Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,302

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. hntnhole
    I think that we have "inborn" aims/goals/alignments that only surface when we become sexually aware. That can happen at any age, of course, but at some point relatively early in our lives we begin to sense that we're more interested in one (T or b) than the other. There are many equally interested in both, and more power to them. Maybe I'm wrong, but the instinct to fuck other men - or get fucked by men - is something that's waiting for the right time to surface in our consciousness. At some point, maybe in (grade school?) little girls stop hating boys, and boys begin to notice girls. It just happens to straight kids, so why not the same for us? We begin to notice other boys, maybe not even sure why, and that "notice" eventually awakens our sexual Lust. It's said that the gene that controls sexuality is passed from the mother, which would imply that it's something that's there from birth. Just as our Cocks begin to sprout, get hard, pubes start to grow, and sexual maturity begins, the object of our sexual needs also becomes apparent. Once clarity dawns, it's off to a wonderful life of sating those Lusts, and it's really nothing more than becoming the men we were born to become. Or is that too simplistic?
  2. hntnhole
    It's the guy, his personality, his commitment to a life of honesty, recognizing and reveling in personhood, needing and having raw sex with many men that counts most; not whether or not he's poz. That's an ancillary issue.
  3. hntnhole
    LOL ..... Seeya in a couple of months then !!! Conversely, if that was a typo, enjoy the whole damn double-chocolate cake !!!
  4. hntnhole
    We'll be waiting patiently !!! (hmmmm .... no pun intended)
  5. hntnhole
    Well, I must say - that was as professional, clear, and incisive an explanation I've read here. Kudos, and thanks so much for that very comprehensive, intelligent reply. If I wore a hat, it would be off to you right now.
  6. hntnhole
    By which statement, he invited a State - any State - to bring the challenge to other privacy rights to the SCOTUS for reconsideration. Mr. Thomas has made clear what his pre-determined judgement will be, and is hardly open minded on the issue of Constitutional rights hinged on privacy rights as set forth in the Constitution. Of course, he seems to have forgotten that certain right to privacy dealing with interracial marriage, since it would deprive him of "his best friend". All the others though, are on his chopping block - he has said so, and in explicit terms.
  7. hntnhole
    I try not to use the 'dislike' response much at all. There are occasions within a thread however, when some guy proves intractable in his discourse - almost like throwing word-hand-grenades at others with whom he disagrees. If that happens, I just skip reading those submissions, and read/respond to other, less antagonizing guys thoughts. I've only used the block-function once; and I haven't seen any of his mess since. Unfortunately, there are some folks that simply insist on uncouth behavior, but fortunately there are only a handful of them, and easily denied attention. All of that said, I think the "thumbs down" is useful, when used sparingly, and I hope it remains, since I don't think some little doo-dad possesses the power to "stifle" the exchange of ideas, perceptions, or thoughts. We use the "thumbs up" doo-dad far more often than the thumbs down anyway, which I find most appropriate. Thanks for your thoughts.
  8. hntnhole
    Which is - hopefully - very seldom !!!
  9. hntnhole
    Couldn't find the "thumbs up" doo-dad, so ....... Thumbs up !!!
  10. hntnhole
    I haven't taken his (multiple) requests to hear from a Republican about these issues as anything more than wanting to have responsible, intellectual curiosity addressed. That's (hopefully) what all of us want. I think he's sincere in asking for varying points of view. He doesn't live in the US, but he's well-read on what goes on here. I respect him for wanting even-handed input to his perspectives. Where's the harm in that?
  11. hntnhole
    This is becoming ridiculous ... replies that have nothing whatsoever to do with the actual thoughts others have shared? Cogency is simply not afoot here.
