the point that care was taken in the voting process to make sure it would pass, so that a handful could vote "no" - assumedly an effort to help their re-election efforts. All the while, Goebbels was yammering on their cellphones, threatening this, that, and the next thing. Apparently, we citizens have made their jobs in Congress a little bit too cushy. If there's one lesson to be learned by the American Voters, it's trust no one. Lets hope they all don't get sent to those ultra-heinous prisons in South America.

I would say to a great extent; the more obvious it becomes, the easier to counter it. Pandering to the fears, anxieties of those citizens that have been less successful is easy as can be. It's inspiring them to a more productive thought-process, introducing programs to assist them, rather than push them even farther down would be far more humane than stirring the pots of hatreds. Yet, the clever conmen have always managed to figure out how to demean others, and thus seemingly make themselves attractive to the less-advantaged. Apparently, some more clever folks in the Administration have taught His Nibs that lesson: the most disadvantageous aspects of the Big Bullshit Bill won't even take effect until after the midterms. Clever, craven, and crass. I agree .... and here we are. This is why I enjoy BZ so much: we get to express our ideas, exchange viewpoints, consider and re-consider issues of the day. My only wish is, one day the subject of Government-studies will be re-introduced into our public schools. It's inexcusable that there aren't any required courses in that subject these days. It used to be called Civics, but that or any other name would be a huge investment in some measure of awareness in the general population. To the "Where is Cronkite" issue, where indeed is his bequeathment to the current crop of tv "personalities"? Look only to the current Cabinet the President has chosen to run the country. Dullards, drunks, whoremongers, insipid fools - to enure that none of them outshine His Nibs, scrambling only to earn his favor instead of offering him one scintilla of "wisdom". One could enlarge that conundrum to the Republikans in Congress as well. Yes-men/women to a one. Cowards, concerned only with ensuring the Presidential Mouth doesn't go after themselves. Or, more plainly put, honest, well-reasoned women and men. Some of the major media is more honest than others, but we're in a "truth-desert" these days. BUT - we get to come here to BZ to discuss and share with others, so that's at least something.

If that's the case, you wear rather intelligent shirts (including the cuffs). Including, crucially him. Agreed. To the Magaroid crowd, braggadocio, blaring insults, negativity in all it's hideous forms seems somehow attractive in a President. The underlying reasons could be manifest and many. A lack of curiosity about the world, other than how to demean it, is the hallmark of a disinterested, self-centered, self-focused bs artist, who's spent his 70-some years learning the craft of Circus Barker. ripping off every other person/entity he possibly can to inflate his own ego. I laughed when I read the phrase (bully pulpit - as if he'd ever been within shouting distance of an actual pulpit). Entirely agreed. Not the good of long term stability, not the individuals themselves, and certainly not the entire world. To these kinds of so-called Leaders, stability is to them, as kryptonite is to Superman, The more the population concentrates on the blaring trumpet of the day, the less they are likely to recognize the abject failures of the phony guy.

It seems the President needs to acquire a dictionary; he seems not to know the definition of "obliterated". Reports subsequent to that bombing campaign suggest something well short of "obliteration". Unfortunately, we here in the US are embroiled in a national issue, which has just been tipped towards the President's favor. At least we Americans get to concentrate on a domestic issue, rather than some foreign one. The "fallout" may prove most destructive to the American People, but that's for another thread.

and now I "live" just NE of you .... København. I wonder if my ancestors would forgive me ......

Can/would you be willing to expand a bit on that statement? I'm not sure I understand what you mean ..... Thx.

Welcome, new guys Pineapple Semen and chillrawtopguy. BZ is a welcoming community that encourages discourse (will some measure of decent manners, of course) where we get to exchange ideas, viewpoints on all manner of subjects, from the obvious to many other issues of the day. We look forward to hearing more from you and all the other new members.

That's the real issue - "given the right opportunities". When a guy hears the magical beat of some distant drummer, it may not be insistent enough, get lost during a guys day to day life. I doubt many of us does nothing but fuck. We have to eat, live someplace, blah blah blah - and just that requires time, employment, opportunities, on and on. I suppose it's why so many guys relocate to major metropolitan areas, where both employment and living up (or down) to their sexual potential are enabled. When everything a guy needs is within a few minutes drive, the "call of the wild" is easy to not only hear, but then act upon with thrilling regularity. Well said.

Thanks, Erik62, for that interesting addition to the subject. I would only remark that that PM held the position over 50 years ago, and much has changed in the area since then.

To the OP though, I think virtually every guy has the potential, but not every guy has the chance to actually become a sexual pig. Location can play a big role in the potential development, if one lives far enough from a major metro area. It can become a burden if one has to travel for a couple of hours to even get to a sexual pigsty. There are, of course, other variables involved, family pressures, religious pressures, cultural repressions, on and on. That said, almost all of us have the ability - even hidden deep down in our subconsciousness - to revel in wanton sex.

LOL .... I'd have paid good money to have witnessed that ......

"It’s just using sounds like “Na” and “La” ........ (apparently the "quote" doo-dad is taking the day off ......) Try replacing a voiced consonant with a percussive one, like Ta or Ka. It's easier to get your throat muscles to "remember" something exact, rather than something inexact. There's a reason some singers form the particularly bad habit of "scooping" to the correct pitch. That might be ok for B-grade Hollywood movies, but - - - Once the throat muscles get accustomed to "knowing" that position, see if the switcheroo to voiced consonants gets easier.

Actually, I was quite surprised by that statement. While it seems there isn't one intact vertebra in the collective spines of the Congressional R's, at least she gave her "reasons", tainted with a heavy-helping of phony-baloney. She may not like this, she may not like that, but Congress operates on the basis of achieving consensus, or some measure of it. It's crystalline that the Congressional R's are even more terrified of the Panderer-in-Chief than they are of their own constituents, and they seem to believe that those constituents have memories that only last momentarily. Now that the puddle of shit has landed squarely in the Boy Blunder's lap, at least there should be a bit of comedic relief. I'm anticipating a tsunamic wave come the Midterms.