hntnhole

Have other, more important things going on here this weekend, so it'll have to wait.

Special requests are fine, but the question here should be "who provides what". Frankly, I think that in a "private" hookup, that's the Top's responsibility to provide the other guys. In the fuckjoints, all that would be required for that Top to get what he wants, is sending the bottom off to take loads off other Cocks for half an hour or so. Just because a guy is a Top doesn't relieve him of doing his part in setting the scene he wants. If the hookup is not planned for a public venue, then it's the Top's responsibility to make sure he gets what he wants. It's not that tough. Any cumdump worth the name will have "regulars" he can call on to pre-load his Hole, and then stick around for the rest of the show. More, any serial-breeding Top will have fuckbuddies willing to provide the necessary loads - and the whole event would bring new BreedCocks to the bottom's attention. Win/win all around.

Well .... as they say in AA ....... First things First !!!!!! 😜

What an thought-provoking prospect. Of course, it never crossed my mind prior to reading your thoughts, (and if you believe that, the bridge over to Brooklyn is still available). Secondly, now that the US is dropping food (maybe even medical supplies?) parcels via helicopter to the starving-to-death (literally) Palestinians, some of the idealistic kids will realize that their best bet is to vote for one or the other, and come to the conclusion that Biden is the least-worse in their minds. Plus, there's plenty of time before the election, and - as Bernie put it last night on MSNBC - "not one more nickel for Netanyahu" until the eradication of the Palestinian innocents ceases, food-security is guaranteed, the 2-State Solution is accepted, and the process of achieving it begun. Only the "not one more nickel ..." is a direct quote - his flapping arms were trying to lift him off the chair, but ..... the rest is the gist of his comments.

It may be time for a word-substitution: prudence seems in short supply in the SCOTUS majority these days - how about we coin a new, more appropriate word for this particular majority? The (new) word "jurisprejudice" seems to roll off the tongue nicely ....

Thanks for ^ that. I'd never heard either of those contractions before.

I disagree. Most Democrats realize that there have been enormous wrongs committed in the past, and are in process of learning how to correct those wrongs. I mean, regular, plain old Dems, not ultra Liberals or Progressives (who wind up voting Dem, since to these folks voting R is simply impossible. However you define "casual" racism, all of the above-mentioned groups know that grievous behavior, whether in the past or present, needs to be addressed honestly, and rectified to the greatest extent possible. More, systems constructed or resuscitated to address these profoundly sad, regrettable issues. We know that any kind of racism is anti-human, and must be addressed wherever we find it. Anything less is unacceptable.

^ assuming these pollsters are conducting an actual, honest poll in the first place. I don't believe that most of them are willfully "leading" responses via their phrasing, but then, I'm not a pollster either.

What kind of surprises? Welcome, and we hope to hear more from you. That's a great start - welcome, and we hope to hear more from you.

Dinner ....

Well, it's a risk just to get out of bed in the morning. Risk of all kinds of events populates our every move, in some sense. Heading to the john for that first piss of the morning, slipping on something (just for color, maybe a still-wet cumrag), could be a serious event. Getting run down by a drunk driver, all kinds of shit happens to people every minute of every day. Nothing is guaranteed, so we have to accept some measure of risk no matter what - if we're going to actually live a full, enriching, satisfying life. Taking steps to avoid risk makes sense to me, but no one can completely evade some measure of risk in their lives.

Lets just remove the word "condom" from human languages, in the M2M context. The straights can still use the word, the barrier, to prevent pregnancies, but it really doesn't have any context for guys who rawfuck each other. For us, it's just an oxymoron.

From the Oxford: the·ism /ˈTHēˌizəm/ noun belief in the existence of a god or gods, especially belief in one god as creator of the universe, intervening in it and sustaining a personal relation to his creatures. "there are many different forms of theism" I'm not sure what "theism", at least in the modern sense, has to do with cumdumpery - maybe that some deity wants us to rawfuck each other? Priapus would definitely be in favor, I'm sure (for some truly ancient, deliciously filthy statuary, give him a little google). In a sense, when we "connect" our Lusts with others of the same bent, that can be a "spiritual" sharing of our mutual Lusts, as well as sharing our Sperm. I can't say I experience Breeding a Hole in a theocratic sense though. To me, it's a crucial, important, beautiful "act" that benefits each guy tremendously - each and every time. 😇

A few days ago I apparently used a "banned word", and I can't remember what it was. I didn't intentionally use a banned word - why would anyone? Maybe on of the moderators can explain in a "beat-around-the-bush" fashion what word it was, so I don't mistakenly use it again. Also, is there a list of the banned words/phrases somewhere on BZ? If there is, at least I could check my thoughts before clicking "submit reply". Thanks (in advance).

