tallslenderguy

Total and ass obsessed

"at least 8 loads" eh? Gee, i'd lease a room at a bathhouse if i could get a guaranteed 8 loads every time i visited. i've never been to an Indy BH, but in Portland Oregon (there are two, Hawks and Steam), it can be hit or miss. i've been at times when i got loaded continuously, and other times i couldn't have gotten it if i paid, just depends on the crowd. The bigger the city, the better the odds i think. Also, don't worry about your looks. Yes, people care about that, but honestly i never even try for the really hot guys, they're just too intimidating for me, and there are a lot more average guys than hot at the bath houses i've been to. Honestly, i have a lot more success/fun at ABS than bath houses because there are closeted (read: "straight" or "married") at ABS who would never go to a bath house. Best time is have found for those places is during lunch hour or right when guys are getting of work... also Monday or after the holidays, guys seem pent up because they didn't get any that weekend or during family get togethers.

i've never times any of my hook ups, but cruising hook ups can be really quick and i've had lots of those. Being in a department store restroom at the urinal, i've had guys step over, slide in and unload right in front of the urinal... gotta be quick because anyone can walk in at any moment. love it!!

It's a curious thing. i think the advice to drink water and eat fiber are good since those are basics for good intestinal health. i'm kinda into this sort of thing, i.e., diet, fiber, etc.. i'm a critical care nurse and have taken additional course work from Cornell University on reversing and preventing disease through diet. i see you are in Hungary, so i don't know what type of diet you eat, but if it is anything like the Western Diet, it's not a healthy one. The Western Diet (lots of meat and processed stuff), is pretty poisonous. Our bodies are mostly adapted to eating a whole food plant based diet, which is full of fiber. We live in symbiosis with bacteria. Our gut (the large colon) has about 10x more bacteria living in it than cells that make up our whole body. Fiber feeds the gut "biome," and what we eat determines the kind of biome we have. This is a quick video that explains the colon biome using study evidence to support it. Science ?

About $15. Seriously, if one reads the ingredients, Pure is pretty much marketing. They added aloe a few years ago so they could distinguish their product as a 'proprietary blend,' but the primary ingredients that are actually fiber are psyllium, chia and flax, Metamucil just uses psyllium. Benefiber uses wheat (sans gluten). Zero for Him is pretty much like Pure, and is obviously trying to compete with Pure, it has psyllium, chia and flax and is about 20% less. Here's a quick primer on fiber from Medline: There are 2 different types of fiber -- soluble and insoluble. Both are important for health, digestion, and preventing diseases. Soluble fiber attracts water and turns to gel during digestion. This slows digestion. Soluble fiber is found in oat bran, barley, nuts, seeds, beans, lentils, peas, and some fruits and vegetables. It is also found in psyllium, a common fiber supplement. Some types of soluble fiber may help lower risk of heart disease. Insoluble fiber is found in foods such as wheat bran, vegetables, and whole grains. It adds bulk to the stool and appears to help food pass more quickly through the stomach and intestines.

Yes, you might get chlamydia or gonnorhea... but you won't get HIV

There are five stages to kidney disease before a person reaches failure and has to go on dialysis, and that is based on GFR. For instance, a GFR of 60-90 is considered stage one kidney disease and "mild." Apologies, this is Stage II, not stage one.

