Jump to content

hntnhole

Senior Members
  • Posts

    6,283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by hntnhole

  1. When considering the effectiveness of PReP, take into consideration the danger of a crash while driving, walking across the street and getting run down, slipping and cracking your head open in the shower, all kinds of stuff. Then, balance those risks against the above-mentioned reductions in risk of hiv, and you'll wind up with a fairly impressive appreciation of how PReP can protect you from hiv. Nothing is fool-proof, we're all going to ditch at some point from something, and the way I see it, taking easily-accomplished steps with impressive track records of protection so I can live my life on my terms is - well - a no-brainer. Sure, you'll pick up some treatable bugs once in a while. Get regular testing, get rid of the bugs, and keep fucking. The way I see it, a small price to pay for living the life I need to live.
  2. Welcome, BigBearSean Thanks for your insightful commentary. Most appreciated and well thought out. As to the "fuck that asshole" comment, that's waaaay too generous of you .....
  3. Actually, if I were the cinematographer, EVERYONE ON EARTH would know !!! Obviously, I'd put a "squiggle" (or whatever it's called) on your face so you wouldn't pay the price, but they definitely would. I wound have to admit - if I saw a couple of them at the tubs taking loads, I'd probably add mine. ... 5 or 7, maaaaaybe ... expecially if you'd already been "visiting" with them ....
  4. Please do !!! The first three are definitely rarified and refined !!!
  5. Thanks .... I knew the wrap-up would be well worth the wait !!! That elusive "connection" doesn't happen all that often, which makes it all the more precious when it does.
  6. #'s 2 and 4 will be eeeeasy pickins: the wrestler wrecker and "our dancing daughter" are already well-established (if closeted) gays. #1 is all yours: Not me, not for anything. #3 doesn't deserve a second glance, let alone your magnificent obsessions. #5, welllllll ... maaaybe I'd second the motion, provided a large gag was handy. #6, I'd rather take that curling iron off his head and shove it where you intend to leave your calling card, so check to see if I beat you to it before you ... well ... #7, Not in my nightest-of-mares. #8, I'd rather never Breed a Hole again, than get within 30 yards of that total p.o.s. I WILL, however, be your cinematographer ......
  7. Beautifully said, PhoenixGeoff. Thanks.
  8. I think that we have "inborn" aims/goals/alignments that only surface when we become sexually aware. That can happen at any age, of course, but at some point relatively early in our lives we begin to sense that we're more interested in one (T or b) than the other. There are many equally interested in both, and more power to them. Maybe I'm wrong, but the instinct to fuck other men - or get fucked by men - is something that's waiting for the right time to surface in our consciousness. At some point, maybe in (grade school?) little girls stop hating boys, and boys begin to notice girls. It just happens to straight kids, so why not the same for us? We begin to notice other boys, maybe not even sure why, and that "notice" eventually awakens our sexual Lust. It's said that the gene that controls sexuality is passed from the mother, which would imply that it's something that's there from birth. Just as our Cocks begin to sprout, get hard, pubes start to grow, and sexual maturity begins, the object of our sexual needs also becomes apparent. Once clarity dawns, it's off to a wonderful life of sating those Lusts, and it's really nothing more than becoming the men we were born to become. Or is that too simplistic?
  9. It's the guy, his personality, his commitment to a life of honesty, recognizing and reveling in personhood, needing and having raw sex with many men that counts most; not whether or not he's poz. That's an ancillary issue.
  10. LOL ..... Seeya in a couple of months then !!! Conversely, if that was a typo, enjoy the whole damn double-chocolate cake !!!
  11. We'll be waiting patiently !!! (hmmmm .... no pun intended)
  12. Well, I must say - that was as professional, clear, and incisive an explanation I've read here. Kudos, and thanks so much for that very comprehensive, intelligent reply. If I wore a hat, it would be off to you right now.
  13. By which statement, he invited a State - any State - to bring the challenge to other privacy rights to the SCOTUS for reconsideration. Mr. Thomas has made clear what his pre-determined judgement will be, and is hardly open minded on the issue of Constitutional rights hinged on privacy rights as set forth in the Constitution. Of course, he seems to have forgotten that certain right to privacy dealing with interracial marriage, since it would deprive him of "his best friend". All the others though, are on his chopping block - he has said so, and in explicit terms.
  14. I try not to use the 'dislike' response much at all. There are occasions within a thread however, when some guy proves intractable in his discourse - almost like throwing word-hand-grenades at others with whom he disagrees. If that happens, I just skip reading those submissions, and read/respond to other, less antagonizing guys thoughts. I've only used the block-function once; and I haven't seen any of his mess since. Unfortunately, there are some folks that simply insist on uncouth behavior, but fortunately there are only a handful of them, and easily denied attention. All of that said, I think the "thumbs down" is useful, when used sparingly, and I hope it remains, since I don't think some little doo-dad possesses the power to "stifle" the exchange of ideas, perceptions, or thoughts. We use the "thumbs up" doo-dad far more often than the thumbs down anyway, which I find most appropriate. Thanks for your thoughts.
