Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,806

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. hntnhole
    Wellllllllll .......... thanks for the reply, but I'm afraid I don't know how to do that either. I always had secretaries to figure out how to make the damn computers work ... No apologies needed - the discourse is what I come to BZ for !!! I'll go back through some of the "likely" posts and see what I can find. It won't be today or tomorrow, but - I'll look for some. Again, thanks for your kind words.
  2. hntnhole
    For what it's worth, I never cared for girls much - from grade school days on. It's not that I had any notion of what "sex" was, I didn't. I just didn't like how girls behaved, being silly, all the damn giggling, little girls trying to bat their eyes at little boys, the whole panoply of childish behavior. I always gravitated to other boys. To be clear, I hadn't so much as experienced a sexual thought at that time. I just didn't like girls, which blessing has remained to this day.
  3. hntnhole
    That's an interesting proposition. Are you equally active with both women and men now?
  4. hntnhole
    Agreed - with the obligation to what? I would posit that would be our ancient enemy, Organized Religion. In the effort to cover the world with certain religious beliefs, and thus accruing corporal/emotional power to themselves, some religious institutions forbade any form of birth-control. For instance, it wasn't until 1968 that the Pope allowed women to take advantage of "the pill". I would further hazard a guess that one of the reasons so many of our neighbors in the Southern Hemisphere are trying so desperately to get to America, is the overpopulating taught them by the original invaders of that continent - Catholic Spain. The more adherents fearful of hell, the more dough flowing back to Rome. This while the clergy were busy lifting their long fancy dresses and fucking each other, teaching choirboys that sucking Cock is a holy activity, on and on. The post-Reformation lturgical institutions may be ever-so-slightly less culpable, but I wouldn't bother trying to fit a piece of paper between the two.
  5. hntnhole
    Quite a number of worthwhile advice above. Here's one more possibility: Get a friend/buddy to go with you. Some guy who you already trust, knows your issue, and is willing to help you release your inhibitions or fears. These are the things that can interfere with one's Lusts, and need to be expunged from your mind. Basically, the fuckjoints are about only one thing: Guys who need sex meet up to either fuck or get fucked. Sure, there can be small groups of guys who know each other, sit around and trade gossip more than anything else, and that's ok too. NO guy has a fantastic time every time he goes to a fuckjoint/baths. Allow yourself to be bolder - if one guy doesn't work out, find another, and then another. Don't allow your inhibitions to rule your sex life, listen to your Lust instead. If you can manage that once, the second time will be easier, and the third will be even easier, and the hundred-and-third will be a piece of cake. Know that exercising your sexual needs is an important part of your wholeness, your human-ness. Good luck !!
  6. hntnhole
    Agreed. There are almost always other cultural issues afoot when one race or ethnicity is avoided, but another sought. Nevertheless, we can work on solving the issue, bit by bit, bigger bit by bigger bit, and improve not only ourselves, but including others in that process too.
  7. hntnhole
    It does seem, NWUSHorny, that you need to get outta Dodge as soon as you can. A well-rounded, talented man, erudite, versatile, loving both T and b, is too precious to waste on an unappreciative population.
  8. hntnhole
    Apparently I was unclear: it's the owner of the bar that fills the envelope, out of the cash register to which you "make your contribution" when you buy drinks. The bar owner needs the cops to know who the dough is coming from ....
  9. hntnhole
    I can't explain that either, but then I haven't noticed that situation in the fuckjoints I go to. At Slammer, there are simply far too many guys to mentally keep track of, even if I were inclined to do that. I wouldn't know if I'd been there at the same time they were from one week to the next (excluding some hot bottoms, of course). I suppose it's possible that emotionally, some guys want to be seen to be pigs, as a part the raw community, and show up at the fuckjoints but fail to have any sex. To me at least, that would be a lot of bother for precious little reward. Frankly, it's what a man does that matters - not what he might appear to be doing. There are plenty of places where gay men go to socialize, some of the bars over in Wilton Manors are jammed all night long with guys not having sex. Even some of the bars where guys do fuck have areas where that happens, and not in the main bar area. Ramrod is like a weekend meeting place for gay friends of long standing too. Sometimes it's almost funny; a group of buddies can be blabbing away, right next to a group of guys fucking each other. To the OP though, I'm hoping some other guys can offer differing viewpoints on why those findings may/may not be valid. I'm not doubting the researcher's intent, nor their product, but there's got to be more they didn't factor into their conclusions.
