hntnhole

There are a number of "telll's" that indicate how much is up there. If it's leaking out on it's own, the guy has been celebrating his Lusts for quite a while. That said, here are a couple: 1. I get on my knees if he's on his, pull his cheeks apart, and if everything passes the olfactory test, I look for leakage when the cheeks are pulled apart a bit. It's the sense of connection that I particularly love, so the volume isn't the key, it's the fact that I'm not the first. I do particularly love "volume", but it's the pleasure the bottom takes in acting on his impulses, and doing so proudly, with confidence that turns my crank the most. 2. After shoving my tongue in there, if there's a lot of Sperm, it becomes evident right away. If there isn't that also becomes evident. When there's a lot, I don't need to consume it all, I just get off knowing that there's a lot, and rutting in loads off other Cocks is fantastic to me. All I want is the confirmation that he's a cumdump - which, to me, means he's dealt with the cultural bullshit, done his intellectual/emotional work involved in becoming the man he needs to be, coming out of that process happy with who he is. 3. Not that I've ever measured, but if, for instance, there's a tablespoon right at the lips, there'll be more farther up inside. If there's almost none right at the back door, there won't be much farther up-stream either. When there isn't, I just enjoy what I've already rutted my tongue in, and proceed. Thus, there's however much the previous Cocks have shot, plus mine when I'm done, and I feel confident I haven't been selfish. 4. Frankly, I don't ask how many loads, and if the bottom tells me anyway, I pay little attention. I know what counts, and I can find that out without being told. Thanks for the question; hope this helps answer it.

Well, how would we get it on here?

REGISTER. VOTE. OUR HARD-WON RIGHTS DEPEND ON IT, AS WELL AS THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS.

