Jump to content

hungry_hole

Senior Members
  • Posts

    2,107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hungry_hole

  1. Yeah, and nothing better that the university toilets. My university had a raunchy toilet in the Student's Building, near the pool tables and the food machines (coffee, sandwiches, drinks, etc). The door was noisy so it would alert guys fooling around. The 4 toilet cubicles had a privacy wall and the last 2 cubicles were perfect for sex. The university Pub was just around the corner from this toilet so the best times were Friday or Saturday nights with lots of straight drunken guys coming for a piss. After many years, all of a sudden, the gloryholes were gone.
  2. I took my first loads starting in the mid 70's at the YMCA in NYC and enjoyed going to NYC a few times a year and stay at the Y. I had heard about the Y from a friend a bit older than me who was a bottom and would tell me about his trips to the Y in NYC. The YMCA in NYC in the 1970's was a hot place for sex. I had to stop barebacking and taking loads in the early 80's, when everyone else started wearing condoms because of AIDS. But I still remember refusing a fuck from a top who insisted in wearing condoms. I already knew about the epidemic but I still wanted it raw. I eventually started wearing condoms too when I once got stealth and felt with my fingers a fresh load dripping out of my hole. I'm now slowing down.
  3. For those who don't trust any information from AHF (AIDS Healthcare Foundation) and who want Weinstein dead because of his point of view, here is another source of information: CDC about the same topic. "The Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported troubling news on Tuesday that sexually transmitted infection rates skyrocketed over the last year, particularly among gay and bisexual men." The CDC is concerned about the use of PrEP. And here comes the ridiculous part: Although PrEP may be the culprit behind the wave of new STI infections, health groups including the World Health Organization are strongly urging men who have sex with men to get on the pill regimen but warn that the pill must be used with condoms to effectively prevent most STI infections How many guys in here are on PrEP and wearing condoms when they have sex? Does it make sense to have an organization like the CDC evaluate the defectiveness of PrEP based on the assumption that condoms are also being used? When we know that most men go on PrEP so they can have bareback sex. How about the antibiotic resistance? "The CDC warned that although treatments for most STIs are readily available, many STI strains are becoming antibiotic resistant, including gonorrhea."
  4. And Gilead is not?
  5. I found this definition of Panacea: "Something that will make everything about a situation better." PrEP is not a panacea and this is no reason to get defensive. Advocates of PrEP have to accept its shortcomings. How about remembering that there are many married men who enjoy casual sex with other men but are terrified by any kind of infection, not only HIV. These men don't have the luxury of just getting treated if by chance the catch some curable STD. Yeah, for some cock&cum-hungry bottom slut who's only concerned about HIV when he takes anon loads in darkrooms, PrEP may be good enough.
  6. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160908006730/en/AHF-UCLA-Study-Shows-Gay-Men-PrEP "AHF (AIDS Healthcare Foundation): New UCLA Study Shows Gay Men on PrEP Are 45 Times More Likely to Contract Syphilis; 25 Times More Likely To Be Infected With Gonorrhea" “Not only have gay and bisexual men largely rejected the relentless drumbeat for PrEP by the CDC and other agencies who have been dubiously shilling for Gilead, the men who are using PrEP are having increased condomless sex—contrary to the PrEP guidelines set by the CDC—and, as a result, are exposing themselves to dangerous sexually transmitted infections,” continued Weinstein." "Their findings come amid growing international concern about the rise of antibiotic resistant strains of gonorrhea and other STIs. In releasing its new guidelines for treating bacterial STIs last week, the World Health Organization (WHO) expressed concerns that “resistance of these STIs to the effect of antibiotics has increased rapidly in recent years and has reduced treatment options. Of the 3 STIs, gonorrhoea has developed the strongest resistance to antibiotics."
  7. PrEP causes changes in behavior that increase the risk of other STD. I would consider this a side-effect. What happens when someone has to stop PrEP, will he be able to change back his behavior and stop taking anon loads at a bathhouse?
  8. This is what read in the Slut Club website: Each third SUNDAY of the month The most legendary and talked about Sex Orgy Party in town in total darkness. At the entry you will get all you need, a pitlamp to use on your head and the bag for your clothes, so the fun can start from now on. Horny boys and big balls, Gang Bang in every corner, lights ou and party starts. Fuckin´ horny atmosphere being naked in boots with a flashing light on your head. It wouldn't be easy to do "safe sex". Not sure how you'll fight the temptation.