  15. Which is - hopefully - very seldom !!!
  16. Couldn't find the "thumbs up" doo-dad, so ....... Thumbs up !!!
  17. I haven't taken his (multiple) requests to hear from a Republican about these issues as anything more than wanting to have responsible, intellectual curiosity addressed. That's (hopefully) what all of us want. I think he's sincere in asking for varying points of view. He doesn't live in the US, but he's well-read on what goes on here. I respect him for wanting even-handed input to his perspectives. Where's the harm in that?
  18. This is becoming ridiculous ... replies that have nothing whatsoever to do with the actual thoughts others have shared? Cogency is simply not afoot here.
  19. I suppose it's all relative: I've been sexually active for decades, but what has certainly increased is a thirst for ever-deeper depravities. Years ago, I didn't love to eat loads out of Holes anywhere near as much as I do now. I didn't love an audience as much as I do now. Sure, I'll still do 1-1's at home, but much prefer weekends at the fuckjoints. I like other men to watch me rut/Breed, watch them get hard, take out their Cocks, start jacking, waiting for their turn. I like when other guys start sucking Cocks, rutting in each other, waiting their turns. It's like I've become fairly good at acting out onlookers fantasies, thus enabling, enticing other guys to join in the bacchanal. Inhibitions may be appropriate in some situations, but I can't think of any just now .... tomorrow's Friday - finally. It's all about Cock/Hole/Sperm
  20. That ^ may be somewhat accurate, and it may not, depending on the tightness of the Hole. Most of us know what a toilet "plunger" is, which depends on suction to deal with less-than-pleasant situations. Since that dependability is not available in circumstances like these, the "suction" function should be replaced with displacing certain substances with water under mild pressure, which is then easily dismissed. There may be other variables in play (physiology, etc) - but it's worth being sure, rather than "just enough". Nothing is more off-putting than discovering - midway into the fuck - than evidence that an incomplete prep job failed to achieve the intended result. Shallow prepping may not be appropriate 🙄
  21. Per the above two replies: I understand so well. As far as I've figured it out, the "reward" for posting/replying - i.e. taking part in the discourse - is we're allowed more "reactions". I have no idea if there's some kind of sliding scale as to what type of posts get x percentage of rewards, but the more you take part, the more you're able to use the responses doo-dad. I think I've spent too much time in the responses clink ("you cannot post any more responses today").... but, it's not my site, either. It encourages us to actually write something, rather than just click the little doo-dads. So, thanks for joining up, and jump into the conversations.
  22. You're right, of course. The medical profession is based on rendering needed medical care to anyone, without regard to extraneous issues, and not on cultural preconceptions. Consigning women to the dark ages of the past is an ethical, moral, and certainly intellectual disgrace. Here in the US, there are States that will continue to offer comprehensive medical services to women, thank Whatever. Girls are often raised to believe they are subject to the <polite cough> "leadership" of their husbands, including sex on demand, thanks to demented, archaic religious teaching. When the inevitable occurs, the husband then blames the wife for becoming preggers, out of a sense of entitlement, also instilled since childhood. Yes, that sense of blunt ownership has begun to fade in some areas, but it still thrives in others. Once women gained the right to have a determinative say in what happens to their own bodies, the now-old men who depended on acceptance of their God-Given right to dominate women to function, find themselves desperately trying to stem the tide of history - like - oh, say - Mr. Thomas and his fellow 17th Century era "intelligentsia". As always, most men tend to think with their Cocks, and blame the consequences on something - anything - other than themselves.
  23. Thanks, Close2myBro. No wonder that commentary stirred up (yet another) hornet's nest. Her loose language doesn't really help, other than maybe fire up the base. Still, I've liked her through the years, shooting from the lip. Still, she has definitely "walked-the-walk", along with so many others. As far as I'm concerned, the more citizens that get fired up to VOTE in their primaries and the General in November, the better. In the M.W. vein though, I've voted at two polling places here, and both were staffed mostly by elderly Af/Am ladies. There have been reports in the media that a lot of them are afraid of the hatemongers running amok these days, and have quit their jobs working the polling places. So, I went downtown to the Registrar's office and volunteered to work on primary & election day. They were delighted to accept my offer, and I am awaiting notification of where the training will take place. While I am experienced in local political work, it wasn't here in FL, so I know the various minutia of the rules will be a bit different. I know I can do it, and I encourage any/all of our members to do the same. Remember: the mischief-makers know they're in the wrong, no matter how much bluster they put up. It's not that tough to stand up to blathering idiots.
  24. I know that I 'lose track' of certain threads sometimes - and I completely missed the Maxine Waters whatever-it-was. Does anyone have a link to her latest kerfuffle? Or better, a summary of what she said/did? Thanks (in advance).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.