hntnhole
-
Posts
6,510 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by hntnhole
-
Shucks .... in Junior High, swimming class (somewhere around 60 guys) was held, and no swimming trunks - at all. There are two events that I recall: Once a guy got a hardon in the locker room , which was bouncing in front of him when he entered the large room with the pool. He got teased like crazy for weeks .... The other memorable event was when some guy shit in the pool, and I've never seen 60-some guys claw their way out of a swimming pool faster. It was like a naked Three Stooges scene .... still makes me laugh.
-
Unless he directly asks you that question, I don't see why you would feel obliged. For all you know, sonny might have told daddy all about it. - and that's how daddy knew to contact you. Then again, maybe not. Don't lie, of course - but I don't think you're obligated to volunteer information that may or may not prove unfortunate. Why risk it - just enjoy the (almost literally) Cock-Next-Door !!! One day, down the road, you can casually mention something like "does being a hot fuck run in the family?" If daddy didn't know, I'd buy tickets to that extravaganza !!! 😇
-
I don't understand that either. Even if a guy lives in a small burg somewhere, the tests / meds are available via delivery services to one's doorstep. It couldn't be easier ...
-
Thoughts on SLAMMERS 321 and CUMUNION
hntnhole replied to Pig4Fucking's topic in Miami / Ft. Lauderdale / South Florida
Don't forget to check out the darkroom ... I told one of the front-desk guys it needs to be expanded. There are a couple of gh booths just to the west of the darkroom, and they are not used much. It would double the size of the darkroom, and that'd be a cheap, excellent little project !!! -
I'm with BBArchAngel, however I wouldn't go so far as to call your actions a "mistake". I'd call it not much more than not carrying out your role in the scene. Maybe the bottom thought you were merely a Top that could be pushed around (since that's what he did), maybe he thought you weren't sufficiently Dom to suit him, maybe he didn't think anything at all, and is merely a "pushy bottom". The only misstep you made was accommodating the guy. If you allow it, some bottoms will take advantage. So what to do? Next time, set the limits both when you're cruising (i.e. before you actually meet the sub), and reinforce them when the guy arrives for the scene. If, in the future, any bottom tries to seize the moment and Dom you, end the scene and kick him out. There are times when a soft-hearted Top can be a scene-ender, so tuck that sense of polite manners into a jar and put it on the shelf - at least until the sex is finished. We'll be waiting to hear about how the next scene works out !!!
-
What ??? Help you out ??? Like they deserve the fruits of YOUR labors ??? They're the idiots that need some "help", and certainly not from your richly earned buffet. Let them earn their own, and then see how willing they are to accept "help" from others.
-
Agreed. Put another way, part of raw Breeding is the "connection" we can create with a "brother". It can last for a long time, it can last for a few moments, but we've "connected" deeply, spiritually, carnally with another man, and that's what's so compelling about raw fucking. Now that we can take pills to protect our heath to a very substantial measure, it's like the old, pre-hiv days. There are some guys that fetishize condoms, and that's fine. But the rest of us don't require barriers anymore, and that ineffable, sweet, lovely, magical connection is well-worthy of pursuing over and over and over again.
-
On the whole, your reply is spot on. The above sentence though, does not ring true to me. To straights, who have never bothered to entertain a moment's worth of thought as to why things are what they are, it may seem that cumdumps are emulating the female reproductive role, but that is hardly true for the men who actually do it. There are perhaps exceptions, (i.e. men who use female clothing, etc), but that's a different issue that may result in cumdumpery or may not. I believe that men who practice cumdumpery are men who have either a) spent the time and effort to answer the question of why via a process of intellectual work, questioning their sexual drive/identity, and arrived at some answers unrelated to females at all, or b) their innate nature was recognized by an experienced man who helped them realize their calling. We don't need to emulate or even consider what straight folks do, or why they do it. We aren't straight. Even the bi guys don't identify as that. They say they're bi. Cumdumps aren't "emulating" anything - they're doing what makes sense to them, what they believe they must, structuring their sexual lives according to their own self-perceptions. Whether that realization comes via self-introspection or via input from a more experienced man who recognizes what the cumdump does not yet recognize in himself, the result is focused not on emulating women, but on self-realization, self-fulfillment, self-acceptance. If this is "misogynistic", merely because females have no important place in the issue as I see it, then that's ok with me.
-
Another productive thing Tops can say when they're about to Breed: Lean over his back so your mouth is close to his ear and quietly say or whisper something like "now I'm going to make you one of MY boys ..." They usually love that.
-
Apparently, I make guttural, growling sounds when I unload. Does that count? I always try to give good verbal feedback - sometimes it's just not more than "good boy", or something innocuous, but at least something. I think it's important to encourage the bottom in at least some small way, even if it wasn't a mind-blowing fuck.