  9. I also love anyone who fucks me and breeds my hole, but I wouldn't say that I have "great respect" for all those who've creamed my hole. Some haven't even been tops but just horny bottoms looking to get off. For me, just because someone fucks and breeds doesn't make him a top or even a versatile-top. There are so many total bottoms who need to get off so they look for a willing hole to shoot in. What I'm talking about here is the admiration and respect that I have for REAL tops, those guys who really enjoy fucking for the sake of fucking. They can fuck for a long time without shooting. Those are the ones that I respect and in a way envy because I see how much they enjoy fucking.
  10. One of the things that surprised me in my visit to sauna GI-Joe (Montreal, Canada) last weekend was the widespread use of smartphones by guys in the rooms themselves. As I walked through the hallways I could see lots of guys with the door of the rooms open while they they were totally engaged on Grindr or some other hook-up App. Many wouldn't even make the effort to see who was going by because they were totally focused on the smartphone.
  11. That I part I do agree. And I agree with this part too. I think that most bottoms are looking to please selfish tops...
  12. I spent a lot of time this weekend at GI-Joe, a sauna in Montreal, Canada. It has been renovated and you can find public slings in many parts of the establishment. Maybe not as good a Lab-Oratory in Berlin (never been there but I hear is hot), but GI-Joe is a great sex place. Watching bottoms getting pounded in their rooms and in the public slings made me envious not of the bottoms but of the tops. How can a dude be such a great top, fucking forcefully non-stop for 5-10 minutes, then moving on to another willing bottom. Same thing in the dark room, one top fucking every bottom in the room until he breeds a hole and leaves. But he's back an hour later, again fucking every hole. If I could do long-time fucking and really enjoy it, like the tops I saw at the sauna, I would be a top. But I can't really enjoy topping. I really admire those tops who can fuck for a long time and fully enjoy it. Any top can tell us how many holes can you breed in one night at the bathhouse?
  13. The site safestsex.org explain that the problem is not that people lie about their STD situation, but that the information is vague and many times ambiguous, like "clean", "all clear", "tested couple of months ago", etc. They claim that by answering a detailed STD testing questionnaire during registration is a game-changer because now there's clear and unambiguous information such as precise tests and dates. Although the test results are not entered directly by a clinic and are not verified, it's a step up from "are you clean".
  14. I know it's a story but I bet it happens more often than we think. The long-time "grooming" is different because most stealthing like this would happen at a bathhouse, with a shorter grooming.
  15. Some tops may not like a loud bottom while fucking outdoors so as a bottom I would just whisper dirty talk to the top and moan quietly.
  16. For me being a top, a bottom, gay, bisexual, or straight is determined mainly by the guy himself, and not by what he does. That's why I'm not surprised by a top who occasionally bottoms, or a bottom who occasionally tops, or a straight guy who occasionally has sex with men. A top who under certain circumstances bottoms is still a top, not versatile. A guy may be 100% top with dates and boyfriends and on-going fuck-buddies. But if he's out of town on business he may stop at a bathhouse and be a total bottom slut for a night. But he's still a top, if that's because that's how he sees himself. The same goes for 100% bottoms who are afraid of topping because they may loose their bottom "card". I've known of many 100% bottoms who after a long night taking loads at the baths go on the hunt for a hole to quickly fuck and breed before they home home. Usually when bottoms top they don't last very long and cum quickly because they only want to get off and fucking is not that enjoyable for them. Between jerking-off or breeding a hole many bottoms choose the later. Versatile guys enjoy both and are open about it because that's how they see themselves. It's not that some straight men also like men for sex. What they like is the WAY men have sex, anonymous. The idea of being sucked in a gloryhole is only a dream for most straight men. They have no interest in relationships but the fascination with anon sex is universal in men, straight, gay, etc. I see nothing wrong with a straight guy wanting to get sucked and even fucked.
  17. My comment to anybody thinking that they may have erectile dysfunction is "You are not watching the right porn!" When I'm watching "the right bareback porn" I can get hard and cum 3-4 times a day. If at the sauna I don't get hard I never think of ED. Some married guys think they have ED because they can't get hard with the wife.
