Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
  • Posts

    6,798
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. Yes, in the macro sense, I understand your point. However, in this particular upcoming election, I think there is one urgent issue that many 3rd'ers will pay most attention to, and that's the issue of women's healthcare. A few days ago the State elections that ostensibly were to deal with a number of issues fooled the residents of not one State. This upcoming (national) election cycle, there are millions of enraged women (and their supporters - like gay folks, students, for instance) that are determined to throw out the haters. and I'll bet that there is a decent plurality of 3rd'ers who will eschew their particular "cause", and vote to restore the healthcare rights of women. More, the breathtakingly shit-show in the House will only further inflame those who might be soft around the edges. I think the hard-core OJ crowd will gradually shrink somewhat - not into insignificance, but out of frustration. He seems to be coming more and more unglued in recent clips, and no one wants to back an apparent loser. The right-wing wants to dominate their opposition, and to the extent that OJ appears weaker and weaker as the lawsuits/penalties pile up, his apparent ability to follow through on his hateful agenda may fade. Thus, the impact of the 3rd party voters would be diminished. All bets are off however, if Mr. Netanyahu manages to drag the U.S. into his war.
  2. 1. I wonder how many times we've awakened the morning after an election, to find out that the polls were wrong. 2. Orange Jesus has already been heavily damaged (except to the brainwashed), and at least one or two of these trials will damage him even more. His businesses are in receivership, his receipts are down, and there's a substantial likelihood he'll wind up in a matching jumpsuit. IF the Biden Administration can get a handle on how to promote his accomplishments, hammer on the R's many utter failures, that alone should be enough to win him reelection. Good point. What remains to be seen however, is the actual number of voters who will throw away their votes on one of them. It may be that the 3rd-party voters think they're making a statement, but what they're actually doing is wasting their time and their vote. There have always been "fringe" voters who presume themselves above the fray, and fool themselves into believing they stand for something "higher", or "more pressing" - the Greens, for instance - and they have a point. However, when the Democracy itself (the governance that allows them to vote 3rd party in the first place) is on the block - as O.J. has said publicly in recent days - any wasted votes are truly missed. That's for sure. We're ALL going to need even more "distraction" than we're already getting, and that's a pervectly good thing. Skip the booze, and go for the booty. 😁
  3. Allow me to disagree. While there may be "previews of coming attractions" in '28, we have other issues to deal with currently, and those are predominant now. I think the guy from Ohio will disappear as fast as he initially appeared. What makes you think you know the demographics of television news consumption? If you make silly statements, be prepared to back them up with facts. Real ones.
  4. Well, I'm pleased to know that you noticed at least some positive actions in your area. I don't live in Ohio, but I do live in FL, and I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. Thanks for your input.
  5. I can't help but wonder if a purple front door carries some meaning in some way? Mine's not purple .... but maybe it should be ???
  6. Does a Cockring count ???
  7. SIGH ..... What's so bad about just getting the "who's doing what to who" out of the way first thing? If a guy goes to a fuckjoint and doesn't see a covered Cock anywhere, it's a safe assumption that guys fuck raw in that joint. If he does see covered Cocks around, then it's reasonable to briefly mention the parameters before having sex with a guy, and if the proposed fuck isn't to both guys liking, just smile, say thanks anyway, and get in line for some other guy. I would imagine that the same m.o. would hold true on the fuck apps. It's not really that big a deal to just say "I need it raw" or "I need it covered" or any other fetish - for either the T or b. If it's not going to be a match, fine; each guy has done the right thing, and each guy will go find some other guy to get what he needs. No Sturm, no Drang, just guys doing what they need to do.
  8. The only valid regret might be if you responded in a negative, demeaning way to that second time. There is nothing to regret about refusing to have sex with him though. Those were terrible years for all of us, and we did whatever we could to avoid dying in a gruesome, hellish way. Once the medical arts provided at least some measure of protection against hiv though, most of us were drawn back to our old ways, and thank Whatever for that. I hope you got on PrEP as soon as possible, get tested for the lesser bugs frequently, and keep those "ginger" balls drained regularly.
  9. I don't quite agree with that, since there are relatively few D's in office in FL (particularly higher office), but - it's a good enough reason to elect a few more and judge their efforts when the "playing field" is a bit more balanced. One thing is certain though: the current Administration in FL is simply focused on repressing "the other", so there's no surprise that it's achieved rather little positive, uplifting, inclusive achievements.
  10. Welllllllll ..... at least I'm not the only guy that's remained unfamiliar with the descriptor. Thanks for all the replies, guys. I know a little bit more today than I did before .... I guess I'll be sticking to the "restaurant" definition though.