  10. hntnhole
    I didn't mean to imply that I ever "bought into" that philosophy - but I knew guys that did. It doesn't make sense to me that one guy should play "deity", and the other guy should play "lump of clay" needing to be remade. That may be fine for some guys, and I have no judgement to offer regarding what other's do; I only hope informed decisions are made by both guys during the negotiation. I much prefer the "work with what is, and see if you can make it even better" approach. You're entirely correct that this type of interaction definitely implies a long-term, committed relationship, which should be explicitly a part of the foundation the two build their lives upon. One guy gets the fulfillment of caring for his "property"*, the other gets the fulfillment of knowing he's secure and treasured. *obviously, nothing more than language used within the Bd/Sm community. A "collared" boy is off-limits unless and until his Dad decides to share the boy, and then only after a serious chat with the prospective Top.
  11. hntnhole
    First, to the OP: It changes every time you do a scene with a new guy - during the negotiation. One of the points of a negotiation is for the bottom to allow a safeword to come into his own mind, all by himself. Thus, he's more likely to remember it if he feels he needs it during the scene. You can write it down on a sticky note, in case you might need it - preferably out of the bottom's sight. Yes, it does, and I'm glad nothing serious happened to you. Placing yourself at risk of hospitalization (or worse) seems a bit too heavy a risk to achieve "an ultimate high". It can happen for you over and over again, when delivered by a man who knows his craft, and can be enjoyed over and over again. On the other hand, the "one and done(for)" seems to be risking too much. Good luck.
  12. hntnhole
    Interesting article; thanks for posting it, NWUSHorny. (from the article) "But if the errors aren’t random — if, for example, somewhat same-sex oriented people are more likely to misidentify themselves as heterosexual" I don't see much material about this cultural issue in the article. What appears to be not in the consideration of the scientists, is that fact that thanks to cultural/religious repressions, it's entirely likely that a number of respondents would keep their sexual behavior to themselves. They'd have centuries-worth of repression and worse behind their decision. To another point the researchers raised, is something I've occasionally noticed: the gay or straight gene seems to run in extended families, meaning that in any generation, one (extended) family may have more gay men or women in their wider biological family, and the opposite true of families with no known gay members. To the point that bi/gay men appear to father more children, could that be since they are simply craving that which we all crave: sex. If they can't have it the way they want, they'll get it from their second-choice partner - their de rigueur wives - and finding it less fulfilling than their same-sex partners, want all the more sex, hoping to find that which is denied them for cultural/religious reasons. "why there seem to be so many gay men who are mostly or completely averse to sexual activities" My own personal reasoning points to an effective repression of any sexual activities that won't potentially produce offspring. Cultural, and more importantly religious beliefs can really stunt a gay man or woman's emotional health, and the only way I know of to overcome it is to simply shuck it off as irrelevant to that person's life, and move on. Thanks for sharing the article !!
  13. hntnhole
    Depending on what you mean by a "clean" Hole, there are definitely gradations to that particular aspect, at least for me. To me, "clean" means no bits of last night's supper. "Pre-lubed" means that hot-assed boy has taken loads before I got to his Hole. If the bottom's Hole doesn't measure up (or down, for some guys) to that requirement, there are plenty of other guys that do, and I'll just excuse myself and go find some. Yes, I know that "accidents" can and do happen, and all measures taken by the bottom to prevent accidents are not only much appreciated, but - using my definition of 'clean' - a requirement. It's happened a number of times, and all I say is something vague-yet-unmistakable like 'maybe there's something you need to attend to ... see you a little later'.
  14. hntnhole
    I don't really know why some political ads make a lasting impression. That one though, was so preposterous that all some of us needed was the mere mention, and the laughter (specific to that ad) came right out of hibernation.
  15. hntnhole
    Essentially, it's a question of whether or not the Top believes that a bottom is an equal partner in the scene. It takes at least 2 willing men to Breed, which means that if 50% of the pair - for whatever reason - wants the fuck to end, that's it. Anything less than that mutual respect implies a messed up mindset. Sure, there are bottoms who say they're not worth valuing, but I don't buy that. What I've found through the years, is that lifting them up, rather than diminishing them, makes any fuck far more thrilling. I'm not addressing a negotiated, S/m B/d scene, which I've commented on any number of times. Negotiated role-play can be earth-shattering for both the T and b. I'm merely commenting on the basic level of respect we all owe to every other guy. If we can't respect each other enough to allow each other to be a partner in the fuck, might just as well stay home and toss one off. So, to answer the OP, of course I'd stop, make sure the bottom is ok, and move on to the next one.