THIS FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, 12:43 pm this afternoon: The Supreme Court opens its new term Monday, hearing arguments for the first time after a summer break and with new Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Already the court has said it will decide cases on a range of major issues including affirmative action, voting rights and the rights of LGBTQ people. The justices will add more cases to their docket in coming months. A look at some of the cases the court has already agreed to hear. The justices are expected to decide each of the cases before taking a summer break at the end of June: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION In cases from Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, the court could end any consideration of race in college admissions. If this seems familiar, it's because the high court has been asked repeatedly over the past 20 years to end affirmative action in higher education. In previous cases from Michigan and Texas, the court reaffirmed the validity of considering college applicants' race among many factors. But this court is more conservative than those were. ___ VOTING RIGHTS The court could further reduce protections for minority voters in its third major consideration in 10 years of the landmark Voting Rights Act, which was enacted to combat enduring racial discrimination in voting. The case the justices are hearing involves Alabama, where just one of the state's seven congressional districts has a Black majority. That's even though 27% of the state's residents are Black. A three-judge panel that included two appointees of President Donald Trump agreed that the state should have to create a second district with a Black majority, but the Supreme Court stopped any changes and said it would hear the case. A ruling for the state could wipe away all but the most obvious cases of intentional discrimination on the basis of race. ___ ELECTIONS Republicans are asking the justices to embrace a novel legal concept that would limit state courts' oversight of elections for Congress. North Carolina's top court threw out the state's congressional map that gave Republicans a lopsided advantage in a closely divided state and eventually came up with a map that basically evenly divided the state's 14 congressional districts between Democrats and Republicans. The state GOP argues that state courts have no role to play in congressional elections, including redistricting, because the U.S. Constitution gives that power to state legislatures alone. Four conservative justices have expressed varying levels of openness to the “independent state legislature” theory. ___ CLEAN WATER This is yet another case in which the court is being asked to discard an earlier ruling and loosen the regulation of property under the nation's chief law to combat water pollution. The case involves an Idaho couple who won an earlier high court round in their bid to build a house on property near a lake without getting a permit under the Clean Water Act. The outcome could change the rules for millions of acres of property that contain wetlands. ___ IMMIGRATION The Biden administration is back at the Supreme Court to argue for a change in immigration policy from the Trump administration. It's is appealing a ruling against a Biden policy prioritizing deportation of people in the country illegally who pose the greatest public safety risk. Last term, the justices by a 5-4 vote paved the way for the administration to end the Trump policy that required asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for their court hearing. In July, also by a 5-4 vote, the high court refused to allow the administration to implement policy guidance for deportations. A Trump-era policy favored deporting people in the country illegally regardless of criminal history or community ties. ___ LGBTQ RIGHTS A new clash involving religion, free speech and the rights of LGBTQ people will also be before the justices. The case involves Colorado graphic and website designer Lorie Smith who wants to expand her business and offer wedding website services. She says her Christian beliefs would lead her to decline any request from a same-sex couple to design a wedding website, however, and that puts her in conflict with a Colorado anti-discrimination law. The case is a new chance for the justices to confront issues the court skirted five years ago in a case about a baker objected to making cakes for same-sex weddings. The court has grown more conservative since that time. ___ NATIVE AMERICAN ADOPTION In November, the court will review a federal law that gives Native Americans preference in adoptions of Native children. The case presents the most significant legal challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act since its 1978 passage. The law has long been championed by Native American leaders as a means of preserving their families and culture. A federal appeals court in April upheld the law and Congress’ authority to enact it. But the judges also found some of the law’s provisions unconstitutional, including preferences for placing Native American children with Native adoptive families and in Native foster homes. ___ BACON LAW BACKLASH Also on the menu for the justices: a California animal rights law. The case stems from a 2018 ballot measure where California voters barred the sale of pork in the state if the pig it came from or the pig's mother was raised in confined conditions preventing them from laying down or turning around. Two agricultural associations challenging the law say almost no farms satisfy those conditions. They say the “massive costs of complying” with the law will “fall almost exclusively on out-of-state farmers” and that the costs will be passed on to consumers nationwide. ___ ART WORLD The court's resolution of a dispute involving pieces by artist Andy Warhol could have big consequences in the art world and beyond. If the Warhol side loses a copyright dispute involving an image Warhol made of the musician Prince, other artworks could be in peril, lawyers say. But the other side says if Warhol wins, it would be a license for other artists to blatantly copy. ___ Follow AP’s coverage of the Supreme Court at [think before following links] https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court

One more thing: I can't remember what the subject matter was, but there was a post I wanted to make, so all I did was ask one of them before posting it. Got the reply of where it should go, and did that. Easy as pie, and no issues at all. It's not that tough to do it right.

^ This. I almost always do the "sniff-test" in the fuckjoints, since there are a few guys that actually don't care enough to do the prep work before going out. If all I smell is Sperm, then I slobber on that Hole and feast for a little while. No, I don't have to take all of it - I'll leave some for the next guy too - that's only fair. A Hole full of loads off previous Cocks means (to me) that he's in love with raw Cocks, has dealt with any/all the issues of becoming a cumdump, and that's exactly my kind of bottom. A while back, there was a guy getting fucked between some parked cars near a cruisebar close to my house. When I unbuttoned my jeans and shoved it to him, well-churned Sperm literally splashed out onto my balls, my jeans, and I shot almost immediately.

I agree with you, because it is 100% real. It could be you or me being recorded - it could be any one of us, or a million other guys. Yes, the polished, professional porn actors know how to play to the camera, how to keep their arms out of the camera's sight-lines, all of that. And they know enough to announce that they're about to pump their loads up a Hole, so the cameraman can get close, and that's ok. What I don't like about pro-porn is, they always have to pull out and shoot on the Hole (at best - often shooting the whole load onto the Hole, his back his balls, everywhere but where it belongs. That said, it's much better to go to the fuckjoints and DO it !!!

