All Activity

Both forms of experience — the fleeting, pressure-free hookup and the deep, evolving connection — can be genuinely erotic and real. They just draw from different parts of our sexual selves. The key is awareness - knowing which experience you’re seeking at a given time, being honest with partners about that, and recognizing that desire is dynamic. For some, deep bonds amplify arousal; for others, novelty or distance does. For most, it’s a shifting balance between the two.

I suggest we all have a notions of ideal sex play; our desires, kinks and fantasies creating our own hot story to live out. It seems (to me) very hard to find someone that connects on all those levels and chemistry of what really awakens my base desires. I mean, any interaction has to be give and take (even D/s has its roles) but all of the desires have to have mutual interest, or else someone is faking a good time. Really, its like any other relationship, and how many really good ones are out there. I often wonder, is that why hook ups are so hot? There is no pressure of what happens next because your not expecting it - your at your most honest because who cares you will never see that person again, most selfish and at the same time most willing to do something that you ever will be, because there is no commitment beyond that moment or recriminations to follow So my ask is, is that all bullshit? Does partnered or occasional partners lead to deeper experiences, or do those bonds alter the base desire on the alter of nurturing a relationship?

I love Asian tops. I lost my virginity to a very sexy guy from Singapore. I like diversity and find sex with a white guy boring. So give me a Latino, black or Asian top any day.

One time this was couple years ago I was probably in my 20's I went to an adult store and I was in one of the booths with a black man and had some fun with him it was the first time with a black man but all we did was kissed and I sucked his cock it was good

Welcome to the forum

Jumped on sniffles found a 10” bbc I had seen him on before but I was passing through and hit him up and he said he was just chilling. I asked if he was on prep he said yes so I ran to the gas station and did the old water bottle clean out and he sent me the address I get there and he takes me back to his room and we strip and I start sucking this beautiful cock. He get hard and has me get on my knees on the edge of his bed and he starts sliding in. It’s been a while so it takes a few minuets but once he opened it up he slid all the way past the second hole and held it there then he soft fucks me for 10 min or so and pulls out and eats my hole. Continued to fuck me in every position you can think of but I end up on my back with my legs on either side of his head and he is fuck ing me hard he lets out a loud moan and he UNLOADS inside me. He pulls out and I feel if run down my crack and he slides back in and continues to fuck me for another 15 and he unloads again. I was In fucking heaven. I kept his load in my ass all day and got home and pushed out what little was left. I will definitely be going back for more. I’m a true bbc slut now

Well, as a centrist and data-junkie, I love election nights as I now rarely have a horse in the race. In work I did elsewhere, what was fascinating: Dems won at or better than Trump's first term, the 2017 elections for these race (NJ/VA Gov). Dem net approval fell to 0%, approve - disapprove, from +6% in 2017 (avg NJ/VA) Rep net approval improved to -9% from a disaster in 2017 at -24% So, we're at a point where neither party is especially we like nor well hated. It's just most are in opposing camps spitting at each other. The above was exit poll data I got from NBCnews.com as are below. These are post-overnight re-weights for anyone who saw similar on TV or online last night. @hntnhole To answer your Q indirectly, the exits also had two Qs which will answer your clarify: Will Republicans pull back from their behavior relative to immigration? In the NJ/VA exits, 55% said Trump's immigration policies had gone to far with only 14% saying not far enough. Will Democrats pull back from their push on trans when 49% (NJ/VA) said we've gone too far while 24% said not far enough. I'm not opposing or endorsing either. I'm just saying, what do you think will actually happen? We're in two camps, that's it. Both sides think facts are subjective. To end on a positive, at least we're not in a parliamentary where governments collapse. We get out our ideological intramural debates in the primary process, for better or worse, instead of while governing.

Are there any in particular you're missing?

@hntnhole you’re conflating two very different things. Biden did NOT step aside from his duties as President which is what you would be describing. He stepped aside from running for another term – an election mid-way through. The US constitution says nothing about how political parties can (or cannot) select their nominee. Consider the 2016 Democratic primary relative to the fluid nature of the democratic process. At the time there was anger toward super delegates in that primary between Clinton and Sanders, by progressives and Bernie Sanders particularly. Their issue was that super delegates were not bound -- by the voters themselves via election results -- at the convention, so they claimed. They called this undemocratic. For Democrats, “regular” delegates are now bound to voters’ selection in the caucuses and primaries – thought this hasn’t always been the case. And is not the uniformly the case currently for Republicans. Over time, more delegates have become bound for a certain number of ballots at the convention. But let’s move on from that history. The Democratic party responded after 2016 by both reducing the number of super delegates and preventing them from voting on the first ballot. This is important for 2024 since, after Biden stepped down, all regular bound delegates became unbound – effectively making all of them super delegates. They could select anyone. And in a process not decided directly by voters (see above 2016 above when that behavior was called undemocratic). Delegates were then guided to pick Harris by the Biden campaign and encouraged to do so by ranking Democrats. Sanders even threatened to challenge but he was quickly told to desist for the sake of party unity. And remember, these weren’t a cross section of Democrats. Nearly all were Biden supporters as no one challenged him (by any considerable measure) in the 2024 Democratic primary. That primary process is part of the broader set of procedures for people to become national convention delegates. By the party’s own standards, due to progressives' demands following 2016, it is undemocratic when delegates -- not voters -- that decide of a candidate. p.s. and @tallslenderguy you can add this to the Sanders list: we can be sure if Sanders would have benefited from super delegates there would have been no changes after 2016. Look back at his anger and push-back against getting rid of caucuses (where he excelled). Caucuses have much smaller participation (100s to 1000s of people) than primary elections (10s of thousands to millions). For reference, see 2016 Nebraska and Washington state binding caucus vs. non-binding primary results as to why he pushed back and consider the number of voters in each. Then look at how he fared in 2020 vs. 2016 in states that switched to primaries: WA, NE, ME, KS, MN, ID before that contest effectively ended.

So fucking HOT

Nice! Great set up for more!

234! Decent, but not good enough!

I would not consider myself to be a liberal, but am happy to see some pull back from MAGA ideas. I hope this was the indicator that the negative consequences for at least some of the MAGA actions are impossible to ignore.

Negative (as far as I'm aware) and no longer on prep since February this year. No drugs (apart from poppers).

All good things... Great story and a perfect way to end this saga. But hopefully we may see more from these characters. Thank you@Uncut300

Being a Liberal myself, I was of course gratified by the across-the-board ascension to elected office by the Dems/Liberals. As I see it, this portends the beginning of a potential belittlement of the current Administration, and all it entails. From the East coast to the West coast, citizens have roundly rejected the current administration's policies. Perhaps the fever is broken, and healing can finally begin? Too soon to tell yet, but hope is afoot in the land, and that's a good sign.

It’s been 13 years, I don’t think we are getting a part 2 and I don’t think he has posted or commented since 2021.

Welcome as a contributor, and it's great that you're finally unbound to fuck raw.

You make a good point: Maybe there's something in the water there ... 😇

Welcome new members ! We're glad you're here, and look forward to hearing more from each of you !