Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
  • Posts

    5,757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. I completely agree. Putin is an autocrat, despot, whatever you want to call him, but he's not crazy. He won't use Nukes against Ukraine, for two reasons: 1. That would invite a similar retaliation 2. Once nuked, the entire area for miles and miles would be unusable, fenced off for generations at the very least. Entering the area would be guaranteed to cause anyone a horrible lingering death. Putin wants the Ukraine for the agricultural potential, and nuking the area would obviate that potential for generations. That crap he mouths about it being Russian territory since Peter the Great is nothing but revisionist historical turds mouthed by an avaricious little mini-man; a shallow-at-best excuse for some adventurism as he grows older. 3. The President-Elect, however, is the wildest of cards in the mix. Dull, incurious, self-absorbed, poorly educated, just for starters.
  2. re: the "tongue-in-ear" thing ..... I can't think of a better way to ask for a kick in the ass than that .... particularly when I'm sleeping.
  3. Well, it seems that the serial sexpig of the clearly straight variety was forced to withdraw from the position he was breathtakingly inappropriately nominated for. Even his fellow Republicans bucked the will of their Lord and Master and kicked him in the (well-used) balls. It seems the Venmo trail just kept after him to the point that even the R's in Congress were pushed into taking a stand. I'm assuming that there were knee-splints a-plenty furnished to the weak-kneed committee. Also of interest, (less than the above, however) but notable none-the-less, the ICC has formally charged Nettie Yahoo with crimes against humanity, and indicted him (apparently, some 40,000 + innocents) for war crimes in Lebanon. Since the US is not a signatory to that institution, (along with the 120 other Countries that ratified) the Government apparently can't grab him (Netanyahoo) when he comes to kiss the suet-laden ass of his buddy one of these days. Reminds me of a tv show my Grandmother used to watch; As the World Turns ....
  4. I think it refers to the Original Post, or it's author. It's interesting how threads seem to gain a life of their own, and veer off on a different course than the OP (😜) originally suggested.
  5. The thing about electing an incompetent fool President is, there's simply no way to predict (and thus prepare for) what's going to come next. Frankly, I think Putin is bluffing re: threatening to start a nuclear war, despite the long-range missiles the US is sending over there. I imagine P would sacrifice the Koreans first, but I doubt he'd actually start a nuclear war. He knows he'd get his country blown to pieces, and he'd have no more high-rise building windows to throw his enemies out of anymore .....
  6. I don't think of this as a "kink", but eating a previously well-bred Hole would be one ...
  7. I think the spread would be at least 25 to 1 against wanting to fuck a less-then well prepped Hole. For most Tops, I would think that prospect would be good cause for hollering "NEXXXXT" .....
  8. I'm not sure I understand why guys would want to keep track of "one-&-done" tricks in the first place .... If one of them starts to turn into something more, well - that I do understand. But just the guys in the fuckjoints?
  9. I don't think that it's just bottoms that experience going into "heat", it's the same for Tops too. The wanton sexual behavior is what's so addicting - the ability to experience sex anywhere, at any time, and the expectation that it can happen any time, any where, is what some guys find so intoxicating. Obviously we don't actually perform the mating act anytime/anywhere, since we'd rather stay outta the clink, but the connection can be made anytime and anywhere. It's that mutual reinforcement of each other's Lusts that's so alluring, so habit-forming.
  10. Well, live and learn, huh? That was an interesting article, and thanks for posting it.
  11. I was about to eat some lunch ....... but I think I'll wait a while 😷
  12. My favorite fuckjoint .... some of the snowbirds are starting to return now .... more for every guy ....
  13. Generally, I agree with this reply. The only "rub" might be that kids too young (intellectually) may very well not be equipped yet to process this kind of information. I think that ideally, a certain level of physical maturity needs to precede the sexual awareness, but there's no way I can think of to accomplish that. Imagine some kid sitting in SexEd class, knowing that something really cool is happening between his legs (whether het or gay is immaterial in this thought-exercise). It would be most productive for him to learn once the process of maturity has begun, rather than too much too early, or too little too late. But kids simply don't mature sexually at the same time, so it's reasonable to set an age at which most kids have either reached sexual maturity, or at least become aware of what's happening to them. It's probable that 18 is too late for most.
  14. I had to ask the Googler about that one - and learned something new - Thanks !!
  15. Yeah - the Varsity Theatre on Clark St hollered "DUMP" before you could walk up the steps to go in. And that little park across the street once was "ground zero" for political discussions of every kind and persuasion.
  16. What would circumcision have to do with it in the first place? Assuming that hideous act was performed (typically at an extremely early age - as in days, not years after birth), and long before the dick was used for anything other than to piss through. I would imagine that the chances a bug can be contracted by a Cock - circumcised or un - are pretty much equal.
  17. Given that boys and girls begin to reach sexual maturity at differing ages, there is no "fair" way for Government to decide at what age we can start to fuck each other (meaning boys/girls/gays/straights/everyone). Girls get preggers well before 18 (and their dads get out the shotguns) forcing a legal status on the physical realm, and obviously no particular age will work out fairly - but that isn't the point. The majority of folks believe there must be some cast-in-cement control mechanism, and we've wound up at 18. Kids that want to fuck younger than that have done it, and will continue to do that no matter what contrivance 'we the people' or 'our' Government decides. Government believes it must regulate things which neither cultural norms nor Institutionalized Religion can, and has settled at x age, merely because the majority of the governed insist that Government do that. Whether there's sense to be made of it or not is hardly the point.
  18. On that, my friend, we can ALL agree 😘
  19. I'm guessing that Tim Pool offered him that ancient "fire/theater" line .... probably the Satanic Panic thing too ....
  20. I generally avoid the fictional stuff, but maybe I'll read this one ... everyone seems to love it !!!
  21. I may be the only guy that needs some basis for this comment, if you care to offer any?
  22. Agreed. I'm wondering about that statement too.
  23. Guys ..... don't forget A2M with a guy you're waiting to fuck - or the guys next to him .... Eating the load(s) out of a well-bred Hole and kissing it to him - or the next guy waiting in line - or just any other random guy - is burning hottttt !!!
  24. "Woke" is a transitive verb (usually, but can be intransitive depending on usage). Basically, it's another word for "awakened", if more clumsy. These days it refers to those folks who were previously either unaware or have recently become aware of the deeper (or perhaps more deeply buried in our collective consciousness) problems, and potential fixes to these problems. Some would say it refers to those who have been "aware" of these cultural ethnic divides for many years; those who have been actively doing their best to ameliorate the wrongs of the past. Thus, the anti-woke'ers are those who would rather excuse age-old wrongs, imagine they have not benefitted from whatever the particular inequity in question happens to be, and therefore refrain from any possible progress. I agree it's a vulgar (in the actual sense of the word) term, awkward to pronounce, even more so to explain, but it's what the collective 'we' have to work with. Personally, I much prefer this concept as enunciated by J.S. Bach in the famous cantata Wachet Auf (literally, "Wake Up"), BWV 140.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.