The guy who has the webcam on the bookshelf to ensure that his visitors don't walk away with the checkbook has little, if anything, to worry about. The Florida statute expressly exempts a security system when there's a conspicuous notice that there's a video surveillance system for security purposes. The statute also exempts any video surveillance device that is clearly and immediately obvious to anyone. And most importantly, the statute only reaches people who record for the "amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit" of themselves or another. The guy who simply wants to keep an eye on his property isn't acting with that intent. I wanted to disabuse anyone of the notion that recording someone was ok as long as it wasn't posted on a website. Otherwise, it strikes me that my reading of the statute is pretty consistent with your thinking on the topic.