All Activity

@Jaygusher Welcome back, it has been awhile. Another great little story.

Fucking hot and romantic 🥵

Or will he? Poz is hardly certain here. Just "in play maybe". It will be a delight to see where Jaygusher take's this. He always writes excellent stories. I am definitely looking forward to reading where he takes this one.

Bummer "justsexnowatl" once again left BZ. This is a good community; always glad to be part of it.

Eek, i repent. Bur seriously, that was a throw it at the wall to see if there's any adhesion comment. i resort to my foundational assertion that i'm a regular guy talking about stuff that confounds experts. On the one hand, a flat tax seems to treat all equally, but then it doesn't take into account that all are not (e.g. financially) "equal." From my limited grasp, it seems a method more suited to starting out an economy, than it does applying to an already complex economic system. Looking at your response, the progressive tax system seems more suited to the realities facing individuals, while a flat tax seems to assume one total group would be equally affected. YES!! Agreed. Go back to my previous paragraph (where i to my credit "repent"), some guy (i.e. me) on the internet suggesting a flat tax does not constitute a "real leader," (at least, not on that topic). In this case, i'd be the patient who watched a youtube video and then chose my own judgement over my doctors. On the other hand, those patients questions can help challenge presumption that often comes with 'expertise' or professional authority. Sort of how the ongoing scientific process (ideally, more study is always needed) disallows static notions in a an infinite, fluid reality. A challenge is, knowing when we need to go to the doctor. Vive democracy. i'd (likely) be by your in the vehement fight. The notion of "take from these people to give to these people" strikes me as the opposite of moral. How to we reach the Star Trek era where "those with more" agree and voluntarily (even want to?) "pay more?" Yes, you are right of course. It's not as if we are starting from scratch here, society already is a huge system that has long relied on taxation. Day to day governance is more like tending the establishment garden vs a revolution that does a reset. Yes and no? (note the question mark). The wealthy benefit maybe more from the roads and infrastructure they use to transport their stuff to the workers they employ who buy the stuff they make to make the wealthy, wealthy (is that convoluted?). Pharmaceuticals. i did an investigation a few years ago on the cost of developing a new drug. Then, it was about 5 billion dollars. Half of the cost is subsidized by federal grants (i.e., tax dollars). Half of that 5 billion dollars is profit. So, as the 'patient' watching the youtube vid, i go to my 'doctor' with a cure. Why not skip the middleman. NIH hire, instead of fire, those same scientists working for the pharmaceutical company. The incentive for creativity could be enhanced by paying the research scientist more than the pharmaceutical company did, or maybe a bonus system to incentivize creativity, would still result in a much lower cost for drug development. It would still employ the same amount of productive people. The primary investors would be the ones to lose out, but then, what are they really contributing? The small investor whose few dollars a month go into a mutual fund won't take much of a hit on that side of the equation. I'll use the incendiary term here, the "oligarchs" are the biggest losers? But, have they produced anything or just exploited the productivity of others? The notion of risk of investment is pretty watered down by federal grants. i wonder how many are super wealthy because they benefit from our system of taxation? No, no particular direction other than publicly discussing and learning to perhaps better refine or qualify a direction to go. It seems to me that all government programs are directed to "one group of people," but the benefits vary amongst the members of the group. E.g., national defense (spending), benefits Lockheed Martin more directly than the person working at McDonalds (referential). Having fun with AI: "Usage Statistics: In 2020, it was reported that Walmart accounted for approximately 18% of all SNAP transactions in the U.S." i know i'm maybe missing your point, but maybe simultaneously making a valid point that "one group" is hard to label or define? But to your question: Some argue the current guys in charge used group programs like SNAP and ACA tyrannically. i don't presume to have the answers, just thoughts and more questions... but to me, this is part of the process of maybe finding answers. i've been pretty fiscally 'conservative' my whole life. I.e., i work hard to get out of and stay out of debt. i was first debt free at the age of 43 when i paid cash for my first house. i worked my ass off to get there. Then at 51, i got divorced and my former wife got everything (long sordid story), and i started over. i'm currently debt free again, and that's after paying of >100k in student loans from a career change at age 55, and own my house again (no mortgage), no credit card debt, etc.. my individual experience and philosophy is one remains solvent through hard work and not spending more than one has. Debt should be a short term tool vs an ongoing integral approach. i honestly do not know if that would or could work on a huge government level? my intuition asks: "why not?" my rational brain says: "it's complicated." Volume of taxation can be summed up as "driven by the activities of government," but it seems to me, the devil is in the details? Some activities are driven by the voting population. Some are driven by greed, corruption. Some are driven by systemic red tape. The list is probably really long, but it seems to me the activities of government often fly under the radar. Legislation often feels like buying a used car from a disreputable dealer, where the sales person is always leaving the negotiation to "check" with their "manager." I.e., the disguised or buried add on expenses are SOP. So, "what it takes on" is way more than the proposed used car. All my answers refer back to my first disclaimer lol. Education and engagement seem important to me to managing capability. i think US government does a lousy job of managing expectations. i think we Americans often expect a panacea when there is no cure, just management of an ongoing condition. I.e, "needs" will always be a part of life, part of education and expectation management might include replacing the notion of a total fix with need reduction that fits within means. I may want a Ferrari, but i can get by with a Toyota. Both are capable vehicles.

