tallslenderguy

i still haven't done it. i've had lots of piss up my ass, and love that, having a Tops cock and contents in my pussy is always my first choice, butt having Him in me is so important that i'll take Him any way He wants or needs. Honestly, not yet having drunk piss i'm still nervous about it, but i love the Top/bottom dynamic of being in the position to take Him and Him 'training' me to take it. For me the bigger part of sex is psychological, Him penetrating and putting a part of Himself in me, so it's mind fuck for me. i suspect i will not enjoy the taste of piss... initially, that it will end up becoming one of those things where i am changed by a Tops need and desire to love it and it will become yet another need for me to have it once He has inseminated me with His piss and impregnated me with Himself. That's how it works with me, it's like a Top turns me into an addict who needs Him after conditioning me.

Ha, interesting, but true. i guess i've just been lucky. i stand corrected, shouldn't just go on my experience. Oral sex is not a common cause of infection with this bacteria. Chlamydia is less likely to be transmitted during oral sex because the bacteria that cause chlamydia prefer to target the genital area rather than the throat. This is why it is unlikely for chlamydia to be transmitted from mouth-to-penis and penis-to-mouth contact, although it is still possible. It is even less likely for transmission to take place from vagina-to-mouth or anus-to-mouth contact. Transmission is not known to occur from mouth-to-vagina and mouth to anus contact [think before following links] [think before following links] http://chlamydiacoalition.org/chlamydia-101/transmission/

Ditto you and pozguyinchi. i have a fantasy of having a Top who is so full of need and desire to breed that He doesn't care if i'm cleaned out or not. i fantasize about His sliding in and breeding me spontaneously, any time the need arises. But that's a fantasy that has never happened. i've talked to a few Tops online who share a similar fantasy, but i have to wonder how it would play out in reality? i kinda doubt i'd be able to get past the smell and mess if it happened. Maybe the embarrassment of it if it was a D/s thing? idk.

"Worthless cumdiump" is a an oxymoron to me, a contradiction of terms. I'm not saying that there are not Tops or bottoms who think there is such a thing, i'm just saying that our actions belie the term? A Top can jack himself off and cum that way, but he prefers (values) a cumdump over his hand. He spends time and effort seeking out this "worthless" person as a place to put His cock and cum. A bottom who really thought he was "worthless" would be spending his time looking for Tops to fuck his bottom friends instead of himself because he just isn't worth it lol. i think it's the other way around for both Tops and bottoms. Fucking and getting fucked, seeding and getting seeded, is a way that we affirm our value to each other and ourselves. The Top affirms the value of the bottom by putting His cock and seed in him and the bottom affirms the Tops value by prepping and showing his craving for the Top. i think it's symbiotic , even though an expression of the opposing forces of yin and yang.

lol, i read this title as someone having a 'bottom free' (i.e., no bottoms) Thursday in Chicago.

Both gonorrhea and clamydia are pretty easy to catch orally. When i get my STD checks always get an oral, anal swab and urinalysis. When i was younger, the only time i seemed to ever get an STD was from getting sucked.

This is an excellent and informative pod cast, but it doesn't answer my question. It addresses the greed of pharmaceutical companies, which i have railed against for years as a healthcare professional. my personal belief is that pharmaceutical research should not be privitized. If we took the scientists who discover meds like Truvada and Descovy, gave them a 10% raise, our cost to develop drugs would still be half by removing the profit element. It would be even less when you remove patents that sustain obscene profiteering. The claim was: "Truvada is superior over Descovy when it comes to PrEP trust me I’ve seen the data " I have not seen research evidence to support this claim. To my way of thinking, Descovy should have he patent removed and made readily available as PreP, because at this point the evidence points to it being as efficacious and having fewer deleterious side effects. Truvada costs about $60 a year to make, i am guessing Descovy is probably about as cheap, yet Gilead wants to charge $20,000.

i'm not a pharmacist, so not able to offer info from that professional perspective. But here's an excerpt from the article i cited earlier that may help? Like TDF, TAF is a, NRTI. It's a pro-drug of tenofovir, specifically designed to circulate systemically and undergo most of its conversion to tenofovir intracellularly. This results in higher active metabolite levels within HIV-infected cells and lower plasma levels. my understanding is the improved renal function is a result of putting more of the efficacious elements intracellular where it inhibits HIV reproduction vs circulating in the blood where it has deleterious effects on the kidneys?