Here's an explanation of creatinine levels and what it means from an authoritative source (the Mayo Clinic)... which is not to suggest some of the commenters are wrong, just wanted to offer an independent source that everyone can confirm as reliable. Results of the creatinine blood test are measured in milligrams per deciliter or micromoles per liter. The normal range for creatinine in the blood may be 0.84 to 1.21 milligrams per deciliter (74.3 to 107 micromoles per liter), although this can vary from lab to lab, between men and women, and by age. Since the amount of creatinine in the blood increases with muscle mass, men usually have higher creatinine levels than do women. Generally, a high serum creatinine level means that your kidneys aren't working well. Your creatinine level may temporarily increase if you're dehydrated, have a low blood volume, eat a large amount of meat or take certain medications. The dietary supplement creatine can have the same effect. i'm a critical care nurse and look at this number daily on all my patients to check kidney function. i'm used to looking at the milligrams per deciliter number which is used by the hospital blood tests where i work. Along with that number, i look at GFR (glomerular filtration rate). There are five stages to kidney disease before a person reaches failure and has to go on dialysis, and that is based on GFR. For instance, a GFR of 60-90 is considered stage one kidney disease and "mild." Once GFR hits 15 and below, one is considered in kidney failure. Kidney failure can be acute or chronic. i had a patient this week who started out with a creatinine level of 2.20 and GFR of 29 on Tuesday and by Thursday his creat was 1.90 and his GFR 35. i've had many patients come in with ARF (acute renal failure) with a GFR <15, usually older people who fell and broke a hip and couldn't get to water for a few days and got dehydrated, who we were able to get back to normal ranges with hydration. Dehydration means you aren't urinating as often, thus not getting rid of creatinine, e.g., a metabolite of muscles, so it builds up in the blood and presents in a blood test. As another has noted, physical exercise can increase creatinine levels, it's a normal waste product of muscle metabolism that can be used as a marker for kidney function because our kidneys are how the body gets rid of that waste. Bottom line is, lots of things can cause a bump in Creatinine. The kidneys are redundant. Each one has ~1m filters (nephrons), very tiny, complex structures that regulate urine production, get rid of waste. A person can go their whole life with just one and never notice. However, creatinine and GFR are tests that reflect the health of both kidneys, so we pay attention when there's a bump and retest to see if it's a trend or a bump in time. Type 2 diabetes and hypertension can also harm kidneys, and they're common, so it's also important to not ignore or self diagnose. Go to a doc and get tested and diagnosed for the real cause if there is a chronic condition you need to be aware of. The good news is your kidneys are still in a good place, please don't wait to see if they get worse before you get yourself checked.

Only happened to me once when i was married. Was a regular Top who fucked me in restrooms frequently. He saw me with my wife once in a department store and gave me a big grin as He walked by. The next day He bred me at one of our usual hook up restrooms, was always under the stall wall. He'd spit on His cock and slide under and expect me to sit on it, which i always did, and then He'd breed me. This time, however, He followed me to my office in His car and i didn't realize it. So, now He knew where i worked. i found a note on my car with Him saying something about my wife, kind of a thinly veiled threat of exposure. Then He showed up in my office and my secretary said He was there to see me. i had no idea who it was, thought it was a sales person, but then walked out to our waiting room and there He was smiling. i brought Him into my office and closed the door, nervous as hell, and He just smiled and looked around my office. He could see that i had floor to ceiling windows and a corner office where i could see the parking lot. He told me to meed Him in the downstairs restroom so He could breed me and then said that whenever He saw me parked in the parking lot, to meet Him downstairs in the restroom. Honestly, it felt pretty vulnerable and scary, He'd fuck me that way several times a week... but i miss Him now.

like others, "it depends" for me too. If it's just an anonymous fuck with no established romantic chemistry, i like to be prone (face down) because that is the most sub feeling for me. The weigh of the Tops body on me is almost a form of bondage or control. Also, i'm really tall and a lot of guys have a hard time reaching me doggie style. so i don't think i've really felt the Topness of that position as much as i would if i were not as tall. If i have the kind of connection with the Top that involves kissing, then on my back so i can wrap my long legs around Him and grope His awesome ass while He thrusts inside of me while kissing. That will take my breath away and make my eyes roll back in my head.