  12. hntnhole
    I suppose it's all relative: I've been sexually active for decades, but what has certainly increased is a thirst for ever-deeper depravities. Years ago, I didn't love to eat loads out of Holes anywhere near as much as I do now. I didn't love an audience as much as I do now. Sure, I'll still do 1-1's at home, but much prefer weekends at the fuckjoints. I like other men to watch me rut/Breed, watch them get hard, take out their Cocks, start jacking, waiting for their turn. I like when other guys start sucking Cocks, rutting in each other, waiting their turns. It's like I've become fairly good at acting out onlookers fantasies, thus enabling, enticing other guys to join in the bacchanal. Inhibitions may be appropriate in some situations, but I can't think of any just now .... tomorrow's Friday - finally. It's all about Cock/Hole/Sperm
  13. hntnhole
    That ^ may be somewhat accurate, and it may not, depending on the tightness of the Hole. Most of us know what a toilet "plunger" is, which depends on suction to deal with less-than-pleasant situations. Since that dependability is not available in circumstances like these, the "suction" function should be replaced with displacing certain substances with water under mild pressure, which is then easily dismissed. There may be other variables in play (physiology, etc) - but it's worth being sure, rather than "just enough". Nothing is more off-putting than discovering - midway into the fuck - than evidence that an incomplete prep job failed to achieve the intended result. Shallow prepping may not be appropriate 🙄
  14. hntnhole
    Per the above two replies: I understand so well. As far as I've figured it out, the "reward" for posting/replying - i.e. taking part in the discourse - is we're allowed more "reactions". I have no idea if there's some kind of sliding scale as to what type of posts get x percentage of rewards, but the more you take part, the more you're able to use the responses doo-dad. I think I've spent too much time in the responses clink ("you cannot post any more responses today").... but, it's not my site, either. It encourages us to actually write something, rather than just click the little doo-dads. So, thanks for joining up, and jump into the conversations.
  15. hntnhole
    You're right, of course. The medical profession is based on rendering needed medical care to anyone, without regard to extraneous issues, and not on cultural preconceptions. Consigning women to the dark ages of the past is an ethical, moral, and certainly intellectual disgrace. Here in the US, there are States that will continue to offer comprehensive medical services to women, thank Whatever. Girls are often raised to believe they are subject to the <polite cough> "leadership" of their husbands, including sex on demand, thanks to demented, archaic religious teaching. When the inevitable occurs, the husband then blames the wife for becoming preggers, out of a sense of entitlement, also instilled since childhood. Yes, that sense of blunt ownership has begun to fade in some areas, but it still thrives in others. Once women gained the right to have a determinative say in what happens to their own bodies, the now-old men who depended on acceptance of their God-Given right to dominate women to function, find themselves desperately trying to stem the tide of history - like - oh, say - Mr. Thomas and his fellow 17th Century era "intelligentsia". As always, most men tend to think with their Cocks, and blame the consequences on something - anything - other than themselves.
  16. hntnhole
    Thanks, Close2myBro. No wonder that commentary stirred up (yet another) hornet's nest. Her loose language doesn't really help, other than maybe fire up the base. Still, I've liked her through the years, shooting from the lip. Still, she has definitely "walked-the-walk", along with so many others. As far as I'm concerned, the more citizens that get fired up to VOTE in their primaries and the General in November, the better. In the M.W. vein though, I've voted at two polling places here, and both were staffed mostly by elderly Af/Am ladies. There have been reports in the media that a lot of them are afraid of the hatemongers running amok these days, and have quit their jobs working the polling places. So, I went downtown to the Registrar's office and volunteered to work on primary & election day. They were delighted to accept my offer, and I am awaiting notification of where the training will take place. While I am experienced in local political work, it wasn't here in FL, so I know the various minutia of the rules will be a bit different. I know I can do it, and I encourage any/all of our members to do the same. Remember: the mischief-makers know they're in the wrong, no matter how much bluster they put up. It's not that tough to stand up to blathering idiots.
  17. hntnhole
    This ^. 100% agree.
  18. hntnhole
    I know that I 'lose track' of certain threads sometimes - and I completely missed the Maxine Waters whatever-it-was. Does anyone have a link to her latest kerfuffle? Or better, a summary of what she said/did? Thanks (in advance).
  19. hntnhole
    When weighed against similar situations throughout recorded history, well ........... the outlook is not bright. To my mind, the zenith of Washington's power and influence was reached during the Johnson Administration and began to decline at that point. The failure in SE Asia, Kent State, young folks questioning the validity of the Administration's actions (which had not happened in any substantial numbers prior), the Kennedy murders, etc etc etc. I'm really glad I'm not a kid anymore. Close2MyBro may very well be spot-on.