  16. hntnhole
    Well said. I don't ask, since if possible, I indulge in the infamous "taste-test" anyway. But even if the bottom hasn't taken any loads yet, it wouldn't put me off. Lots of Tops like to rut in any number of Holes, and then find their favorite again and Breed in that one. Put another way, raw Hole taking raw Cock is - in and of itself - a very special thing. Loads off previous Cocks just makes it even more thrilling than it already is.
  17. hntnhole
    As Chevalier once sang (well, kinda 'sang' ) : "Ah, yes - I remember it well ..." The camera was far enough away to allow us to imagine a grinning Chimpanzee riding in a toy tank, finger-fucking himself ...
  18. hntnhole
    Mine actually poked right through ..... 😀 Yeah, and despite the "high cost of everything" these days, I hope they can all still afford to eat. (tongue retracted, back inside). Around BZ, it's the community that gets nothing, and the moderators get everything - not. Seriously, it's easy to break a rule when we first join BZ. I know I did, and when it happened I took the time to figure out why. Asked one of the moderators for guidance re: what I did wrong, he replied, and it's been fine ever since. Again, seriously: This site is fantastic. Far more productive than not, and a rich opportunity to exchange thoughts. perceptions. viewpoints on all kinds of issues. Sure, there are some subjects I don't bother to read since they don't interest me. I rather doubt I'm missed in those threads either. Every guy gets to take part in an amazing exchange, whenever he decides to log on. Observing the rules seems a truly tiny "price" to pay.
  19. hntnhole
    That possibility always, always, always exists, at least for me. Just because I happen to like whatever, doesn't mean every other guy does.
  20. hntnhole
    LOL .... I wonder if they even understand the meaning of being embarrassed! Yes, we have crooked pols in the D party too - and they'll get what they've earned. Egyptian bling only buys so much these days ....
  21. hntnhole
    Lots of commentary on this thread; I don't recall ever caring to "keep track". At one time, shortly after moving to Chicago, I actually (shame on me - stupid kid)actively tried not to fuck the same guy twice, unless it was a fantastic fuck. The way I saw it, once I'd fucked a guy I already knew what that Hole felt like, and there were so many others I hadn't fucked yet (and thus didn't know what those Holes felt like) there were a couple of years when I only fucked fresh Hole. If life is like a highway, in my youth I was stuck in the dumb, self-centered, ignorant lane. Hopefully I've learned a few life-lessons since then, and grown into a better man.
  22. hntnhole
    Clearly and obviously 100% correct. I agree completely that whatever the potential drawbacks of term limits, it's well worth a try. As to the idea of sending 'those who do not want to go", I'm all in to try that asap.
  23. hntnhole
    Actually, not at all. I have commented on the depopulation of the Native Americans a number of times on this site. The wholesale murder of the indigenous population of the North American Continent was clearly - obviously - horrifically - the "original sin" of the invaders. That hellish issue however, was not a part of the Original Post; far from it. Actually, that is neither germane to the OP, and not the case personally. I was an infant; less than one year old when my parents emigrated to the US, and thus had no choice in the decision. Again, because that horrific issue is not the subject of the Original Post. I know that threads often "drift" into other subject areas, which is ok with me regarding other guy's posts. I try to keep to the discourse to the original topic when I create the topic, and if/when that gets thoroughly chewed over, create a new post to discuss whatever the next issue happens to be. I'm not quite sure how we "search" other guys contributions, but there must be some way, in the event you're interested in my perspective regarding the Native American issue. Thanks for your responses.
  24. hntnhole
    Well, if not "new", the certainly more aware. Not only of your intense pleasure in feeling a hard, raw Cock pumping loads up your Hole, but also pleasing your partner. Welcome to Freedom, GyroLover - and the rest of your rich, fulfilling, satisfying, load-taking Life !!!
  25. hntnhole
    To the OP, I'd guess that almost every raw Top would prefer to fuck a well-bred Hole full of loads off Cocks previous to his. I know I would. The fact is though, that at least some guys have to have fucked the bottom in order to fulfil that pleasure. I think it's a bit on the narrow side to simply dismiss a Hole because it hasn't been fucked full of Sperm from several Cocks quite yet. Maybe the bottom only got to the fuckjoint a few minutes before the OP did. Maybe this, maybe that, maybe whatever - it's not reason enough for me, at least, to refuse to fuck the guy. As Iker80 mentions above, there is simply no better lube than loads off previous Cocks, and most Tops will agree. That said, some guy has to be the first of the night ....

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.