The generation and culture i grew up in automatically considered rape or molestation a likely factor if one is gay. I.e., their assumption is/was that gay people are made by various factors, molestation when young being one of them. That idea, among others that gay people are made out of trauma vs born/natural, really fucked with my ability to come to a place of self acceptance. i got there, but it was a long process. i used to fantasize about being kidnapped and forced to be a sex slave. That fantasy was more about my getting past my own lack of self acceptance than anything else. i had such cognitive dissonance the that i wanted the decision to be taken from me and to just have what i wanted (a man who wanted to fuck me) without having to choose. That's the closest i've ever come to rape fantasy. To me, the "violent" aspect in a lot of fantasy speaks to the extremity of the fantasizer's need/desire for acceptance, but i tend to associate that need with ones lack of self acceptance and the only way they can experience affirmation is in extremis. No scientific evidence to back that up, just my own observations and thoughts. When i think of being raped now, it doesn't appeal. i suspect if someone attempted to take me violently and by surprise now, they'd end up dead (i have a second degree black belt lol). On the other hand, i have long time fantasies of being taken spontaneously... which i think is an element a lot of bottoms desire/need? i've had a long time fantasy of being asleep with a guy and waking up to Him sliding in or pushing the tip of His cock against my lips. But to me, that speaks more to deep connection than to a violation of consent. I.e., there is such a connection between me and that person that He knows i'm His for the taking. To me, that's very different from rape. The other half to this equation that seems to be rarely considered or discussed is the guy doing the "raping." What is it he really wants or needs? Psycologically, a rapist is not a powerful person at all, but a weak person preying on someone weaker in order to get a sense of power and control. If he had someone in his life who wanted his dominance and control, would he still have the need/desire to rape? i see a lot of guys in the D/s community who identify as "dom" who really strike me as needing a sub in order to establish their own sense of self. Which is not a condemnation on my part, i personally think we all need relationship to be healthy (not "a" relationship, but interaction with others where we can mirror each other and help each other in the process of self discovery). i feel rape is a fuzzy or incomplete expression of what is really needed or desired, which is acceptance, on either side of the equation.

i think this is a great point. It seems with male/female sex there is less space for 'just' sex, that there has to be preamble of some sort. Guys seem to be able to fuck instantly, without much prelude, to fuck just for the sake of fucking. And i love that about being a guy.

i think this way too. i often look at it as a physics thing, opposites attract, positive and negatively charged particles naturally attracted to each other and bonding. It's obviously not a new phenomena, the idea of yin/yang has been around a long time.

i think it's both, or it can be, if one has no regard for the other. my feel is that one of the things that makes for insatiation is the need for something more, that we are not filling the 'hole' with everything it actually needs, so it remains un[ful]filled? i was married when i first started getting bred by guys. i was also very religious and didn't accept who i was. my anonymous encounters were a way of my minimizing the contact that i had with guys. my own particular addictive disposition was related to self loathing, i hated myself for who i was and what i was doing, but it was my only means of affirmation and that part of me (the 'gay' part) needed that to survive. i did anonymous sex with guys for so many years it became a familiar pattern for me and was pretty much all i knew when it came to intimate contact with another guy. After i came to a place of peace and self acceptance, the addictive part fell away immediately, but my need for being with a guy didn't. But by that time, anonymous was all i really knew or experienced, but my feel is it's a compromise for what i really need, i.e., a more substantial relationship. But i don't look at "substantial" as equal to traditional, i like the freedom we have to reinvent relationship. For instance, after years of anonymous sex, walk in dump and go, i actually slept in the same bed as my Top, and that felt really good too. i look at cum dumping as a sexual equivalent of fast food. we all know McDonalds is junk food and eating nothing but McDonalds is unhealthy, but if that's the only thing one allows their self to eat, one will gorge when hungry. To me, not getting what we really need makes us all that more hungry, needy and dependent on what we get.

