hntnhole
-
Posts
5,801 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by hntnhole
-
That may be true, but there are steps to take - like many of us have - to ameliorate those dangers. It's still no excuse for one guy to anoint himself arbiter of that sandy scene.
-
If life is a journey, and the guys that haven't been living that life for as long as some, I can understand that disappointment. The remedy might be, for the disappointed bottoms to realize that part of the thrill for many Tops is to "connect" with multiple bottoms - not Breeding each one - merely rutting is connective. When a certain Top has accomplished that ritual, and goes back to find a certain bottom he liked the most, and give his load to that guy, it means something.
-
Like tallslenderguy, I completely missed this interesting thread. First though, THANKS, topblkmale, for sharing that most interesting link. It's well worth listening to any number of times. Agreed. It's not my Principal objection, but it arises out of that same mindset. When great leaders/teachers emerge, throughout history, their original message is often coopted to serve later assumptions by those who have been fooled into believing that they're "special" to some Deity or another - which therefore assumes that folks who don't believe the same way are somehow less deserving. That belief - often reinforced over centuries - that the "beloved" of the Deity are therefore "better" than non-believers (in that particular belief-system), which gives license to undervalue their fellow citizens, their peers. That result becomes the antithesis of the original belief-system, and the believers cannot grasp that truth. When any belief-system throughout history becomes an "us vs them" ideology, it's value is diminished exponentially, which is where we find ourselves currently with the "Christians" vs the rest of society. That couldn't be more obvious. How else could a substantial number of presumably intelligent people be so fooled into following a clearly depraved individual, emotionally crippled and devoid of a scintilla of being "awakened" to anything but himself, his own selfish interests - the very antithesis of what they proclaim to anyone who will listen? I think the term "woke-ism" was coined to counter the presumptive superiority of the "Christians". If an "awakening" in a substantial number of free-thinking citizens can occur, then those who have closed their minds to the world around them, choosing instead to depend on ancient, magic-based belief system, I believe they'll be left behind (and yes, I meant it in that sense).
-
I would consider that situation as something that needed a brief discussion before the fuck takes place. That chat could contain almost anything, as long as it was either true, or clearly fantasy. The point being, anything other than a regular breeding can and should be mentioned. If the bottom says something like "I want to be pozzed", but the Top can't (because he's negative or on some preventative), the Top could either 1) play along, despite being negative, or 2) just say he can't, and go on to the next bottom. If the Top doesn't want to participate in that kind of fantasy, he can easily say so, and just go on to the next bottom. If he does like the notion, he can verbally put a sweat on the bottom's brow, and physically his Hole.
-
Well, if that works for both guys, fine. All that matters is both agree to whatever the limits are, and respect them.
-
To the above posts, I think there was a universally wanton response to the post-covid time. It was like being stuck in heavy traffic, by a stoplight that was broken, stuck on RED - for years. When the DMV finally got that stoplight fixed, and it turned green, everyone "floored it", and all those built-up cubic inches of lust roared to life again.
-
I think Ann Slanders (or was it Dear Blabby?) should take her cues from YOU !!!
-
The only qualifier that I can discern, however, is if the darkroom/bar/fuckjoint is full of men rawfucking each other, i.e. dozens and dozens of men fucking/sucking at any given moment. In places like that, I've never so much as seen a condom. Thus, when every guy is either fucking/getting fucked raw (or, merely sucking Cocks off if that's his bent), it's not inappropriate to make the assumption that "raw is law" in that joint, otherwise the guy wouldn't be there in the first place. I can understand in places like bathhouses, where private "rooms" are available, a negotiation of limits can (and should) take place. This implies a brief "negotiation", which, upon taking place, if there is variance between what's being offered, the two simply say something like "thanks anyway", and continues looking for what they're prowling for. No harm done.
-
My money is on Leontyne .... Beyonce is great too, but ... The "added phrases" applies to the apps? Polite manners take no more time than impolite manners, Thanks for your input.
-
Simple: Too late. Assuming the venues discussed above, where there is at least a darkroom, slings, guys fucking raw, breeding, all of that, it's just too damn late once a Cock starts pumping Sperm up bottom's gut. Even if the Top hears the bottom once he's started shooting his load deep in the Hole, there's already the first or second volley in the Hole, and pulling out, wasting the rest of the load won't reverse that. It's also disrespectful for the bottom to merely assume he has control. The bottom's control (to whatever extent) ends when the Cock starts to part his cheeks.