@admmakarov

Some background then. Drew was brought up by a single mother, his dad was absent his whole life and they didn’t meet until he was 22 so they were like strangers to each other. By then I was regularly fucking Drew. His Dad knew that and if we stayed over at his Dad’s I would make no secret of fucking Drew when we were there. Drew’s Dad is Bi and while nothing happened between them for about 2 years he was definitely interested. Drew was also up for it so I encouraged them to try it. No brothers, Drew is an only kid. He does have cousins.

i was very young at that time and i fucked around bare only, also for money, still alive and kicking

very good style, congrats

Fantastic as always.

thats the way i like it

@Jaygusher man another excellent story. Thank you!

Hi! I'm a new member, I discovered this forum while I was looking for fetish stuff (e.g. filling each other's bladders with pee). I thought I'd introduce a topic that many might find strange or unusual, but which means a lot to me and represents me. Maybe I'll find people who are interested, who, like me, have had experience with this kind of thing. I'm talking about the effect that pure, waterless liquid soap has on the dick and cockhead. I've been obsessed with this since I was very young. I don't know how it started, but I know that as a child, I often played with soap or body lotions. I'd put so much on my dick that it would get red and irritated for days. And I enjoyed it like crazy! This feeling has never left me, and I still do it from time to time. It's hard to describe what it feels like; I think it's a combination of chemical, physical, and mental effects. I've also noticed that not all soaps are the same. For example, in Italy, where I live, there are many soaps for intimate hygiene that work in unique ways. The cockhead is definitely the most sensitive, because it has a remarkable absorption capacity and after a while it tends to swell, become red, and more sensitive... After a while, I even feel it penetrating inside me, as if it were sliding into my urethra, and bladder, giving me very intense pleasure. To prolong the treatment, I often wrap the head with paper to ensure absorption... it's a bit like giving baby food (and sometimes I say "C'mon... eat that soap!)... Is there anyone like me? Thanks for your attention.

I respect whatever the top wants to do because I am in it for more so the fuck than the final load, but it seems they are the ones that typically want to go from condom to none.

Another great piece of work from you!! Looking forward to the next chapter!! Thanks...

Holy fuck! Been on and off BZ for 10 years - this post is one of the hottest to me outside the backroom. I think it's the casual attitude, group fuck and versatility of Dad and son that has me boned up hard picturing this scene! Does Drew have a brother or cousin? I gotta go back and read the lead up to this - reads like fiction - hot AF it's in last loads 🙂

Love all this in a story. 😜 Sadly, the authoir has not logged in here for nearly three years, so its unlikely we will be gettung another horny chapter.

Totally agree. A lot of authors shy away from having too much dialogue but this author is excellent at using it as a tool to progress the story. Very hot!