All Activity
- Past hour
-
PhillyNeg4Poz started following metroguy
-
PhillyNeg4Poz started following Guy11111
-
PhillyNeg4Poz started following curiouslooker
-
PhillyNeg4Poz started following phillygwm
-
PhillyNeg4Poz started following POZme90
-
Negson started following Converting a 20 Year Old
-
Guy4GuyCOS started following PozPumpDump
-
Xhamster video links here
DenverBtmDude replied to Lustofalltrades's topic in Bareback Porn Discussion
[think before following links] https://xhamster.com/videos/cump-deposits-here-3-12571289?utm_source=ext_shared&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=link hot compilation! -
PhillyNeg4Poz started following Berny-13189
-
ImXXX666 started following PhillyNeg4Poz
-
PhillyNeg4Poz started following ImXXX666
-
-
DAWSON having a little drink π₯ππ₯ππ₯ππ₯ππ₯π
Str8convert commented on pupHawaii's gallery image in User Galleries
-
the rules = huff and load in one minute.png
Str8convert commented on ff69's gallery image in User Galleries
-
Many things in life "cannot be proven." One cannot prove that their car will start every time they push the start button, but millions of people rely daily on the perception that their car will start when they push the start button... even though their are surely times a car is not going to start. But, it's a reliable assumption that's still exercised by millions daily with perceived benefit that results in them continuing to push buttons. i never suggested that "any donor to the Republicans [is] just cravenly greedy." "This is an assumption." But "for instance," Musk paid millions of dollars to the trump campaign to get trump elected. Coincidentally, Musk ended up with a powerful position (DOGE) and influence when trump did get elected. If one had the money and resources, one could study this seeking some sort of "proof" that Musk did or didn't donate for a perceived benefit. In studies there's always a section where the funders and investigators declare whether there is a conflict of interest... because studies that "prove" a premise can be manipulated by the... "cravenly greedy?" lol. my "simplified" premise is that money buys influence. i believe that is a tried and true, rational belief that society runs on. Are there exceptions? Sure. As to "voters get to have the final say." i cannot remember who said it, but i think it was Senator Ron Wyden in an interview yesterday, so paraphrasing: "the average voters soap box is not equivalent to the billionaires bank account." i prefaced my "simplified" when i posit my belief that big money buys political influence, but that is not to say it is a simple knot to untie. i think it is true that more money spent does not automatically result in getting elected. There are so many factors in how said money is spent to influence the vote. Re: "buying influence is a crap shoot." Maybe, sometimes more than others. Musk is back at it, donating millions. One may think he's just a careless, ignorant gambler shooting craps. i think he is purposely buying influence because it seems apparent that he thinks it pays off. i do not think one can prove either assertion. No, the idea is not to "instill a two-party system," but to work towards (money is only one factor) a level playing field. i envision a process more centrist because it would be more inclusive. i think money is a major factor in the (primarily) two party system we currently have. i do wonder how it might effect an election if all those running had the same amount of money to work with(money NOT the only factor, but a major one). "Isn't that the vote -- one person, one vote -- where this comes into play, exactly. In the last two elections, Dems have outspent Reps yet lost, the reverse has been true too. And sometimes the greater spender wins. Money doesn't guarantee electoral wins. So buying influence is a crap shoot and if it wasn't -- let's say a candidate or party is likely to win -- then they wouldn't need the money and be burdened by the influence you imply." "But this is an assumption." You do not have to "get across" the obvious. Of course "voter influence during an election is [also] driven by issues that are not limited to influence by campaigns." Though one could argue that campaigns try to identify and capitalize on those issues. "Influence and money already flow outside of campaigns, as people want to support their own thing" that's nothing new: "organized religion, ACLU, WWF, ACU, Citizens United, ad infinitum. OF COURSE, money is not the only factor in any of these advocacy organizations, but i think it can be argued money is a major factor in any influential organization. Advocacy organizations, corporate messaging, marketing and advertising are all social influencers. The goal is to prune, trim that influence when it comes to representative election and make it more dependent on engaging the individual voter. People will still go to church and be influenced on how to vote, or watch tv and be influenced by media, or donate to organizations that agree with their beliefs and desires. That's another topic also needs attention. Again, i reassert, to me reform is not just about campaigns and getting elected (or re-elected). It's also about the influence money plays with people in office. i do not think we should just leave things as they are, that the system that got us where we are today isn't working well. Do you agree or disagree with this? You write a great deal explaining how and why [you think] i am wrong, but when i ask you for your solution, you give the briefest of answers. i have asked for thoughts and opinions, i have not asked for "books." i'm as likely to read a book you suggest as you are likely to watch an entire video i post lol. Neither of us has managed to sway the other :-). Right or wrong, my perception of you is that you sort of like a movie critic criticizing my every production, which tends to put me in a continuous defensive position with you. Could you please provide your detailed solutions, or reasons why things should remain the same if you believe all is good?
