hntnhole

Absolutely appropriate, and, may I say, deee-fukkin-licious !!!!

Maybe I'm a little bit more "liberal" in my fucking views too, but I don't really care what the bottom does with his Cock while I'm fucking him. Whatever makes it best for him, makes it best for me too.

For good reason. If you've heard any of the things he's been saying, it's not hard to notice that he wants to become a "strong-man", just like the dictators of any number of countries around the world. Can you point to any worthwhile policies his (presumed) candidacy is touting? (the golden slippers don't count) The man is a clear and present danger - described clearly by his own lips - to our system of Government, and unless you believe that Democracy needs to be discarded, it's no wonder the Democrats are going on about the threat Trump is. On the contrary, replacing old, crumbling infrastructure is one of the hallmarks of the Biden Administration, plus, advancing new energy-saving infrastructure. I know we're pumping more oil at the Administrations behest, and I don't think that's a terribly good idea, but I'm no expert on the issue. Biden got a collapsed bridge on I-95 replaced in an astoundingly short time. He's replacing the bridge that's been crumbling for years over the border with Canada. There are brand new energy plants (solar, wind) being built in many parts (Red as well as Blue) of the country, and in a mere 3 years. What can T. show that he's accomplished in any of these areas? The answer would be nothing. If by "weak security" you mean the issues on the border with Mexico, who promised to build a wall, and never bothered to get around to doing it? Who is blathering about getting out of NATO, which security treaty has kept the peace since WW2? It's been 80 years since despots around the world have dared to actually threaten peace, and it's not Biden who's giving these despots the green light. Was it President Biden who finally agreed to sign a "border-bill" that the House constructed, giving the R's everything they wanted (because an unelected private citizen) decided he wanted to use it against the opposition) in their border proposal? And the R's still refused. I would be interested to know what vantage points those are. Everyone gets to follow what makes the most sense to them, so please share that information. Thanks.

I surely don't know - but, maybe they think it'll make room for more ???

LOL .... I had to read through the choices twice ... and the "full service dining experience" got my vote !! Nothing against a hot neighborhood bar though - (if it still existed, dammittall) 😉

I understand completely - which is why I never did it again. We need the moderators, or BZ would turn into a maelstrom of who knows what. Thanks.

Yeah, as though having X hair or eye or skin color would have any impact whatsoever on the fuck-ability of the Hole ...

No need to apologize; the way to "earn" more "responses" (i.e. the little icons in the lower right hand corner) is to compose replies to threads, or start new ones of your own. The more you participate in the discourse, the more "responses" you earn. All of us, which, of course, is the purpose of BZ.

It seems odd, but we often tend to like that which we are not. I'm with you, akula.

I can understand why those restrictions are there, but really - just saying "thanks" to a guy in another country is a bit over the top. I suppose that if it were allowed, there would be threads/posts in many different languages (we are a Universal bunch) it would cause too much commotion. particularly for the moderators.

Sure it's worth doing, if you have the time. Sharing your well-earned information with your brothers in the UK would be most appreciated. Post it in the UK area too !!

1. Of course it's entirely "normal" - for you. 2 If other bottoms achieve the same reaction, it's entirely normal for them too. 3. I suggest you repeat this behavior a number of times, and see if the thrill remains, or perhaps grows. The only caution would be to take steps to make sure your Hole can physically open widely "on demand", so as not to injure yourself.

Actually, considering ^, I wonder if our enemies have discovered this site, and are here trying to infiltrate, or worse, collect names .... should worse come to worse in November. I would gladly cast my vote - on any level - for MR. BOOTMAN - should he run for office.

Another, fresh example of raw Stupidity occurred yesterday, at the trial of Fani Willis: One of the lawyers-cum-interrogators was grilling her about keeping (apparently) a stash of cash in her home. He even spelled out what he meant, which was truly dull: The attorney actually spelled out the word: h-o-r-d-e .... which only summons forth allusions an army from the 13th Century ... namely, "Genghis Khan and the Golden Horde", meaning a force of armed men so enormous, the combatants couldn't even be counted. I doubt that "attorney" could possibly be gay, but in the event he is: The word you - stupid attorney - seemed to be searching for is "hoard" - meaning a mass of currency (whether metal or (these days) paper. This dullard actually spelled out an entirely wrong word - sounds the same, sure - but it was emphasizing a truly stupid mistake. I think even the neighbors heard me laugh ....

As usual, you "get it" ..... the actual mating is fantastic, but there can be so much more involved - when we allow ourselves to experience it ....

Generally, I'd always advise to do some holework ... er .... I mean HOMEwork ... first, before you try dp. Make sure you're able to open up enough before you actually try it in-the-flesh. You could be injured (meaning, a quick trip to the hospital) if you're Hole simply cannot expand enough, yet is forced to. Lust is wonderful, but things can get carried away when we're "in heat".

Thanks for your input. I think every viewpoint is equally important, regardless of which side of the aisle one aligns oneself with.

That may be true in the large metropolitan cities, which is why so many American gays relocated to large cities. That said, there is plenty of homophobic hatred of gay folks out in the other, more rural parts of the country.

❤️

First, thanks for sharing your views on these important issues. I would be interested in knowing your sources proving your point. I could find none. He recently endorsed a bill (which, as you know, no President can initiate - that must be done by Congress) giving the Republicans in the HoR everything they wanted. Yet, at the last minute the former President quashed the deal, although he has no executive power now. The President relinquished a number of his plans to ameliorate the current mess at the southern border, and allowed virtually everything the (proposed) House bill demanded. Yet, thanks to one statement from a disgrace of a man to the contrary (apparently so he can use the issue in his campaign against the President), the House refused to accept everything they had wanted. How, pray tell, is that making it "harder and harder" for our neighbors to the South to emigrate? Your commentary relating to "the end times" would definitely apply to some members of the House (particularly Mr. Johnson), but Government Policy endorses no religion at all. Everyone is allowed to believe in the religion of their choice (or no religious belief at all), as long as they don't foist their beliefs on others. I happen to believe that the "end times" have nothing whatsoever to do with some deity - we humans are perfectly capable of bringing that to pass completely on our own. More, the President - like very other citizen - is entitled to believe in whatever religion he chooses - or none at all, for that matter. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with this statement, but it really should be supported by some evidence. Please provide the evidence to back up your statement. It seems you may be misconstruing the former President with the current one. Thanks for sharing your viewpoints.

Maybe the old saying "any port in a storm" would suffice ??? Or, maybe the probation officer has a little secret of his own ....

Welcome, anonCUMtainer. Sounds like you'll be making interesting additions/replies so some of the threads of conversation. We look forward to hearing more from you.

Thanks - that's the one.

The world is having a difficult time of it these days, it seems, at least the Western world. Sorry your conversation ended the way it did, but most of us would have reacted the same way. The "woke-ers" are drowning in a sea of "anti-woke-ers" sometimes. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

It was from an earlier one ... maybe I'm the one that needs a test or three ... 😉