  18. I've used the system (safestsex.org) and exchanged STD data twice by now. One guy who was already a member and another guy who I asked to become a member before we met for sex. After all it only takes 5 minutes to join. The immediate advantage is that I got to read which tests and when those tests were conducted. Yes, it is self-reported so guys could be lying about it. But to me the main point is the clarity of the information one gets from the other member. For instance, I noticed that the guy who had just become a member had not posted anything about Gono and Clam, although he has insisted he was "clean" before the exchange. He said he was going to get tested now for those. This is what I get to see from the other member (I removed the ID). I find it a great idea. STD Profile Exchanged:2016-08-06 17:40 HIV: Negative, last screened May 2016 [3 months ago] Syphilis: Last screened June 2016 [2 months ago] Gonorrhoea: Nothing reported Chlamydia: Nothing reported Hepatitis-B: Immune Genital Herpes: At registration member reported never being diagnosed Hepatitis-C: At registration member reported never being diagnosed
  19. (1) I've taken multiple loads many times in one evening but I prefer to have a bathroom available if I take more than 3 or 4. All depends on the size of the loads and my digestive system at the moment. (2) I don't think there is one answer to this question because a lot depends on the person, including age. Some technique may work for years and then it can stop working. An example is fiber which for me is no good. Deciding on what to use when douching is also something personal. (3) Prevent discomfort? Not sure what you mean. I may smell the "aroma" of the loads left overnight. (4) The best bet is a bathhouse unless you are in your 20's and 30's when it's easier to hook-up only, exchange sexy pictures, etc. I find that for older guys cruising places are better because no need to ask "Stats? Age?". You meet somewhere in the bathhouse, you like each other and just have sex.
  20. I'm sure this is the big reason. Any dirty hole getting fucked would leave a mess and no good place to wash or shower.
  21. For me the risk of STDs has NOTHING to do with why I enjoy barebacking. On the contrary, the risk keeps me away from trying even more sexual experiences. Now that I joined safestsex.org I'll see what it does about the fear. I managed to meet up so far with 2 guys who were also members so I could read all the details of their "screening results". I had syphilis decades ago so in my case the test results for Syphilis are always positive. My record says "Screened for syphilis" which means the clinic determined I was not contagious but my sexual partners don't need know about my past sexual history.
  22. I'm sure many guys used to refer to being HIV-negative as "being clean", but realized that it somewhat offensive only after they pozed.
  23. That's strange because it worked for me with no problems. Even the sample for works well and it accepts dates. http://safestsex.org/firstrepinfo-en.php. You have to "click" on HIV- or HIV- on PrEP fro the date to appear. From what I understand and after going through the registration process, the first time the dates required for the tests are Year-Month. It assumes, and it turned-out to be right in my case, I didn't have the exact dates of the tests. Then for the following tests results one must have the exact date. It makes sense.
  24. There are never any guarantees, just better protection. Even if guys were tested and data was certified an entered by a clinic there wouldn't be any guarantee either. An identical twin who's poz could get tested instead, or the test results could be wrong. Wearing condoms is no guarantee either. So far I like what I see in safestsex.org. First, nothing else but an email address is required. I don't know how comfortable I would feel about having to provide all my personal data. But an email address is no big deal. Guys are more likely to lie when horny and ready to fuck. But if one has to purposely store the data in a profile that cannot be easily changed, I doubt one would lie in the same way. There is some trace left no matter how anonymous the profile is.
  25. I've been bottoming bareback and taking loads since the 90's and I've been extremely lucky and I'm still HIV-neg with no other infections either. I no longer have the amount of sex I had in my 30's till my 50's, when I was taking multiple anon loads in one night at the baths. Now I still like having sex but I'm becoming more concerned with HIV because I figure, after so many years, why get infected now and complicate my life with doctor's visits, treatments, having to disclose status, etc. One ongoing fuck buddy texted me telling me he was horny and would like to meet me at a park. He's now living with his girlfriend and concerned about STDs. He mention that he would prefer if I joined safestsex.org and that way I was his STD situation and he saw mine. It took me 10 minutes to join and build what they call an STD Profile. We met at the park today at lunch, he bred my hole. Nothing is 100% safe but every little thing may help. I liked the idea almost immediately especially because I have no desire to poz or get any other STD. I also hesitate getting into PrEP because it only protects you against HIV and don't want any side effects. Has anyone else heard of safestsex.org?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.