-
-
Youngasianbttm changed their profile photo
-
Thanks! I my hole IS inviting. I'm hoping to be overflowing with jizz
- 2 comments
-
- cumdump
- no loads refused
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi there. Iβm visiting Berlin for the first time and Iβm looking to take as many loads as I can while Iβm there. I plan to be in Berlin 3/27-3/31 and Iβm overwhelmed with options. As a muscular, tall Asian guy, not sure if Iβll be popular as a bottom in Berlin lol Will I have better luck hosting a cum dump event on sniffies, laboratory, or going to Broiler? Any parties I should be aware off? I saw that there is a horse fair in Mannheim but I donβt think it is realistic to travel out there. which hotel should I stay at to have the best luck? I was looking at axel online but not sure how popular or accessible it will be. things about me - Age - 28 Height - 6β1β / 185 cm Weight - 230 lbs / 104 kg build - muscular and smooth with a bubble butt sub bottom Kinks - chastity, leather, gangbang, bondage, bdsm, blind folds
-
Youngasianbttm joined the community
-
The Earle was more wide open for sex then the apex. Rows of seats removed for more space. Nudity was tolerated and groups/gangbangs happened. Was on the receiving and giving end quite a few times. There was a gay oriented bookstore on the 2nd floor on a side street off the block. Had great booths and a theater where things got really wild. Was always raw there too. DAMN, it used to be fun.
- Today
-
Dan needs to quit school and be Ray's full time ABS whore!!
-
That first pic is the money shot. Very inviting hole Good luck with your event. Hope you get your guts really drenched. (I lived on Rivington for years!)
- 2 comments
-
- cumdump
- no loads refused
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
siksin joined the community
-
Looking for a Poz top while Iβm there. HMU
-
PhillyNeg4Poz changed their profile photo
-
Random is a hot scene esp if it anon, but a reg fuckbuddy breeder that takes ownership of yer ass is evern better....
-
Slaveryart joined the community
-
Such a hot story, enjoyed both episodes. It describes so well the bottom cravings and sensations, the need for your hole to be filled. And Ty has that predatory attitude that some tops get when they are determined to fuck a particular boy and use chems to manipulate him. Gets in the kidβs head. Heβs also a bit possessive and even protective of him. Reflects many of my own experiences.
-
PhillyNeg4Poz joined the community
-
How did it go?
-
HIV is one thing as there isn't a known cure and only treatment you have to take meds the rest of your life. STI's, especially gono, need to not be fetishized, and hurt those that receive it from others. It ruins the fun of care free sex, and sucks having to go through the treatment process. I ended up losing a month and a half play time last year because I caught gonorrhea twice within a months time.
-
πMoved here 10 years ago from Houston to take care of dad and planning to move back after he died. Two years later he died. Guess who changed his mind. Now I love this place. LHC is 2.5 hrs from Vegas, 3 hrs to Phoenix and Palm Springs and 4.5 hrs to Tucson. Only way to get here is to drive or fly your own plane. My truck and I have made many trips to all of them , usually a bit Hi and horny, for...well...you know π
-
Dan really needs to stop taking that prep.
-
Oh yes, from straight to beiing whored out ...
-
-
slav joined the community
-
positive results?
-
-
Hot damn! This is one of the best stories on here.
-
Up to you, but don't have to be alright with the chance. Doxy pep is good at stopping bacteria STDs, I plan to start it soon, but it's not like the almost certainty prep gives you for HIV protection. And it costs you if you get something, it takes time to get tested and treated, something like gonorrhea can be 2 weeks of feeling crap.
Other #BBBH Sitesβ¦
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.