Here's an excerpt from an article in the pharmaceutical publication Pharmacy Times on the two different forms of tenofovir I.e. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) an ingredient in Truvada and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) an ingredient in Descovy. Issues with TDFDespite TDF’s being the most commonly prescribed ARV and a recommended component of most HIV treatment regimens, TDF presents several safety concerns.1,2 First, all ARVs formulated with TDF have warnings in their prescribing information for new-onset or worsening renal impairment. How this occurs is still debated, but it’s believed to be due to TDF’s toxicity to mitochondria in the proximal tubule, which leads to impaired reabsorption of low-molecular-weight proteins and other solutes.1 Consequently, physicians should assess creatinine clearance in all individuals prior to initiating therapy and assess additional lab parameters in those with previous renal events. TDF isn’t recommended for concurrent or recent use of nephrotoxic drugs (eg, high-dose or multiple NSAIDs, or aminoglycosides). The incidence of renal toxicity with TDF use is relatively low and it’s seen to be comparable with other nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) in clinical trials.3 Despite this, there are many case studies and small case series of renal dysfunction with TDF. A second safety concern with TDF involves its effects on reducing bone mineral density (BMD). The potential mechanism for this effect is unclear; however, it may result from proximal renal tubular dysfunction causing hypophosphatemia. More recently, TDF was reported to alter both osteoblast gene expression and function.4 In clinical trials in HIV-1 infected adults and in a clinical trial of HIV-1 uninfected individuals, TDF was found to be associated with slightly greater decreases in BMD and increases in other biochemical markers of bone metabolism, suggesting increased bone turnover relative to comparator. The long-term effects of TDF on bone health and fracture risk is unknown. According to the prescribing information for TDF products, assessment of BMD should be considered for adult and pediatric patients who have a history of pathologic bone fracture or other risk factors for osteoporosis or bone loss. How TAF WorksLike TDF, TAF is a, NRTI. It's a pro-drug of tenofovir, specifically designed to circulate systemically and undergo most of its conversion to tenofovir intracellularly. This results in higher active metabolite levels within HIV-infected cells and lower plasma levels. Within the cells, it inhibits the activity of HIV reverse transcriptase by competing with natural substrates and causing DNA chain termination after being incorporated into viral DNA.5 The major difference with TDF is that it has much higher plasma tenofovir exposure, which leads to some of the safety concerns. In fact, TAF in Genvoya is formulated as one-tenth the dose of TDF in Stribild, which results in a 90% lower circulating tenofovir plasma concentration. This results in less renal dysfunction and issues with BMD.6 [think before following links] https://www.pharmacytimes.com/contributor/timothy-o-shea/2016/10/what-every-pharmacist-should-know-about-tenofovir-alafenamide

Interesting. Could you cite the data supporting your claims please?

"Cocksucker faggots are a convenient, handy tool for men" idk. i think we may often oversimplify the Top/bottom D/s dynamic in an attempt to enhance certain aspects? I.e., the Top/Dom loves, wants/needs someone to take His cock, load and the attitude of topping/dominance. i think we are often ignorant or fuzzy about the psychological aspects of the Top/bottom relationship, one of them being the seeming need for some Top/Dom to feel superior and some bottoms or subs to feel inferior. Both parties deem their position as 'better,' i.e., the bottom/sub wants to suck cock, it's not something a Top or Dom really has to force him to do lol. Hell, a bottom usually craves a Top and much of what comes with Him. i think something that often gets lost or blurred in the sexual Top/bottom exchange is the emotional and psychological needs and desires we are trying to meet. i think at it's most basic level is the expression of mutual desire and need. i think both sides want to feel needed and desired, and in that we are the same. i think the superior/inferior labels (masks?) we put on is more of a courting dance to attract than it is an expression of reality. i don't think submission logically equates to inferior, or Dominance logically equates to superior. If a bottom/sub didn't consider his role to be the better, more fulfilling role, he wouldn't be doing it. Having said all that, one of the mysteries for me of D/s is humiliation, and i think that's true about a lot of us... maybe most of us? Being affectionately humiliated, certain ways, is deeply powerful for me. i don't get it, just sort of dance around the edges of understanding it. One guy may meanly and derrogatorilly call me a "cocksucker," and do it with an attitude where i'll be completely turned off and closed to him. Another may use the same exact terms, but instead of complete distain, there is an affectionate acknowledgment of His own desire to possess me that opens me wide to Him.