-
Should I take it raw with this guy?
hntnhole replied to soki's topic in Making The Decision To Bareback
Absolutely it will. This experience should make you proud of yourself, in that deciding for yourself what you want, and not allowing some other guy pressure you into what he wants could be called "a defining moment" in your life. It's your decision what to do with your body, how to do it, and good for you for having the courage to back up your decision. -
Well then, the only thing to do is have some short, vaguely polite response ready. Something like - oh - "no thanks", for instance. Every guy gets to say what he needs, and every other guy gets to either accept or decline.
-
I'm not sure I understand ... what does rain vs no rain have to do with guys fucking? Aren't there any places where guys fuck inside, rain or shine?
-
Years ago, my life-partner and I would attend an annual convention in New Orleans, staying at a hotel called Olivier House. There was a bar on the corner (can't remember the name), two-storey, and it was a absolute pigpen. guys would fuck on the balcony when the inside fuckroom was too full to even get into. It was across the street from a long park, at the end of which was a large (presumably RC) church, and there was a little beignet shop down there where people went for "morning call" - coffee and beignets. I hope that's not the bar you're referencing, since that joint was FANTASTIC !!!
-
LOL !!! I'd managed to forget about that practice ..... foreplay, maaaaaybe ...... nothing more? Include me out.
-
Is there a way to specify that a guy has "hard" limits on Grinder? For instance, raw bottom only - raw Top only, etc, etc.?
-
That bitch should have just walked away and kept his sour commentary to himself. Who, I wonder, anointed him warden of the (wanna-be) pigpen? 😠
-
You're not kidding .... there is simply no way I'd consider it for a nano-second. yuck !
-
That's just sad .... no wonder you travel so much .... Why even bother in the first place ...
-
Unless there are some verrrrrrry peculiar elections going on in your area, who did that guy think he was, as though he's the mayor of Sukoff Beach or something? "WE" like it that way ??? If you were polite in your response, you're a better man than I am ....
-
I'll defer to both Bootman & NWUSHorny on this one: It's been a number of years since I used the last one I was a member of (bbrt), and since nothing is ever static, it's very likely that both of them know more about the issue than I do. It does seem (from the conversations above) that guys are using the apps to fulfil a purpose (human interaction) that the apps cannot fulfil as currently formatted. That said, I still believe that in-person contact is something the apps discourage (whether purposefully or not is another issue), and as a group, we're not as well off as we were before the apps came into such widespread use. Thanks, you two. <polite cough> Maybe the divide between the literate and the non is simply more - oh - would "obvious" be too much? More likely, some guys enjoy communicating via the written word, and some don't ... and thus are less able than others.
-
That sounds kinda weird .... what is it they're online for then? Maybe just looking for a little companionship? That's ok, I suppose, if it's made clear via their profiles, but we're dealing with cruise apps, right? As in "lets fuck" apps?
-
I take your point. In this area, there are lots of LGBTQ+ places, clubs, i.e. "in-person" venues where gay folk get together for some common purpose other than fucking, such as political action, shared interests, such as theatre clubs, car clubs, musical clubs, etc. But, of course, after a quick chorus of 'getting to know you', some pair up and leave together. It's just less overt, I guess, and at least it implies some talking, interacting with others before fucking. It's that human connection with each other - in the flesh, but not necessarily overtly sexual - that seems to have withered on the vine with the coming of the fuck apps. I think that some of the younger guys don't have those opportunities (or take advantage of them), and wind up trying to replace in-the-flesh human interaction with the apps, which can't possibly equate with actual human interaction. The sad thing is, in many less populated areas there either never were much group interactions available, or they've withered on the vine by now. Fortunately though, there are some areas that still maintain a substantial population of "out" gays/lesbians/not yet sure folks where we can actually communicate with our peers. Thanks for your input.
-
Is fucking with a married guy (married to a woman) that bad?
hntnhole replied to Sharp-edge's topic in General Discussion
Most interesting discussion above. All I have to say is, I wouldn't knowingly be a part of a destructive act. That said, I'm absolutely certain that I've fucked guys on the dl (either from a wife or cheating on a bf) in the fuckjoints. The way I see it, if they're in that kind of joint, part of the act of breeding them is not interviewing them to find out what's none of my business in the first place. They're there (pardon the awkwardism) to either fuck or get fucked, and whatever baggage they may be carrying is theirs alone. I'm not a relationship counselor, I'm just another horny guy that needs to unload in a cumdump that needs what I have. If anyone thinks that's shallow, well - it is what it is. They have what I need, I have what they need, and that's the extent of it. -
Years ago ... standing in a large swimming pool, up to my shoulders. The load looked so strange, clots of Sperm just suspended in the water .... As someone famous once said; kids do the darndest things ....