How can you tell if the beetle or worm cums?

i've never been locked in chastity long term, and then it was just me trying it on my own. It didn't last for me, and i think that speaks to a psychological aspect of chastity. The reason it didn't work for me is because i'm not dom and so i couldn't effectively be my own dom by simply wearing a chastity device. To me, if the device is not connected to Someone, then it's lost a good deal of its effect. i did have a online D/s relationship and my Dom took me through a process of measuring for a device, but we never got to the place of actually getting one and me wearing it because the online relationship wasn't sustainable. Still, just the process of measuring had an effect. He had me measure my penis every day and send Him a picture of my penis next to a measuring tape. He also had me wear different plastic rings that were different sizes to see how my penis and testicles would respond to wearing them, what was too tight, what was too loose, etc.. He demonstrated care for the process of locking the penis in chastity, and that care left an imprint on me. To me the most obvious part of being locked in chastity would be the loss of being able to have any orgasm control and the constant reminder of that loss. The result for me would be to be perpetually horny, or always at an easy edge of being horny. i'm at my most malleable when i'm horny, so being locked would make and keep me easier to direct, because that is when my desire to please is at its highest. my desire to please and horniness are connected. For me, there would be a sort of fear or embarrassment factor as well. Thoughts like: "what if i got in an accident and had to go to the hospital" or any public venue where it might be exposed. That thought would often be with me, at least at first. i suppose long term that concern would wane, but the horniness would just get more intense and thus the dependence on the Dom would also become more intense.

So, is that the barrier for you? That you'll be "hooked?" Hmmm, this made me think of my own experience. i fought accepting myself for most of my life (was married to a woman and religious). i had tons of sex with guys, cheated on my wife, but hated myself the whole time. For me, sex with guys was my only form of affirmation for who i am and i could truly not help myself from doing it. When i came to a place of self acceptance, the addictive nature of sex dropped away for me. i still want it and need it, but "hooked" is probably a wrong descriptor for that need/want. i think that our sexual needs/wants are natural and normal and it's the suppression and/or repression of who we are that can lead to obsession. If you love being penetrated physically as well as in your imagination, then i'd have to agree with you that you are not being true to yourself by forbidding what you want. We can only guess what's going on in your mind or feelings as to why that is, your really in the best position to know that since you live with you. Maybe a therapist could help you uncover if there is a hidden reason. But from what you have written, you seem to be afraid of being "hooked" once you try it... but again, i think "hooked" is probably a misnomer that we are using. That it's kind of like saying you are hooked on food because you are hungry and eating.

i don't know how to answer this other than offer my thoughts, but not sure they will be at all helpful. Have you ever had anything in your ass? Like toys or finger or any other kind of penetration? Are you ambivalent about being penetrated? You note you love cock and semen, but have only experienced it by sucking. i can't relate (lol) but i know there are guys who are only into oral, maybe you're one of those and maybe you are being true to your self? Do you like the feeling of being penetrated anally? On the other hand, if you've had stuff in your hole and know that you like it, that's a whole different matter. Most bottoms will probably tell you it only takes one cock up the ass to get hooked.

i think it's sort of sad, i hat the idea of guys feeling rejected. i know some guys are either ignorant of social cues, or simply ignore them, and they don't seem to realize that their behavior exacerbates their problem of being rejected. i'm pretty sensitive and fold if there's any hint that i might not be wanted, i don't think i've ever spent more than 10 minutes occupying a sling or bench if there are no takers. The clubs i have been in, it doesn't take all that long to make the rounds, so once i see the same guy pass by a second time, i know it's time to vacate. Also, the clubs where i've gone generally have more than one or two slings, so even if someone does plant their self in a sling, if guys aren't interested they just use the other slings or go to the other guys in slings. Clubs can be a harsh environment, a sort of meat market where everyone is naked and on display. i've never bred a guy like Eros describes, but that's because i'm not really a breeder. i've sucked a lot of obvious club "rejects" before and they usually seem pretty grateful for the attention. i've surprised myself by the connections i have made when i get past my own visual bias. i won't compete for cock, if i feel like there are too many bottoms in a place at one time and they start to compete, i'll leave. i hate pettiness or meaness. i think the kind of person Eros is describing has entitlement issues.

