hntnhole

Never.

100%. The notion that such an intellectually /emotionally crippled creature as the Trumpanzee (credit to the above), could ever allow anyone in a wheelchair within a thousand yards of him - particularly in office, and most particularly as his running mate is beyond the imaginatory powers of even the most generous-of-heart human being. He's only interested in one thing in a running mate: someone who will bend over on command, and kiss his enormous, Big Mac engorged ass (my apologies for even summoning that vomit-inducing mental image).

It will be interesting to watch this issue unfold. On the one hand, the politicized SCOTUS can hardly handle much more ill-will from the non-crazy citizenry. On the other, quarter-million-dollar RV's just don't grow on trees either.

If he makes it past the current Colorado Supreme Court brou-ha-ha, I agree that he wouldn't choose a Veep from the current field, and for one simple reason: Running for high office in the US requires a certain amount of hubris in the first place, and that's the very last thing the Trumpanzee is interested in. All he wants is some weak-kneed push-over that will shit their pants/ies if he looks at them cross-eyed. DullSantis is - well - dull enough to accept if he were offered Veep, but he won't get it. Haley is far too bright (in that peculiar, R sort of way) and young to accept, should it be offered. Trumpanzee* only wants a "yes-man/woman" he can utterly dominate. *credit: Bootman

DP is hot - a lot of fun. But triple? You'd have to get at least two stallions disguised as guys to actually make it work. The lowest on the Hole might be the biggest one, graduating upwards to the next-biggest, with the least gigantic Cock on top of the pile? That said, I'd try it (as the "non-horse" guy). Would be fun to at least try it ....

There are ways for a Top that unloads too quickly to postpone the ecstasy (not the drug) of Breeding a Hole. One is to pull out and lather the Hole with your tongue. Another is to pull out, but keep your Cock on the Hole, not in it. Exchange some "Breed-talk". Praise the bottom's Hole, endorse his cumdumpery, and whatever other depravity comes to mind. That can extend the Top's rutting time, and help postpone the actual Breeding. Works for me sometimes, anyway ...

I disagree. I don't think any of us need to apologize to anyone for what we need to do. As long as the "how's" are at least mentioned prior, if the other guy doesn't like what we do, we just murmur something inoffensive, and move on. It's not your "problem", it's who you need to be, and we should never apologize for living our truth. One tip though: during the pre-fuck chat, mention early on what your preference re: condoms is. That will give each guy the cue to either exit gracefully, or be there in 10 minutes with a hard Cock or hungry Hole, maybe both. I haven't seen a condom in the joints I hit for years; the default position is raw, with the load pumped up the raw Hole. That said, if some guy wants it covered, I'd just say something vague, polite, and move on. But, never apologize for being the man you need to be.

So did I. It seems that eeeeever so timidly, a handful of the R's that understand how off-the-rails their party has become, some are trying to murmur that fact to their fellow R's. It's late, but not too late to begin righting the ship of state. Do you mean Pramila Jayapal, AOC and the far-left Progressives? Just as the R extremists are wreaking havoc, the far-left Dems are handing the R's plenty of ammunition. In fairness, each political party has it's extremities, whether left or right. As I see it, there's no problem with that, however I would note that there aren't far-lefties advocating the fall of the US Government. I think there's room in the Government for everyone to have a chance, with the proviso they're not advocating anarchy, quoting dictators (past and present), etc. Promoting one's view is fine. If the majority of voters in the district don't care for those views, they won't be elected. Repressing the views of others isn't fine. Bernie didn't make it either; a moderate leftie did.

I'll send you a box of Kleenex to dry your eyes 😄

How about rubbing your hard Cock (inside your pants, of course, if it's in public) up against him? If that doesn't let him know you need his load up your gut, I wonder what will ...

While there are several variations on this theme, it's one of my favorites too. In the darkroom of my favorite fuckjoint, the bottoms are always on their hands and knees on the fuck-bench, with numerous Cocks rutting/Breeding their Holes. Often there's just not room enough to kneel down and get my mouth on their spermholes (it's pitch-black in there), but in the orgy room, there's enough light so other guys don't trip on me. Occasionally some other guy will kneel down next to me if there's room to, wanting to snowball the loads - which, of course, only adds to the thrill. There's not much I don't love about the darkrooms, but eating a well-loaded Hole before rutting in it is my very, very favorite.

Can't help but wonder who from the House might have been right along side of Lady G ... sopping it up his Hole too .... (not the son, I mean the father ...)

I'll bet he has .... and plenty of times. More, it's not just the places he's referencing, it's the "results" of those "intimate conversations". Hand, mouth, Hole, or all three ??? No need to repeat it, Lilly .... we get it ... you're taking loads in the privacy of your offices. The only question is, how much do you have to pay them?

Thank you, topblkmale !!! I was hoping it wasn't some automated, non-human thing: (at least until A.I. takes over everything). And, thanks for enlarging the colored text - I was able to make out the red-colored words fairly easily with that font.

