Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,300

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. hntnhole
    Exactly. In your case, it's your magnificent Calling that obviates any silly physical barriers. In mine, it's the enduring effort to avoid guys that look like me. That's perhaps because I ditched the cultural bullshit I was raised with many years ago, and - (maybe subconsciously?) - seem to avoid guys that might carry the same cultural baggage I threw off. Probably not the most fair way to cruise, but then I've fucked plenty of loaves of white-bread through the years. Compensatory, maybe? All I know is the one-eyed-jack in my jeans takes notice of men that don't look like me a lot <polite cough> harder than some others.
  2. hntnhole
    .... and then you answer yourself .... hell no that's not all there is ..... and your Cock gets hard all over again .... and .... well ..... you get the picture ....
  3. hntnhole
    Welcum home, bud ..... maybe seeya over there .....
  4. hntnhole
    Clearly there does exist a plane of caring between two same-gendered people that goes deeper than common "friendship". I've experienced this twice with straight guys. One was a guy I wouldn't have had sex with on a bet; sexually, yuck. The other was such a good friend I wouldn't have allowed anything like sex the chance to ruin the friendship Example: when I had a physical emergency years ago, and he had moved hundreds of miles away, I called him on a Tuesday - explained the situation - he replied "I'll be there on Thursday". Now that's the kind of friendship that also possesses a certain level of love. The Greeks had quite a system (and remember - they had nothing at all against boy/boy, man/boy sex - as long as marriage took place, the man fucked his wife too, and thus brought forth the necessary future members of their armed forces) of describing these "bromanitical" relationships. Agape, Eros, Philia, Pragma, Mania are some specifically-defined types of love between men, Eros and Mania being most familiar to BZ'ers. It's not easy to clearly define, but once experienced, it's easy to recognize when we're fortunate to have experienced it. If we do experience it, we're well and truly enriched.
  5. hntnhole
    T.I.M. is legendary, ground-breaking, standard-setting, and the goal of other gay porn producer to meet/exceed. I'm not surprised that so many other companies went after TIM the way they have; that's basically a sound business-plan. Sometimes the King of the niche (in whatever industry) gets knocked off the perch, sometimes they react quickly and break even more new ground. That's just the nature of being in business. The thing is though, no one will ever take away what T.I.M. accomplished. As far as I'm concerned, TIM shits crushed pineapple, and my hat is off to them.
  6. hntnhole
    Just to be clear, I don't care what other guys find enticing, attractive, whatever. Call yourselves whatever makes you feel good, happy, sexy, attractive, whatever. The original question was what terms do "you"- i.e. each one of us - prefer or not. So I just answered the question.
  7. hntnhole
    Well, thanks for the educational reply !!! I tried only one of the so-called "social media" once, facebook, and found it to be nothing more than a time-sponge. When I watch porn I just put terms in the search bar, and dozens show up. As to twitter, I never used that one since Big-Mac-ass seemed to claim it to peddle his bullshit. Some of my friends send me silly jokes, pictures they find on facebook, and that's enough for me. I'd much rather spend computer-time here on BZ, communicating with other men like myself. You, for instance.
  8. hntnhole
    To me, references to women in a sexual context are off-putting. I don't need to hear or see anything related to women.
  9. hntnhole
    Soooooooooo ..... NOW I understand why Cheeto-head - he of that ridiculous orange pompadour - uses twitter to issue all the road-apples oozing out of his fingers. I had NO idea that porn existed on this site; obviously, I've never used it.
  10. hntnhole
    I went for vers. A hot guy, whichever way he goes. And, almost as regrettably talented at dancing as I am !!!
  11. hntnhole
    Size isn't the crucial component, skill is that component of a hot fuck. If a guy has a 10 incher he doesn't know how to use, then so what if it's 10 inches or 5? Conversely, if a guy has a 5 incher that he uses skillfully, to it's very best advantage, then he's delivered a hotter fuck than the horse that doesn't know how to use what he's got in the first place. The mark of a truly dedicated Breeder is in the skills he's learned.
  12. hntnhole
    Similar experience for me. We met at the tubs, had just over 30 wonderful years together. Usually went out cruising together, but sometimes we went to different fuckjoints. Often had small groups over, or went to group-fuck events. We were both pigs, but he passed a number of years ago, and I miss him every damn day. Very happy for you, EuRawBottom, that you found the right man to share your life with. It's a gift from the Universe to find the right man we can be completely honest and open with, and go do it all with him.
  13. hntnhole
    ^ He's correct. No consent = no nookie. Period.
  14. hntnhole
    Ditto for Ft. Lauderdale. I have requests for appts in at a number of service providers ... but my phone has yet to ring. Monday I'll be calling them all again anyway .... squeaky wheel, and all that ...
  15. hntnhole
    Ahhhh .... Grindr, then. That app is also one of the reasons why crossing several streets in the area are almost begging to be run down. Guys actually drive around, staring at their phones in the wee hours. There are relatively minor crashes all the time. One day, someone is going to invent some doo-dad that pedestrians can push a button on, and fry the Grindr guy's phone. Thanks for the info.
  16. hntnhole
    Is being "tapped" some kind of electronic communication on one of the apps? In my (admittedly) outdated lexicon of the apps, I remember "oinks", but "tapped" always meant you got fucked - as in "so and so tapped my ass really well". If getting "tapped" is similar to the old "oinks", then it surprises me not one bit that you get those messages. You're one of the very special ones, and have my complete admiration for answering your calling. Precious few have that same courage. Thanks for all the important and interesting discourse too; I know all of us appreciate your excellent contributions, even if some neglect to mention it.