This is the exact thought that came to my mind when reading the OP. There are guys in the D/s community who (on both sides) want objectification, and i see a lot less "submission" going on in that kind of dynamic and a lot more passivity. i find a lot of variation and expectation on both sides of the fence of Dom/sub. Go to a site like Recon and read profiles and many of the Dom's profiles will say "boundaries respected" while others have the expectation of absolute obedience. Honestly, i think the majority of subs have limits and a big part of D/s relationship is "pushing limits." i don't see D/s as simple or subject to the strict black or white definitions some want to use to structure them. One form of D/s relationship is the expectation that whatever the Dom says, goes. There is another form though where the Dom doesn't so much expect submission as He wants to elicit submission from His sub. Either way, in order for "submission" to take place, there has to be volition and someone there who is actually submitting. Personally, i land on the latter form. To me, part of the fun and erotic turn on of D/s is the process of a Dom getting into my head ("mind fuck") and Him gaining control and getting me to submit. i want to submit, but to me "submission" requires there be substance to submit The Dom's i have had relationship with have wanted that too. They don't just want a mindless play thing, but a challenge that exercises their Dominant nature. In the OP's case, i'd say the behavior of trying to manipulate or control a top into breeding him is more of a Dom attitude. Wanting or needing to be bred is different than controlling to get bred. i think the more developed and understanding Dom gets His subs needs and uses those to control and elicit submission from His sub.

my take on 'love' is it's unconditional. I.e., we take a person as they are. That is simple (but hard), looks good on paper, and is one of the biggest challenges of relationship in my opinion. For me, my top priority in relationship is compatibility because i don't believe in trying to change someone, or vice versa, because of "love." To me, that isn't really love, it turns a relationship more quid pro quo. You are in relationship with a couple of guys who, for whatever reasons, want/need and are having raw, bareback sex with other guys. i get that you are "conflicted" because these are guys you care about and want in your life. my guess (and it's only a guess) is that, on some level they know you disapprove of what they are doing, so they hide and lie about it. i.e., they too are "conflicted." They too know the consequences of "raw dogging" and to them "the consequences" (apparently) are worth it. Seems to me you guys are sexually incompatible. Based on what you have written, i don't think PreP is the answer for you. Don't get me wrong, i think PreP is pretty essential if you're having penetrative sex, especially as a bottom, because you have NO control over your partner/s. Yes, there are guys out there who believe in and are monogamous, but nothing is absolute. This isn't the case with you though. You already know that your partners are having hook up sex. If you stay with them and have sex with them, sooner or later, the odds are you're going to get an STD. From what you have written, i think you need to change the form of relationship you have with these guys to platonic and find someone you can be monogamous with for the sexual part of your life. This goes beyond STD's for you. Psychologically, you are feeling "used" by who and how they are. i'd wager if they managed to not have hookup sex for awhile, they too would feel "used" and the same sort of resentment and hurt would develop. i don't think ether side is 'good' or 'bad,' it think it's a question of compatibility. It looks to me that a closed polyamorous relationship would be more suited to your desires and needs. i'm not one to throw out the baby with the bath water, i.e., an all or nothing scenario with your current guys. Clearly, you're all getting something from the relationship, so i'd look for ways to remove the elements of conflict. Would there still be something of value left if sex was taken out of the picture?