  20. hntnhole
    All I know is, no one knows everything, and everyone needs to keep learning new ways of thinking, new points of view. It's empowering to know that no one knows everything, and thus, everything is always up for reflection and new potential answers. If we stop doubting, we only get encrusted with old notions. Learning new perspectives is healthy, uplifting, even exciting sometimes. I write on a political blog, and find new perspectives all the time. Each deserves consideration, some are bs, but some are well thought out. Getting stuck in some intellectual rut only diminishes us. Cheers !!!
  21. hntnhole
    I think this ^ statement gets to the crux of the issue. To less secure-minded folks, the world seems to be careening out of control: Russia on the march, financial instabilities, commodity scarceness, unreliable trade agreements, governments struggling to stem the tide, often seemingly unable to deal with important issues, on and on. This has been increasingly clear for several years now, and only becoming more obvious. More emotionally secure folks are concerned, but not losing their ability to keep the unsettled in it's proper perspective. There is hope that people of good will can right the ship in more self-confident men and women. When an era of disruption of what's been the norm seems imminent, insecure folks tend to lash out at anything around them, without considering the negative value of their actions. Without a firm belief-system (I mean, personal - not institutional) of hope, enlightenment to hang on to, some folks simply succumb to a sense of ennui - which is when the real despots can take advantage and create genuine havoc. But there's always hope too.
  22. hntnhole
    Of course this is true. What is also true, is that we vary widely in the manner we enjoy sex. Some men love X, some men love Y, and some men love the entire alphabet. Yes, we have much in common, and we have a wide pool of ways to express out sexuality too. There are men who are deeply in love with another man, and have mind-blowing sex with their loved one. There are men who love their One and Only, and never find outside sex appealing. There are men who find polyamory thrilling, and men that don't. There are men that find that "connection" with only one, and men that find it in a pile of rutting men. Who's to say one is better (or less confused?) than the other? Certainly not me. There's room for everyone, and men that see things differently deserve just as much value, to have their lives upheld, and enjoy acceptance from all of us. While it may be true that some guys write "can you top this" stuff on this site and there's room for that here on BZ. The point is, do what makes you happiest, and share that with everyone else. If some guy reads something he doesn't care for - well, no one is forcing him to read it in the first place. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
  23. hntnhole
    Welllllll ..... there is, of course, the question of skill involved in this question. It did serve to recall a semi-regular years ago who, somehow - was able to relax his throat to the point that there was no muscular resistance, only the flesh, which gave way fairly easily. That was fun. Then, there's the issue of the teeth. If the bottom has a particularly wide "bite", it might be ok. If not, as the old saying goes - sticks and stones may break my bones, but teeth will definitely break my enthusiasm ...... or something like that.
  24. hntnhole
    Your point is well taken. As to the others (Protestant - i.e. Luther derived), the method of teaching racism was less overt, and thus more insidious. "They" (meaning P.O.C.) simply weren't mentioned. The R.C's were heavily denigrated in the most overt fashion (after all - they worship statues - which I was quite literally taught as a little kid in Sunday School), they don't have to be sorry for their sins, because they only have to pay money and count beads, and then they can go do whatever it was all over again. This, when we were taught that every single little thing we ever, ever did wrong was written down in some impossibly enormous book in the sky, and we would have to answer for every single entry under our individual name. I clearly remember someone asking something in Sunday School - can't recall just what - about the people on the other side of the river dividing the city I grew up in - and the answer came that "they stay over there, we stay over here on our side". This shit was literally taught to little kids. So, generations upon generations of mostly Northern-European-derived Americans were inculcated with the notion that "the other" simply was not relevant to "our" lives. We wind up therefore, with Caucasians today who can actually say shit like "I didn't own any slaves - it's not my fault". And this was in the second-largest metro area outside of Chicago. With this kind of nurturing of kids, it's hardly a wonder that we find ourselves where we are these days.
  25. hntnhole
    There are some verrrry tasty Holes around BZ ..... so when's the BZ Convention scheduled for ???

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.