I had to do that too. It seems like forever - but, it's not all that bad. Cleaning out the garage, other odious domestic tasks can help soak up the time, but it's worth it. Do watch out for your right hand (assuming you're right-handed) though - towards the end of the third week, it may reach up and slap your face instead of jack your Cock. Raw Cocks can get very pushy when they've had to go without for a while ......

501's, t-shirt, old engineers,* maybe a ballcap. Very seldom see anyone naked there .... *never ever wear good Boots to the backrooms/fuckjoints. They'll get stomped on, scratched, messed up. I learned that lesson the hard way, dammitt. On the other hand, a fine pair of Boots worn with some gear to a Leatherbar will always be respected, particularly by the bootblacks.

Between two pickups parked on the street near my house; anyone walking down the sidewalk (on either side of the street) could have seen it.

Hear Hear. I have respect for them putting up with as much as they do. I used to own businesses in the publishing industry, and I wouldn't want their job, no matter how much they're paid. The notion that there are "bullies" moderating this resource is nothing short of myopic.

Ok. I take your point. Let me re-phrase: The "love" shared between partners is the monogamous part, to get down into the weeds. The outside-the-loving-relationship sex is, I suppose, merely an ancillary facet to the foundational bedrock. Thanks, as always, for the interesting addition.

This is pretty much the situation with the homeless in this area. There are shelters, but many homeless persons avoid them for certain reasons. This means they live on the streets, without access to any hint of cleanliness facilities. There's one guy in particular that hangs out in my 'hood; I see him almost every day when walking the dog - and he's actually offered himself to me. I've made it a habit to carry a couple of bucks loose in my pocket for him, whenever I see him, and I think he had the impression I might have put out for him. There's a language barrier, but that's hardly why I wouldn't fuck him for all the tea in China. I've actually seen him shit on the sidewalk, on a busy street. He literally shit a cow-pie - a liquid, puddling cow-pie - hiked up his rags - and wandered away. There may well be better-mannered homeless guys wandering around, but I haven't noticed any. Sure, I've been followed home occasionally, and sometimes I fuck them. Usually, they've driven over to RR to cruise, and hardly homeless. Around here though, the term "homeless" is synonymous for bodily filth, and I'll give them a few bucks, but I wouldn't fuck them with ANYONE'S dick.

As I understand it (and I'm no medical professional), once the second mpx shot is received, and two weeks waiting period have passed, even if a guy has mpx, it is sufficiently weakened within his system to be virtually un-passable. That is not a guarantee, but it is thought by the medico's to be very difficult to pass on to an uninfected guy. Anyone know differently?

So I've been reading responses for a few days - and I can't really say either is more slutty than the other: both equal halves of the whole in my book (in slut-quotiency). I do like to eat Holes more, but - I don't feel sluttier, just more - - - oh, what's the right word - - - satisfied, I guess?

A brief addition to the earlier response of a few days ago: After the above-described merry-go-roundandroundandround, and after seeing him on tv last night, I'd take him to a decent tailor to get a shirt/suit that didn't come off the rack at Walmart ..... and then strip him down and gobble him up all over again.

Well, shucks ..... If I could still blush, I would. Thanks !!

Monogamy doesn't necessarily mean never fucking anyone else. When you and your loved one fuck some fresh meat together, or go out to the backrooms together and fuck guys, then - by definition - that is not cheating; that's playing together. That's answering the 'call of the wild' together, and that kind of depth in a relationship is fantastic. If, however, it's the intrinsic dishonesty associated with "cheating" - i.e. the dishonest acts are fun, thrilling merely because a guy is "getting away " with something, and it happens to be sex, (not stealing stuff, or other anti-social behavior), there's a whole 'nother issue at hand. When we indulge in outside sex with our loved-one, the thrill is exponentially increased, watching our partner take a hard Breeding from Cock after Cock, sucking off Cocks, one after the other, or whatever scratches the itch. Each guy's Lusts are reinforced, deepened, celebrated, and it's shared with each other. What could be better, I wonder. Any/every relationship involves some give/take, and that's as it should be. If dishonesty with each other enters into the relationship however, that's a sorrow waiting to wreak havoc on both parties.