There is an erotic side to this for me, the mind fuck of a Top or Dom engineering and putting their bottom in a desperate position where they end up wetting their pants, but this vid kinda of missed the mark for me. How "desperate" could the guy have been? He was sitting in a bath tub lol.

this is a pic of me peeing through mine https://assets.s3xstatic.com/bz/uploads/monthly_2019_12/IMG_0846.JPG.a1623fdb9bbb58ec0e555cd4f757d758.JPG

no, i didn't have a mother like her, women sort of creep me out sexually. would love a guy fb like her though

Fuck yeah, that is so hot! To me, the Top/bottom dynamic is in part about how the Top creates, effects, controls the bottom. Making His bottom piss himself to me is along the lines of making His bottom orgasm, it's all about the Top exercising His power that 'makes' His bottom do something beyond his control because he has lost his control to the Top. That submission and loss of control is a huge part of sex for me.

i love the idea and intent behind hypnosis. Even if it doesn't work, i love the intent and desire expressed if a Dom uses such things.

https://assets.s3xstatic.com/bz/uploads/monthly_2019_11/75653334_2737549522972576_8360465570390343680_n.thumb.jpg.23e19d1a173f7355c7f812c27ae3e0d4.jpg

Look him straight in the eye and tell him "i really just want it fucking raw...." i agree with others, we cannot "ensure" another persons response or feelings. But really, if he is 'joking' about it too, He likely wants it as badly as you do, the most you can do is tell Him you want His cum deep inside of you.

For those interested, here's some info on "implicit bias" and tests you can take at Harvard to gauge your self. When is the last time a stereotype popped into your mind? If you are like most people, the authors included, it happens all the time. That doesn’t make you a racist, sexist, or whatever-ist. It just means your brain is working properly, noticing patterns, and making generalizations. But the same thought processes that make people smart can also make them biased. This tendency for stereotype-confirming thoughts to pass spontaneously through our minds is what psychologists call implicit bias. It sets people up to overgeneralize, sometimes leading to discrimination even when people feel they are being fair. [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-think-about-implicit-bias/ [think before following links] [think before following links] https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html

Couple of thoughts. i agree with others who identify averages, cycles. i encourage you to keep putting yourself out there, but altering expectations. The truth is, we don't know what we're going to get when we put our self out there. While age and looks factor in, they are not the only factors and i find it's a mistake to put to much weight on them. I really believe other factors are more in play. To me, places like saunas or gay events are some of the hardest places to get sex. If i were a Top spending $30 at a sex club, i'd get very selective and wouldn't want to shoot immediately and just go home. From what you describe, this was an event and was more social than sexual. For me, those venues are very hit or miss. i go to a all gay resort in Palm Springs on a regular basis and some days while i'm there are awesome and some sexless. And PS is a gay Mecca lol. If you get discouraged and give up, you'll miss the on days though. If i am feeling very horny and cum dumpy, i get most of my quick and easy loads at an ABS during lunch or when guys are getting off work. i find most of the guys who frequent these places at those times just wanna get off on their way home. It's not unusual for me to take half a dozen cocks in a half hour or so. It's a different crowd and many are there to simply get off, not find the man of their dreams.

Can't wait till he gets to the part where he kills Han Solo.

For those interested in anatomy and physiology, here's some info. Our whole intestinal tract has cells lining it that provide different function. There are cells called "goblet" cells that produce the mucus we are talking about here. Those cells are particularly active rectally and their production of mucus is a direct result of stimulation. Their function is to protect the absorptive process and to help facilitate elimination. It makes sense that the penetrative stuff we do would result in the stimulation of these cells and the subsequent increased production of mucus in our rectums.

i feel sad if cum isn't put inside of me by a Top, on me feels like a waste. Even though i know i can still eat it, it's just not the same to me if my Top didn't put it inside of me. i do go long periods without cumming myself, and edge a lot to keep horny. When i shoot it often shoots onto my face... sometimes the headboard above my heat lol. my cum is the only cum i don't feel badly about not going into me.