ejaculaTe
-
Posts
1,544 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by ejaculaTe
-
It's hardly a recent phenomenon even if it's a more frequent occurrence now. It happened to me years ago when I lived near Philadelphia. I still recall a couple incidents: I'm at the front door, I've rung the doorbell a few times, and there is nothing. I send a message on the particular app... nothing; send another message... nothing. After 5 minutes or so, I leave. Sometimes, the expected encounter was to be a 3-way, and I surmise that the guy who hadn't been online when the invitation was extended vetoed my involvement. That I could understand; the inability of anyone to tell me that always irked me. I was much more wary about 3-ways afterwards.
-
Advice on hooking up with a much younger guy (legal)
ejaculaTe replied to polyglutton's topic in General Discussion
Grindr, I assume, requires one to state one's age, and I'd hazard a guess that the minimum age to get on the app/site is 18. The Kid is 16 going on 17 as he told the OP. The Kid has thus already told one lie, and for all anyone knows, let alone the OP, The Kid could actually be 15. "But he said he was almost 17 -- I asked. Don't tell me he lied to me" won't be much help. In most states, mistake of fact as to someone's age is not a defense to a charge of statutory rape, sexual assault, or similar offenses. -
Remote Work - Best place for a horny gay guy to live?
ejaculaTe replied to Breedingandseeding's topic in General Discussion
When I moved to the Philadelphia area in 1982, it was Back Street Baths. -
The guy who has the webcam on the bookshelf to ensure that his visitors don't walk away with the checkbook has little, if anything, to worry about. The Florida statute expressly exempts a security system when there's a conspicuous notice that there's a video surveillance system for security purposes. The statute also exempts any video surveillance device that is clearly and immediately obvious to anyone. And most importantly, the statute only reaches people who record for the "amusement, entertainment, sexual arousal, gratification, or profit" of themselves or another. The guy who simply wants to keep an eye on his property isn't acting with that intent. I wanted to disabuse anyone of the notion that recording someone was ok as long as it wasn't posted on a website. Otherwise, it strikes me that my reading of the statute is pretty consistent with your thinking on the topic.
-
You're all too right that one needs to be alert and apprehensive in this situation. A guy acting as you describe is on day 4 of a chem-fueled bender and the shadow people are now talking to him. It's also possible that he's simply paranoid to start with, and the lack of sleep and too much tina has aggravated his paranoia. Over the years, I've learned that those guys should be shown the exit at the earliest possible moment (or that I should leave at the earliest possible moment).
-
Wrong. It's illegal under Florida law "to secretly view, broadcast, or record a person, without that person's knowledge and consent" even if the recording is for your own entertainment. (The person has to reasonably believe that he could fully undress or expose a sexual organ in privacy without worrying whether his activity was being viewed, recorded, or broadcasted.) Posting to a website isn't required. (The Florida statute is section 810.145, Video Voyeurism.) "Nanny cams" are ok because, presumably, they're not being used to film Nanny in her shower; they're used to keep an eye on her and Junior.
-
To my mind, there are two advantages to email (and its cousin, messages on hook-up sites/apps). The first is that unless the context implies that a quick reply is wanted, I can send the email or message and not fear that I am making unreasonable demands on the recipient to answer. The second is that unlike face to face encounters, it is easier -- or at least, I find it easier -- to ignore email and messages. If after "thanks for the compliment," I see another message which is now unwanted, I just ignore it. Don't be afraid of hitting the "delete" button.
-
Hook up sites like Recon and Adam4 Adam
ejaculaTe replied to BearPleaser's topic in General Discussion
"Apprentice" might be a better choice; for whatever it's worth, a guy who uses that word certainly gets my attention. -
I always viewed a simple "Thanks for the compliment" to be more than sufficient. Indeed, if upon looking at the other's profile, I know I'm not interested, that is all I write. Of course, one can always ignore the message from the other person and proceed with one's own survey of profiles.
-
"Can you bring some other tops with you?" "Sure, there's a regional Tops convention going on in town right now. There should be 4 or 5 guys wanting to nail an ass after all of these damn meetings." ---- Guys who ask you to "bring other tops" seem to think there's 6 or 7 tops sitting in a lounge somewhere, waiting for an urgent plea from a bottom in need, as if they're fighter pilots ready to scramble at a moment's notice. I always avoided guys who made that request.
-
I'd hazard a guess that it's a matter of control. The guy who hides the web cam or cell phone in the plants won't think anything of it because he has control of the video or pictures on that phone, etc. But he has no control over what you do with the video or pictures on your phone, and he accordingly objects. You're right that if one party is recording, then as a matter of logic and etiquette, everyone should be allowed to do so, especially if the host is the one taking pictures. When sex is involved, however, logic and etiquette are often left at the bedroom door.
-
Someone worked at a funeral home, right, and the coffin was at the funeral home...? Because it'd be creepy as all hell if it happened at the cemetery....
-
I often thought that anyone giving highly unlikely stats, such as being 99 years old or being 6'6" tall and weighing 145 lbs, was just messing with the search filters.
-
I didn't think that the word "renovation" was in the vocabulary of the owner. Glad you had a good time at the hotel, and thanks for letting us know.
-
Two of my worst hookups in one night
ejaculaTe replied to BritishCumdump's topic in Your Last Load...
Because some of this technology stuff is a bit beyond me, what about getting a Google Voice number and using that? -
That would be one hell of a "slip and fall" personal injury case.
-
How was the trip?
-
no lines, no waiting... you are the perfect host 😉
-
Out of more than idle curiosity, where did you find any plans for a frame?
-
Faking my anon cumshot leads to some sketchy public breeding
ejaculaTe replied to rock-cock-jock's topic in Your Last Load...
The 8th Circle, Fraud, is for those who commit acts of dishonesty. Of course, there are grades of dishonesty, and in the first ring, panderers, sex workers, and seducers are tortured. They are whipped by the demons for they exploited others by seducing them to fulfill their interests. That sounds like a pretty good fit. -
Where did you get (or give) your last load?
ejaculaTe replied to rawTOP's topic in General Discussion
One of the seldom mentioned advantages of owning a home. It eases the pain of writing a check to the HVAC repairman. -
YES...!!!!!!!!!!
-
Is it Illegal to ask guys off the street to blow them.
ejaculaTe replied to piercedcock555's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
If the object of the solicitation was sufficiently pissed off at your offer, I can envision you being charged with disorderly conduct (§42.01 of the Texas Penal Code). I'm not saying any prosecution would be successful; I'm simply saying that disorderly conduct is the most plausible charge. -
I’m thinking he missed the off ramp to Chem Sex Fiction….
-
Wikipedia has a description of a "green card marriage" under the topic "Sham Marriage." The general idea is that a US citizen marries a non-resident alien who is typically ineligible for residency but for being the spouse of a US citizen. On the basis of the marriage, the non-resident alien obtains permanent residency status, evidenced by an immigration document that used to be a card, about the size of one's driver's license, that was green in color, hence "green card."