-
I seldom hear this, but when I do, I just say something like "sure - I showered just before I left to come here ...."
-
LOL ..... never heard THAT one before !!!
-
Is anyone using AI to generate erotic/explicit images?
hntnhole replied to rawTOP's topic in General Discussion
I'm not sure I 'get it' regarding A.I. Sure, a couple of those - well - depictions? - were quite well done, a couple weren't, but what's the goal here? Produce phony porn? Elevate the male physique beyond almost anyone's ability to achieve it? Challenge Michelangelo? Pictures can't fuck, porn actors can and do. Maybe a handful of us here on BZ actually do look like gods ... and the rest of us don't. Are we supposed to feel 'less-than' because we don't look like a sex-god? Perfection is alright I guess, but I'd rather fuck regular guys - like me. -
Agreed, 100%
-
I am not familiar with the complexities of your culture, but I rather doubt it. He may be wrestling with coming to terms with his own issues of sexuality, and that can be quite a process. Just be there for him, in whatever way he seems to need you. A cheerful smile can do wonders for a man going through a difficult time; give him plenty of that. Remember that the turtle won the race, not the hare ....
-
How about PIG ... it wouldn't be an insult to me. I've been called a pig before - all I did was smile, nod, and keep on doing what I was doing. "Sticks & Stones" - blah blah blah.
-
I've written my perspective before on BZ, but it bears repeating: I simply adore cumdumps. These are men who have done the introspection, come to their self-realization, done the work (or, in some cases, had it done to them), and arrived at their self-realized Truth. I'd trust my wallet to a cumdump before I'd entrust it to some haughty, self-centered Top. I know I'm in the minority on this particular thread, and I don't care. Without the dedication to their sublime calling, where would we Tops be? Going hungry - that's where.
-
You're right, of course. When the porn companies institute certain "rules", or any other kind of company/business, it's to a) maximize profits, and b) avoid penalties. Business is business.
-
I agree with virtually all of the above rejections of condoms in porn. There is, however, one potential "business" reason that the actors (Tops) are asked to pull out, at least for the initial spurt of Sperm - that being so the viewer can see that the Top actually shot his load, It can be proven a lot better though, when a Top pumps the Hole full of Sperm, and then gets down there and eats the load(s)s out of the Hole. So yeah - the load belongs INSIDE the Hole, and not anywhere else. Rubbers and fuckflicks are like oil and water: nothing but a waste of time and loads.
-
You're entirely correct, of course !!! Thanks.
- 781 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- anonymous sex
- dark room
- (and 2 more)
-
As soon as we get the more pressing issues resolved (guns, dead kids, cretins in Congress / States), I think standardizing English is a splendid idea !!! Ya, youse rite as rain 😉
-
LOL .... no, he surely doesn't. There are a number of things he doesn't deserve .... feeding himself, for instance ....
-
Actually, I have. When we were little kids, my dad said "now we're in America, and we're going to go see it". I can't remember how long it took, but we actually drove through all 48 contiguous states. I don't recall whether the mountain you reference was Stone mountain or Lookout mountain, but I do remember the '29, '30 Stutz I saw parked in a gas station with a for sale sign on it. I know it was in the South somewhere. Admittedly, I've been vehicularly-oriented long before I knew what my Cock is for.
-
Darkrooms (really dark ones) serve the same function as glory holes. They remove all the other senses except hearing, and nothing else matters but Cocks rutting in Holes, Breeding Holes, grunts and groans of sexual depravity. What could be more enticing ???
- 781 replies
-
- 3
-
-
-
- anonymous sex
- dark room
- (and 2 more)
-
After reading through these replies, I think that the descriptor "bottom" is too vague regarding how we become bottoms or Tops. There may be different reasons some guys bottom, one of which may be the component of submission in their nature. Submissives are usually bottoms, and Dominants usually aren't. But that isn't carved into some mountainside somewhere. When a burgeoning gay boy is growing up, it seems to me he is naturally (and at the same time) developing his Dominant or his submissive, in-born nature. It's that natural affinity for submission (in this case) to feel more comfortable, more inclined, more fulfilled to offer up his Hole to Dominant men. The instinct of all men for sexual conquest takes different forms, but might derive from the basic instinct - one way or the other. Whether the guy is butch as nails, or not possessive of the cultural definition of masculinity in some way, maybe their sexual desire is naturally driven one way or the other by their inborn-nature. Add to that the cultural conditioning, and we wind up with self-assigned roles that may or may not reflect that in-born foundational nature to submission or Dominance. It's an interesting thread - thanks, all you guys .....