  17. hntnhole
    Thank you for the interesting response. Agreed. American citizens did indeed make that decision, and it led to murmurs of session. And also with much respect, particularly since your forebears suffered through the tragedy: There was indeed, as there always is, was, and every shall be, an "us" and a "them", which is based in economic advantage vs perceived economic disadvantage, accompanied by some cultural contrivance (often religious) to divert the attention of the masses. The Romans marched and conquered because they could. The British sailed the seas sweeping aside all opposition because they could. The Germans (and their allies in the Far East) marched and conquered because they could, possessing superior industrial (i.e. killing-power) development. At the time, it turned out that the US was the sleeping giant of industrialization, which is an economic advantage if ever there were one. Is there a nation that ever existed throughout history that hasn't exerted the will of it's powerful because it could?. The "us" vs "them" is always lurking in the shadows. Choose any ancient text chronicling domination of one economic group against another - or any modern text of the same purpose - and it boils down to who's got control and who doesn't. I would hazard that in this country, there has always been - since before there even was a Nation - an "us" and a "them", defined by economic status. When the North found it necessary to mobilize, the concept of using enslavement of another race of people was far easier to rouse the citizens of the North than to stick to the truth. It's so much easier to rouse hatred of "the other" by stand-in's, as opposed to the truth. Thank you again for your most interesting and beautifully-expressed response. Never-the-less ......
  18. hntnhole
    Most interesting conversation. Actually, I didn't go out last weekend, and I won't be this weekend either. I want the damn monkey vaccination before I resume the usual weekend m.o. Have requests for an appt in at as many places that are taking reservations (or, at least those I know about). So, dry weekend ahead. I should clean out the garage anyway, dammittall ...... still have hurricane-preparedness shit to shovel too, doubledammitall ..... damn monkeys in Africa ...... but, this too shall pass (at some point, tripledammitall 😬😒☹️😠💢
  19. hntnhole
    There was also a car by that name, made in Toledo from the late '20's to early '30's. A sporty little car, and well regarded in it's day. It got gobbled up by the conglomerate that later became American Motors.
  20. hntnhole
    Allow me to disagree: That conflict was essentially an economic one. The agrarian-based economy of the Southern States found itself in a stand-off with the industrialized North. While the economic power of the South - based, of course, on the utter depravity of enslaving other human beings for the economic benefit of the Plantocracy - began to fade, and the Northern States became increasingly Industrialized and more and more powerful, an inevitable reckoning would have to come. This was increasingly apparent from around the mid-to-late1840's, simmering ever hotter, until the conflagration finally erupted. The filth of enslaving other human beings, and basing the plantocracy on that fact, only provided the hook upon which to begin the secessionist movement. It is interesting to note that human behavior doesn't sink deeply into the pit of hellish behavior until one group has the chance to unseat another more powerful group. That instinct, I suppose, is the common curse of humankind, since it occurs constantly throughout human history. It's easy to appear genteel when we're squatting on top of the heap; less-so when we begin to slip off the apex. So, no. Slavery was not the principal issue. Fading economic power on one side, and burgeoning economic power on the other was the cause. Some historians believe that the South never had a ghost of a chance, considering the weight of the economic engine of the North. Even outstanding military talent couldn't win it for the South; the Shenandoah Campaign lasted from the beginning of that war to the very end of it. The sheer crushing industrial might of the North is what won, and in doing so, brought an end to the outrage of American slavery.
  21. hntnhole
    ^ I love it. I wonder if the Canadians would like it all that much though ..... Surely the present nation of Canada wouldn't care to have such a long, exposed border with Jesusland. And, we already know how much they (don't) know about building a long border wall ...... One modification does occur though. I think USoC should keep Alaska. That way we can watch Putin's collapse from the roofs of our houses. But poor old Illinois should really be a part of CreepyLand. It's only the City of Chicago that's the real bastion of Democratic power; the rest of the state has been reddish for a long time. It's only the vestiges of the old machine that keep the State Government blue. And imagine the saliva running out of Jesusland's mouths, when they realize that California alone possesses an economy far larger than the rest of their entire country. But, jealousy has always been one of their hallmarks.
  22. hntnhole
    Not at all .... just one of them. It usually does take some guy to crank things up in a backroom, but it doesn't take all that much. Just the first domino in the row to fall, and the rest happens of it's own accord. I'm not afraid to stir the pot, if it needs stirring, but it doesn't take too much to turn some guys standing around cruising each other into some guys having sex with each other.
  23. hntnhole
    Really ..... which particular corner of the current USA did you have in mind to waste on them? I'd rather the hatemongers get re-programmed, and eventually resume the national life with the rest of us. Once Cheeto-head is either in the clink or dead, the air in the reactionaries balloon will gradually dissipate, and with proper reforms, we can move forward again.
  24. hntnhole
    As far as I'm concerned, the more onlookers the better - since onlookers turn into participants, once they see other men sucking off Cocks - taking loads - right in front of them. It's only natural they'd want to get in on the action.
  25. hntnhole
    These idiots would make it illegal to take a shit on Sundays ... just so "Whoever" doesn't have to smell it on "his" day.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.