i was getting ready for work this morning, early, was about ten after six, and i hear a light tap at my front door. i looked out the window and there was a stranger standing there. i asked him what he needed (it was still dark outside), and he said he must have the wrong address... but he just stood there and smiled at me. i realized that he wanted to hook, but i work at a hospital and had to go to work. i had no idea who this guy was, not sure if i had hooked with him before (i'm always face down when someone comes to my house). The other thought i had was maybe he was one of those guys who'd gotten my address before and flaked, or i thought maybe someone else i had hooked with or who had my address had arranged a hook up, then used my address? Either way, i have no idea who he was, but damn i wish i'd been abel to hook with him.

i don't have any piercings, so i can only speak to taste and not experience. For me, PA's are a Top piercing, really, any kind of piercing on the actual shaft strikes me emotionally as a Top accessory. Taint piercings, nips, ears, all strike me as more bottom. Probably no rhyme or reason for it, jus the way they make me feel personally. From the comments, everyone is different.

This link is essentially the published study, the info is reliable. A little info for those interested: HIV is a virus and, as such, requires a host for replication. I.e., HIV cannot reproduce on its own, it invades a cell and uses its hosts DNA to reproduce. What made it so deadly was HIV's ability to mutate rapidly. The way we finally achieved suppression was by med combinations that resist the virus at more than one point. Sort of like instead of cutting off only and arm, the combo meds cut of an arm and a couple of legs. Essentially, the anti retroviral therapy (ART), reduces the levels of HIV to "undetectable" thus removing the deadly aspect of the virus, which is the virus ability to decimate the immune system. With ART, the immune system can recover and remain intact, so people don't progress to AID's and thus stay alive and relatively healthy. The London Man are cool progress because it demonstrates repeatability of the Berlin Man, who has been HIV free for 10 years. The process was even less aggressive in the London Man, yet still appears to have succeeded 18 months later. Both used bone marrow transplant which process involves wiping out the immune system then replacing it with someone else's (i.e., stem cell transplant). In each case, the donor cells were from donors who have the genetic mutation where the CCR5 receptors are missing from the their cell surface, receptors that HIV needs to gain access to a cell and its DNA so it can reproduce. So, not unlike ART, this method employs hitting HIV from a couple of directions and it appears, so far, to irradiate HIV from the body. The thing that makes scientists excited about the "London Man" is that they were able to replicate the "Berlin Man." The London Man has been free of HIV for 18 months, the Berlin Man 10 years. This is new and rare (only two cases) results, so terms like "remission" are being used instead of "cure." We did/do the same with cancer. Terms like "remission" are used when we do not have enough experience or replicated evidence to apply the term "cure." No one is considering this a viable treatment for HIV, especially with the success of ART, but it is exciting to see it's possible for the virus to be removed from the body.

Awesome, eh? I’m almost obsessed with holding what a Top puts in me, ive slept overnight with it and even if I have the urge to evacuate, i resist. I do the same with loads of cum, I just tell my body to hold it. I recommend holding it, it can be done

i know, right? And sometimes, even less. i swear there seems to be something magical about it sometimes. i have been driving down the street on more than one occasion and had a guy make eye contact and we both knew instantly. Once i was driving down a main street and a guy pulled up next to me, made eye contact then pulled ahead and in front of me. i followed Him to a Burger King parking lot. He got out of his car, without looking back, and went in to the restaurant and into the restroom. i followed Him into the restroom (a private one) and He locked the door behind me and without a word, pulled my pants down around me knees, turned me around and bent me over, pulled his cock out and proceeded to put His cock in me. i was dry, so i spat in my hand and wet my hole for Him and He slid in, fucked and bred me, put His cock back in His pants and left, again, never a word spoken. i had to rush to get my pants up in case someone came in after.

Yeah, this. It's so hot to me when there is thought behind the act of breeding. For me, poppers is like a chemical door opener and i love it when a Top knows that and uses them for that purpose. i get no turn on from a Top using poppers on Himself. i know some tops get soft or lose there drive to breed when they use them, so i am not thrilled when i see a top take a hit, even though i know not all tops are effected that way. But, when a Top uses them on a bottom to make the bottom hornier, more pliant or to relax his hole for entry, it's a total leg spreader for me.