  11. Same here. In fact, I don't think I've ever heard it "live", just here on BZ. Apparently, it's what we used to call a regular/occasional "trick"? Or maybe it's a contraction of "sidekick", meaning a guy that always seems to be around? Someone needs to update the Gay Pig's Dictionary ....
  12. Mess. Watched some of the R's shouting match (billed as a "debate") last night. As usual, Vivid MagaSmarmy hollered and interrupted everyone else, stabbing that bony finger in the air constantly, shouting at the top of his inexhaustible lungs. Scott was a bit more "alive" than usual, but with much of his old talking-points. Governor High-Heels was dull as a stone, natch, and Christie made a few points that reflected at least some measure of prior consideration. But the star of the show was Nikki Haley, who got so pissed off at MagaSwampy she called him "nothing but scum". She made a number of points (good, considering their flawed basis), but at least grounded in a point of view, albeit mistaken in my opinion. She's got bigger balls than most of the others, and I wonder if she'll move up in the polls today. I'm guessing that VMS will be flushed down the crapper fairly soon, but that may just be wishful thinking. So these people are the best alternatives to Orange Jesus that the R's can put forth. What a sorry, miserable mess.
  13. The only reason I can think of, is the Top neglected to mention he's got a verse-streak running up his back. By definition, and to coin an old phrase, a Top would be more interested in the other side of the coin ....
  14. He went from mayor of Studebaker-town to Sec'y of Transportation. That hardly reflects incompetence,
  15. What a lovely description of the ecstasy and eventual agony of a truly loving, caring relationship - for the survivor. My other half has been gone for 14 years now, and at first it was really tough - to the point I felt I had to sell our home and relocate. Sure, friends did everything they could to help, and I was grateful, but he/his presence was everywhere, and I felt as though I was rotting like an old potato. But, eventually the hurt sort of crusts over, and all the wonderful memories take over. It's not like we forget - that's impossible - but the sense of loss can diminish somewhat as the years pass. Thanks, JimInWisc.
  16. That'd be letting her off really cheap - but then, that's probably appropriate in her case.
  17. If you're tempted enough to try it, the subject of how to make them, store them, use them, etc was discussed at length a while ago in previous a thread. Fin som snuss !!
  18. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA .......... I should'da known ..... 🤩
  19. I would have bought tix to THAT .... payable in marks, dollars, or whatever currency you'd care to mention !!!
  20. Well, maybe I'll just accept the pleasure of wearing the shirt and giving her a Dehner right where it surely doesn't belong. It's almost always too hot in SoFl for Full Dress anyway.
  21. Aren't you able to change locations? I can choose from a number of (larger) cities, and all around the world.
  22. I've been reading these replies for several days now - and I think that bottoms with really tight Holes should at least loosen up a bit before heading out to the backrooms/fuckjoints. Some of us are on the thick side, and it's not all that much fun trying to open up a Hole when it hasn't already had some Cocks up there. I'll take loose and sloppy anytime, over so tight I have to "work" it to even get my Cock in there. Besides - loose and sloppy implies the Hole is pre-loaded, which makes any Hole taste all the better. Every once-in-a-while I have to tell some guy to go take some other Cocks, and then come find me. They aren't put off - they understand.
  23. Most likely. That happened to me a while ago, but even I was able to figure it out quickly. I just "moved" to Berlin for a while !!! I still set different cities occasionally though; it seems a smidge safer.
  24. I still have my "Boot-Edge-Edge" shirt. If I were about to get outta here, I'd put it on, and go kick her homely ass. Let's get the Dems to introduce a bill to reduce her check to a nickel. She could stand to lose some weight off that overtaxed excuse for a brain.
  25. Last Friday (I think?), that tall, splendid, slim boy out West somewhere explained it well - on the previous page (4). Somehow, these folks have come to the conclusion that they not only believe X is true, they know X is true. It's the assumption that they, and only they, simply know absolute Truth, and therefore anyone who thinks even slightly different is completely wrong. The part about the adopted "son" is heart-rending. The part about the porn-patrol is puke-able. Since women are already apparently relegated to a subservient role within this religious construct (there is no Mrs. God, to my knowledge), I doubt it would matter much to Johnson. The wife would either follow her husband's errors, or go - as in the boardgame monopoly - directly to jail (or worse). I suppose it's convenient for these people to simply jettison their own ability ability to process ideas, and embrace what makes sense to them. But when these people proceed to force their perceptions on others, it becomes a dangerous, anti-human construct. While many of us were raised with restrictive religious notions, most of us smelled the poison pill at some point and simply stepped away when we could. But folks who weren't merely brain-washed, but brain-scrubbed apparently have no capacity for generosity left; it's all or nothing with that crowd. Thus, it's up to the rest of us to ensure that the latter - nothing - is their fare.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.