The President's recent primary victories seem to have dulled the R's noisy blathering's lately. Even Lady Graham of SC's* dizzying dance of turnabouts can't keep up these days. The President's gains seem to be mirrored by the other guy's diminishing returns - literally. Of concern, of course, are the ballots in Michigan marked for neither the (presumed) R candidate nor the President. This was no surprise, given the President's mystifying disinclination to "get butch" with the Prime Minister of Israel over what amounts to genocide, and at the hands of said PM. I've kept quiet about this issue for a while, hoping that Biden will indeed get a bit pushy with Netanyahu over the massacre of civilians since Oct. 5, and the fat is clearly in the fire now. The President needed every liberal Jewish vote in MI he could get, and now that primary is over with a resounding victory. He needs to risk some Jewish votes elsewhere now, and come down hard on Nettie, whose support in Israel is evaporating more and more. The Israeli general population is already royally pissed at their PM (messing with their Supreme Court - what a surprise), as well as other issues. Of more recent interest however, is the announcement by the Majority Leader in the Senate (affectionately known as turtlehead) that he will retire at the end of his term. This is the man who directly caused the "stacking" of the Supreme Court, refusing to allow the then sitting President to appoint a successor to RBG., resulting in the succeeding President to "stack" the Court with repressive ultra-conservatives, thus throwing out women's reproductive rights. Now, even IVF is on the block, and no one with an ounce of sense thinks the High Court will stop in their sticky tracks if the Jailbait guy gets elected in November. Senator John Thune (SD) appears to be the leading candidate to become Majority Leader, but there's a lot of water to pass under the bridge before that might happen. It seems the President's continuing disinclination to push back against Netanyahu's intransigence could be his biggest hurdle to reelection, unless the (admirably idealistic) student/young folks vote coalesces around his reelection. The war in the Middle East is spreading, the ambassadors are flying furiously around the area, yet the Stumbling Block of Intransigence remains enabled in his thirst for Arab blood. If anyone knows how the "you slap me, I slap you harder" routine can bring peace, I'd appreciate reading that explanation one of these days. *moniker bestowed by no less than Jen Psaki when she worked at the White House for all those years. Then, there's the issue of the little baby-faced jerk running the House of Representatives. We're literally on the threshold of a Government Shutdown (again), with all the mess that goes along with that. But, that's for another day, I guess.

How many times have we got out of bed the morning after an election to screaming headlines saying "The Polls Were Wrong"? There are rather few Pollsters worth the time it takes to tell about them, and the only "poll" that counts is the one the day after election day.

Welcome to you and all the new guys. To your comment above, better late than never, right?

Spain? A hotbed of gay porn? How tantalizing .... <filthy grin>

In my experience (back in Chicago), the LCR's are concerned more with "assimilating" more than anything else. There was a neighbor (member) who invited me, and I went to a few meetings as his guest. All I heard were cautionary comments about not pissing off this straight group, that straight group, and for heavens sake not that straight group either. And no, I didn't sneak in a fuck with his hotttt boyfriend .... really really really I didn't .... 😇 I don't even know if there's a chapter here in Ft. L.

Isn't it remarkable how some posts are created, discussed, and then resurface quite a while later? I understand the OP's mindset, and I endorse it. In my case, while pumping my dna up Holes has always been an important part of my (adult) life, it's not the only important part. While I do love fucking Holes, there are other things that interest me as well, and I keep active in a number of facets of living. I guess it's just that I don't want any one-thing to control how I live, what I do, or what I don't do. Life can be a fantastic experience, varied and interesting on many levels. I don't allow any one "thing" to overtake everything else. There's just too many experiences to enjoy, take part in, to allow one particular activity to predominate. That said, when it's Fri/Sat night, the time is right, the Lust, the behavior is right, and I love that part of me completely too.

Of course. The one goes hand-in-hand with the other. I also participate on a "general" political blog, and do my part there. It's not anywhere near as much fun as BZ though ...

Whatever works, right? As long as we can vote (and, fingers crossed, have it counted properly), we'll have to accept any contrivance to get the job done.

I agree. They were both victims of O.R., which only taught repressive notions, and the advent of "free thinking" had barely just begun. Frankly, I think they were both too embarrassed to ever allude to sex in general, let alone anything useful to a kid. Once, my mother actually made a date for me, after receiving a call from one of her friends. The friend's oldest daughter (a real mousey wallflower) didn't have a date for the Prom, and asked my mom if I'd take her. My dad was home, sitting in a wing chair with this Cheshire Cat look on his face, glancing at me sideways. He knew what was coming, and I didn't. So, mom explained the situation, and asked if I'd ask what's-er-name to the Prom. I was stunned, and my dad was trying not to smile. I told my mom that she could never ever try to make a date for me again. Dad began to lose the battle not to smile. At which point, mom said "alright, you call (her friend, the mom of the girl) and tell her "your daughter isn't good enough for you". I'll never forget that exchange - my mom was furious. I simply replied "No, YOU call her, and tell her not to make the same mistake with her son (3rd or 4th oldest, I think). Now. I would have gladly taken the second-oldest daughter - she was a firecracker if ever there were one - she was a lot of fun. Loved getting into mischief, laughing, just a lot of fun. Not for anything sexual at all, just for the fun that surely would have taken place. I don't know how my mother dealt with the issue: she never mentioned it again, thank Whatever.

That jogged my memory: I can't remember exactly what grade I was in - probably Junior High - when my Dad took me downtown to the YMCA one night to hear an "expert" clinically describe what the heteronormative event we call fucking consisted of. It was an "X happens to the woman, Y happens to the man, Z happens when they fuck" kind of thing, quite "clinical". While I recognized a number of schoolmates (with their dads), I don't think any one of us ever talked about it at school. That was it, as far as my cultural sexual education went. Thank Whatever it was only a one-night thing.

Agreed. Thanks for your input.