Recent reports from the collapsed House of Representatives are murmuring that the scorpions are about to devour their young .... meaning the baby-faced Magaroid Speaker. McCarthy has packed his kleenex and gone home now, Mikey-boy has completely failed to advance one productive bill. It's to the point that Chip Roy (21st, TX) stood in the well hollering over and over again words to the effect: "Tell me one thing (index finger jabbing skyward) we've accomplished that I can go home to my district and campaign on. TELL ME ONE THING !!!" This from a Republikan from Texas. So who's to blame? That body might as well blame the same old thing: The Speaker, of course. Failure of leadership. Failure across the intellectual board. Failure to accomplish the insurrection he was so invested in. Failure to even partially control his razor-thin majority. Failure in it's awful entirety. Apparently he can control whether his kid ever watches porn, but he can't control anything else. That tortured wreck of a man is, if major media is to be believed, already on the skids. Maybe Marjorie Trailer GreeneTrash will be the next to descend to the dizzying depths of failure that the House of Representatives has become. Or, maybe that pompadour'ed serial rapist from Florida's 1st District. At least it wouldn't be any fresh news that a rapist had advanced his career - after all - he'd just be following in the footsteps of the original king of the ridiculous Pompadour. He'd probably dye it a matching shade of orange too.

Welcome, GyroLover. Glad you found what you need - we hope to hear more from you. Good luck.

Had you mentioned prior that you already have a boyfriend?

To the OP's topic though, "a Liberal" means someone who supports Progressive (i.e. the process of addressing cultural/social deficits, and in support of ameliorating those weaknesses in our collective lives. The word "Nice", in and of itself, can mean anything from the absence of malice to active support of humane social/cultural causes, and has become so generalized it's not of much use in serious discussions. "Conservative" carries a connotation of preserving those inequities that need to be addressed. The BLM movement, for instance. Yes, it took a breathtakingly blunt murder of an American who happened to be of African ancestry by a Caucasian cop to rip the blinders off the general public's eyes, and force the issue onto the front burner. Another example, very recently, is the inexcusable, overt racism emanating from the former Mayor of NYC, even after conviction of the same. Generally, "Conservatism" promotes conserving the wrongs of the past, in support of a minority afraid of losing their assumed cultural dominance. Liberalism promotes adjusting the focus of the public towards justice and equality across the board. A more coarse way to say it might be the "us first, then everyone else" viewpoint, vs. sharing the whole pie equitably in the first place.

Can someone give me a brief explanation of what a "troll" (in the above context of this post) actually is? It seems that a human (?) called Harry has been stirring this pot - is a "troll" (not in the sense of a broken-down old person) some mechanical device? Or an actual human behaving like a troll ....

Wellllll ..... Experience counts, right? 😉

Disruptive Film Co.

Last night over to Slammer .... looks like I'm the one getting fucked tonight though - flooding rains, high winds, warnings of every kind and description today, continuing on into the wee hours. Dammittall ... 😖

HELL yes !!!!!!!!!!! Plain-kissing a guy is aright, I guess - but cum-kissing a guy is fan-fukkin-tastic !!!

LOL .... yeah, it may very well awaken something in him you wouldn't want to wake up !!! That's silly ... no matter what moniker you or he attaches to the relationship. Chronological age has relatively little to do with loving relationships. Do your own parents take an interest in fulfilling that crucial role? Does he sense that you need parental care? Usually, one pair of parents is plenty for most of us. One thing you haven't mentioned is, has he had any sexual experience at all with other guys? Has he ever sucked a Cock? Fucked a guy? That answer would go a long way to figuring out your next step.

Thanks, Flared, for the interesting response. It sounds like he's trying to carry more burdens than most guys can. Has he sought professional help with alleviating these issues? When we try to carry too much at any one time, it's hardly surprising that he's so conflicted. It might be worth a try. If you're concerned he could back away, try to come up with some contrivance (oh - you have a buddy who sought counseling, got better, blah blah blah) that would encourage him to find a professional that can help. If that previous marriage was his only "relationship", and it ended badly, there's little wonder he's skittish about getting into another one. Obviously, we don't have enough insight here on BZ to offer concrete advice; I'm no professional councellor, Of course - I would venture that one can't exist without the other. Maybe it's varying degrees of attraction? If you don't believe he's actually gay, then how is it you believe that you can fully receive "love" from him? He receives comfort, a kind soul to be present with the added benefit of physical interaction (including sexually, occasionally), but that's not a definition of "love" that I'm acquainted with. I don't doubt that he loves you, in a limited way - as much as he's capable of it - but he's apparently carrying a ton of emotional baggage too, which may prevent him from that deeper state of intense love we normally associate with that word. Since he tells you to "get a boyfriend", that's the flip side of telling you he doesn't believe he will be able to bring himself to being that to you. It sounds like he's being upfront with you - he knows what you want, and he doesn't believe he can fulfill role for you. I guess it all depends on whether you can accept what he's offering, and be thankful for it. Romance can have unlimited shades of color, from brilliant red to whatever some soft hue of vague pastel. Keep an open mind, and you may wind up with both: a boyfriend and a mentor/friend. Thanks for the interesting post !! Best of luck to you both.