What a splendid idea !!! How did I not think of that ...........

The basements of most of the bars are darkrooms/fuckjoints. Imagine going down (usually fairly) steep steps, into the inky blackness, with carved stone walls arching up to form the ceilings, hearing the lovely sweet music of rutting men, seeing almost nothing, and wading in, palpating your way into the maelstrom. Feeling Holes being fucked, hard Cocks being sucked, every possible sexual sensation, over and over again. And then, joining in to the sweet, wonderful, beautiful mass of writhing men. The basement of the Prinz Eugen bar was fantastic (I stayed at the Art Connection hotel*, just above that bar in Fuggerstrasse), but so were all the other bars. *this was a small, piggish "hotel" fashioned from one of the large, grand old pre-war apartments that (apparently) managed to escape the bombing. The owner fucked as many of his guests as he could right in the lobby, and tried to join into the scenes of those he couldn't. It was the absolute opposite of a motel 6. And the bar on the first floor for an eye-opener first thing in the morning, and the darkroom just below that - morning, noon or night. I will treasure those times forever.

So, I used a calculator. Some of these questions I did the described act to others, but have not had it done to me: thus, no score (wax, for instance). Being somewhat surprised at the total, I did it all over again. Same result. Also, being a Leatherman of many years, I have a lot of gear, most of which falls into the higher category. Bear in mind, I've been at this for longer than some of you guys have been alive ..... so ...... I don't think I'll admit the actual number. But, it's close to 2.75 bucks.

I agree. While the "terry towel twist" has never been my first love, I've spent plenty of time at bathhouses through the years. The whole "toy" thing is new to me too. At the tubs, phony Cocks, Cockblocks, all of these toys is something I just didn't run across. I have plenty of Bd/Sm gear, but - using any of them at the tubs would never occur to me. They're all for use in my home, or maybe at an SM club like CHC. But, time marches on, things change. Whatever scratches the itch, go for it.

So have I - and there's rather little I haven't done (that I want to do). My problem though, is logistics. I haven't seen it in porn, or heard of it from other guys. That said, I would love to somehow be able to have my tongue inside a raw Hole at the same time a Cock is fucking it - thus actually sharing, being a part of - in real time - the Cock Breeding the Hole. I've tried lying on my back, with the bottom's balls crushing into my face, but my tongue's not long enough (unlike some others on BZ, one in particular who I'm almost certainly closely related) to get all the way into the Hole and have room for a Cock to be rutting in the Hole simultaneously. The ability to be physically, sexually part of two other men Breeding is like the Holy Grail of sexual depravities. I've eaten Holes out immediately after the Breeding hundreds of times - it's part of the celebration for me. I've been part of DP scenes any number of times, I've sucked the remainder off Cocks immediately after Breeding, I've had my tongue/mouth on Cocks at the moment they pumped Sperm up a Hole many times, sharing in the exchange. But - actually being a part of the exchange, having my tongue in the Hole along with the load-pumping Cock, the connection, the "one-ness" - in real time - would be a (wet) dream come true. Maybe next time around .... if there is one.

If you actually believe that, you're not kidding anyone but yourself, and certainly no one here on this site. The potato chip reference above is, of course, true, but it applies exponentially to men that realize they want/need Cock. You're standing at a crossroads in your life, bud. Decision time is at hand. I see you're in So California; there have to be plenty of resources in your area if you decide to get some professional help in making your decision. Alternatively, there's almost certainly plenty of that which seems to be festering in your mind. Whatever choices you make, do your utmost to be as kind as possible to your partner. She could be emotionally damaged if substantial care is not taken as you navigate through this interesting time. Good luck.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA ...... how much are tickets to THAT event ??? The Kentish Kock Krippler strikes aGAIN !!!!!